1. First principles calculations of
electron mobility in
nanocrystalline TiO2
Suzanne Wallace and Dr. Keith Mckenna
Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
2. DFT+U for correlated systems
Coulomb interaction of localised electrons
electron density NOT uniform
Employ DFT+U (UTi = 4.2 eV)
Correct for SI error
U: adjustable correcting potential
4.2 eV: produces good agreement with spectroscopic data [1]
[1] Morgan, B. J., & Watson, G. W. (2009). J Phys Chem C, 113(110), 7322–7328.
3. Finitex-dimension
∆E = Es - Eb
Eb
Es
Localising electrons
Initialise magnetic moment at the site
Create a potential well by dilating bonds
Increase U-parameter (if necessary)
4. Wallace, S. K., & McKenna, K. P. (2014). Grain Boundary
Controlled Electron Mobility in Polycrystalline Titanium
Dioxide. Advanced Materials Interfaces, n/a–n/a.
doi:10.1002/admi.201400078
5. TiO2 anatase grain boundary
Deep trap at GB relative
to bulk:
-0.46 eV
(c.f. rutile GB: -0.2 eV)
14. Conclusion
[2] Barnard, a., & Zapol, P. (2004). Effects of particle morphology and surface hydrogenation on the phase stability of TiO2.
Physical Review B, 70(23), 235403. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.235403
[3] Dinh, C., Nguyen, T., Kleitz, F., & Do, T. (2009). Shape-Controlled Synthesis of Highly Crystalline Titania Nanocrystals. ACS
Nano, 3(11), 3737–3743.
Nanoparticle mostly composed of (110) and (101) surfaces
(110) strong subsurface trapping
(101) weakly repulsive
Reduce area of (110) relative to (101) for
improved electron transport
e.g. by surface hydrogenation [2]
or capping [3]