In this presentation project evaluators Sunil Maher & Eleni Anoyrkati (Coventry University Enterprises Ltd.) present their Quality Assurance workpackage for the Web2LLP project, which aims to improve Internet strategies and maximize the social media presence of lifelong learning projects.

1. Improving Internet strategies and maximizing the social media presence of LLP
projects
Work Package 6 – Quality
Assurance
Sunil Maher & Eleni Anoyrkati
Coventry University
Enterprises Ltd.
This project was financed with the support of the European Commission. This publication is the sole responsibility of the
author and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. http://www.web2llp.eu

2. Work Package 6 – Quality
Assurance
• Key Aims of Work Package
– Perform an evaluation of;
• The project
• The partnership
• Experience gained based on Case Studies
• Development of recommendations
– Effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, sustainability, impact on
activities of other LLP project activities

3. Key Activities (1)
• Monitoring System
– Gather information from target groups,
consortium, partners & key stakeholders

4. Key Activities (2)
• Evaluation System
– Focus on Interim & Final results
– Deliverables of highest system
– Evaluation meets need of (potential) participants
– Added-value
– Uptake by LLP projects and sub-actions

5. Key Objectives (1)
• To develop a Quality Assurance plan, tools and
indicators for the assessment of the project's
progress
• To design and implement a monitoring and
evaluation system
• To monitor project development and evaluate
the (potential) impact of the project on other
LLP projects and the LLP programme itself.
• To set-up evaluation methods

6. Key Objective (2)
• To develop a perpetuity agenda
• To develop two evaluation reports (Interim
and Final)
• To establish constant communication and
facilitate feedback from the external reviewer
• To develop a recommendations report
summarizing good practice and potential
future improvements in cooperation with the
external reviewer

7. WP6 Deliverables
Delive
rable Title Type Input Deadline
No.
Agreed evaluation criteria, project
Quality Assurance Plan &
30 Report processes, self-evaluation manual, Month 4 – April 2012
Project Evaluation Tools
project milestones/reports
Methodological Matrix (Organic
31 Set of Tools Tools Month 9 – September 2012
document)
assessment of first 12 months results,
Interim Evaluation of Project Report
32 Progress Vs Target, impact to other LLP, Month 11 November 2012
Results
Method & Tools (WP2, WP3, WP5)
Project Sustainablility, future potential
33 Perpetuity Agenda Report or other Month 16 – April 2013
activities
External evaluators report. Case Studies,
34 Final Evaluation Report events training sessions, future Month 24 – December 2013
recommendations

8. WP6 Partner Input
Number of staff days
Partners
Country Short name Role and tasks in the work package
involved Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Total
P5 leads this WP in terms of coordination,
supervision and assessment of the quality of
Lead partner P(4) UK CUE 30 35 65
the project. To deliver the reports on time and
on task.
To provide any type of feedback valuable to the
P(1) LU UL 10 10 quality assurance plan. To gather feedback
from the target group.
To review and provide input and feedback on
the deliverables. To assist with the
P(2) GR W2L 15 10 25
development of the tools & methods. To
develop the Perpetuity Agenda
In conjunction to WP3, to review and provide
P(3) BE AT 5 5
input and feedback on the deliverables
To provide any type of feedback valuable to the
P (5) IT 5 5
quality assurance plan.
To provide any type of feedback valuable to the
P (6) ES 5 5
quality assurance plan.
Total 45 70 0 0 115

9. Deliverable 30; Quality Assurance Plan &
Project Evaluation Tools
Description Focus
• Deadline month 4 (April • Project Processes
2012) • Deliverable overview
• Dissemination Level; • Self-evaluation manual
Confidential (internal)
• Nature; Report • Measurable Criteria
• English • Apply Corrective Actions
(where necessary)

10. Deliverable 31; Tool Matrix
• Description • Focus
• Deadline month 4 • Methodological
(April ‘12)
Matrix
• Outcome; Set of
• Impact of WEB2LLP
Tools
on other LLP projects
• Dissemination Level;
• Detail usage of tools
Confidential
and frequency of
• Nature; Report application
• English • Assessment Criteria

11. Deliverable 31; Tool Matrix (2)
Assessment Criteria
• Acceptance by target group • Project Management
– Usefulness, training – Integration, results
provision, re-use of valorisation Vs
resources objectives
• Organisational Impact • Potential of continuation
– Impact of training – Benefits for LLP
scheme projects
• European added value
– Training uptake - EU

12. Deliverable 32; Interim Evaluation
of Project Results
• Description • Focus
• Deadline; month 12 • Progress Vs initial
• Outcome; 12 month plan
Evaluation • Preliminary impact
• Dissemination; on other LLP’s
Confidential • Review WP2, 3 & 5
• Nature; Report methods & tools
• English • Review of each
phase of project

13. Deliverable 33; Perpetuity Agenda
• Description • Focus
• Deadline; month 16 • Establish project
sustainability strategy
• Dissemination;
• Potential project
Confidential
continuance
• Nature; Report • Delivery of training
• English modules (independent)
• Adaptation to other
programmes

14. Deliverable 34; Final Evaluation
• Description • Focus
• Deadline; month 24 • Assess overall quality
• Outcome; Evaluation of activities
of Results • Summation from
• Dissemination; external evaluator
Confidential • Include
• Nature; Report – case studies
– Events
• English
– Training sessions
– Recommendations

15. WP6 Discussion
• Partners role in WP6
• Deliverable deadlines
• What are the next steps ?
• Discussion