1.
ADECCO – CARL ZEISS VISION JOB ASSIGNMENT:
DID YOU KNOW?
United States of America President Barack Obama’s and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson
Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz’ and Banker/JP Morgan Chase Bank’s DISCRIMINATORY
practices are so SUBTLE and MASKED; however, see if you recognize these
UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL discriminatory practices. For instance, have you ever seen white
employees who CANNOT do their jobs; however, relies on SUPERVISORS/MANAGERS to
COVER-UP/SHIELD their INCOMPETENCE? Perhaps you have had to TRAIN LESS
QUALIFIED white employees who may later wind up getting your job and perhaps you being
DEMOTED and/or FIRED/TERMINATED? White employee(s) with LESS EXPERIENCE,
QUALIFICATIONS, EDUCATION, etc. getting job(s) you qualify for?
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT www.vogeldenisenewsome.net
TRANSLATION BUTTON (To Read In Another Language) IS IN THE UPPER RIGHT-
HAND CORNER OF THE WEBSITE. OTHER DOCUMENTS CREATED and/or BEING
SHARED BY VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME MAY ALSO BE FOUND AT:
www.slideshare.net/vogeldenise
TO: ADECCO – c/o Gerald and Brittany
FROM: Vogel Denise Newsome
RE: CZV Assignment – Notification of Complaints Submitted – Concerns Regarding
THIRD Party(s) As United States of America President Barack Obama,
His Legal Counsel/Attorney Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz
And JP Morgan Chase Bank‟s Interference With Equal Employment
Opportunities
DATE: February 10, 2013

2.
This is in follow-up to our telephone conversations on Wednesday (2/6/13) and Friday
(2/8/13) regarding my concerns brought to CZV’s/Brian’s attention on Friday (2/1/13) and
the meeting on Thursday (2/7/13) requested by CZV’s Jerry Hostetler (?sp), Jerry Smith and
Brian. While I may want to believe this matter is resolved, I am confident that it is NOT
because of HISTORICAL reasons and because it appears to be a CONTINUED PATTERN of
attacks that have been leveled against me (i.e. spanning over 20 years) for RACIAL,
DISCRIMINATORY and PREJUDICIAL reasons. Unlawful/Illegal practices that the
PERPETRATORS clearly want to be kept HIDDEN from the PUBLIC’S/WORLD’S view.
However, appears may have to also become a matter for PUBLIC SHARING to provide the
PUBLIC/WORLD of how such issues continue to exist in 2013 and the attempts to
COVER-UP such RACISIM/DISCRIMINATION leveled against AFRICIAN-Americans.
The following information is PERTINENT/RELEVANT in addressing the CONTINUED
PATTERN-OF-DISCRIMINATORY/RACIST attacks that have been leveled against me and
to IDENTIFY the CULPRITS carrying out these UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL practices – i.e.
culprits who it now appears are looking to add ADECCO and/or CZV to their list of CO-
CONSPIRATORS if they are not already WILLING participants:
LAW FIRM/Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz – CLIENTS:
United States of America President Barack Obama /Congressional Members (Senate
and House of Representatives)/Supreme Court of the United States Justices/Federal Judges
Association and JP Morgan Chase
Unless a man is honest we have no right to keep
him in public life, it matters not how brilliant his
capacity, it hardly matters how great his power of
doing good service on certain lines may be... No
man who is corrupt, no man who condones
corruption in others, can possibly do his duty by
the community” - - Teddy Roosevelt.
Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of
a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that may exist and be punished whether or not the
substantive crime ensues. Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above
the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the
combination in crime makes more likely the commission
of other crimes and because it decreases the probability that
the individuals involved will depart from their path of
criminality. - - The Supreme Court of the United States finding in U.S. v.
Jimenez Recio, 123 S.Ct. 819 (2003)
The “freedom of speech and of the press” guaranteed by the Constitution
embraces at least the liberty to discuss publicly and truthfully all
matters of public concern without previous restraint or fear of
subsequent punishment - - United States Constitutional Amendments 1
and 14 - - The Supreme Court of the United States finding in Thornhill v. State
of Alabama, 60 S.Ct. 736 (1940)
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK and ADECCO Relationship:
https://www.adr.com/Home/LoadPDF?CMSID=628bee305ae04b8ab907c9b7d00c195d
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK/JAMIE DIMON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF JP MORGAN CHASE ) is United States of
America’s President Barack Obama’s FAVORITE BANKER:
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/d/james_dimon/index.html
The above information and that to follow have been provided to ESTABLISH what is known as
a NEXUS/RELATIONSHIP/CONNECTION to the PATTERN-OF-
DISCRIMINATORY/RACIST attacks that have been leveled against me (Vogel Denise
Newsome). According to the United States of America’s DEPARTMENT OF LABOR’S
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Discrimination often is subtle, and there

3.
rarely is a “SMOKING GUN,” because of the way such unlawful/illegal practices are
carried out and then COVERED UP! - - By the way the LAW FIRM/Baker Donelson
Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz (i.e. which appears to also have
TIES/CONNECTIONS to the KU KLUX KLAN) that is legal counsel to United States of
America President Barack Obama and JP Morgan Chase is ALSO legal counsel for the United
States of America’s Department of Labor. So that it is clear on how such matters have been
allowed to remain HIDDEN; however, is NOW getting PUBLIC EXPOSURE in
addressing RACISM and DISCRIMINATORY practices leveled against myself as well as
PEOPLE-OF-COLOR here in the United States of America and the TRUE motives for the
WARS that have been started by the United States of America here and
ABROAD/INTERNATONALLY!
Conducting a Thorough Investigation
Because discrimination often is subtle, and there rarely is a “smoking gun,”
[Fn. 45 - See Aman v. Cort Furniture Rental Corp., 85 F.3d 1074, 1081-82 (3rd
Cir. 1996)(“It has become easier to coat various forms of discrimination with
the appearance of propriety, or to ascribe some other less odious intention to
what is in reality discriminatory behavior. In other words, while discriminatory
conduct persists, violators have learned not to leave the proverbial „smoking
gun‟ behind.”); cf. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 801
(1973). . .] determining whether race played a role in the decisionmaking
requires examination of all of the surrounding facts and circumstances. The
presence or absence of any one piece of evidence often will not be
determinative. Sources of information can include witness statements,
including consideration of their credibility; documents; direct observation; and
statistical evidence such as EEO-1 data, among others - -
See EEOC‟s Compliance Manual Section 15: Race and Color Discrimination
Shortly after my FIRST Assignment (GSI – ending on about December 21, 2012) through
ADECCO because I was drawing UNEMPLOYMENT Benefits, I submitted a claim to draw
on the week(s) in which I did not work. My claim was handled over the telephone in which I
made known of the Work Assignment through ADECCO. It appears that based on this filing the
following events occurred:
1) United States of America President Barack Obama and his Legal Counsel Baker
Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz (“Baker Donelson”) RELIED upon this
information and RESORTED to JP MORGAN CHASE Bank’s RELATIONSHIP
(i.e. as a THIRD-PARTY) with ADECCO to provide them with information
regarding income paid to me (Vogel Denise Newsome).
2) On or about FRIDAY, January 4, 2013, my Account (i.e. providing
PAYROLL/PAY STUB information) with ADECCO was HACKED
into/COMPROMISED (See Email ATTACHED) for purposes providing United
States of America President Barack Obama and his Legal Counsel/Lawyer Baker
Donelson of determining whether I worked, how much I was paid and other reasons
KNOWN to these CRIMINALS). ADECCO following its procedure, NOTIFIED
me of the change to the PIN on this account to determine whether or not the change
was made by me – i.e. in which it was NOT made by me and NEITHER
authorized by me. At the TIME (8:04:26 A.M.) of such CRIMINAL acts, I was
ON-THE-JOB at CZV which does NOT require COMPUTER/INTERNET access
to carry out my day-to-day functions of the duty(s) assigned.
This DATE (1/4/13) is also relevant because President Barack Obama and
his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson having KNOWLEDGE it was a DEADLINE
regarding PROTECTED activities in which I am involved and they have
INTERESTS! Therefore, they were interested in seeing whether or not I would be
responding and trying to determine whether or not I had an INCOME since PRIOR
to the HACKING into my ADECCO account they had come AFTER my Federal
Unemployment Benefits and worked with ANOTHER one of Baker Donelson’s
BANKING CLIENTS (US Bank) to SHUT DOWN my Unemployment Benefits
Card for purposes of DEPRIVING me monies so that the January 4, 2013
DEADLINE would be missed. However, they FAILED in their efforts and I was able
to fulfill my obligations through their CRIMINAL attacks and their
UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL practices. The SECOND such FAILED efforts in that
their attacks on one of my PUBLIC/SOCIAL forums had also FAILED and the
PUBLIC/INTERNATIONAL communities were made aware of such CRIMINAL
ATTACKS:
3) On or about MONDAY, January 28, 2013, I had another matter involving
PROTECTED activities that required my attention. This obligation was met.

4.
4) From my research and the ability to determine that United States of America’s
President Barack Obama and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson had
STALKED/TRACKED me down and was engaging in FURTHER STALKING
crimes – i.e. following me from JOB-TO-JOB and STATE-TO-STATE and
contacting my employers for purposes of NOTIFYING them of PROTECTED
activities in which I am involved. Engaging in such CRIMINAL acts in contacting
my employer(s) – i.e. as ADECCO and CZV for purposes of having my employment
TERMINATED, it is important to note the following:
EEOC COMPLIANCE MANUAL at No. 2, Page 13: "Adverse
Actions Can Occur After the Employment Relationship Between the
Charging Party and Respondent Has Ended" . . .
Examples of post-employment retaliation include actions
that are designed to interfere with the individual's prospects for
employment, such as giving an unjustified negative job reference,
refusing to provide a job reference, and informing an individual's
prospective employer about the individual's protected activity. [See,
e.g., EEOC v. L. B. Foster, 123 F.3d 746 (3d Cir. 1997), cert. denied,
66 U.S. L.W. 3388 (U.S. March 2, 1998); Ruedlinger v. Jarrett, 106
F.3d 212 (7th Cir. 1997)].
CONTINUED criminal/civil violations leveled against me and in FURTHERANCE
of PATTERN-OF-DISCRIMINATORY practices. In fact, with one of my previous
employers (MESSINA Staffing and The Garretson Firm Resolution Group), it
appears President Barack Obama and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson relied upon
the TIES/RELATIONSHIP of President Obama’s CAMPAIGN
Manager/DEPUTY Chief of Staff/DIRECTOR of Personnel for the
TRANSITION TEAM (Jim MESSINA) to Messina Staffing and The
Garretson Firm Resolution Group to come AFTER one of my previous jobs. Then
President Barack Obama and his Legal Counsel RESORTED to one of their MANY
tactics and had ANOTHER lawsuit brought against me (Vogel Denise
Newsome) for purposes of getting their hands on EVIDENCE that they did NOT
want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Of course I did NOT entertain their
FRIVOLOUS lawsuit in that my research found that they file lawsuits against
PRIVATE citizens for purposes of getting their hands on evidence – i.e. as in the
Debra Palfrey (a/k/a the D.C. Madam who apparently had information
they did NOT want released regarding the September 11, 2001 World
Trade Center Attacks in that there are allegations that HIGH PROFILE
Political Figures on Capitol Hill involved in 09/01/11 Attacks were
Clients of hers) matter. So what it appears happened, Baker Donelson being legal
counsel to also former President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard “Dick”
Cheney (i.e. whose Government Attorney and CHIEF OF STAFF DAVID
ADDINGTON being a Baker Donelson employee) had a FRIVOLOUS Criminal
Lawsuit filed against Ms. Palfrey. It appears because of Ms. Palfrey’s FINANCIAL
situation, she turned to a FEDERAL PUBLIC Defender to assist her with legal
actions. What President Bush and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson did NOT tell
Ms. Palfrey and the PUBLIC/WORLD was that:
a) Palfrey was FIRST represented by A.J. Kramer/Office of the FEDERAL Public
Defender for approximately 2½ months BEFORE a withdrawal motion was filed;
and
b) FUNDING and APPROVAL of appointment of attorneys for the Office of the
FEDERAL Defender is handled by the DIRECTOR of the Administrative Office
of the United States Courts – i.e. in Palfrey’s case, the DIRECTOR at that time
JAMES C. DUFF (an EMPLOYEE of Baker
being
Donelson). Therefore, it appears providing the United States of America’s
WHITE HOUSE and CONGRESSIONAL Members with MEANS, MOTIVES
and ACCESS to information/evidence that Debra Palfrey possessed – i.e.
moreover, to DESTROY information/evidence and get rid of Palfrey because of
the SMOKING GUN TRAIL leading back to the United States of America’s
WHITE HOUSE and Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell &
Berkowitz . . .

5.
Therefore, it appears that once President Bush and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson
were able to get the documents from Palfrey, she was KILLED/MURDERED and this
was covered up as a SUICIDE although Ms. Palfrey made it PUBLICLY known that
she would NOT be committing SUICIDE:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/010508palfrey.mp3
http://www.infowars.com/dc-madam-predicted-she-would-be-suicided/
The reason why this information is PERTINENT/RELEVANT is because it
goes to the ESTABLISHED PATTERN-OF-CRIMINAL activities by United States of
America Presidents and their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson and their
CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS in that about a year ago President Barack
Obama and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson used my (Vogel Denise Newsome’s)
former employer to bring a FRIVOLOUS lawsuit AGAINST her for purposes of
getting their hands on documents/EVIDENCE they did NOT want the
PUBLIC/WORLD to see. However, FAILED in their attempts to get the documents
and this information is NOW a matter PUBLIC record. As shared, such VICIOUS
attacks that have been leveled against me by Baker Donelson have SPANNED
OVER 20 YEARS! Now it appears that they are doing everything they can to
keep ADECCO and the PUBLIC/WORLD from finding out; however, failing in such
attempts because here we are! How bad is it? It appears Baker Donelson relied
upon their TIES/CONNECTIONS to Government Agencies to POST FALSE and
MALICIOUS information on the INTERNET regarding me for purposes of having me
BLACKLISTED/BLACKBALLED and to engage/RECRUIT “WHITE Employers”
in their CONSPIRACIES leveled AGAINST me:
on matter of public concern
Where statement of “opinion”
reasonably implies false and defamatory facts involving
private figure, plaintiff must show that false implications
were made with some level of fault to support recovery - - United
States Constitution , Amendment 1 - - Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 110
S.Ct. 2695 (1990)
Such VICIOUS attacks have been responded to PUBLICLY with the TRUTH being
told by me and, again, are a matter of PUBLIC RECORD!
Paul proclaimed his innocence to . . . leaders. When is it wise to make
a public response to false accusations, and when should we just let them go?
In the case of Paul, the gospel would have been discredited if he had
not spoken up. His circumstances made him look like a criminal, and he had no
history with these leaders to expect them to assume otherwise without a proper
defense.
If we have been publicly slandered by credible
sources, we should probably make a public response.
Otherwise our own witness will be compromised. . . Jesus
warned us that some people will say all manner of evil
against us falsely, so we should not be surprised when it
happens. But we do need to exercise wisdom when we
become aware of it. - - 2009-2010 Standard Lesson Commentary (King
James Version) - August 29, 2010 Lesson Entitled: “Upheld By God” - Subtitle:
“Let’s Talk It Over.”
5) On or about FRIDAY, February 1, 2013, realizing that I had AGAIN become
a VICTIM of President Barack Obama’s and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson’s
STALKING, and that such evidence was being observed in the CHANGE in the work
environment of CZV – i.e. appears to be turning to a HOSTILE and
DISCRIMINATORY work environment TARGETING me – I spoke to one of CZV’s
Managers (Brian) and made him aware of my concerns. Making known that it appears
that from my observation, if not addressed, such practices may continue and/or escalate.
Sharing with Brian that the subtle approach being used were attempts by a co-worker
(Tammy) “to find FAULT with my work while MASKING the TRUE motives;”
however, such attacks were met with my sharing with her that:

6.
The harasser can be the victim's supervisor, a supervisor in another
area, a co-worker, or someone who is not an employee of the
employer, such as a client or customer. . . .
Constructive Discharge/Forced To Resign
Discriminatory practices under the laws EEOC enforces also include
constructive discharge or forcing an mployee to resign by making the
work environment so intolerable a reasonable person would not be
able to stay.
a) Jerry Smith (1st Shift Manager) stood by me and watched me
perform my duties and found NOTHING wrong with my work
process;
b) Tony (2nd Shift Manager) stood by me and watched me
perform my duties and found NOTHING wrong with my work
process – i.e. I have not seen Tony in almost TWO weeks.
While concerned, I would not be surprised if Tammy is
EYEING this position being she is BUDDY-BUDDY with
Jerry Smith.
c) Betty (1st Shift co-worker) was assigned TWICE to review my
work and found NOTHING wrong with my work process. I
advised Betty “that she TRAINED me well and that I was
carrying out duties the way she had TRAINED me;” and
d) Virginia (1st Shift co-worker) was assigned to watch me
perform my duties and found NOTHING wrong with my work
process.
Tammy mentioned to me that there were SWIRLS showing up so she wanted to see
how I was placing the padding on the tools. I shared with her that my work processes
had been checked and I also asked Tony whether or not I was doing it correctly and
he advised I am. Also mentioned to Tammy that each individual may have their way
of doing things and there are those who suffer from OCD. Therefore, no matter how I
may do my work, a person with OCD may find fault with it.
According to Jerry Smith, this was being done with the 2 nd Shift Crew
because there were problems such as BREAKS, SCRATCHES, etc. of the lenses
being processed; however, the problem was NOT with my work – i.e. POLISHING
will remove scratches, etc.. Nevertheless, I have been REPEATEDLY targeted
WITHOUT just cause! In fact, TAMMY had mentioned to me on ONE occasion
that the problems were NOT with me with the issues being found and that any
such errors/issues were BEYOND the area of my work; however, there she was on
FRIDAY, February 1, 2013, it appears FULFILLING her duties in what may be
the CREATION of a HOSTILE and DISCRMINATORY work environment – i.e.
for instance, in a previous conversation, I noticed how it BOTHERED her that an
AFRICAN-American male (Antonio) was driving an Escalade (i.e. an
EXSPENSIVE vehicle). I’ll leave it at that. Antonio is NO longer there and he was
noticing how management was watching him and shared his concerns with me. On
FRIDAY, February 1, 2013, Tammy (White Female) made a comment to me about
my clothing. My impression, seeing what happened to Antonio and the comment to
my clothing left me with the impression that AFRICAN-Americans are not supposed
to be driving an Escalade and/or able to DRESS nicely. Based upon the VICIOUS
attacks that are leveled AGAINST me, this appears only to act as a FRONT
shielding an ILLEGAL MOTIVE and RACIST/DISCRIMINATORY agenda – it
appears that CZV may have been contacted and advised of protected activities and
perhaps THREATS made against them if they do NOT TERMINATE my
employment.
6) On MONDAY, February 4, 2013, Brian came to me with a Complaint
from TAMMY (White Female) alleging I was “acting like a mother hen!” How
does that sound? Brian asked for my feedback. I directed Brian to my
conversation with him on FRIDAY, February 1, 2013 and AGAIN REITERATED
my concerns and observations – i.e. HIGH TURN over in the POLISHING section,
etc. and my concerns regarding the TWO culprits’ (Tammy and Marisa (?sp))
PERSONAL and INTERNAL issues motivated by “ILL intent.”
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: My Friday, February 1, 2013 VERBAL
complaint coming approximately FOUR Days after the PROTECTED activity

7.
carried out on Monday, January 28, 2012, and I had noticed the CHANGE in the
work environment turning towards what appeared to becoming MORE HOSTILE
towards me. The January 28, 2012, PROTECTED action taken by me which
involved providing United States of America President Barack Obama with
information.
According to Brian, he came to me instead of Jerry Smith. Apparently,
Tammy had gone to Jerry Smith (1st Shift Manager and her FRIEND/DRINKING -
BEER – Buddy) to engage him; however, Jerry had spoken to Brian and Brian
agreed to talk with me. Again, I shared with Brian my conversation with him on
Friday, February 1, 2013, and that I do NOT engage in such work practices as
OFFICE POLITICS/GANGS/CLICKS in that clearly they EXCLUDE a
certain GROUP of people and are practices that “I do NOT stoop to
NOR engage in.” Furthermore, that I am there at CZV to do a job and will
continue to do it. Mentioning to Brian that when I began working at CZV that I ate
alone until invited by Tammy to join her and Marisa (?sp). However, upon seeing
their mentality and DISCERNING certain things, I elected to separate myself from
them. Brian thanked me for sharing with him my concerns and
encouraged me to continue to do a GOOD job and he is pleased with
my work. Brian mentioned that he would share this with Jerry Smith. I had no
reason to believe that Brian would not.
7) On TUESDAY, February 5, 2013, familiar with OVER 20 YEARS
of STALKING and the OBAMA Administration/Baker Donelson practices in
contacting my employers, I decided to begin a PRODUCTION Log as to
how many TRAYS were being PROCESSED by me and sent through. On this date, I
had begun later in the Shift to BEGIN keeping count. At the end of the Shift, my
counter had shown approximately, 88 POLY and 41 PLASTIC. Why?
Because based on my experience and training, I knew that there most likely would be
an attempt to make it appear that I was SLOW and could NOT do the work
– which was NOT the case and the problem was NOT with me!
8) On WEDNESDAY, February 6, 2013, PRIOR to going into work, I
called and spoke with Gerald “Jerry” Rauen at ADECCO and placed him on NOTICE
as to the meeting I had with Brian on Friday, February 1, 2013 and then with the
incident regarding Tammy going to Jerry Smith on Monday, February 4, 2013.
During my conversation with Rauen at ADECCO I shared with him my concerns
brought to Brian’s attention as my observation of Tammy (CZV employee) and
Marisa (?sp – an ADECCO employee) and the attacks that have been leveled
against me. I shared with Jerry my concerns that hopefully, the MONIES that
ADECCO receives from CZV would not have an ADVERSE affect in my sharing of
this information and their handling of this matter. Rauen thanked me for sharing the
information and told me to keep up the GOOD work and that he had NOT been made
aware of any issues with my job performance.
PRIOR to getting started, Tammy had come to Daniel (another Adecco
employee) and I to mention that she wanted us to wash blocks since it seemed as
though we were finishing our work ahead of time and had time to spare in washing.
She called us over to meet with JerryHoestetler who showed Daniel and I what he
wanted done. During this meeting, it again appeared that the washing was to be done
by those (i.e. not JUST Daniel and I) employees who had the time to share in
washing the blocks. However, that Tammy was ONLY targeting Daniel and myself.
Therefore, I asked Tammy for clarification purposes as to who was supposed to wash
blocks and she mentioned that Daniel and I and HESITATED – but added – “and
whoever else had the time to do it.”
MARISA (?sp) came to me during the Shift and advised that Daniel and I
did NOT need to wash blocks because she had done them and our help was not
needed. However, from my observation, Marisa could NOT be trusted. In has
EVER come to me on the line to speak.
When I returned from the LAST Break of the Shift, Tammy was
WAITING on me to ATTACK. She had verbally stated something “AT” me rather
than talking “TO” me while walking away MUMBLING something. Daniel was
concerned about Tammy’s behavior and asked me what was that about?
Of course I continued doing my work in that it was obvious to me that Tammy was
attempting to create a HOSTILE work environment and wanted me to engage her an
ALTERCATION which I did NOT entertain! Rather than take me Break in the
Break Room, I had taken it elsewhere.

8.
Tammy later came to me and mentioned to me that she was acting under
the direction of Jerry – Jerry Hostetler in that he was trying to figure out why we
were NOT meeting our numbers when in the BEGINNING of the
assignment we WERE. Therefore, what was the REASON why our production
had dropped? I advised, Tammy that we can ONLY process what is sent
to us. I advised Tammy to look and she can see for herself that ALL
trays had been processed and that we can only work and process those
trays that are sent our way. Furthermore, we had COMPLETED ALL
trays sent our way that night. Tammy was the person RESPONSIBLE
for blocking and sending the trays through to Daniel who would get
them and then process and pass them on to me. I mentioned to Tammy
that I could foresee such attempts to make it appear that Daniel (? Asian-
American) and I were NOT doing the work. Therefore, I was a STEP-
AHEAD and had BEGUN keeping COUNT of the NUMBER of trays
processed – i.e. something Marisa was doing at one time; however, for
some reason STOPPED keeping record of the number of trays being
processed.
Near the end of the Shift while cleaning my area, I went and pulled the
mop and leaned it against the table in my area so that I could mop my area. I had wet
the floor and before I could go and get the mop that was resting against the table in
my area, Marisa came through and took the mop. When I shared with her that I was
about to mop my floor, she was ADAMENT about returning the mop advising me
that she was trying to hurry up and get her area cleaned up so that she could go and
wash blocks. I advised Marisa that was the same reason I was cleaning my area so
that I could also wash blocks as instructed by Jerry Hoestetler – i.e. I knew NOT to
trust her because her actions and character displayed DISTRUST.
At the end of the Wednesday Shift, my counter had shown
approximately, 149 POLY and 64 PLASTIC. IMPORTANT TO
NOTE: Poly is run for approximately 2.5 MINUTES and Plastic for
approximately 1.5 MINUTES. Therefore:
149 x 2.5 minutes = 3725 ÷ 60 minutes = 6.2 HOURS
64 x 1.5 mines = 96 ÷ 60 minutes = 1.6 HOUR(S)
Trays are being PROCESSED on two lines with my having to run/walk
back and forth BETWEEN both lines because Jerry Smith made it
CLEAR in a meeting that he did NOT want POLY run on the
PLASTIC side and vice versa. Should he hear that this is being
done AFTER being told not to COMBINE the lines, this WILL
result in DISCIPLINARY action.
When Brian came to check on how we were doing, I shared with Brian my
concerns regarding Tammy’s comments and what she had mentioned regarding Jerry
Hostetler’s comments about production. I showed Brian my count for the Shift and
my computation; therefore, it was not clear to me why I was attacked. I showed
Brian that ALL of the trays had been processed and he agreed with my computation
that time was NOT spent just being idle. He mentioned to me that he will talk to
Tammy as well as Jerry to find out what is going on.
9) On THURSDAY, February 7, 2013, PRIOR to starting, I was met by
Brian who had asked me if I could meet with them. Brian asked me to follow him so
I did. He took me to Jerry Hostetler office where Hostetler and Jerry Smith joined. I
was advised that there had been COMPLAINTS submitted regarding my work;
therefore, they were wanting my feedback and advising that there are “TWO
SIDES TO EVERY STORY” – so they wanted to hear mine regarding
the Complaints. In reiteration of the above information regarding my meetings with
Brian and encounters with Tammy, a SYNOPSIS of what I shared in this meeting is
as follows:
a) My FIRST coming to Brian on Friday (2/1/13) and
sharing my concerns/complaint with him regarding Tammy
and Marisa. Doing so in hopes of SQUASHING such
employment practices that I believed were not
CONDUCIVE to productive work environment. Wanting

9.
to address such issues at the early stages so that it would
SNOWBALL/NOT ESCALATE into anything further –
i.e. which clearly was the right action to take based on the
meeting called and the HIDDEN/ILL motives at play.
b) My carrying and conducting myself in a
PROFESSIONAL manner and NOT engaging in
OFFICE Politics/Gangs/Clicks which EXCLUDE
members of certain Groups – i.e. in this case I was the
ONLY African-American in the meeting and those who
LAUNCHED complaints (Tammy and Marisa) BOTH are
WHITE.
c) The ATTACK on my clothing and the fact that I do NOT
own a pair of blue jeans and that I wear clothes that I
believe are CASUAL and I can work in.
d) Tammy’s mentioning Jerry Hostetler concerns about the
fall in PRODUCTION – i.e. however, FAILING to
mention the HIGH TURN over in POLISHING. In fact,
that on Wednesday night (2/6/13), Marisa yelling to Caleb
to SLOW DOWN! Another observation that Daniel
and I noticed about Wednesday was THE DROP and
the number of trays Tammy had processed and
sent through.
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: From
my observation Marisa (White) was NOT able to
keep up with her WASHING duties of the lenses and
keep the trays moving through. Therefore, she yelled
at Caleb, telling him to SLOW DOWN. Not only
that Tammy was NOT blocking and sending the
number of trays through in efforts to COVER-UP
Marisa’s INCOMPETENCE and they were
TARGETING the POLISHING area and may have
been DELIBERATELY finding FAULT with their
work and working to get them TERMINATED
and/or MOVED to HIDE/SHIELD Marisa’s
INCOMPETENCE.
While Caleb SLOWED DOWN, I continued to process
my work and passed them on to Polishing/Caleb for
handling and he just allowed them to STACK UP and
processed, it appears, when given the okay by Tammy and
Marisa to begin sending them through!
IMPORTANT TO NOTE:
Tammy and Marisa were successful in getting
Antonio and Jacob out of POLISHING. To me it
appears it’s only a matter of time for Caleb if the
issue is NOT addressed. Caleb will be the next
VICTIM. Interestingly enough is the fact that the
AFRICAN-American (Antonio) is NO longer at
CZV. He was replaced by Jacob (White) – who
spent time TEXTING as well as going on 15
minute breaks while on the line (i.e. PRIOR to the
scheduled breaks). However, Jacob was NOT let
go but from my understanding MOVED to
ANOTHER department at CZV – i.e. the African-
American let go and provisions made for the White
person in another department. During one of the
Group Meetings it was made known that Gerald
(Manager) knows Jacob’s FATHER. Believed
Jacob’s father and Gerald worked together.
NOW they are TARGETING Daniel
and I in and appears are trying to
DEPRIVE us of EMPLOYMENT
opportunities while they make
SPECIAL provisions for WHITE
employees as Marisa and Jacob.

10.
Shared from my observation that Antonio and Jacob were
getting the job done and it reminded me of this movie (Ice
Castles) that I had seen where the problem were NOT with
the male skating partners but the “go-to-girl!”
Furthermore, how Jacob had ADMITTED to SWAPPING
lenses around – i.e. a question I had because it was NOT
clear to me how this could happened if he took them out
and replaced them in the same order prior to removal.
Furthermore, they may be marked with L=Left and
R=Right.
e) Shared that the reason that I took my concerns/complaint
to Brian and NOT Jerry Smith was because of my
concerns that Jerry Smith could NOT be impartial in that
his Buddy/Drinking Buddy (Tammy) was involved and
his inability to remain FAIR and IMPARTIAL in the
handling matters.
f) Shared that when I do NOT understand something, that I
have NO problems in asking for clarification and
proceeding to do my job as instructed by MANAGERS.
For instance, when Jerry Smith advised NOT to run POLY
on the Plastic side and NOT to run PLASTIC on the Poly
side because it would lead to DISCIPLINARY action, that
on the PRIOR day (2/6/13), Noel had tried to get me to go
AGAINST the instructions that Jerry Smith had given and
I REJECTED, advising that I did NOT hear this from
Smith, therefore, I will continue to run both sides as
instructed.
g) Shared concerns that I saw the 2 nd Shift more so as the
Police Academy 2 Group and because of his behavior
and/or conduct, that Jerry Smith had given me the
nd
impression that he wanted the 2 Shift to FAIL!
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: That it was
brought to my attention (i.e. Tammy sharing this
information) that the 1st Shift was upset with the
bringing on of the 2nd Shift because it cut in on the 1st
Shift employees’ overtime and/or eliminated
overtime for the 1st Shift employees all together.
When we began working at CZV, there seemed to be
NO problem with OVERTIME. However, I
NOTICED the CHANGE and the CANCELLING of
the ability to work OVERTIME when President
Barack Obama and his Legal Counsel Baker
Donelson TRACKED/STALKED me down to this
employer.
h) Jerry Smith mentioned in the meeting that he can come
over as being a little rough/hard (i.e. which to me was an
UNDERSTATEMENT) and was an area in which could
improve.
i) Shared my concerns on the attacks that have been leveled
against me and how I have taken the necessary steps (i.e.
separating myself during breaks) to NOT engage in
ALTERCATIONS with Tammy and Marisa and NOT
come DOWN on their mental level in that I could discern
their spirits and motives were not right.
j) Shared that my experience led me to observe and that my
conclusions had NOT been wrong and the meeting with
them supported it. That while my background is in
corporate, I strive to do a good job no matter what and take
pride in my work.

11.
k) Regarding the alleged DROP in production, I advised I saw
that coming and, therefore, have begun to keep a COUNT
of the number of trays processed.
l) During the meeting all THREE (Jerry Hostetler, Jerry
Smith and Brian) advised me that I am doing an
EXCELLENT job and to keep doing so. Thanking me for
my time.
m) Jerry Smith came to me AFTER the meeting and thanked
me for my feedback and advised that he had learned things
about me from the meeting that he had not known and
appreciated it. Moreover, shared that our work ethics may
be similar in wanting to get the best results. Advised to
keep working and NOT to give in to the young people’s
work practices.
At the end of the Thursday (2/7/13) Shift, my counter had shown
approximately, 111 POLY and 166 PLASTIC with NO trays left over.
10) On FRIDAY, February 8, 2013, PRIOR to starting work, I noticed that the
NUMBER counter that had been there since about the time I started
working at CZV (i.e. approximately ONE month) has
COINCIDENTALLY disappeared. That at the beginning of the Shift
there were approximately 44 POLY and 16 PLASTIC left over from the 1 st Shift.
Virginia had mentioned to me that at the LAST minute, Betty was
PULLED from Fining to go and work with BOB and Alba (?sp) and they
SLAMMED her with Trays; however, she could only do what she could. However, I
KNEW from this information what was probably going on. My conclusion was
RETALIATION. Why? Because the Number Counter that had
been there since my starting work with CZV had
DISAPPEARED and this was the very NEXT day AFTER the
Thursday (2/7/13) meeting. Nevertheless, this did NOT stop me from
counting the Trays BEFORE I started and to get an idea where the NEXT
attack would be coming from. Jerry Smith saw me counting the
Trays and making a note as to what I was starting with. My conclusion
was that they knew I was onto their NEXT attack and the REMOVAL of
the Number Counter SOLIDIFIED that. It appears that the ONLY reason
why the Number Counter from the Plastic side was NOT taken, was because it is
screwed/bolted down onto the machine.
Not changing anything the way I worked, I began my work moving from
side-to-side as usual and keeping count. I had found ANOTHER Number Counter
that I would walk over to (i.e. AWAY from Poly) that I used to track the work done
by ME on that side.
From my observation, Jerry Smith realized that I was onto them, therefore,
requested that Tammy assist in processing the Trays on the Poly side since they were
STACKING up and, like Virginia, I continued to do my work as normal with
KNOWLEDGE that the LAST–MINUTE piling of Trays may have been
RETALIATORY and further attempts to get me to QUIT and/or find FAULT in
the EXCELLENT work that I was doing! Tammy asked me to help her
with processing the Poly trays because she felt it was TOO
much for her to do by herself. Making up some lie that those
trays the Poly trays needed to be processed for alloy purposes –
i.e. I had seen them staked up before on the 1 st Shift as well as
2nd Shift. While the 1st Shift is allowed to run Poly on the
Plastic side and vice versa, the 2nd Shift was PROHIBITED
from doing so! However, I advised her that I am NOT to run Poly on the
Plastic side per Jerry Smith and REMINDED the Managers of these
INSTRUCTIONS in the meeting held on Thursday. That unless, authorization
comes from management which would allow me to do that, I could not assist her –
i.e. in other words was not going to allow her to SET ME UP. I advised Tammy
unless a Manager advises me otherwise; I would NOT be defying Jerry Smith’s

12.
instructions. Tammy, therefore, went and talked with Brain who came to me and
asked me to assist Tammy with processing the Poly on the Plastic side – i.e.
information that was also shared in the Thursday meeting (that I would await
instructions from management as to protect myself and to assure that information is
received correctly). Remember, Tammy is the White employee that had
submitted the complaints against me. I shared with Tammy that it was not
my wanting to help her but due to her complaints why it was important that I had
MANAGEMENT Approval. Furthermore, why it was important to me to address
concerns such concerns on FRIDAY (2/1/13) due to the PATTERN that it
appeared was developing. I advised Tammy that I had notified ADECCO of my
concerns/complaints on WEDNESDAY (2/6/13) in that ADECCO employees were
involved BEFORE their Thursday attack. Advising Tammy that experience and
observation of her and Marisa had proven to be correct. Tammy shared that she has
approximately 10 years of experience. I advised Tammy I have OVER 20 years
and a COLLEGE degree. That my CORPORATE background prepared me with
meetings as that with the Managers on Thursday (2/7/13) and I found to be very
informative. Moreover, that their time would be better spent in doing their jobs
correctly rather than attacking me. I shared with her that as in the meeting that I
would NOT be coming down to her and Marisa’s level NOR entertaining their
spirits. Tammy after receiving this information appeared to be ANXIOUS to move on
– i.e. LEAVING trays behind for me to process.
PRIOR to the final BREAK, Loretta (i.e. THIRD person in the chain-of-
command that Jerry Smith advised me of AFTER the Thursday Meeting) came to me
and advised that I am to shut down the machines at 11:30 – i.e. NOT to
run anymore trays. My work process was to STOP at 11:45 and BEGIN
cleaning because at the time it does NOT take me a WHOLE hour to clean my work
area. My concerns that such a request was done to CUT into my PRODUCTION
numbers; therefore, I began running and pulling the trays when the machine stopped
and stacked them and at 11:30, stopped running the machine as requested.
Nevertheless, I finished processing the trays that had already been processed.
At the end of the Friday Shift, my counter had shown approximately, 130
POLY and 154 PLASTIC – i.e. which included some of the Poly that
was processed in assisting Tammy. Therefore, the TOTAL count for the 2nd
Shift did NOT include the number of trays Tammy processed.
In conclusion, should ADECCO want to know how: HOW IS BAKER DONELSON
BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ LINKED TO VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME?
Its attorneys appeared as opposing counsel in PROTECTED Activities involving Newsome!
Matters in which they took a SHELLACKING and apparently has led to their
ENGAGEMENT of other CRMINAL Activities – i.e. planning and carrying out of the
September 11, 2001 World Trade Center Attacks and other TERRORIST Acts. Clearly these are
the results when such CRIMINALS are not stopped. They go on to commit further CRIMES!
Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act.
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which constitutes the essence of
a conspiracy, is a distinct evil that may exist and be punished whether or not the
substantive crime ensues. Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over and above
the threat of the commission of the relevant substantive crime, both because the
combination in crime makes more likely the commission
of other crimes and because it decreases the probability that
the individuals involved will depart from their path of
criminality. - - The Supreme Court of the United States finding in U.S. v.
Jimenez Recio, 123 S.Ct. 819 (2003)
Furthermore, are using their CONNECTIONS/RELATIONSHIPS to CLIENTS to STALK
Newsome from Job-To-Job/Employer-To-Employer and State-To-State in the carrying out of
their CRIMINAL/CIVIL violations AGAINST her on behalf of THEMSELVES and their
CLIENTS!
It is IMPORTANT TO NOTE that Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and
its Attorneys/Lawyers are a WALKING LIABILITY! Hopefully, ADECCO is
NOT using Baker Donelson and or its AFFILIATE firms as Legal Counsel. Furthermore, from
research I have found a case for instance in Utah involving Title VII/Civil Rights violations by
Adecco against another employee for participation in PROTECTED ACTIVITY:

13.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Adecco USA (United States
District Court – Utah - 1:06-cv-00124-BSJ)
http://www1.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/7-13-10.cfm
http://www.staffingindustry.com/Research-Publications/Daily-News/EEOC-
Adecco-settles-suit-for-62-500
By copy of this email, I am providing Congressional members with a copy of same in that it
appears that such issues are a matter of PUBLIC/GLOBAL/INTERNATIONAL interests.
Reiterating:
Unless a man is honest we have no right to keep
him in public life, it matters not how brilliant his
capacity, it hardly matters how great his power of
doing good service on certain lines may be... No
man who is corrupt, no man who condones
corruption in others, can possibly do his duty by
the community” - - Teddy Roosevelt.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
With Warmest Regards,
Vogel Denise Newsome