How to secure microservices running in containers? Strategies for Docker, Kubernetes, Openshift, RancherOS, DC/OS Mesos.
Privileges, resources and visibility constrains with capabilities, cgroups and namespaces. Image vulnerability scanning and behaviour security monitoring with Sysdig Falco.
Lions, Tigers and Deers: What building zoos can teach us about securing microservices?
1. Jorge Salamero Sanz
Lions, Tigers and Deers:
What building zoos
can teach us about
securing microservices?
2. % whoami
Jorge Salamero Sanz
<jorge.salamero@sysdig.com> @bencerillo
@sysdig
• Working on OSS last 12 years
• Working on OSS+Cloud last 5 years
• Working on monitoring last 3 years
• Technical Marketing geek @sysdig
3. Sysdig
Open Source system troubleshooting
with native container support
(htop, vmstat, netstat, lsof, tcpdump…)
Monitoring, alerting,
troubleshooting tool for
Docker, Kubernetes, Mesos,
RancherOS, GCE, ECS
6. How to secure this?
Containerization is not something new to us...
• Establish trust boundaries
• Identify, minimise, and harden attack surfaces
• Reduce scope and access
• Layer protections and defenses
From Aaron Grattafiori presented “The Golden Ticket: Docker and High Security Microservices
7. Securing Microservices
Defense in depth Microservices
Single responsibility principle:
• Principle of least privileges
• Principle of least surprise
• Principle of least access
9. Docker Security Techniques
• Drop privileges
• Limit capabilities
• Do not run as root! containers are not VMs!
• cgroups
• Limit resources share, not access restriction
• namespaces
• Useful for not complete security model
• User namespaces
• Kubernetes/Openshift security contexts
• Host security and access (Docker bench, RO access, etc)
11. Static Scanning
Yay, this was soo easy to deploy! I Docker Hub!
(your developers too, actually they were already using it :P)
uhm… wait, is someone maintaining this image?
RUN apt-get install -y wget build-essential python python-dev python-pip
python-virtualenv
RUN wget http://nodejs.org/dist/node-latest.tar.gz
RUN tar xvzf node-latest.tar.gz
RUN cd node-v* && ./configure && CXX="g++ -Wno-unused-local-typedefs" make && CXX="g++
-Wno-unused-local-typedefs" make install
• Static Scanning:
• CoreOS Clair, Docker Nautilus, Red Hat CloudForms,
etc
12. Image Vulnerability Scanning
• Scan contents of images looking for software versions with
known defects
• Container image layering can make this efficient (exploits
immutable nature of images)
Ubuntu: 14.04
Apache: 2.2
Wordpress: 4.6 PHP: 7.0
13. Image Vulnerability Scanning
• Scan contents of images looking for software versions with
known defects
• Container image layering can make this efficient (exploits
immutable nature of images)
•
Ubuntu: 14.04
Apache: 2.2
Wordpress: 4.6 PHP: 7.0
14. Image Vulnerability Scanning
• Scan contents of images looking for software versions with
known defects
• Container image layering can make this efficient (exploits
immutable nature of images)
•
Ubuntu: 14.04
Apache: 2.2
Wordpress: 4.6 PHP: 7.0
15. Image Vulnerability Scanning
• Scan contents of images looking for software versions with
known defects
• Container image layering can make this efficient (exploits
immutable nature of images)
•
Ubuntu: 14.04
Apache: 2.2
Wordpress: 4.6 PHP: 7.0
16. Container Security Techniques
OK, no known vulnerabilities, still secure?
Containers are black boxes exposing a behaviour, is
something misbehaving?
• Dynamic Scanning:
• Seccomp
• MAC (Mandatory Access Control)
• Behavioral Security Monitoring
17. Seccomp
• Seccomp: application system call “sandboxing”
• Create filter (BPF program ) with lists of allowed syscalls
• Each syscall matched against filter
• Failures-> log message, error return, and/or kill process
• Docker runs containerized process under a seccomp profile
• Notable disallowed syscalls:
• clone (creating new namespaces)
• reboot (reboot the host)
• setns (change namespaces)
18. Mandatory Access Control
• SELinux or AppArmor
• Same mechanisms: kernel-level interception/filtering
• features++ && complexity++
• Above syscalls:
• Actors (process)
• Actions (read/write on files/sockets)
• Targets (files, IPs, ports)
• But what if I only want to put some surveillance in?
19. Behavioral Security Monitoring
• Auditing vs enforcement
• detect intrusions instead of preventing intrusions
• Build rules that define suspicious/anomalous behavior
• Match rules against activity on a system
• Auditd (SELinux logger)
• Falco (with container capabilities)
22. What is Sysdig Falco?
• Detects suspicious activity defined by a set of easy
rules
• Uses sysdig’s flexible and powerful filtering expressions
(in userspace)
• Container support (Docker, Kubernetes, Mesos, etc)
• Flexible notification methods
• Open Source
23. Quick Examples
A shell is run in a container container.id != host and proc.name = bash
Overwrite system binaries
fd.directory in (/bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin) and write
Container namespace change
evt.type = setns and not proc.name in
(docker, sysdig)
Non-device files written in /dev
(evt.type = creat or evt.arg.flags contains
O_CREAT) and proc.name != blkid and
fd.directory = /dev and fd.name != /dev/null
Process tries to access camera
evt.type = open and fd.name = /dev/video0
and not proc.name in (skype, webex)
24. Falco Rules
• .yaml file containing Macros, Lists, and Rules
- macro: bin_dir
condition: fd.directory in (/bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin)
- list: package_mgmt_binaries
items: [dpkg, dpkg-preconfigu, rpm, rpmkey, yum, frontend]
- rule: write_binary_dir
desc: an attempt to write to any file below a set of binary directories
condition: bin_dir and evt.dir = < and open_write and not package_mgmt_procs
output: "File below a known binary directory opened for writing
(user=%user.name command=%proc.cmdline file=%fd.name)"
priority: WARNING
25. Alerts and Outputs
• Events that match filter expression (rule) result in alerts
• output field used to format event into alert message
• Sending to:
• syslog
• file
• stdout
• shell (e.g. mail -s "Falco Notification" alerts@example.com)
• Sysdig Cloud