O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×

Delwarca software remote support unit

Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Próximos SlideShares
Hubspot Case Analysis
Hubspot Case Analysis
Carregando em…3
×

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 13 Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Diapositivos para si (20)

Semelhante a Delwarca software remote support unit (20)

Anúncio

Mais recentes (20)

Delwarca software remote support unit

  1. 1. Group 9 Santosh Mishra (10228) Shweta Kumari (10232) Srishti Singh (10236) Tanay Loya (10240) Chirag Ved (10244)
  2. 2.  Delwarca is a global supply chain management software provider  It delivered its customer support through four separate units:  Software Development  Field Support  Critical Support  Remote Support  Jack McKinnon, manager of Delwarca’s Remote Support Unit, changed the process of handling the incoming calls, known as Rapid ID ABOUT DELWARCA 2
  3. 3. Customers were dissatisfied with the long waiting time • Multi-channel, Single Phase system • The customers service Arrival: Calls received Operator Waiting Line: The time taken by Delwarca to resolve the issue Exit: After the issue is resolved • Customers had to wait at every step to get their calls connected to the next person 3
  4. 4. Change in the process • Introduction of Director Associates, also known as Sorting Hats • Responsible to direct the calls based on the intensity of the issue • Probability to get the problems solved at the first step increased The change was done to decease the Total Time taken and hence increase the Customer Satisfaction and Capacity Utilization 4
  5. 5. Pre-Rapid ID Customer Distribution percentage Post Rapid ID Customer Distribution percentage The ratio at which customer problem was solved by Associates and Senior Associates changed 5
  6. 6. President Head, Software Support Manager, Remote Support Senior Associate Associate Employee Numbers Salary Overhead % Average Cost Associates 12 $40,000- $60,000 26% $63,000 Sr. Associates 7 $70,000- $90,000 23% $98,400 TOTAL $14,44,800 Pre-Rapid ID employee segregation Post-Rapid ID employee segregation Employee Numbers Salary Overhead % Average Cost Associates 11 $40,000- $60,000 26% $63,000 Sr. Associates 8 $70,000- $90,000 23% $98,400 TOTAL $14,80,200 6
  7. 7. • Working Hour: 8 hours per day, i.e. 480mins • Break time: 60 mins, Effective Working Time: 420mins Pre rapid Post rapid CTC Associate Senior associate Associate Senior associate $ 66,780.00 $ 98,400.00 $ 66,780.00 $ 98,400.00 Employee 12 7 11 8 CTC per day considering (240 days) $ 3,339.00 $ 2,870.00 $ 3,060.75 $ 3,280.00 Total calls taken 135.798 104.46 101.52 122.2 Total calls resolved 69.64 104.46 65.8 122.2 Cost per call $ 24.59 $ 27.47 $ 30.15 $ 26.84 Cost per call resolved $ 47.95 $ 27.47 $ 46.52 $ 26.84 7
  8. 8. • Working Hour: 8 hours per day, i.e. 480mins • Break time: 60 mins, Effective Working Time: 420mins Pre-Rapid Rapid Associate solved 0.78 30.2 4,099 Associate solved 0.54 27.4 2,782 direct senior associate solved 0.22 21.6 827 direct senior associate solved 0.18 23.6 799 Indirect senior associate solved 0.38 19.1 1,263 Indirect senior associate solved 0.19 17.2 614 Utilized capacity 6,188 Direct to specific senior associate 0.28 24.4 1,284 Total Capacity 7,980 Utilized capacity 5,479 Utilized capacity 7560. 00 Capacity Utilization in Pre-Rapid 78% Capacity Utilization in Rapid 72% Utilization of Associates 81% Utilization of Associates 60% Utilization of Sr Associate 71% Utilization of Sr Associate 80% 8
  9. 9. Associate Senior assoiate Current rapid id average service rate 2.04 2.39 Replacing the worst performer with avergae one 2.29 3.02 Improvement 12% 21% Change is resolution Time Percentage Pre Rapid Percentage Post Rapid Call solved by associate 0.4 66.8 0.35 41.5 -38%Decrease Call solved by specific sr. associate 0.22 47.5 0.28 83.2 75%Increase Call solved by indirect sr associate 0.38 109.6 0.19 97.2 -11%Decrease Call solved diectly by sr associate NA NA 0.18 Improvement in Capacity Utilization by Replacement of bottom two worst performers Change in Resolution Time before and after updated 9
  10. 10. 10 After implementing Rapid ID method Wait time for Associates decreased significantly Wait time for Sr. Associates increased Wait time for Specific Senior Associates also increased
  11. 11. Before Rapid ID After Rapid ID Utilization of Associates 81% 60% Decrease by 21% Utilization of Sr Associates 71% 80% Increase by 9% Labour Cost per call (Associates) $ 24.58 $ 30.14 Increase by 22% Labour Cost per call (Sr. Associates) $ 27.47 $ 26.84 Decrease by 3% Cost per Call resolved (Associate) $ 47.94 $46.51 Decrease by 4% Cost per Call resolved (Sr. Associate) $ 27.47 $ 26.84 Decrease by 3% Resolution Time Calls resolved by Associates 66.8 mins 41.5 mins Decrease by 38% Calls resolved by Specific Sr. Associates 47.5 mins 83.2 mins Increase by 75% Calls resolved indirectly by Sr. Associates 109.6 mins 97.2 mins Decrease by 11% 11
  12. 12.  Associates should be trained so that bottle neck of Sr. Associate reduces  More calls need to be diverted to Associates to increase the capacity utilization  Instructing Field and Critical employees to not promote any employee in front of the client unless it is necessary to do so  Talking to Aronson (Associate), Shah (Associate) and Sacks (Sr. Associate) to understand why they are taking so much time per call and replace if required  Directors can request clients that we will call them back if Director thinks that the Sr. Associate won’t be available soon  If possible, then only follow up calls can be directed to specific Sr. Associates 12
  13. 13. Thank you .

×