Marketing Coordinator at Gudia (Pvt) Ltd. em Gudia (Pvt) Ltd.
Denunciar
Educação
Its an assembled file of five different topics on Suicide in Pakistan, Corporate social responsibility, Crime & deviance, Social Class & Elton Mayo's Theory
3. Suicide Suicide is a multi-dimensional disorder, which results from a complex interaction of biological, genetic, psychological and environmental factors. Suicide in Pakistan In a country like Pakistan where growing economic instability, especially poverty, has forced people to sell their children and body organs, the reasons behind increasing rate of suicides could be understandable. Pakistan is also a Muslim country and according to Islam suicide is forbidden. Islam is the only religion that has a clear scriptural ban on suicide, so, it has an independent effect on lowering suicide rates but still many people commit the act everyday in Pakistan. Some psychology experts also agreed with the fact that majority of suicides are usually linked to economic difficulties but there are other reasons behind committing suicides and these can force a person to end his or her life or release them from the pain they are suffering from. Reasons behind committing suicides depressive disorders unemployment domestic violence parental separation growing economic instability child abuse bullying rising inflation loss of social cohesion Remedies of suicide Ideally mental health and suicide prevention programmers should be integrated within the primary health care (PHC) system. Crisis intervention centers and suicide prevention telephone hotlines play an important role in helping suicidal people Restricting availability of latter two can potentially prevent 50% of suicides. Public education campaigns to promote safe storage of insecticides are needed.
4. Summary The traditional low rates of suicide and the protective influence of Islam appears to have undergone a radical change in Pakistan and suicide has become a major public health problem. There is need for collaboration between government, non- governmental organizations and public and mental health professionals to take up this challenge.
6. Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Social Responsibility is the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large. Or, A concept whereby companies decide voluntarily to contribute to a better society and a cleaner environment. A concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis CSR Implementation As all businesses know, living up to promises is essential to success. Failing to meet CSR commitments, in the absence of satisfactory explanations, can lead to problems for a firm, including disgruntled employees, shareholders, business partners, customers, communities and others. A firm that effectively implements its commitments is not only less likely to run into problems, but may be more favorably looked upon when problems do arise than a firm that continually fails to meet its obligations Measurable Targets and Identify Performance Measures A firm needs to set measurable targets for the commitments. In this regard, firms behave not differently from individuals. Athletes may set personal goals, such as “win an Olympic medal,” but they frequently set more achievable, intermediate targets. In essence, these intermediate targets are guideposts along the way to the ultimate goal, providing a gauge of progress and an opportunity for re-evaluation should adjustment in approach, training or resources be necessary. A firm's approach to setting measurable environmental, economic and social targets and tracking success in meeting them is fundamentally not different from the athlete's approach to winning an Olympic medal. A widely used approach to measuring success is to identify the objectives underlying a CSR commitment, develop key performance indicators, work out the measurement method and then measure the results. Regardless of the exact approach taken, it should follow the SMART guidelines: Simple Measurable Achievable Reliable Time-bound
7. The scale and nature of the benefits of CSR for an organization can vary depending on the nature of the enterprise, and are difficult to quantify, though there is a large body of literature exhorting business to adopt measures beyond financial ones. However, businesses may not be looking at short-run financial returns when developing their CSR strategy. CSR may be based within the human resources, business development or public relations departments of an organization, or may be given a separate unit reporting to the CEO or in some cases directly to the board. Some companies may implement CSR-type values without a clearly defined team or program. Through globalization they have encountered new challenges that impose limits to their growth and potential profits. Government regulations, tariffs, environmental restrictions and varying standards of what constitutes "labor exploitation" are problems that can cost organizations millions of dollars. Some view ethical issues as simply a costly hindrance, while some companies use CSR methodologies as a strategic tactic to gain public support for their presence in global markets, helping them sustain a competitive advantage by using their social contributions to provide a subconscious level of advertising. To retain a focus on outcomes, companies must set targets, measure progress against them, and link incentives to their achievement. The saying “what gets measured gets treasured” is as true for external engagement as for any other area of business. Ideally, companies should measure outcomes in terms of value added to the business, a challenging standard Via CSR the firms can achieve the targets of high profits, better customer and human relationships externally as well as internally (resulted in staff welfare). When the relations got better than the firm can prosper with exceptional performances and goal achievements.
9. Crime and Deviance
Crime: An illegal act for which someone can be punished by the government. The punishment of crime will be more severe than the punishment of deviance.
Deviance: behaviour that deviates or moves or away from norms of society. It is considered abnormal. Deviant behaviour is considered unacceptable but depending on the context it may be viewed differently by some.
Social control: ensures people conform to social rules and societies accepted norms and values. Done through formal and informal agencies of social control.
Social order: refers to the patterns and regularities in life.
Types of crime:
• White collar crime: middle class crime that is mainly invisible which means many are not caught. An example would be fraud
.• Corporate crime: large scale crimes based on companies i.e. Bhopal disaster. May be committed against employees, consumers, the general public or the environment.
For sociologists, the term deviance does not mean perversion or depravity. Deviance is behaviour that violates the standards of conduct or expectations of a group or society. In Pakistan, alcoholics, gamblers, rapists, and atheists would all be regarded as deviants. Being late for class is categorized as a deviant act; the same is true of dressing too casually for a formal wedding. On the basis of the sociological definition, we are all deviants from time to time. Each of us violates common social norms in certain situations. Deviance involves the violation of group norms that may or may not be formalized into law. It is comprehensive concept that includes not only criminal behaviour but also many actions not subject to persecution. The public official who takes a bribe has defied social norms, but so has the college student who refuses to sit in an assigned seat or cuts class. Of course, deviation from norms is not always negative, let alone criminal. A member of the police force who exposes corruption and brutality present within the force is deviating forms the norms of the force. As we noted earlier, deviance can be understood only within its social context. A
10. nude photograph of a man or woman may be perfectly appropriate in a medical college but would be regarded as completely out of place in an elementary school classroom.
12. Class
Class is a relative social rank in terms of income, wealth, education, status/position, and/or power. A class consists of a large group of people who share a similar economic and/or social position in society based on their income, wealth, property ownership, job status, education, skills, or power in the economic and political sphere. Class is determined not just by “economic capital” (what you earn or own) but also by “social capital” (who you know) and “cultural capital” (what you know). Our class identity affects us on the personal and emotional level, not just in economic terms, since it influences how we feel about ourselves and others.
The Class Structure of Pakistan
The class structure of Pakistan is characterized by Asiatic capitalism, with the non- agricultural sector of the economy dominated by petty commodity production and small-scale capitalism. This has implications for the country’s politics, society, and culture.
This work on the class structure of Pakistan is based on the framework of historical materialism. It is an important work, since in recent times class analyses have been largely neglected in works on South Asia, particularly on Pakistan. This study therefore fills a gap in our knowledge. Sketching the history of the region that is now Pakistan, it analyzes the class structure from the time of the Mughal Empire, through the distortions of the colonial era and the transition to capitalism, to the class structure of contemporary Pakistan. It avoids over-schematic arguments, attempting to proceed from facts rather than from any ideal forms. The study develops three propositions.
First, the author establishes that the mode of production of pre-colonial South Asia was qualitatively distinct from European feudalism. Marx’s notion of the Asiatic mode of production is more consistent with the pre-colonial historical evidence.
Second, the colonial path of capitalist development of South Asia resulted in a socio-economic formation that combined features of the Asiatic and capitalist modes of production, which this study terms Asiatic capitalism. Empirical analysis of agrarian relations in Pakistan reveals the relative absence of wage labour and the continuing existence of various forms of pre-capitalist economic relations within the overall framework of a capitalist economy.
Third, the vast majority of the non-agricultural working population of Pakistan today is engaged in handicraft and manufacture. However, manufacturing and services are dominated by petty commodity production and small-scale capitalism.
13. Hence, while being significant in terms of output, the formal large-scale industrial sector, which was developed along the model of state-corporate capitalism, remains relatively small in terms of provision of employment.
Social Classes in Pakistan
A social class is a homogeneous group of people in a society formed on the combined basis of 1. Education 2. Occupation 3. Income 4. Place of residence And have who have similar social values similar interest in lifeand they behave a like have approximately equal position of respect or status in a society. The social classes of Pakistan. 1. Upper social class 2. Middle social class 3. Working social class.
1. Upper social class. The upper social class which generally have high level of income and belong to be most high paying profession and they live in most cleanest place of the country and money will be no problem for them and their size is 2% of the total society and approximately 3.7 million they have 60% to 65% of money of the country. They are actually 1. High status leadership 2. Big business man 3. Top management of the company
2. Middle Social Class. The USC and MSC education are met different like USC study in foreign country like oxford university and MSC are study in local university of their country but income size will found more different their houses are different their house are not huge and not think for a huge house of defense and think a house of Gulshan-e-iqbal their population is 28% out of the total population their population is 53 to 54 million of the total population They are actually 1.They are small to medium size business man. 2. Middle management 3. Low ranking govt officer And the big difference in USC and MSC is house concentration they focus more to their house but USC not so much home focus they are less and MSC lot home focus.
3. Working Social Class. The WSC are not much more educated they are not in very accurative profession their income is low and they build one two room poorly houses, electricity not available water etc. Their size is 70% out total population of Pakistan. They areactually 1. They are very small size shop owner. Skill, semi skill & unskilled 2. Low grade govt staff ( peons, driver) 3. Poor former 4. Political worker
14. What are some advantages and disadvantages of a class system in society?
I have to say that there are a good few advantages and disadvantages to a class system. Firstly the advantages, it gives stability to society, if all where equal, then in theory everyone would not have a right to control the other, and therefore society collapses. Second, there is social mobility. Those who do work hard can move up the ladder, thus giving an incentive to archive higher and therefore making society progress. With no class these incentives would not exist. However, Social mobility is limited in most societies, for example within the United States and the United Kingdom, money talks. Statistics show that those born in class 1 groups (Professional business e.g.) are more likely to stay in that group. This is the same for groups of a lower nature like the underclass as you stated. If you are born in the underclass, you are more likely to die in the underclass then join rank 1. This can be supported in statistics of working class students going to University, what is averaging about 35%, but of those students most go to "lower ranking" Universities. Looking into Bourdieu’s theory of Habitus (Overall orientation to or way of being in the world’ (Sweetman). Habitus is earned from socialisation into society, what comes primarily from their family which in turn is affected by class. So this child is socialised into his/her class beliefs, giving a theory into why working class boys shun education and so miss out on that opportunity. This all effects a person's lifestyle and there positioning into social stratification. Because of this it reinforces class and so class becomes partly self policed. Moreover class is reproduced, it is not random that someone meets another person at a polo game and happens to be of the same class when they marry and have kids, as two people meeting at a club. Class has brought them together and so is reborn with that family. Thus showing that class is embedded and somewhat closed.
15. Karl Marx Theory of Social Class Karl Marx was a German economist whose ideas and works generated much controversy. He is known to have inspired revolutionists and has been considered a threat to national governments. Marx was one of the few social scientists whose main focus of his work was on social class. He believed that one's social class determined one's social lifestyle. During his time, Marx became increasingly involved in the plight of the working poor. He felt that the wealthy (the bourgeoisie) held the control of resources and continued to accumulate wealth off of the labors of the poor working class (the proletariat). Marx believed that the proletarians would evidently feel alienated from their work (from not being allowed control of their work) and would eventually revolt against the wealthy to demand a more equal and just society. Marx felt that the cause of such inequality in wealth and lifestyle was the result of capitalism and that to reach a more equal society, capitalism should be replaced with socialism.
17. Elton Mayo's Theory of Motivations & Contributions to Management Theory
Who Was Elton Mayo?
Elton Mayo was born in Australia in 1880. He became a lecturer at the University of Queensland (1911 - 1923) and the University of Pennsylvania, and then became a professor of Industrial Research at Harvard University from 1926 - 1949. He is best known for his work on the Hawthorne Studies, and is considered one of the fathers of the Human Relations Movement.
What Was The Prevailing Theory Of Management Prior To Mayo's Work?
Elton Mayo started his work at Hawthorne in 1924. The prevailing management theory at that time was scientific management, as defined by Frederick Winslow Taylor, an industrial engineer who felt that standardization and enforced cooperation was the way to guarantee the highest work output from a team, after conducting numerous time and motion studies to determine the best way to do specific jobs.
What Were The Hawthorne Studies?
Hawthorne refers to a Chicago-based Western Electric plant. It had agreed to a study by the National Research Council at its plant to determine the impact on productivity of lighting changes on its 29,000 employees.
Initially, two groups were selected and the impact of lighting changes on their productivity was measured. It was found that any change in lighting - even making it worse - improved productivity, so the initial conclusion was that change in working conditions led to the improvements.
Additional changes were then made to working conditions, to see what other types of modifications could improve output. In all cases productivity went up.
Mayo was invited to participate in this study, and visited the project in 1929 and 1930 to conduct interviews with workers.
18. A third stage in the research project involved a group that did not have productivity increases. Interviews showed that the group had a standard for output which they all worked toward, and that they had higher regard for the standards set by their group than those of company management.
What Was The Outcome Of This Work?
Mayo concluded that these experiments showed that workers who have the ability to impact their working conditions and output requirements are more satisfied with their positions, and that cooperation and a feeling of being part of a cohesive group were more important to productivity than financial incentives or physical working conditions.
This work also led to the conclusion that managers need good interpersonal and leadership skills, not just technical ability, to effectively lead a team.
What Is The Human Relations Movement?
The Human Relations Movement is the name today for the concept that social aspects - such as job satisfaction, group norms, and quality of leadership - have a greater impact on productivity than non-social aspects, such as compensation. This concept has resulted in much greater attention paid to these social aspects of work by today's employers vs. those in the early 1900's.
19. Summary of Mayo's Beliefs:
Individual workers cannot be treated in isolation, but must be seen as members of a group.
Monetary incentives and good working conditions are less important to the individual than the need to belong to a group.
Informal or unofficial groups formed at work have a strong influence on the behavior of those workers in a group.
Managers must be aware of these 'social needs' and cater for them to ensure that employees collaborate with the official organization rather than work against it.
Mayo's simple instructions to industrial interviewers set a template and remain influential to this day:
A. The simple rules of interviewing (from The Psychology of Pierre Janet published posthumously): 1. Give your full attention to the person interviewed, and make it evident that you are doing so.
2. Listen - don't talk. 3. Never argue; never give advice. 4. Listen to: what he wants to say; what he does not want to say; what he can not say without help.
5. As you listen, plot out tentatively and for subsequent correction the pattern that is being set before you. To test, summarize what has been said and present for comment. Always do this with caution - that is, clarify but don't add or twist.
Criticism on Mayo’s Theory:
Mayo's contributions to management theory were criticized by intellectual Daniel Bell. Writing in 1947, Bell criticized Mayo and other social scientists for "adjusting men to machines," rather than enlarging human capacity or human freedom. More recently, in 2003, James Hoopes criticized Mayo for "substituting therapy for democracy."