I think London School of Economics doing a proper question and answer session on the topic of RPA emphasizes the speed and importance of RPA in market today.
2. Q & A robotic process automation?
I think London School of Economics doing a proper question and
answer session on the topic of RPA emphasizes the speed and
importance of RPA in market today. Also it establishes that RPA is
moving at a dramatically high pace and its not the future. It is the now.
The following is an Q & A robotic process automation.
“For several months the London School of Economics (LSE) professor of
Work Technology and Globalization Leslie Willcocks and his colleague
María Lacity, University of Missouri curators’ professor and visiting
professor at the LSE, ago have been working hard on a series of studies
of cases that examine how robotics process automation (RPA) has been
deployed in all industries (find the first two studies published here).
Recently a Q & a was conducted with professor Willcocks to gain a
greater understanding its growing interest in the field and the results of
their research.
3. BP: There are a lot of changes in the definitions of robots and as a
result, some confusion in the market about robotics process
automation. How do you define yourself?
LW: For some, the term “process automation robotics” can evoke the
image of bright, human-like robots that move around the office. In fact,
the EPR really only software that can be done to carry out the type of
administrative tasks that would otherwise require human manipulation
to get by. The quality that makes robotics is the use of a machine to
replace a human worker and handle discrete disparate tasks. A “robot”
is equal to a software license and usually this robot can perform
structured tasks equivalent to two to five people.
4. BP: Many may argue that this is only the automation of business
processes. Do you agree?
LW: No, RPA application differs from the classic process automation
business in two important areas. First, the developer hoping to
automate a task does not need any programming skills. For example,
people with commercial processes and experience in the subject, but
no programming experience can, with only a few weeks of training,
operations begin with robots processes EPR software enabled for
automation. Second, RPA not disturb the underlying computer systems.
Robots access to other computer systems in the same way humans do
through the user interface a login ID and password and no underlying
logic systems programming. It is truly “light”.
5. • BP: Why RPA emerging as a viable solution today?
• LW: If you were to look into the operations of any large organization
today would quickly the little time that their knowledge workers are
actually spent on tasks of higher-order thinking. Many companies
have realized this and have tried to solve it by one of two things:
automate or inform yourself Shoshana Zuboff as noted. Many have
tended towards the former – transfer functions of the hands of
workers to machines, rather than providing people with higher
capacities and make them work in symbiosis with technology.
6. As a result, workers now spend substantial time compared to what
John Gall systemantics calls – the peculiarities and defects that are so
endemic to systems as their strengths. For example, it is a problem
systemantic the typical automated trading system (for example,
Enterprise Resource Planning, CRM, or e-commerce) is unable to
complete a tip end to the whole process. For technology to deliver
value, knowledge workers must carry out menial tasks such as
extracting and moving large amounts of data from one system to
another, and they want to be released from such routine and highly
structured tedious tasks to focus the most interesting work. Robotics
Process Automation (RPA) is giving them the opportunity. ”
