Traumatic glenohumeral instability final

www.shoulder.gr
Athens Seminar - Scapular Dyskinesis related to shoulder pathology
E. Antonogiannakis 09.06.2017
Athens Seminar, Scapular Dyskinesis related to shoulder pathology
Athens, 9&10 June 2017 .
Manos Antonogiannakis
Orthopaedic Surgeon
Director of 3rd Orthopaedic Department
Centre for Arthroscopy & Shoulder Surgery
Hygeia General Hospital
Traumatic glenohumeral
instability

www.shoulder.gr
The Shoulder
 Greatest Range of Motion in the Body
 Motion in all 3 planes of movement
 Prone to instability
Sacrifices stability for mobility

www.shoulder.gr
What is Instability
 Biomechanical Dysfunction
 Failure of static and dynamic stabilizers
 Ranges from mild subluxation to
traumatic dislocation

www.shoulder.gr
T.U.B.S.
Traumatic
Unidirectional
Bankart lesion
Surgery
A.M.B.R.I.
Atraumatic
Multidirectional
Bilateral
Rehabilitation
Inferior capsular shift
A.I.O.S.
Acquired
Instability
Overstress
Surgery
Instability Profiles

www.shoulder.gr
The most common presentation
A patient with some degree of laxity
genetically controlled dislocates his
shoulder after a minor or major accident

www.shoulder.gr
History:
degree of violence
Level of athletic participation
number of dislocations
Age of the patient
Clinical examination:
Generalized joint laxity
direction of apprehension
dictates treatment

www.shoulder.gr
Contributors to stability
Static stabilizers
1. ligamentous structures labrum and
capsule
2. bony configuration of glenoid and
humeral head
Dynamic stabilizers
1. rotator cuff
2. scapula muscles

www.shoulder.gr
So what makes a shoulder
unstable
Degree of trauma and anatomic damage
Muscular dysfunction
Level of athletic activity
We must act in all of them

www.shoulder.gr
Bone Defects
 Glenoid side
 Humeral side

www.shoulder.gr
Humeral Bone Defects
Hill-Sachs lesion

www.shoulder.gr
The combination of the lesions
No Bone Loss Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
Glenoid Bone Loss
> 25%
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair + Bone grafting procedure

www.shoulder.gr
From engaging Hill Sachs to
On-track & Off-track lesions
Glenoid Bone Loss
> 25%
What
happens in
between?

www.shoulder.gr
Humeral Bone Defects
Engaging
Non Engaging

www.shoulder.gr
Engaging Hill Sachs

www.shoulder.gr
Evolving Concept of Bipolar Bone Loss and the Hill-Sachs Lesion:
From “Engaging/Non-Engaging” Lesion to “On-Track/Off-Track” Lesion
Giovanni Di Giacomo, Eiji Itoi, Stephen S. Burkhart

www.shoulder.gr
Group Glenoid Defect Hill-Sachs Lesion Recommended Treatment
1 <25% On track Arthroscopic Bankart repair
2 <25% Off track Arthroscopic Bankart repair plus remplissage
3 >25% On track Latarjet procedure
4 >25% Off track Latarjet procedure with or without humeral
sided procedure (humeral bone graft or remplissage),
depending on engagement of Hill-Sachs lesion
after Latarjet procedure

www.shoulder.gr
A.Three-dimensional CT scan with a view of a normal glenoid, with subtraction of the humeral head
The width of the glenoid track without a glenoid defect is 83% of the glenoid width.
B. Relation of glenohumeral joint in abduction and external rotation.
The distance from the medial margin of the contact area (M) to the medial margin of the cuff footprint (F) is 83%±14%
of the glenoid width: F - M = 83% of glenoid width = glenoid track.

www.shoulder.gr
A. 3D CT scan with en face view of a glenoid with bone loss of width d.
In such a case with glenoid bone loss, the glenoid track will be 83% of the normal glenoid width minus d.
B. Relation of glenohumeral joint in abduction and external rotation.
One should note the loss of contact of the intact humeral articular surface with the articular surface of the glenoid.
In this case the large Hill-Sachs interval (i.e., distance from posterior rotator cuff attachments to medial margin of Hill-
Sachs lesion) is wider than the glenoid track, whose width has been reduced because of the glenoid bone loss.

www.shoulder.gr
How to Determine Whether Hill-Sachs Lesion Is “On Track” or “Off Track”
1. Measure the diameter (D) of the inferior glenoid, either by arthroscopy or from 3D CT scan
2. Determine the width of the anterior glenoid bone loss (d).
3. Calculate the width of the glenoid track (GT) by the following formula: GT = 0.83 D - d.
4. Calculate the width of the HSI, which is the width of the Hill-Sachs lesion (HS) plus the width of the bone
bridge (BB) between the rotator cuff attachments and the lateral aspect of the Hill-Sachs lesion: HSI=HS +
BB.
5. If HSI > GT, the HS is off track, or engaging. If HSI < GT, the HS is on track, or non-engaging.

www.shoulder.gr

www.shoulder.gr
From engaging Hill Sachs to
On-track & Off-track lesions
Glenoid Bone Loss
> 25%
What
happens in
between?
It is the combination of the existing lesions
Large Hill-Sachs lesion + No glenoid bone loss
=
Small Hill-Sachs lesion + 15% -20% glenoid bone loss

www.shoulder.gr
Hill- Sachs Remplissage: An arthroscopic surgical
solution for the engaging Hill-Sachs
E.M. Wolf
Remplissage

www.shoulder.gr
Remplissage

www.shoulder.gr
From January 2007 to December 2010
(4 years)
48 patients
Average age: 28.9 ± 7.8 years
Average fu: 37.2 ± 9.9 months
Recurrence percentage: 6.3%

www.shoulder.gr

www.shoulder.gr
Inclusion criteria
 Traumatic unidirectional anterior shoulder instability
 Hill-Sachs lesion of the humeral head
 Evidence of engaging Hill-Sachs lesion during dynamic evaluation under arthroscopy
 Arthroscopic Bankart repair in conjunction with arthroscopic remplissage
 Follow-up period longer than 2 years
Exclusion criteria
 Anterior glenoid rim defect or fracture exceeding 25% of the inferior glenoid diameter confirmed intra-operatively
 Humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments (HAGL) detected intra-operatively
 Psychological disease or epilepsy

www.shoulder.gr
Parameter Pre-operatively Latest Follow-up Difference P value
Active forward flexion
mean value ± standard deviation
170 ± 25.8 degrees 179 ± 3.1 degrees + 9 degrees n.s.
External rotation beside the body
73.6 ± 23.0 degrees 78.1 ± 13.1 degrees + 4.5 degrees n.s.
External rotation at 90 degrees of abduction
89.2 ± 25.9 degrees 85.4 ± 9.3 degrees - 3.8 degrees n.s.
Internal rotation
median value, range
T10 level (range, T6-L2) T10 level (range, T7-T12) Same level n.s.
Mean ASES score
67.7 ± 21.5 90.8 ± 21.7 + 23.1 p<0.01
Mean Rowe-Zarins score
38 ± 17.3 93.8 ± 14.5 + 55.8 p<0.001
Mean Oxford Instability score
27.6 ± 11.1 45.1 ± 8.3 + 17.5 p<0.01

www.shoulder.gr
The outcome of the enhancement of the classic Bankart repair with tenodesis of the
infraspinatus and posterior capsular plication is very good as far as the management of recurrent
anterior shoulder instability is concerned, without significantly influencing the range of motion
of the shoulder

www.shoulder.gr
Glenoid Bone Defects

www.shoulder.gr
The inferior 2/3 of the glenoid is nearly a perfect
circle with avg diameter 24mm
Huysman et al. JSES 2006

www.shoulder.gr
Normal Glenoid
inverted
pear
Bony Bankart
pear
Compression
Bankart
loss of
anterior rim

www.shoulder.gr
Loss of 8.6mm of anterior radius of glenoid at the
level of the bare spot corresponds to 35% of the
normal anteroposterior width
Lo, Burkhart Arthroscopy 2004

www.shoulder.gr
>25 – 30% bone loss 6.5 – 8.6mm AP width
Inverted pear appearance
Bone block procedures
Piasecki et al. AAOS J17 (8): 482. (2009)

www.shoulder.gr
Bone loss <15% (0-3.5mm) of AP width
Soft tissue repair incorporating the bone fragment
if possible
Piasecki et al. AAOS J17 (8): 482. (2009)

www.shoulder.gr
 Glenoid Index in 3D CT scan of both shoulders
 Critical Limit Glenoid index 0.75
SS Burkhart Arthroscopy: Vol 24, No 4 (April), 2008: pp 376-382

www.shoulder.gr
 Taverna et al. Pico Method 2D CT – measurement of
glenoid surface Critical Limit 25% loss of glenoid surface

www.shoulder.gr
 Our practice
The percentage of the glenoid defect was evaluated on the en face reconstructed
view with the humeral head eliminated
Sugaya et al (2005) Joint Surg Am

www.shoulder.gr
Sugaya et al. JBJS Am 2005

www.shoulder.gr
Traumatic Glenohumeral Bone Defects and Their
Relationship to Failure of Arthroscopic Bankart Repairs:
Significance of the Inverted-Pear Glenoid and the
Humeral Engaging Hill-Sachs Lesion
S.S. Burkhart and J. F. De Beer, M.D.
Arthroscopy,October 2000

www.shoulder.gr
 Total group: 194 patients
 173 pt without significant bone defects :
7 pt sustained a recurrence (4%)
 21 pt with significant bone defects:
14 pt developed rec instability (67%)

www.shoulder.gr
23 pt active military personel,
25y mean age 20-30% bone loss 7mm of ap width
34months mean fu,
14.2% rec rate
Mologne et al. AJSM 2007

www.shoulder.gr
Glenoid Bone Loss >25%
Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure
L. Lafosse
Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization with a bone block
E. Taverna

www.shoulder.gr
E.Taverna, et.al,Knee Surg
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2008) 16:872–875

www.shoulder.gr
3 months
Post-op

www.shoulder.gr
Arthroscopic Bone Block
combined with Remplissage

www.shoulder.gr
Our Results
15 cases
Impressive early outcomes

www.shoulder.gr
Bushnell BD, Creighton RA, Herring MM. Hybrid treatment
of engaging Hill-Sachs lesions: Arthroscopic capsulolabral
repair and limited posterior approach for bone-grafting. Tech
Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;8:194-203.

www.shoulder.gr
Raiss P, Aldinger PR, Kasten P, Rickert M, Loew M. Humeral
head resurfacing for fixed anterior glenohumeral dislocation.
Int Orthop 2007 Dec 19 [Epub ahead of print]

www.shoulder.gr
Posterior instability
clinical presentation
1. Sense of insecurity and feeling of instability in forward
flexion and internal rotation
2. Locked posterior dislocation with loss of external rotation

www.shoulder.gr
Locked posterior dislocation
is easily missed

www.shoulder.gr
Thank you for your attention!!!
Save the date: 1-3 February 2018

Traumatic glenohumeral instability final

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mais procurados (20)

Semelhante a Traumatic glenohumeral instability final

Semelhante a Traumatic glenohumeral instability final (19)

Mais de Shoulder Library

Mais de Shoulder Library (18)

Último

Último (20)

Traumatic glenohumeral instability final