Business Ethics Of Posco in Odisha

1. The fight against POSCO
in ODISHA
By
Suryadev Maity
Regd No - 12397104
Paddy

2. The project :
MoU with ODISHA on 22 June 2005
• Investment : USD 12 billion(Rs. 54,000 crore)
• Build (steel) : 12 Million Tonne Per Annum (MTPA)
• Land requires : 4004 acres
(2900 acres forest land, rest private)
• Affected area : Dhinkia, Nuagaon and Gadakujang
(Total Population – 75000+)

3. Clearance for the project :
• Consider as a Special Economic Zone (SEZ)
• Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) and
Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) clearances in mid
2006
• Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF)
clearances in June 2007
• Jairam Ramesh taking charge of the MoEF
• The FRA review committee (headed by Dr N C
Saxena) and POSCO review Committee
(headed by Ms Meena Gupta), recommended
the withdrawal of the project from the area
in May 2011.

4. Unique people’s struggle :
catching fish from sea
cultivation of betelForest
Paddy Field

5. Forest
• 4004 acres
• (2900 acres forest land)
• 5 lakh big tree
• 50000 cut down

6. cultivation of betel
More then 200 family

7. catching fish from sea

8. Paddy Field

9. Recent standoff and protest :
Villagers
Children’s participation
women’s participation

10. Illegalities of the project :
• Palli Sabha resolutions ignored
• Claims under FRA not settled
• Records show existence of traditional forest dwellers
• Prime Minister’s pet project

11. The first and foremost issue relates to the Palli Sabha (3)
resolutions of the Dhinkia (held on 21st February 2011) and
Gobindpur (23rd February 2011) villages under Dhinkia village
panchayat, which dismissed the diversion of forest land to the
project. These resolutions were sent to the MoEF by the
PPSS, with 1632 out of 3445 voter signatures in Dhinkia village and
1265 of 1907 in Gobindpur village. The state government
however, submitted to the ministry that the resolutions were only
signed by 69 and 64 voters respectively, which lacks the quorum
needed in accordance with the Forest Rights Act (4). Said PPSS
spokesperson Prashant Paikray.
• Palli Sabha resolutions ignored

12. • Claims under FRA not settled
The state government’s claim that there are no
tribals and other traditional forest dwellers (OTFDs)
in the area is incorrect. The 2001 census itself shows
there are 23 tribals in Polang village under Kujang
Tehsil, which is one of the villages covered under the
proposed project.

13. In fact in August 2010, Dr N C Saxena, Chairperson of
the FRA monitoring committee constituted by the
MoEF and MoTA (Ministry of Tribal Affairs), wrote to
Jairam Ramesh and mentioned some ten documents
providing the proof of existence of OTFDs in the area.
One such document is the record of rights of a Mr
Giridhari Bardhan of Govindpur village from 1927,
collected from the survey and settlement manual:
• Records show existence of traditional forest dwellers

14. “Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh’s office (PMO) is
directly interested in this project. There is an inside kind
of news that India is probably interested in entering into
a nuclear deal with South Korea. Taking advantage of
this, the South Korean government is backing its own
corporate.”
• Prime Minister’s pet project

16. THANK YOU