SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
Download to read offline
GROUP PROJECT
Project Analysis of Laurentian Bakeries Inc.
Memorandum
To: Danielle Knowles
Vice President of Operations
From: Yifan Lin
Project Analyst
Date: November 10th
, 2014
Subject: Winnipeg Expansion Project Analysis
This memorandum is to explain the current financial situation of Laurentian Bakeries
Inc. based on a comprehensive ratio analysis of year 1993, 1994 and 1995. Also,
project analysis will be conducted so that NPV, IRR, Payback Period and Discounted
Payback Period are calculated using hurdle rate and WACC rate respectively.
Current Ratio, Quick Ratio, and Net Working Capital Ratio are calculated in order to
analyze company’s solvency. Solvency is a company’s ability to meet short-term
obligation. According to the ratio shown in Appendix A, the short-term liquidity of
Laurentian Bakeries Inc. has increased from 1993 to 1995.
Activity ratios measure a firm's ability to convert different accounts within its balance
sheets into cash or sales. Total Assets Turnover, Accounts Receivable Turnover and
Inventory Turnover have increased during year 1993 to 1995, resulting from more
efficient management of company’s assets.
Interest coverage ratio is used to determine how easily a company can pay interest on
outstanding debt. The larger the interest coverage ratio, the more easily the company
pays interest to the bank. Based on the calculation shown in Appendix A, Laurentian
Bakeries Inc.’ s ability to pay interest has dropped largely due to the increased
long-term debt.
Profitability ratio including Return on Assets, Return on Equity and Profit Margin can
assess a business's ability to generate earnings. Profitability ratio has been decreased
from 1993 to 1995, which means Laurentian Bakeries Inc.’s ability to make money
has decreased.
Project Analysis
Laurentian Bakeries Inc. is faced with a project proposal requiring the company to invest $5.2
million for building, equipment and warehouse at first as initial investment. In terms of sales,
there is 0.5 chance customer will order full guaranteed amount, 0.5 chance will order only 50%
of guaranteed amount. Based on this assumption, thus, the unit amount in 1996-1998 are
9.825, 11.175 and 12.15 (million) as shown in Appendix B, and the revenue in each year are
17.203575 20.15444775 and 22.57027619 million (the price in 1995 is $1.7, the inflation rate
is assumed as 3% based on the referred inflation rate from US)
The total operating cash flow from 1995-1998 are 0, 1.741746813, 2.109795906 and
2.276112958 (million) as shown in Appendix C OCF row (in million). We assume that this
company need 30% of next year’s revenue as its working capital, then changing working
capital cash flow (NWC) can be found out in Appendix B Working Capital table which are
-0.55125, -0.34125 and 4.2525 million from 1996 to 1998.
We also assume that this company’s CCA rate for PPE is 20% which is most common CCA
ratio, thus we have got the ending UCC for PPE in 1998 is 2.9952 million; and we assume
that the salvage value of PPE decrease 10% from original price each year so the salvage value
for PPE in 1998 is 3.64 million; thus, the after tax salvage value for PPE is 0.41912 million
(seen Appendix B Residual value (PPE) table & CCA table). Those figures result in the
total investment cash flow from 1995-1998 are -5.41, -0.55125, -0.34125 and 4.67162
(million) which are shown in Appendix C Total Investment CF row.
So the total net cash flow from 1995-1998 are the sum of operating cash flow and investment
cash flow which are -5.41, 1.190496813, 1.768545906 and 6.947732958 million. The risk
free rate is 7.66%, and cost of equity is 12.76% (beta is 8%, risk premium is 5%), cost of debt
is 9.66%, so the WACC rate is 10.17%. Based on the WACC rate, we have got the following
results: NPV is around 2.11 million, IRR is 27% which is bigger than the WACC (10.17%
), Payback period is around 2.35 years and Discounted payback period is 2.55 years.
And based on the hurdle which is 18%, and those analysis results are: NPV is around 0.93
million, IRR is 27% which is bigger than the hurdle rate, Payback period is around 2.35 years
and Discounted payback period is 2.74 years.
Thus, our conclusion is that since the NPVs based on the WACC rate and the hurdle rate are
both positive, and the IRR rates under two rate are bigger than both WACC and hurdle rate,
this project is acceptable because it can help company to create more value. After
implementing this project, the company can get back its investment in 2.35 years based on the
WACC rate and in 2.55 years based on the discounted cash flow under the WACC rate. For
hurdle rate is 18%, the company can cover its investment in 2.35 years and 2.74 years based
on the discounted cash flow.
Recommendations
 Based on the previous analysis, our recommendation is to take this project
because NPVs based on the WACC rate and the hurdle rate are both positive, and
the IRR rates under two rates are bigger than both WACC and hurdle rate, this
project is acceptable because it can help company to create more value
 Company should consider to utilize leverage such as issuing bonds for tax saving
purpose and reducing relieving financing pressure.
 Company can utilize purchased equipment after the project for other production
purpose for achieving more benefits instead of selling them since the assumed
usage life of both equipment, warehouse and building are 10 years, this project
just keep 3 years.
 Company can look for other potential customers in the market for selling them
the left amount of products if our target customer just order 50% of guaranteed
amount, and company can gain more revenue based on the diversified strategy.
 Company can consider to utilize the recovered initial investment (after Payback
period) to repurchase stocks or to claim dividends for increasing shareholder
value.
 Company can also keep working capital for future production which can help
company to create continuous revenue after finishing the project in three years
instead of selling all working capital
 Since there is a great amount of cash out flow for the project in 1995, the
company should prepare more cash as its current assets for supporting this project
by issuing bonds or stocks.
 Company can also utilize the recovered initial investment to purchase risk free
financing assets due to the high risk free rate which is 7.66%.
Appendix A
1993 1994 1995 1993-1995 Average
Short-term solvency
Current Ratio 2.926829 3.184783 3.4 3.170537292
Quick Ratio 2.170732 2.467391 2.733333 2.457152115
NWC Ratio 0.266442 0.307339 0.349515 0.307765278
Activity Ratio
Total Assets Turnover 2.675978 2.8 2.737988827
Receivable Turnover 8.294372 8.353909 8.32414088
Average Collection Period 44.00574 43.69212 43.84892968
Inventory Turnover 4.484375 4.485294 4.484834559
Days in Inventory 81.39373 81.37705 81.3853887
Financial leverage ratios
Interest Coverage 15.22222 14.4 9.5 13.04074074
Profitability Ratio
Return on Assets 0.065758 0.061091 0.063424364
Return on Equity 0.116976 0.114911 0.115943415
Profit Margin 0.094298 0.085595 0.082759 0.087550619
Appendix B
Appendix C
1995 1996 1997 1998
Price 1.751 1.80353 1.857636
# of Unit (in millions) 9.825 11.175 12.15
Sales (in million $) 17.203575 20.15445 22.57028
Operating Expense (in million) 14.623039 17.13128 19.18473
Gross Margin (15% of Sale, in million) 2.5805363 3.023167 3.385541
Plantwide Cost Savings/Unit 0.0114 0.019 0.019
Plantwide Cost Savings (in million) 0.112005 0.212325 0.23085
Other Savings (in million) 0.138 0.14214 0.146404
CCA (in million) 0.434 0.768 0.593
EBIT (in million) 2.397 2.610 3.170
Tax Expense (35%, in million) 0.8387894 0.913371 1.109428
Net income (in million) 1.558 1.696 2.060
OCF (in million) 1.7417468 2.109796 2.276113
Investment CF
NWC -0.21 -0.55125 -0.34125 4.2525
PP&E -5.2
After Tax Salvage 0.41912
Total Investment CF -5.41 -0.55125 -0.34125 4.67162
Total CF -5.41 1.1904968 1.768546 6.947733
Culmulative CF -5.41 -4.219503 -2.45096 4.496776
Dsiounted CF -5.41 1.080623353 1.4571644 5.1961473
Culmulative Discounted CF -5.41 -4.32937665 -2.87221 2.323935

More Related Content

Similar to Project Memo

Weatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docx
Weatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docxWeatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docx
Weatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docxcelenarouzie
 
Q2 2015 Investor Call Presentation
Q2 2015 Investor Call PresentationQ2 2015 Investor Call Presentation
Q2 2015 Investor Call PresentationSquareTwoFinancial
 
92068 92068-92068-92068-92068-3-revi-fm-mike
92068 92068-92068-92068-92068-3-revi-fm-mike92068 92068-92068-92068-92068-3-revi-fm-mike
92068 92068-92068-92068-92068-3-revi-fm-mikeWilliam Aruga
 
Zichun Gao Professor Karen Accounting 1AIBM FInancial Stat.docx
Zichun Gao Professor Karen Accounting 1AIBM FInancial Stat.docxZichun Gao Professor Karen Accounting 1AIBM FInancial Stat.docx
Zichun Gao Professor Karen Accounting 1AIBM FInancial Stat.docxransayo
 
2017 annual shareholders meeting presentation final 2-20-17
2017 annual shareholders meeting presentation  final 2-20-172017 annual shareholders meeting presentation  final 2-20-17
2017 annual shareholders meeting presentation final 2-20-17Hillenbrand_IR
 
MarkWest Energy 1Q15 Conference Call Presentation
MarkWest Energy 1Q15 Conference Call PresentationMarkWest Energy 1Q15 Conference Call Presentation
MarkWest Energy 1Q15 Conference Call PresentationMarcellus Drilling News
 
Bajaj finserv Working capital case study ppt
Bajaj finserv Working capital case study pptBajaj finserv Working capital case study ppt
Bajaj finserv Working capital case study pptHarshal Pedamkar
 
Working capital 500048604
Working capital 500048604Working capital 500048604
Working capital 500048604Mahak Dhakad
 
Phillips 66 ubs austin 2014 final 2014-08-14
Phillips 66   ubs austin 2014 final 2014-08-14Phillips 66   ubs austin 2014 final 2014-08-14
Phillips 66 ubs austin 2014 final 2014-08-14investor_phillips66
 
Working capital Strategies
Working capital StrategiesWorking capital Strategies
Working capital StrategiesWeibull AS
 
Week 11-800-Flowers.com Inc.Financial Ratios2014201320122011Curren.docx
Week 11-800-Flowers.com Inc.Financial Ratios2014201320122011Curren.docxWeek 11-800-Flowers.com Inc.Financial Ratios2014201320122011Curren.docx
Week 11-800-Flowers.com Inc.Financial Ratios2014201320122011Curren.docxmelbruce90096
 
newgateciplafinancialanalysis-120516061438-phpapp02 (1).pdf
newgateciplafinancialanalysis-120516061438-phpapp02 (1).pdfnewgateciplafinancialanalysis-120516061438-phpapp02 (1).pdf
newgateciplafinancialanalysis-120516061438-phpapp02 (1).pdfAmanKhan487877
 
Q1'15 Earnings Presentation_5.7.15
Q1'15 Earnings Presentation_5.7.15Q1'15 Earnings Presentation_5.7.15
Q1'15 Earnings Presentation_5.7.15Gary Wojtaszek
 
Brookside energy ltd
Brookside energy ltdBrookside energy ltd
Brookside energy ltdGagan Dharwal
 
Promacs ppt Tamplate 2022[53] - Read-Only.pptx
Promacs ppt Tamplate 2022[53]  -  Read-Only.pptxPromacs ppt Tamplate 2022[53]  -  Read-Only.pptx
Promacs ppt Tamplate 2022[53] - Read-Only.pptxMohamed Saad
 
2015 citi may presentation-final
2015 citi  may presentation-final2015 citi  may presentation-final
2015 citi may presentation-finalinvestor_phillips66
 

Similar to Project Memo (20)

First Investment Inc.
First Investment Inc.First Investment Inc.
First Investment Inc.
 
Weatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docx
Weatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docxWeatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docx
Weatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docx
 
Q2 2015 Investor Call Presentation
Q2 2015 Investor Call PresentationQ2 2015 Investor Call Presentation
Q2 2015 Investor Call Presentation
 
92068 92068-92068-92068-92068-3-revi-fm-mike
92068 92068-92068-92068-92068-3-revi-fm-mike92068 92068-92068-92068-92068-3-revi-fm-mike
92068 92068-92068-92068-92068-3-revi-fm-mike
 
Zichun Gao Professor Karen Accounting 1AIBM FInancial Stat.docx
Zichun Gao Professor Karen Accounting 1AIBM FInancial Stat.docxZichun Gao Professor Karen Accounting 1AIBM FInancial Stat.docx
Zichun Gao Professor Karen Accounting 1AIBM FInancial Stat.docx
 
2017 annual shareholders meeting presentation final 2-20-17
2017 annual shareholders meeting presentation  final 2-20-172017 annual shareholders meeting presentation  final 2-20-17
2017 annual shareholders meeting presentation final 2-20-17
 
MarkWest Energy 1Q15 Conference Call Presentation
MarkWest Energy 1Q15 Conference Call PresentationMarkWest Energy 1Q15 Conference Call Presentation
MarkWest Energy 1Q15 Conference Call Presentation
 
Bajaj finserv Working capital case study ppt
Bajaj finserv Working capital case study pptBajaj finserv Working capital case study ppt
Bajaj finserv Working capital case study ppt
 
Working capital 500048604
Working capital 500048604Working capital 500048604
Working capital 500048604
 
Working capital ppt
Working capital pptWorking capital ppt
Working capital ppt
 
Phillips 66 ubs austin 2014 final 2014-08-14
Phillips 66   ubs austin 2014 final 2014-08-14Phillips 66   ubs austin 2014 final 2014-08-14
Phillips 66 ubs austin 2014 final 2014-08-14
 
Working capital Strategies
Working capital StrategiesWorking capital Strategies
Working capital Strategies
 
1 q14 gaap analyst presentation
1 q14 gaap analyst presentation1 q14 gaap analyst presentation
1 q14 gaap analyst presentation
 
Week 11-800-Flowers.com Inc.Financial Ratios2014201320122011Curren.docx
Week 11-800-Flowers.com Inc.Financial Ratios2014201320122011Curren.docxWeek 11-800-Flowers.com Inc.Financial Ratios2014201320122011Curren.docx
Week 11-800-Flowers.com Inc.Financial Ratios2014201320122011Curren.docx
 
newgateciplafinancialanalysis-120516061438-phpapp02 (1).pdf
newgateciplafinancialanalysis-120516061438-phpapp02 (1).pdfnewgateciplafinancialanalysis-120516061438-phpapp02 (1).pdf
newgateciplafinancialanalysis-120516061438-phpapp02 (1).pdf
 
Q1'15 Earnings Presentation_5.7.15
Q1'15 Earnings Presentation_5.7.15Q1'15 Earnings Presentation_5.7.15
Q1'15 Earnings Presentation_5.7.15
 
Brookside energy ltd
Brookside energy ltdBrookside energy ltd
Brookside energy ltd
 
Promacs ppt Tamplate 2022[53] - Read-Only.pptx
Promacs ppt Tamplate 2022[53]  -  Read-Only.pptxPromacs ppt Tamplate 2022[53]  -  Read-Only.pptx
Promacs ppt Tamplate 2022[53] - Read-Only.pptx
 
2015 citi may presentation-final
2015 citi  may presentation-final2015 citi  may presentation-final
2015 citi may presentation-final
 
Finance Report
Finance ReportFinance Report
Finance Report
 

Project Memo

  • 1. GROUP PROJECT Project Analysis of Laurentian Bakeries Inc.
  • 2. Memorandum To: Danielle Knowles Vice President of Operations From: Yifan Lin Project Analyst Date: November 10th , 2014 Subject: Winnipeg Expansion Project Analysis This memorandum is to explain the current financial situation of Laurentian Bakeries Inc. based on a comprehensive ratio analysis of year 1993, 1994 and 1995. Also, project analysis will be conducted so that NPV, IRR, Payback Period and Discounted Payback Period are calculated using hurdle rate and WACC rate respectively. Current Ratio, Quick Ratio, and Net Working Capital Ratio are calculated in order to analyze company’s solvency. Solvency is a company’s ability to meet short-term obligation. According to the ratio shown in Appendix A, the short-term liquidity of Laurentian Bakeries Inc. has increased from 1993 to 1995. Activity ratios measure a firm's ability to convert different accounts within its balance sheets into cash or sales. Total Assets Turnover, Accounts Receivable Turnover and Inventory Turnover have increased during year 1993 to 1995, resulting from more efficient management of company’s assets. Interest coverage ratio is used to determine how easily a company can pay interest on outstanding debt. The larger the interest coverage ratio, the more easily the company pays interest to the bank. Based on the calculation shown in Appendix A, Laurentian Bakeries Inc.’ s ability to pay interest has dropped largely due to the increased long-term debt. Profitability ratio including Return on Assets, Return on Equity and Profit Margin can assess a business's ability to generate earnings. Profitability ratio has been decreased from 1993 to 1995, which means Laurentian Bakeries Inc.’s ability to make money has decreased.
  • 3. Project Analysis Laurentian Bakeries Inc. is faced with a project proposal requiring the company to invest $5.2 million for building, equipment and warehouse at first as initial investment. In terms of sales, there is 0.5 chance customer will order full guaranteed amount, 0.5 chance will order only 50% of guaranteed amount. Based on this assumption, thus, the unit amount in 1996-1998 are 9.825, 11.175 and 12.15 (million) as shown in Appendix B, and the revenue in each year are 17.203575 20.15444775 and 22.57027619 million (the price in 1995 is $1.7, the inflation rate is assumed as 3% based on the referred inflation rate from US) The total operating cash flow from 1995-1998 are 0, 1.741746813, 2.109795906 and 2.276112958 (million) as shown in Appendix C OCF row (in million). We assume that this company need 30% of next year’s revenue as its working capital, then changing working capital cash flow (NWC) can be found out in Appendix B Working Capital table which are -0.55125, -0.34125 and 4.2525 million from 1996 to 1998. We also assume that this company’s CCA rate for PPE is 20% which is most common CCA ratio, thus we have got the ending UCC for PPE in 1998 is 2.9952 million; and we assume that the salvage value of PPE decrease 10% from original price each year so the salvage value for PPE in 1998 is 3.64 million; thus, the after tax salvage value for PPE is 0.41912 million (seen Appendix B Residual value (PPE) table & CCA table). Those figures result in the total investment cash flow from 1995-1998 are -5.41, -0.55125, -0.34125 and 4.67162 (million) which are shown in Appendix C Total Investment CF row. So the total net cash flow from 1995-1998 are the sum of operating cash flow and investment cash flow which are -5.41, 1.190496813, 1.768545906 and 6.947732958 million. The risk free rate is 7.66%, and cost of equity is 12.76% (beta is 8%, risk premium is 5%), cost of debt is 9.66%, so the WACC rate is 10.17%. Based on the WACC rate, we have got the following results: NPV is around 2.11 million, IRR is 27% which is bigger than the WACC (10.17% ), Payback period is around 2.35 years and Discounted payback period is 2.55 years. And based on the hurdle which is 18%, and those analysis results are: NPV is around 0.93 million, IRR is 27% which is bigger than the hurdle rate, Payback period is around 2.35 years and Discounted payback period is 2.74 years. Thus, our conclusion is that since the NPVs based on the WACC rate and the hurdle rate are both positive, and the IRR rates under two rate are bigger than both WACC and hurdle rate, this project is acceptable because it can help company to create more value. After implementing this project, the company can get back its investment in 2.35 years based on the WACC rate and in 2.55 years based on the discounted cash flow under the WACC rate. For hurdle rate is 18%, the company can cover its investment in 2.35 years and 2.74 years based on the discounted cash flow.
  • 4. Recommendations  Based on the previous analysis, our recommendation is to take this project because NPVs based on the WACC rate and the hurdle rate are both positive, and the IRR rates under two rates are bigger than both WACC and hurdle rate, this project is acceptable because it can help company to create more value  Company should consider to utilize leverage such as issuing bonds for tax saving purpose and reducing relieving financing pressure.  Company can utilize purchased equipment after the project for other production purpose for achieving more benefits instead of selling them since the assumed usage life of both equipment, warehouse and building are 10 years, this project just keep 3 years.  Company can look for other potential customers in the market for selling them the left amount of products if our target customer just order 50% of guaranteed amount, and company can gain more revenue based on the diversified strategy.  Company can consider to utilize the recovered initial investment (after Payback period) to repurchase stocks or to claim dividends for increasing shareholder value.  Company can also keep working capital for future production which can help company to create continuous revenue after finishing the project in three years instead of selling all working capital  Since there is a great amount of cash out flow for the project in 1995, the company should prepare more cash as its current assets for supporting this project by issuing bonds or stocks.  Company can also utilize the recovered initial investment to purchase risk free financing assets due to the high risk free rate which is 7.66%.
  • 5. Appendix A 1993 1994 1995 1993-1995 Average Short-term solvency Current Ratio 2.926829 3.184783 3.4 3.170537292 Quick Ratio 2.170732 2.467391 2.733333 2.457152115 NWC Ratio 0.266442 0.307339 0.349515 0.307765278 Activity Ratio Total Assets Turnover 2.675978 2.8 2.737988827 Receivable Turnover 8.294372 8.353909 8.32414088 Average Collection Period 44.00574 43.69212 43.84892968 Inventory Turnover 4.484375 4.485294 4.484834559 Days in Inventory 81.39373 81.37705 81.3853887 Financial leverage ratios Interest Coverage 15.22222 14.4 9.5 13.04074074 Profitability Ratio Return on Assets 0.065758 0.061091 0.063424364 Return on Equity 0.116976 0.114911 0.115943415 Profit Margin 0.094298 0.085595 0.082759 0.087550619
  • 7. Appendix C 1995 1996 1997 1998 Price 1.751 1.80353 1.857636 # of Unit (in millions) 9.825 11.175 12.15 Sales (in million $) 17.203575 20.15445 22.57028 Operating Expense (in million) 14.623039 17.13128 19.18473 Gross Margin (15% of Sale, in million) 2.5805363 3.023167 3.385541 Plantwide Cost Savings/Unit 0.0114 0.019 0.019 Plantwide Cost Savings (in million) 0.112005 0.212325 0.23085 Other Savings (in million) 0.138 0.14214 0.146404 CCA (in million) 0.434 0.768 0.593 EBIT (in million) 2.397 2.610 3.170 Tax Expense (35%, in million) 0.8387894 0.913371 1.109428 Net income (in million) 1.558 1.696 2.060 OCF (in million) 1.7417468 2.109796 2.276113 Investment CF NWC -0.21 -0.55125 -0.34125 4.2525 PP&E -5.2 After Tax Salvage 0.41912 Total Investment CF -5.41 -0.55125 -0.34125 4.67162 Total CF -5.41 1.1904968 1.768546 6.947733 Culmulative CF -5.41 -4.219503 -2.45096 4.496776 Dsiounted CF -5.41 1.080623353 1.4571644 5.1961473 Culmulative Discounted CF -5.41 -4.32937665 -2.87221 2.323935