O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×

IDSP19C#F - B - Mingjun Lan - Updated - What ideologies and realities can be identified from the Information & Communications Technology (ICT) Masterplan for education in Singapore?

Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 17 Anúncio

IDSP19C#F - B - Mingjun Lan - Updated - What ideologies and realities can be identified from the Information & Communications Technology (ICT) Masterplan for education in Singapore?

Baixar para ler offline

The use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Singapore public schools is guided by the Ministry of Education (MOE), whose ICT Masterplan (MP) outlines the vision and goals for ICT-in-education. The latest initiative, ICT MP4, has been uploaded onto the internet for public consumption. Through an examination of MP4, I am interested to know how MOE uses language to communicate policy initiatives, and how the usage reflects the ideologies and world-views pertaining to Singapore’s education landscape and society. Hence, my research question:
“What ideologies and realities can be identified through a discourse analysis of the education ministry’s masterplan for ICT in Singapore?”
Using discourse analysis, I examined the linguistic and functional aspects of MP4 at the micro level to uncover strategies used by the authors to persuade readers of their policy. These helped to anchor my macro-analysis of discourse as a social practice, involving the identification of problematisation, power relations, recontextualisation and unquestionable truths. While the MP4 was crafted in a concise and straightforward manner through the use of simple sentence structures and infographics, it seemed to portray a neo-liberal view of the world as a market with unlimited opportunities. It also seemed to promote the ideology that to benefit from the ICT-driven world, the public should continue to support MOE’s initiative and students should equip themselves with the prescribed ICT knowledge and skills which suggested an essentialist philosophy of education. Furthermore, it seemed that the different discourses of policymaking, education, technology and future economy were mixed together to apparently construct a certain identity of MOE with particular values and authority – it was visionary and capable of delivering what it promised, it was the authority in ICT-in-education and it always had the best interests of students at heart.

The use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Singapore public schools is guided by the Ministry of Education (MOE), whose ICT Masterplan (MP) outlines the vision and goals for ICT-in-education. The latest initiative, ICT MP4, has been uploaded onto the internet for public consumption. Through an examination of MP4, I am interested to know how MOE uses language to communicate policy initiatives, and how the usage reflects the ideologies and world-views pertaining to Singapore’s education landscape and society. Hence, my research question:
“What ideologies and realities can be identified through a discourse analysis of the education ministry’s masterplan for ICT in Singapore?”
Using discourse analysis, I examined the linguistic and functional aspects of MP4 at the micro level to uncover strategies used by the authors to persuade readers of their policy. These helped to anchor my macro-analysis of discourse as a social practice, involving the identification of problematisation, power relations, recontextualisation and unquestionable truths. While the MP4 was crafted in a concise and straightforward manner through the use of simple sentence structures and infographics, it seemed to portray a neo-liberal view of the world as a market with unlimited opportunities. It also seemed to promote the ideology that to benefit from the ICT-driven world, the public should continue to support MOE’s initiative and students should equip themselves with the prescribed ICT knowledge and skills which suggested an essentialist philosophy of education. Furthermore, it seemed that the different discourses of policymaking, education, technology and future economy were mixed together to apparently construct a certain identity of MOE with particular values and authority – it was visionary and capable of delivering what it promised, it was the authority in ICT-in-education and it always had the best interests of students at heart.

Anúncio
Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Semelhante a IDSP19C#F - B - Mingjun Lan - Updated - What ideologies and realities can be identified from the Information & Communications Technology (ICT) Masterplan for education in Singapore? (20)

Mais de IDSP - IE Dissertation Support Project (13)

Anúncio

Mais recentes (20)

IDSP19C#F - B - Mingjun Lan - Updated - What ideologies and realities can be identified from the Information & Communications Technology (ICT) Masterplan for education in Singapore?

  1. 1. What ideologies and realities can be identified from the Information & Communications Technology (ICT) Masterplan for education in Singapore? IDSP FACULTY COMPETITION 2019 LONDON, 3 JULY 2019 Mingjun Lan Supervisor: Dr Susan Askew UCL IOE
  2. 2. (Recap) Aim and research question  Interest in ICT-in-education; interest in policy discourses  Explore how language may be used in social context  What else is the document trying to say?  What are the assumptions? What are purported as truths?  How does it reflect reality and construct reality? What ideologies and realities can be identified through a discourse analysis of the ICT Masterplan for education in Singapore?
  3. 3. (Recap) Methodology and method Social practice Functional Linguistic MICRO-ANALYSIS Looking for linguistic devices and examining the intent: What cohesive, coherence devices are used? Why is the discourse presented in this way? How is language used for strategic communication? MACRO-ANALYSIS Looking for constructed social identities, power relations, ideologies and realities: Are there statements presented as unquestionable truths? Are there any discourses from other fields recontextualised as education discourse? The way people use language to do things reflect the ideologies and realities they are trying to promote and portray [Fairclough’s 3D Framework of DA]
  4. 4. Finding The discourse in the ICT Masterplan seems to portray a future that is fast-paced and uncertain. Yet, the use of ICT as guided by the authority will make students “future-ready”: It seems to promote the ideology that ICT will improve teaching and learning and that ICT-in-education will develop students well for the future
  5. 5. Emerging theme: The world may be complex, but you will be safe under the ministry
  6. 6. Future is fast-changing, but we can be “future-ready” Recontextualisation of 21CC discourse. Appropriation of language [ICT MP discourse] [21CC discourse]
  7. 7. MOE’s ICT policy has been successful so far… [First lap…]
  8. 8. MOE’s ICT policy has been successful so far…
  9. 9. MOE’s ICT policy has been successful so far…
  10. 10. “The fourth Masterplan for ICT in Education (mp4) continues to build on the achievements of the first three Masterplans, and broadens the focus beyond Self-Directed Learning and Collaborative Learning to the Total Curriculum.” … and it will get even better!
  11. 11. MOE knows what is best for teachers and students
  12. 12. Next steps The future belongs to the digital-savvy The world may be complex, but you will be safe under the ministry ICT will improve T&L
  13. 13. Recommendation for Policy or Practice  NOT a criticism of the policy. NOT a criticism of the document or author  Expected to contribute to the small but growing literature on DA of policy documents  Help non-policymaking stakeholders make better sense of public policies  Look at what else the policy discourses may promote and portray besides the surface- level information in the policy document.
  14. 14. Reflexivity  To apply what had been taught at IOE; to challenge myself  To see if the adoption of a specific analytic lens might help generate interesting themes beyond the actual content found in the policy document  Through the experience, learnt more about my own preconceived notions and knowledge and even challenged my own beliefs and assumptions about social issues  This research journey has helped me to further develop my independent critical thinking
  15. 15. Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (1943) The Little Prince Thank you for your kind attention!
  16. 16. References 1. Brown, T. (2005). Beyond constructivism: exploring future learning paradigms. Education Today. Issue 2. Aries Publishing Company, Thames, New Zealand. 2. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity. 3. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge. 4. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books. 5. Gee, J. (2010). Introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. London: Routledge. 6. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
  17. 17. References (cont’d) 7. Jones, R.H. (2012). Discourse analysis: a resource book for students. London: Routledge. 8. Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2015). ICT Connection: Masterplan 4. Retrieved from https://ictconnection.moe.edu.sg/masterplan-4. (last accessed 29 June 2019). 9. Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2018). 21st Century Competencies. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/education-system/21st-century-competencies. (last accessed 29 June 2019). 10. Moore, A. (2015). Learning in and out of the classroom. Understanding the school curriculum: theory, politics and principles. London: Routledge. 11. Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse analysis. London: Bloomsbury. 12. Rogers, R. (2011). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. New York: Routledge.

Notas do Editor

  • So the ICT MP is a policy on education.

    Educator’s experience (ICT in T&L). CPA study (issues of centralised regulation, power, knowledge). School leader’s experience (making sense of policy docs).
  • Assimilating both concepts of DA, I drew up a method to analyse the ICT MP4: micro and macro. Fairclough for framework, Foucault on (re)producing power/knowledge (social practice level).

    Cohesion (within text): e.g., use of repetition/synonyms (“achievements”) – not just to avoid ambiguity but also reinforce a certain message/image; nudge and persuade reader.
    Coherence (between text and reader’s ‘framework’/K of social conventions/expectations): e.g., format of discourse (online, IT-enabled, infographics – who is the ‘intended’ audience?)
  • The first theme portrayed a broad “reality” of the future (and also the current situation of what must be done to secure that future). I had also mentioned about the more interesting emerging ideology of comfort and security about the future, which I will discuss more about under the next theme.
  • What is future-ready? What does it connote/promote/portray?
    suggests we can know what the future holds and be ready for it.
    ‘future ready schools’ for ‘personalised digitised learning’ https://futureready.org/
    policy brings in wider discourses about the role of ICT in predicting what the future will bring.
    provides comfort in the frightening chaos of an unpredictable future.
    An emerging interesting discourse seems to be one of providing comfort and safety against unpredictability and loss of control?
  • Note the uplifting diagrams and rising arrow!
  • Arrow has gone up exponentially!
  • Policy cohesion: Pre-empt questioning by positioning it as part of a continuous journey. Consistent strategy of using ICT to improve T&L. On the right track.
  • The tone of the statements is authoritative. To tell someone what they will have after following a specific plan is optimistic if not prescient. It is comforting to know what one will have. It removes unpredictability which is often frightening, and is calmly reassuring. The reader of this document will likely feel comfortable and soothed, possibly uplifted.
    They are true for this policy document but they are probably true for every single policy document produced by all governments (to return to in the discussion).

×