SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 44
Phil – 10 Into to Philosophy

         Empiricism
Mid-term
• Everyone should be getting an A
  – 35 response questions
  – 10 definitions
  – 5 quizzes
CSU Vs. UC
• Knowledge vs. brilliance or innovation?
Mid-term
• Feedback
  – Time constraints
    • Types of questions
  – Longer times for definition study
  – Some did not get their response questions
    back - how to make this better?
  – Where to go from here?
    • We will see……
Extra credit
• Philosophy Center (sign in and shoot me an email letting me know)
    – Location: FOB 231
      Hours: T-W 11-4
• Presentations – Shoot me an email letting me know your interested
    – 2-5 min
• To Kill a Mocking Bird – bring a ticket stub
    –   Wednesday 7
    –   Thursday 7
    –   Friday 7
    –   Saturday 7
    –   Give a free-form response to the play – 1 page
         • Have you encountered racism?
         • Do you think racism still exist?
         • Even if “race” does not exist scientifically, does the societal conception of it
           still effect society?
Empiricism
• Remember the scientific revolution?
• Bacon (theorized about science)
Empiricist Philosophers
• John Locke (1632 - 1704)
• George Berkeley (1632-1704)
• David Hume (1711-1776) Solomon Loses
Rationalism vs. Empiricism
• Rationalists claim that there are significant
  ways in which our concepts and knowledge are
  gained independently of sense experience.
• Empiricists claim that sense experience is the
  ultimate source of all our concepts and
  knowledge.
• Video:
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8wh8C7lP7U
Rationalism
• The Intuition/Deduction Thesis
• The Innate Knowledge Thesis
• The Innate Concept Thesis
Empiricism
• True knowledge is gained from experience
• The Empiricism Thesis: We have no
  source of knowledge in S or for the
  concepts we use in S other than sense
  experience.
Empiricism
• Empiricism about a particular subject
  rejects the corresponding version of the
  Intuition/Deduction thesis and Innate
  Knowledge thesis.
• Insofar as we have knowledge in the
  subject, our knowledge is a posteriori,
  dependent upon sense experience.
Empiricism
• Empiricists also deny the implication of
  the corresponding Innate Concept thesis
  that we have innate ideas in the subject
  area. Sense experience is our only source
  of ideas.
Empiricism
• They reject the corresponding version of
  the Superiority of Reason thesis. Since
  reason alone does not give us any
  knowledge, it certainly does not give us
  superior knowledge.
Empiricism
• Empiricists generally reject the
  Indispensability of Reason thesis, though
  they need not.
Empiricism
• The Empiricism thesis does not entail that
  we have empirical knowledge. It entails
  that knowledge can only be gained, if at
  all, by experience.
John Locke (1632 - 1704)
• Biography: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
  =StBlNYX7HBU&feature=related
• An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
• Some philosophers before Locke had suggested
  that it would be good to find the limits of the
  Understanding, but what Locke does is to carry
  out this project in detail.
John Locke (1632 - 1704)
• In Book II Locke claims that ideas are the
  materials of knowledge and all ideas come
  from experience. The term ‘idea,’ Locke
  tells us “…stands for whatsoever is the
  Object of the Understanding, when a man
  thinks” (Essay I, 1, 8, p. 47).
John Locke (1632 - 1704)
• Experience is of two kinds, sensation and
  reflection. One of these — sensation —
  tells us about things and processes in the
  external world. The other — reflection —
  tells us about the operations of our own
  minds.
John Locke (1632 - 1704)
• Reflection is a sort of internal sense that
  makes us conscious of the mental
  processes we are engaged in. Some ideas
  we get only from sensation, some only
  from reflection and some from both.
• Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
  =X-buzVjYQvY
John Locke (1632 - 1704)
• Locke raises the issue of just what innate
  knowledge is. Particular instances of
  knowledge are supposed to be in our
  minds as part of our rational make-up, but
  how are they "in our minds"?
John Locke (1632 - 1704)
• If the implication is that we all consciously have
  this knowledge, it is plainly false. Propositions
  often given as examples of innate knowledge,
  even such plausible candidates as the principle
  that the same thing cannot both be and not be,
  are not consciously accepted by children and
  idiots. If the point of calling such principles
  "innate" is not to imply that they are or have
  been consciously accepted by all rational
  beings, then it is hard to see what the point is.
John Locke (1632 - 1704)
• "No proposition can be said to be in the
  mind, which it never yet knew, which it
  never yet was conscious of" (Essay
  Concerning Human Understanding, Book
  I, Chapter II, Section 5, p. 61).
Berkeley (1632-1704)
• Berkeley was born in 1685 near Kilkenny,
  Ireland.
• Berkeley's first important published
  work, An Essay Towards a New Theory of
  Vision (1709), was an influential
  contribution to the psychology of vision
  and also developed doctrines relevant to
  his idealist project.
Berkeley (1632-1704)
• In his mid-twenties, he published his most
  enduring works, the Treatise concerning
  the Principles of Human
  Knowledge (1710) and the Three
  Dialogues between Hylas and
  Philonous (1713),
Berkeley (1632-1704)
• Principles 4:
• It is indeed an opinion strangely prevailing amongst men,
  that houses, mountains, rivers, and in a word all sensible
  objects have an existence natural or real, distinct from
  their being perceived by the understanding. But with how
  great an assurance and acquiescence so ever this
  principle may be entertained in the world; yet whoever
  shall find in his heart to call it in question, may, if I
  mistake not, perceive it to involve a manifest
  contradiction. For what are the forementioned objects
  but the things we perceive by sense, and what do we
  perceive besides our own ideas or sensations; and is it
  not plainly repugnant that any one of these or any
  combination of them should exist unperceived?
Berkeley (1632-1704)
• Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
  vdDPrmOHFPo
Berkeley (1632-1704)
• Berkeley presents here the following
  argument:
• (1) We perceive ordinary objects (houses,
  mountains, etc.).(2) We perceive only
  ideas.
• Therefore,
• (3) Ordinary objects are ideas.
Berkeley (1632-1704)
• The argument is valid, and premise (1) looks
  hard to deny.
• What about premise (2)? Berkeley believes that
  this premise is accepted by all the modern
  philosophers. In the Principles, Berkeley is
  operating within the idea-theoretic tradition of the
  seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In
  particular, Berkeley believes that some version
  of this premise is accepted by his main targets,
  the influential philosophers Descartes and
  Locke.
Berkeley (1632-1704)
• However, Berkeley recognizes that these
  philosophers have an obvious response
  available to this argument. This response
  blocks Berkeley's inference to (3) by
  distinguishing two sorts of perception,
  mediate and immediate.
Berkeley (1632-1704)
• Thus, premises (1) and (2) are replaced
  by the claims that (1′) we mediately
  perceive ordinary objects, while (2′) we
  immediately perceive only ideas. From
  these claims, of course, no idealist
  conclusion follows.
Berkeley (1632-1704)
• The response reflects a representationalist
  theory of perception, according to which we
  indirectly (mediately) perceive material things, by
  directly (immediately) perceiving ideas, which
  are mind-dependent items. The
  ideas represent external material objects, and
  thereby allow us to perceive them.
• Video:
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTd3ypNu0IU
Berkeley (1632-1704)
• Idealist – The only things that exist are
  ideas.
• If strict empiricism is true then things do
  not exist when they are not observed.
• Berkeley’s jump – God causes ideas in
  our mind and observes everything when
  we are not.
Hume (1711-1776)
• A master stylist in any genre, Hume's major
  philosophical works —
• A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-1740)
• the Enquiries concerning Human
  Understanding (1748)
• Concerning the Principles of Morals (1751)
• Dialogues concerning Natural Religion (1779)
• Video:
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
  =BQ2qjVkMj6s&feature=related
Hume (1711-1776)
• For Hume, all the materials of thinking
  — perceptions — are derived either
  from sensation (“outward sentiment”) or
  from reflection (“inward sentiment”) (EHU,
  19).
Hume (1711-1776)
• He divides perceptions into two
  categories, distinguished by their different
  degrees of force and vivacity. Our “more
  feeble” perceptions, ideas, are ultimately
  derived from our
  livelier impressions (EHU, Section II; T,
  I.i.1-2).
Hume (1711-1776)
• Although we permute and combine ideas
  in the imagination to form complex ideas
  of things we haven't experienced, Hume is
  adamant that our creative powers extend
  no farther than “the materials afforded us
  by the senses and experience.”
Hume (1711-1776)
• complex ideas are composed of simple
  ideas, which are fainter copies of the
  simple impressions from which they are
  ultimately derived, to which they
  correspond and exactly resemble.
Hume (1711-1776)
• Hume offers this “general proposition” as
  his “first principle…in the science of
  human nature” (T, 7). Usually called the
  “Copy Principle,” Hume's distinctive brand
  of empiricism is often identified with his
  commitment to it.
Hume (1711-1776)
• Hume presents the Copy Principle as an
  empirical thesis. He emphasizes this point
  by offering “one contradictory
  phenomenon” (T, 5-6; EHU, 20-21) — the
  infamous missing shade of blue — as an
  empirical counterexample to the Copy
  Principle.
Hume (1711-1776)
• Bundle theory of identity - Where is the
  self?
• Though we've changed in many respects,
  the same person appears present as was
  present then. We might start thinking
  about which features can be changed
  without changing the underlying self.
Hume (1711-1776)
• Hume, however, denies that there is a distinction
  between the various features of a person and
  the mysterious self that supposedly bears those
  features.
• “We are never intimately conscious of anything
  but a particular perception; man is a bundle or
  collection of different perceptions which succeed
  one another with an inconceivable rapidity and
  are in perpetual flux and movement"
Hume (1711-1776
• Cause and Effect cannot be verified by empirical
  means. This leads to the problem of induction:
  Induction (opposed to deduction) always has the
  ability to be fallible  all knowledge gained from
  sense experience is probabilistic  science is
  based on a fallacy and therefore could be wrong
• Cause and effect: http://
  www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tZ6L7QNFws

• Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
  =r3QZ2Ko-FOg
• John Locke (1632 - 1704) - original
  empiricist
• George Berkeley (1632-1704) - Idealist
• David Hume (1711-1776) – took
  Empiricism to its rational ends
Terms to know

• Empiricism (The      • Mediate vs.
  Empiricism Thesis)     immediate
• Idea (complex and    • Representationalism
  simple)              • Copy Principle
• Impression           • Missing shade of blue
• Sensation and        • Bundle theory
  reflection           • Cause and Effect
• Innate knowledge     • The problem of
• Idealism               induction

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Hermeneutics overview
Hermeneutics overviewHermeneutics overview
Hermeneutics overviewGreg Downey
 
Branches of philosophy
Branches of philosophyBranches of philosophy
Branches of philosophyMuhammad Imran
 
2 Major fields of philosophy METAPHYSICS AND EPISTEMOLOGY ONLY
2 Major fields of philosophy METAPHYSICS AND EPISTEMOLOGY ONLY2 Major fields of philosophy METAPHYSICS AND EPISTEMOLOGY ONLY
2 Major fields of philosophy METAPHYSICS AND EPISTEMOLOGY ONLYApril Centes
 
Rationalist epistemology – rene descartes
Rationalist epistemology – rene descartesRationalist epistemology – rene descartes
Rationalist epistemology – rene descartesAimee Hoover-Miller
 
Empiricism and Rationalism
Empiricism and RationalismEmpiricism and Rationalism
Empiricism and RationalismFatima Maqbool
 
Philosophy introduction of western philosophy
Philosophy introduction of western philosophyPhilosophy introduction of western philosophy
Philosophy introduction of western philosophypascastpt
 
School of philosophy realism
School of philosophy realismSchool of philosophy realism
School of philosophy realismkalpana singh
 
Logical positivism and Post-positivism
Logical positivism and Post-positivism Logical positivism and Post-positivism
Logical positivism and Post-positivism Fatima Maqbool
 
Bishop george berkeley
Bishop george berkeleyBishop george berkeley
Bishop george berkeleyRichard Lopez
 
Positivism and Its Criticism
Positivism and Its CriticismPositivism and Its Criticism
Positivism and Its CriticismND Arisanti
 
L4 critique of pure reason
L4 critique of pure reasonL4 critique of pure reason
L4 critique of pure reasonArnel Rivera
 
Philosophy,logic and its kind,inductive and deductive reasoning ppt
Philosophy,logic and its kind,inductive and deductive reasoning pptPhilosophy,logic and its kind,inductive and deductive reasoning ppt
Philosophy,logic and its kind,inductive and deductive reasoning pptUmer Niazi
 
Dulce, evangeline l empiricism
Dulce, evangeline l  empiricismDulce, evangeline l  empiricism
Dulce, evangeline l empiricismEvangelineDulce1
 

Mais procurados (20)

Hermeneutics overview
Hermeneutics overviewHermeneutics overview
Hermeneutics overview
 
Branches of philosophy
Branches of philosophyBranches of philosophy
Branches of philosophy
 
Idealism
IdealismIdealism
Idealism
 
2 Major fields of philosophy METAPHYSICS AND EPISTEMOLOGY ONLY
2 Major fields of philosophy METAPHYSICS AND EPISTEMOLOGY ONLY2 Major fields of philosophy METAPHYSICS AND EPISTEMOLOGY ONLY
2 Major fields of philosophy METAPHYSICS AND EPISTEMOLOGY ONLY
 
Rationalist epistemology – rene descartes
Rationalist epistemology – rene descartesRationalist epistemology – rene descartes
Rationalist epistemology – rene descartes
 
Empiricism and Rationalism
Empiricism and RationalismEmpiricism and Rationalism
Empiricism and Rationalism
 
Logical positivism
Logical positivismLogical positivism
Logical positivism
 
Philosophy introduction of western philosophy
Philosophy introduction of western philosophyPhilosophy introduction of western philosophy
Philosophy introduction of western philosophy
 
School of philosophy realism
School of philosophy realismSchool of philosophy realism
School of philosophy realism
 
Axiology
AxiologyAxiology
Axiology
 
Logical positivism and Post-positivism
Logical positivism and Post-positivism Logical positivism and Post-positivism
Logical positivism and Post-positivism
 
Bishop george berkeley
Bishop george berkeleyBishop george berkeley
Bishop george berkeley
 
Positivism and Its Criticism
Positivism and Its CriticismPositivism and Its Criticism
Positivism and Its Criticism
 
PRAGMATISM
PRAGMATISMPRAGMATISM
PRAGMATISM
 
L4 critique of pure reason
L4 critique of pure reasonL4 critique of pure reason
L4 critique of pure reason
 
Nihilism Presentation
Nihilism PresentationNihilism Presentation
Nihilism Presentation
 
Philosophy,logic and its kind,inductive and deductive reasoning ppt
Philosophy,logic and its kind,inductive and deductive reasoning pptPhilosophy,logic and its kind,inductive and deductive reasoning ppt
Philosophy,logic and its kind,inductive and deductive reasoning ppt
 
Idealism
IdealismIdealism
Idealism
 
Dulce, evangeline l empiricism
Dulce, evangeline l  empiricismDulce, evangeline l  empiricism
Dulce, evangeline l empiricism
 
Hegel presentaciones ppt
Hegel  presentaciones pptHegel  presentaciones ppt
Hegel presentaciones ppt
 

Destaque

Philosophy of man 4
Philosophy of man 4Philosophy of man 4
Philosophy of man 4CD Balubayan
 
John Locke philosophy of man
John Locke philosophy of manJohn Locke philosophy of man
John Locke philosophy of manCarlyn Villareal
 
Rationalism
RationalismRationalism
RationalismBuhsra
 
Phil – 10 into to philosophy lecture 13 - kant
Phil – 10 into to philosophy   lecture 13 - kantPhil – 10 into to philosophy   lecture 13 - kant
Phil – 10 into to philosophy lecture 13 - kantWilliamParkhurst
 
Empiricist epistemology – Hume & Kant
Empiricist epistemology – Hume & KantEmpiricist epistemology – Hume & Kant
Empiricist epistemology – Hume & KantAimee Hoover-Miller
 
Realism and its Role in Education
Realism and its Role in EducationRealism and its Role in Education
Realism and its Role in Educationwritemind
 
Philosophy of Realism in Education
Philosophy of Realism in EducationPhilosophy of Realism in Education
Philosophy of Realism in EducationAnn Vitug
 
philosophy of education - Pragmatism
philosophy of education - Pragmatismphilosophy of education - Pragmatism
philosophy of education - Pragmatismphebe14
 
The founding fathers and philosophies of learning
The founding fathers and philosophies of learningThe founding fathers and philosophies of learning
The founding fathers and philosophies of learningbeatrizrodriguezrivera
 
Lecture notes-on-immanuel-kant
Lecture notes-on-immanuel-kantLecture notes-on-immanuel-kant
Lecture notes-on-immanuel-kantPaul Jaisini
 
Copernican revolution modern
Copernican revolution modernCopernican revolution modern
Copernican revolution modernjoverba
 
Yuk Hui: What is a digital object?
Yuk Hui: What is a digital object?Yuk Hui: What is a digital object?
Yuk Hui: What is a digital object?PhiloWeb
 

Destaque (20)

Empiricism presentation
Empiricism presentationEmpiricism presentation
Empiricism presentation
 
Rationalism
RationalismRationalism
Rationalism
 
Rationalism and Empiricism
Rationalism and EmpiricismRationalism and Empiricism
Rationalism and Empiricism
 
Rationalism
RationalismRationalism
Rationalism
 
Rationalism report
Rationalism reportRationalism report
Rationalism report
 
Philosophy of man 4
Philosophy of man 4Philosophy of man 4
Philosophy of man 4
 
John Locke philosophy of man
John Locke philosophy of manJohn Locke philosophy of man
John Locke philosophy of man
 
Rationalism
RationalismRationalism
Rationalism
 
Phil – 10 into to philosophy lecture 13 - kant
Phil – 10 into to philosophy   lecture 13 - kantPhil – 10 into to philosophy   lecture 13 - kant
Phil – 10 into to philosophy lecture 13 - kant
 
Empiricist epistemology – Hume & Kant
Empiricist epistemology – Hume & KantEmpiricist epistemology – Hume & Kant
Empiricist epistemology – Hume & Kant
 
Realism and its Role in Education
Realism and its Role in EducationRealism and its Role in Education
Realism and its Role in Education
 
Philosophy of Realism in Education
Philosophy of Realism in EducationPhilosophy of Realism in Education
Philosophy of Realism in Education
 
philosophy of education - Pragmatism
philosophy of education - Pragmatismphilosophy of education - Pragmatism
philosophy of education - Pragmatism
 
The founding fathers and philosophies of learning
The founding fathers and philosophies of learningThe founding fathers and philosophies of learning
The founding fathers and philosophies of learning
 
Lecture notes-on-immanuel-kant
Lecture notes-on-immanuel-kantLecture notes-on-immanuel-kant
Lecture notes-on-immanuel-kant
 
Immanuelkant
ImmanuelkantImmanuelkant
Immanuelkant
 
Copernican revolution modern
Copernican revolution modernCopernican revolution modern
Copernican revolution modern
 
Albert einstein
Albert einsteinAlbert einstein
Albert einstein
 
Yuk Hui: What is a digital object?
Yuk Hui: What is a digital object?Yuk Hui: What is a digital object?
Yuk Hui: What is a digital object?
 
Phil constitution
Phil constitutionPhil constitution
Phil constitution
 

Semelhante a Phil – 10 into to philosophy lecture 12 - empiricism

An Essay On John Locke
An Essay On John LockeAn Essay On John Locke
An Essay On John LockeBecky Gilbert
 
Origins of knowledge 2016 revision 1. concept empiricism
Origins of knowledge 2016 revision 1. concept empiricismOrigins of knowledge 2016 revision 1. concept empiricism
Origins of knowledge 2016 revision 1. concept empiricismJon Bradshaw
 
Rebuttal of Innatism
Rebuttal of Innatism Rebuttal of Innatism
Rebuttal of Innatism Bibi Halima
 
Philosophy lecture 07
Philosophy lecture 07Philosophy lecture 07
Philosophy lecture 07Mr-Mike
 
Perception 2016 revision 3. idealism
Perception 2016 revision 3. idealismPerception 2016 revision 3. idealism
Perception 2016 revision 3. idealismJon Bradshaw
 
John Locke theory of knowledge
John Locke theory of knowledgeJohn Locke theory of knowledge
John Locke theory of knowledgeAli Furqan Syed
 
Origins of knowldge 2016 revision 2. concept innatism
Origins of knowldge 2016 revision 2. concept innatismOrigins of knowldge 2016 revision 2. concept innatism
Origins of knowldge 2016 revision 2. concept innatismJon Bradshaw
 
September 10 - Philosophy of Science - Continued Discussion).ppt
September 10 - Philosophy of Science - Continued Discussion).pptSeptember 10 - Philosophy of Science - Continued Discussion).ppt
September 10 - Philosophy of Science - Continued Discussion).pptCandraNingrat1
 
Classical and Modern Philosophy: Rationalism and Empiricism .pptx
Classical and Modern Philosophy: Rationalism and Empiricism .pptxClassical and Modern Philosophy: Rationalism and Empiricism .pptx
Classical and Modern Philosophy: Rationalism and Empiricism .pptxMeiselaHardiantimeis
 
class - epistemology.pptx
class - epistemology.pptxclass - epistemology.pptx
class - epistemology.pptxnireekshan1
 
Philosophy 100: Chapt 5
Philosophy 100: Chapt 5Philosophy 100: Chapt 5
Philosophy 100: Chapt 5dborcoman
 
1. introduction to infinity
1. introduction to infinity1. introduction to infinity
1. introduction to infinityBiagio Tassone
 
AN ESSAY CONCERING HUMAN UNDERSTANDING
AN ESSAY CONCERING HUMAN UNDERSTANDINGAN ESSAY CONCERING HUMAN UNDERSTANDING
AN ESSAY CONCERING HUMAN UNDERSTANDINGSt:Mary's College
 

Semelhante a Phil – 10 into to philosophy lecture 12 - empiricism (20)

An Essay On John Locke
An Essay On John LockeAn Essay On John Locke
An Essay On John Locke
 
Origins of knowledge 2016 revision 1. concept empiricism
Origins of knowledge 2016 revision 1. concept empiricismOrigins of knowledge 2016 revision 1. concept empiricism
Origins of knowledge 2016 revision 1. concept empiricism
 
Rebuttal of Innatism
Rebuttal of Innatism Rebuttal of Innatism
Rebuttal of Innatism
 
Philosophy lecture 07
Philosophy lecture 07Philosophy lecture 07
Philosophy lecture 07
 
Perception 2016 revision 3. idealism
Perception 2016 revision 3. idealismPerception 2016 revision 3. idealism
Perception 2016 revision 3. idealism
 
IDEALISM_PPT.ppt
IDEALISM_PPT.pptIDEALISM_PPT.ppt
IDEALISM_PPT.ppt
 
IDEALISM_PPT.ppt
IDEALISM_PPT.pptIDEALISM_PPT.ppt
IDEALISM_PPT.ppt
 
John Locke theory of knowledge
John Locke theory of knowledgeJohn Locke theory of knowledge
John Locke theory of knowledge
 
Philosophy03
Philosophy03Philosophy03
Philosophy03
 
Origins of knowldge 2016 revision 2. concept innatism
Origins of knowldge 2016 revision 2. concept innatismOrigins of knowldge 2016 revision 2. concept innatism
Origins of knowldge 2016 revision 2. concept innatism
 
September 10 - Philosophy of Science - Continued Discussion).ppt
September 10 - Philosophy of Science - Continued Discussion).pptSeptember 10 - Philosophy of Science - Continued Discussion).ppt
September 10 - Philosophy of Science - Continued Discussion).ppt
 
Classical and Modern Philosophy: Rationalism and Empiricism .pptx
Classical and Modern Philosophy: Rationalism and Empiricism .pptxClassical and Modern Philosophy: Rationalism and Empiricism .pptx
Classical and Modern Philosophy: Rationalism and Empiricism .pptx
 
class - epistemology.pptx
class - epistemology.pptxclass - epistemology.pptx
class - epistemology.pptx
 
Philosophy 100: Chapt 5
Philosophy 100: Chapt 5Philosophy 100: Chapt 5
Philosophy 100: Chapt 5
 
classical empiricism
classical empiricism classical empiricism
classical empiricism
 
1. introduction to infinity
1. introduction to infinity1. introduction to infinity
1. introduction to infinity
 
AN ESSAY CONCERING HUMAN UNDERSTANDING
AN ESSAY CONCERING HUMAN UNDERSTANDINGAN ESSAY CONCERING HUMAN UNDERSTANDING
AN ESSAY CONCERING HUMAN UNDERSTANDING
 
modern-period.pptx
modern-period.pptxmodern-period.pptx
modern-period.pptx
 
Empiricism as an epistemological theory
Empiricism as an epistemological theoryEmpiricism as an epistemological theory
Empiricism as an epistemological theory
 
epistemology.ppt
epistemology.pptepistemology.ppt
epistemology.ppt
 

Mais de WilliamParkhurst

Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9WilliamParkhurst
 
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9WilliamParkhurst
 
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9WilliamParkhurst
 
Intoduction to philosophy lec 8
Intoduction to philosophy lec 8Intoduction to philosophy lec 8
Intoduction to philosophy lec 8WilliamParkhurst
 

Mais de WilliamParkhurst (6)

Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
 
Descartes
DescartesDescartes
Descartes
 
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
 
Descartes lecture 10
Descartes lecture 10Descartes lecture 10
Descartes lecture 10
 
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
Introduction to philosophy lecture 9
 
Intoduction to philosophy lec 8
Intoduction to philosophy lec 8Intoduction to philosophy lec 8
Intoduction to philosophy lec 8
 

Phil – 10 into to philosophy lecture 12 - empiricism

  • 1. Phil – 10 Into to Philosophy Empiricism
  • 2. Mid-term • Everyone should be getting an A – 35 response questions – 10 definitions – 5 quizzes
  • 3. CSU Vs. UC • Knowledge vs. brilliance or innovation?
  • 4. Mid-term • Feedback – Time constraints • Types of questions – Longer times for definition study – Some did not get their response questions back - how to make this better? – Where to go from here? • We will see……
  • 5. Extra credit • Philosophy Center (sign in and shoot me an email letting me know) – Location: FOB 231 Hours: T-W 11-4 • Presentations – Shoot me an email letting me know your interested – 2-5 min • To Kill a Mocking Bird – bring a ticket stub – Wednesday 7 – Thursday 7 – Friday 7 – Saturday 7 – Give a free-form response to the play – 1 page • Have you encountered racism? • Do you think racism still exist? • Even if “race” does not exist scientifically, does the societal conception of it still effect society?
  • 6. Empiricism • Remember the scientific revolution? • Bacon (theorized about science)
  • 7. Empiricist Philosophers • John Locke (1632 - 1704) • George Berkeley (1632-1704) • David Hume (1711-1776) Solomon Loses
  • 8. Rationalism vs. Empiricism • Rationalists claim that there are significant ways in which our concepts and knowledge are gained independently of sense experience. • Empiricists claim that sense experience is the ultimate source of all our concepts and knowledge. • Video: • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8wh8C7lP7U
  • 9. Rationalism • The Intuition/Deduction Thesis • The Innate Knowledge Thesis • The Innate Concept Thesis
  • 10. Empiricism • True knowledge is gained from experience • The Empiricism Thesis: We have no source of knowledge in S or for the concepts we use in S other than sense experience.
  • 11. Empiricism • Empiricism about a particular subject rejects the corresponding version of the Intuition/Deduction thesis and Innate Knowledge thesis. • Insofar as we have knowledge in the subject, our knowledge is a posteriori, dependent upon sense experience.
  • 12. Empiricism • Empiricists also deny the implication of the corresponding Innate Concept thesis that we have innate ideas in the subject area. Sense experience is our only source of ideas.
  • 13. Empiricism • They reject the corresponding version of the Superiority of Reason thesis. Since reason alone does not give us any knowledge, it certainly does not give us superior knowledge.
  • 14. Empiricism • Empiricists generally reject the Indispensability of Reason thesis, though they need not.
  • 15. Empiricism • The Empiricism thesis does not entail that we have empirical knowledge. It entails that knowledge can only be gained, if at all, by experience.
  • 16. John Locke (1632 - 1704) • Biography: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =StBlNYX7HBU&feature=related • An Essay Concerning Human Understanding • Some philosophers before Locke had suggested that it would be good to find the limits of the Understanding, but what Locke does is to carry out this project in detail.
  • 17. John Locke (1632 - 1704) • In Book II Locke claims that ideas are the materials of knowledge and all ideas come from experience. The term ‘idea,’ Locke tells us “…stands for whatsoever is the Object of the Understanding, when a man thinks” (Essay I, 1, 8, p. 47).
  • 18. John Locke (1632 - 1704) • Experience is of two kinds, sensation and reflection. One of these — sensation — tells us about things and processes in the external world. The other — reflection — tells us about the operations of our own minds.
  • 19. John Locke (1632 - 1704) • Reflection is a sort of internal sense that makes us conscious of the mental processes we are engaged in. Some ideas we get only from sensation, some only from reflection and some from both. • Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =X-buzVjYQvY
  • 20. John Locke (1632 - 1704) • Locke raises the issue of just what innate knowledge is. Particular instances of knowledge are supposed to be in our minds as part of our rational make-up, but how are they "in our minds"?
  • 21. John Locke (1632 - 1704) • If the implication is that we all consciously have this knowledge, it is plainly false. Propositions often given as examples of innate knowledge, even such plausible candidates as the principle that the same thing cannot both be and not be, are not consciously accepted by children and idiots. If the point of calling such principles "innate" is not to imply that they are or have been consciously accepted by all rational beings, then it is hard to see what the point is.
  • 22. John Locke (1632 - 1704) • "No proposition can be said to be in the mind, which it never yet knew, which it never yet was conscious of" (Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Book I, Chapter II, Section 5, p. 61).
  • 23. Berkeley (1632-1704) • Berkeley was born in 1685 near Kilkenny, Ireland. • Berkeley's first important published work, An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision (1709), was an influential contribution to the psychology of vision and also developed doctrines relevant to his idealist project.
  • 24. Berkeley (1632-1704) • In his mid-twenties, he published his most enduring works, the Treatise concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (1710) and the Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous (1713),
  • 25. Berkeley (1632-1704) • Principles 4: • It is indeed an opinion strangely prevailing amongst men, that houses, mountains, rivers, and in a word all sensible objects have an existence natural or real, distinct from their being perceived by the understanding. But with how great an assurance and acquiescence so ever this principle may be entertained in the world; yet whoever shall find in his heart to call it in question, may, if I mistake not, perceive it to involve a manifest contradiction. For what are the forementioned objects but the things we perceive by sense, and what do we perceive besides our own ideas or sensations; and is it not plainly repugnant that any one of these or any combination of them should exist unperceived?
  • 26. Berkeley (1632-1704) • Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= vdDPrmOHFPo
  • 27. Berkeley (1632-1704) • Berkeley presents here the following argument: • (1) We perceive ordinary objects (houses, mountains, etc.).(2) We perceive only ideas. • Therefore, • (3) Ordinary objects are ideas.
  • 28. Berkeley (1632-1704) • The argument is valid, and premise (1) looks hard to deny. • What about premise (2)? Berkeley believes that this premise is accepted by all the modern philosophers. In the Principles, Berkeley is operating within the idea-theoretic tradition of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In particular, Berkeley believes that some version of this premise is accepted by his main targets, the influential philosophers Descartes and Locke.
  • 29. Berkeley (1632-1704) • However, Berkeley recognizes that these philosophers have an obvious response available to this argument. This response blocks Berkeley's inference to (3) by distinguishing two sorts of perception, mediate and immediate.
  • 30. Berkeley (1632-1704) • Thus, premises (1) and (2) are replaced by the claims that (1′) we mediately perceive ordinary objects, while (2′) we immediately perceive only ideas. From these claims, of course, no idealist conclusion follows.
  • 31. Berkeley (1632-1704) • The response reflects a representationalist theory of perception, according to which we indirectly (mediately) perceive material things, by directly (immediately) perceiving ideas, which are mind-dependent items. The ideas represent external material objects, and thereby allow us to perceive them. • Video: • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTd3ypNu0IU
  • 32. Berkeley (1632-1704) • Idealist – The only things that exist are ideas. • If strict empiricism is true then things do not exist when they are not observed. • Berkeley’s jump – God causes ideas in our mind and observes everything when we are not.
  • 33. Hume (1711-1776) • A master stylist in any genre, Hume's major philosophical works — • A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-1740) • the Enquiries concerning Human Understanding (1748) • Concerning the Principles of Morals (1751) • Dialogues concerning Natural Religion (1779) • Video: • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =BQ2qjVkMj6s&feature=related
  • 34. Hume (1711-1776) • For Hume, all the materials of thinking — perceptions — are derived either from sensation (“outward sentiment”) or from reflection (“inward sentiment”) (EHU, 19).
  • 35. Hume (1711-1776) • He divides perceptions into two categories, distinguished by their different degrees of force and vivacity. Our “more feeble” perceptions, ideas, are ultimately derived from our livelier impressions (EHU, Section II; T, I.i.1-2).
  • 36. Hume (1711-1776) • Although we permute and combine ideas in the imagination to form complex ideas of things we haven't experienced, Hume is adamant that our creative powers extend no farther than “the materials afforded us by the senses and experience.”
  • 37. Hume (1711-1776) • complex ideas are composed of simple ideas, which are fainter copies of the simple impressions from which they are ultimately derived, to which they correspond and exactly resemble.
  • 38. Hume (1711-1776) • Hume offers this “general proposition” as his “first principle…in the science of human nature” (T, 7). Usually called the “Copy Principle,” Hume's distinctive brand of empiricism is often identified with his commitment to it.
  • 39. Hume (1711-1776) • Hume presents the Copy Principle as an empirical thesis. He emphasizes this point by offering “one contradictory phenomenon” (T, 5-6; EHU, 20-21) — the infamous missing shade of blue — as an empirical counterexample to the Copy Principle.
  • 40. Hume (1711-1776) • Bundle theory of identity - Where is the self? • Though we've changed in many respects, the same person appears present as was present then. We might start thinking about which features can be changed without changing the underlying self.
  • 41. Hume (1711-1776) • Hume, however, denies that there is a distinction between the various features of a person and the mysterious self that supposedly bears those features. • “We are never intimately conscious of anything but a particular perception; man is a bundle or collection of different perceptions which succeed one another with an inconceivable rapidity and are in perpetual flux and movement"
  • 42. Hume (1711-1776 • Cause and Effect cannot be verified by empirical means. This leads to the problem of induction: Induction (opposed to deduction) always has the ability to be fallible  all knowledge gained from sense experience is probabilistic  science is based on a fallacy and therefore could be wrong • Cause and effect: http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tZ6L7QNFws • Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =r3QZ2Ko-FOg
  • 43. • John Locke (1632 - 1704) - original empiricist • George Berkeley (1632-1704) - Idealist • David Hume (1711-1776) – took Empiricism to its rational ends
  • 44. Terms to know • Empiricism (The • Mediate vs. Empiricism Thesis) immediate • Idea (complex and • Representationalism simple) • Copy Principle • Impression • Missing shade of blue • Sensation and • Bundle theory reflection • Cause and Effect • Innate knowledge • The problem of • Idealism induction