5. Why Culture Management?
HNTB's experience with transportation agencies:
• Strategic asset management is a long range capital
project planning function that requires shared goals
and interaction between departments that handle
finance, operations, engineering and maintenance.
• Agency mission (safe and reliable movement of
people and goods) does not include “optimization of
costs (capital and user based) to sustain the
operating infrastructure”.
• This cultural change must be addressed first,
otherwise any attempt to implement asset
management, and worse yet, purchase EAM
software, is doomed.
5
6. Port Authority Asset
Management Needs
PATH Example – State of Good Repair (SGR) Projects
Data
Needed
AlternativesAssessment
Engineering
Evaluation
Short Term Repairs
(“Patching”)
Inspection
Testing
Long Term Repairs
(Rehab)
History of Repairs
Rate of
Deterioration
Replacement
Remaining Life
Future Repair
Cycles
Future Repair
Costs
Who Is
Responsible for
Data?
• PATH Dept.
• QAD
• Design
• Construction
Who is best
positioned to
collect/provide
data on a regular
basis?
6
7. Port Authority Asset
Management Needs
PATH Example – State of Good Repair (SGR) Projects
Data
Needed
AlternativesAssessment
Engineering
Evaluation
Short Term Repairs
(“Patching”)
Inspection
Testing
Long Term Repairs
(Rehab)
History of Repairs
Rate of
Deterioration
Replacement
Remaining Life
Future Repair
Cycles
Future Repair
Costs
Who Is
Responsible for
Data?
• PATH
• QAD
• Design
• Construction
Who is best
positioned to
collect/provide
data on a regular
basis?
Focus on
Safety
with low
operation
impact
7
8. Port Authority Asset
Management Needs
TB&T Example – GWB 244.022 Upper Level Steel Rehabilitation
Figure 10.1: Life Cycle Cost Components
*Steel Repair years 3, 6 & 9 based on current repair rates
Deck Replacement includes miscellaneous steel repairs, joint replacement and wearing surface replacement.
Joint replacement and wearing surface replacement every ten years.
Strap Pl.
Clamps
Replace Deck
Steel Repair
Strap Pl.
clamps
Rehab.
Deck/Steel
$9.04 M $16.27 M $16.33M $29.38 MUser Costs $21.25 M $27.470 M $74.52 M
$-221.95 M
Priority &
Routine
Repairs
Steel
Repairs*
Replace
Deck
Joint & WS
Repl.
Steel Repair,
Joint & WC
Repl.
Joint & WS
Repl.
Steel Repair,
Joint & WC
Repl.
$403.18 M $13.87 M $22.75 M $25.04 M
Repair (P Only)
Construction Cost $46.18 M $59.70 M*
Construction Cost $53.67 M $63.39 M* $403.18 M $22.75 M $25.04 M $-221.95 M
$8.20 M
Repair (P&R)
$55.45 M $9.17 M
$12.42 M $0.46M
User Costs
Replacement
Construction Cost
$4.54 M
$0.62 M
Replace
Deck
$300.00 M $10.32 M
Joint & WS
Repl.
$6.16 M
Steel Repair,
Joint & WC
Repl.
$16.93 M
$100.14 MUser Costs
Rehabilitation
$1.97 M
Steel
Repair
Steel Repair,
Clamps, Jnt &
WS Repl.
$97.29 MConstruction Cost
$13.87 M
$-492.43 M
Joint & WS
Repl.
Steel Repair,
Joint & WS
Repl.
Joint & WS
Repl.
$33.65 M
Joint & WS
Repl.
Steel Repair,
Joint & WC
Repl.
$18.63M
Joint & WS
Repl.
$30.58 M$18.63 M$19.32 M $7.56 M $547.53 M
Steel
Repairs*
Replace
Deck
Priority &
Routine
Repairs
$16.27 M
Steel Repair,
Joint & WC
Repl.
$9.04 M
Joint & WS
Repl.
User Costs $23.61 M $30.520 M $74.52 M
$10.17 M
$16.33M
$18.36 M
$14.80 M
Steel Repair,
Joint & WC
Repl.
$29.38 M
Joint & WS
Repl.
$14.95 M
$30.58 M
$16.55 M
8
9. Port Authority Asset
Management Needs
TB&T Example – GWB 244.022 Upper Level Steel Rehabilitation
Scheme
Duration Months Construction Cost
(2008 $)
Project Cost
(2008 $)
PW – 50 Yr
LCCA
(2008 $)
50 Yr
Sum of
User Costs
Rehabilitation
(20 Year Life)
20 $ 100 M $170 M $230M $160 M
Replacement
(50-70 Year life)
48 $ 300 M $510 M $315 M $110 M
Priority and
Routine Repairs
(Not Recommended)
24 $ 55 M $85 M $300 M $200 M
Priority Repairs
Only
(Not Recommended)
24 $ 45 M $75 M $285 M $190 M
Table 1a: Comparison of Construction Duration, Construction Cost and User Costs
9
10. EAM Benefits
• 28.3% increase in maintenance
productivity
• 20.1% reduction in equipment
downtime
• 19.4% savings in lower material
costs
• 17.8% reduction in maintenance
and repairs
• A reasonable expectation is to
see a 5% to 15% reduction in
maintenance budget with
potential of a 20% to 40%
reduction within 6 to 36 months
of EAM implementation
Source: A.T. Kearney’s and Industry
10
14. EAM Case Study - MNR
14
Infrastructure Management
Metro North Railroad – Bridge Management
System
• 2010 FRA Regulations for RR bridge
management and inspections
• Modern, “clean slate” to BMS; web-based and
real-time
• Extremely user friendly; desktop web (core
app), and agnostic mobile solution (inspection
app); client configurable; integration with
leading vendors; scalable to other assets;
cloud-based (cost savings)
15. EAM Case Study – Iowa DOT
15
Infrastructure Management
Iowa DOT – Bridge Management System
Instead of using the traditional “worst
first” approach, Iowa DOT is leveraging
their bridge management system to
make logical, risk-based decisions
regarding necessary bridge
replacements.
16. Incorporating EAM
Current Process
Build on an established two-year-cycle process?
QAD
Consultant Performs
Inspection and
Prepares Report
PATH
E/A Design
QAD
Consultant Performs
Inspection and
Prepares Report
E/A Design
AM Appendix:
Consultant Adds
Deterioration Trends,
Completed Construction
(since last report),
Remaining Life Forecast,
etc.
PATH
20
17. MAP-21
• MAP-21: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
– 2-year Surface Transportation Bill
– Signed July 6, 2012 / Effective October 1, 2012
• Sets a national goal for all transportation infrastructure to be in a
state of good repair:
– Transit
– Highways
– Bridges
• Asset Management Plan Requirements
– Must cover bridge and pavement assets
– Specific objectives for condition and risk
• Penalties imposed for missing objectives and targets
21
20. Next Steps
• What are the cultural challenges?
• Determine what works and how?
• Workshop?
Don’t Let the Tail Wag The Dog
- The Tail is the Software
24