O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×

Lessons learned from 3k SaaS Companies - Patrick Campbell, CEO, Price Intelligently

Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Lessons learned from 3k SaaS companies
SaaStock 2016
@PriceIntel
We live in a world where acquisition
as we know it is dead
@PriceIntel
@PriceIntel
Single
feature
SaaS
WE’RE LIVING IN A DIFFERENT PRODUCT ERA

Vídeos do YouTube não são mais aceitos pelo SlideShare

Visualizar original no YouTube

Carregando em…3
×

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 69 Anúncio

Lessons learned from 3k SaaS Companies - Patrick Campbell, CEO, Price Intelligently

Patrick Campbell, CEO, Price Intelligently presented "Lessons learned from 3k SaaS Companies" on the Playbook Stage at SaaStock 2016.

Watch the video here: https://www.saastock.com/blog/view/lessons-learned-from-3k-saas-companies

SaaStock is Europe’s premier Conference for B2B SaaS at RDS, Dublin Ireland in September 2017 www.saastock.com

Patrick Campbell, CEO, Price Intelligently presented "Lessons learned from 3k SaaS Companies" on the Playbook Stage at SaaStock 2016.

Watch the video here: https://www.saastock.com/blog/view/lessons-learned-from-3k-saas-companies

SaaStock is Europe’s premier Conference for B2B SaaS at RDS, Dublin Ireland in September 2017 www.saastock.com

Anúncio
Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Diapositivos para si (20)

Quem viu também gostou (19)

Anúncio

Semelhante a Lessons learned from 3k SaaS Companies - Patrick Campbell, CEO, Price Intelligently (20)

Mais de SaaStock (20)

Anúncio

Mais recentes (20)

Lessons learned from 3k SaaS Companies - Patrick Campbell, CEO, Price Intelligently

  1. 1. Lessons learned from 3k SaaS companies SaaStock 2016 @PriceIntel
  2. 2. We live in a world where acquisition as we know it is dead @PriceIntel
  3. 3. @PriceIntel Single feature SaaS WE’RE LIVING IN A DIFFERENT PRODUCT ERA
  4. 4. @PriceIntel Single feature SaaS Multi feature SaaS WE’RE LIVING IN A DIFFERENT PRODUCT ERA
  5. 5. @PriceIntel Single feature SaaS Multi feature SaaS Automation WE’RE LIVING IN A DIFFERENT PRODUCT ERA
  6. 6. @PriceIntel Single feature SaaS Multi feature SaaS Automation Consolidation WE’RE LIVING IN A DIFFERENT PRODUCT ERA
  7. 7. @PriceIntel Single feature SaaS Multi feature SaaS Automation Consolidation Workflow & Anti-Active Usage Products WE’RE LIVING IN A DIFFERENT PRODUCT ERA
  8. 8. Our world is now pin pointed on customer value for growth. @PriceIntel
  9. 9. Who are you? @PriceIntel
  10. 10. Happy customers big and small ProfitWell SaaS pricing software and tech enabled services Free financial metrics for subscription businesses @PriceIntel
  11. 11. We’ve seen inside more SaaS companies than anyone else on the planet. @PriceIntel
  12. 12. The market is becoming saturated and unit economics just aren’t what they used to be… @PriceIntel
  13. 13. Our world is more competitive, making switching costs easier. @PriceIntel
  14. 14. Competition is growing N = 289 SaaS companies, +/- 3.44% MoE at 95% level 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 5 Years Ago 3 Years Ago 1 Year Ago Today #ofCompetitors How many competitors did you have during the following periods? @PriceIntel
  15. 15. Competition is here 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 10 11+ %ofRespondents How many competitors do you current have? (Companies around for less than 1 year) N = 547 software companies @PriceIntel
  16. 16. The relative value of features is declining. All software is going to $0. @PriceIntel
  17. 17. “Differentiation” isn’t what is used to be… N = Varies by line, but minimum of 10,000 customer respondents per line 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 125% 4 Years Ago 3 Years Ago 2 Years Ago 1 Year Ago Today WTPas%ofWTP4YearsAgo Willingnessto pay over time relative to WTP 4 years ago Core Features Single Sign On Integrations Analytics @PriceIntel
  18. 18. CAC is increasing over time. @PriceIntel
  19. 19. Acquiring a customer is getting pricier N = Varies by line, but minimum of 453 companies per data point -­‐25% 0% 25% 50% 75% 4 Years Ago 3 Years Ago 2 Years Ago 1 Year Ago Today CACas%ofCAC4YearsAgo Blended CAC relative to four years ago B2B B2C @PriceIntel
  20. 20. We make matters worse by focusing on the wrong fundamentals @PriceIntel
  21. 21. We’re obsessed with acquisition. Like stalker level obsessed. @PriceIntel
  22. 22. Looked at 25,679 blog posts. @PriceIntel
  23. 23. We love talking about acquisition 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Acquisition Monetization Retention %oftotalarticles Category of growth articles written from 2014 to 2106 N = 25,679 blog posts written between 2014 to 2016 @PriceIntel
  24. 24. Looked at 6,324 B2B companies @PriceIntel
  25. 25. We love building for acquisition 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Acquisition Monetization Retention %oftotalcompanies Category of B2B SaaS companies N = 6,324 companies currently active @PriceIntel
  26. 26. Asked SaaS Founders/Executives @PriceIntel
  27. 27. What’s most important? 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% More logos Making more money per customer Keeping customers around longer %oftotalcompanies C-Level/Founder Growth Preferences N = 1,432 SaaS companies, +/- 2.19% MoE at 95% level @PriceIntel
  28. 28. What’s most important? N = 1,218 SaaS companies, +/- 2.61% MoE at 95% level 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Acquisition Monetization Retention %oftotalcompanies C-Level/Founder Spend Their Time @PriceIntel
  29. 29. There are clear winners and losers in this environment. @PriceIntel
  30. 30. SaaS Death correlates to acquisition focused teams 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Less than $2.5M ARR $2.51M to $5M ARR $5.01M+ ARR %ofRespondents Of those companies who died, what was the makeup of their growth Primarily  Acquisition   Growth Balanced  Growth N = Minimum of 30 companies per category who died over the past 4 years @PriceIntel
  31. 31. Balanced growth velocity is much larger 0% 25% 50% 2012 2013 2014 2015 %ofRespondents How do growth rates compare to our two growth groups? Primarily Acquisition Growth Balanced Growth N = Minimum of 512 companies per segment pulled from the middle 2/3 of companies in terms of growth rate. This, along with a dampening model was used to control for outlier spikes in growth rate. @PriceIntel
  32. 32. Our focus will kill us. @PriceIntel
  33. 33. The root cause here stems from a lack of buyer centricity. @PriceIntel
  34. 34. We don’t really know our buyers @PriceIntel
  35. 35. Buyer Personas Table Stakes Tony • Valued features: • SFDC Integration • Chrome extension • Least valued features • Analytics • API access • WTP = ~$10/month • CAC = ~$22 • LTV: $160 Advanced Arnie • Valued features: • Analytics • API Access • Least valued features • Chrome extension • Premium support • WTP = ~$25/month • CAC = ~$56 • LTV: $325 @PriceIntel
  36. 36. We don’t know our buyers that well 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Thought about them Central document Quantified buyer personas %ofRespondents Which single category best describes your buyer personas? N = 1,647 SaaS companies @PriceIntel
  37. 37. We don’t do a lot of cust dev conversations 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Less than 10 11 to 25 26 to 50 51+ %ofRespondents #  of  cust dev conversations How many cust dev conversations are you having per month? N = 1,647 SaaS companies @PriceIntel
  38. 38. We don’t send any cust dev surveys 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 0 1 2 3+ %ofRespondents #  of  cust dev surveys How many cust dev surveys are you sending each month? N = 1,647 SaaS companies @PriceIntel
  39. 39. We aren’t truly testing that much 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 0 1 to 3 4 to 10 11+ %ofRespondents #  of  tests/experiments How many tests or experiments are you running each month? N = 1,647 SaaS companies @PriceIntel
  40. 40. We don’t realize the power of balanced growth. @PriceIntel
  41. 41. If we improve each lever by the same amount, which lever causes the most growth? @PriceIntel
  42. 42. Impact of improving each growth lever 3.32% 0% 5% 10% 15% Acquisition Monetization Retention %impactonthebottomline Impact of improvingeach lever by 1% N = 578 SaaS companies, +/- 2.89% MoE at 95% level @PriceIntel
  43. 43. Impact of improving each growth lever 3.32% 6.71% 0% 5% 10% 15% Acquisition Monetization Retention %impactonthebottomline Impact of improvingeach lever by 1% N = 578 SaaS companies, +/- 2.89% MoE at 95% level @PriceIntel
  44. 44. Impact of improving each growth lever 3.32% 12.70% 6.71% 0% 5% 10% 15% Acquisition Monetization Retention %impactonthebottomline Impact of improvingeach lever by 1% N = 578 SaaS companies, +/- 2.89% MoE at 95% level @PriceIntel
  45. 45. Improving retention and monetization has 2- 4x the impact of focusing on acquisition. @PriceIntel
  46. 46. What we find important 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% More logos Making more money per customer Keeping customers around longer %oftotalcompanies C-Level/Founder Growth Preferences N = 1,432 SaaS companies @PriceIntel
  47. 47. What works for growth 3.32% 12.70% 6.71% 0% 5% 10% 15% Acquisition Monetization Retention %impactonthebottomline Impact of improvingeach lever by 1% N = Data from 512 companies @PriceIntel
  48. 48. This should be scary. @PriceIntel
  49. 49. Everything aligns to the customer Point of Conversion Drive Customer #1 Offer Product #1 Offer Product #2 Drive Customer #2 Drive Customer #3 Offer Product #3 Justify price #1 Justify price #2 Justify price #3 @PriceIntel
  50. 50. How do we fix this? @PriceIntel
  51. 51. Three ways to overcoming acquisition addiction • Know your numbers • Quantify your buyer personas • Implement a customer development process @PriceIntel
  52. 52. Know your numbers. @PriceIntel
  53. 53. Know your numbers ProfitWell.com
  54. 54. Quantify your buyer personas @PriceIntel
  55. 55. Persona-Product Fit Table Stakes Tony • Valued features: • SFDC Integration • Chrome extension • Least valued features • Analytics • API access • WTP = ~$10/month • CAC = ~$22 • LTV: $160 Advanced Arnie • Valued features: • Analytics • API Access • Least valued features • Chrome extension • Premium support • WTP = ~$25/month • CAC = ~$56 • LTV: $325 @PriceIntel
  56. 56. Go to the customer! @PriceIntel
  57. 57. What do your customers value the most? Needed: Relative Preference Analysis @PriceIntel
  58. 58. How much are your customers willing to pay? Needed: Price Sensitivity Analysis @PriceIntel
  59. 59. For the love of God. Talk to your customer. @PriceIntel
  60. 60. If you don’t know who you’re driving to your product, how do you know what build or how to price? @PriceIntel
  61. 61. Implement a customer development process @PriceIntel
  62. 62. Your Cust Dev Process Customer/Market Research Communication Plan Week: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Impact Analysis Customer Advisory Panel Implement Changes Step: @PriceIntel
  63. 63. Your Pricing Committee Main Decision Maker (could be a member of the committee, as well) Main Coordinator Typically in Product or Marketing Product Leadership Corp Dev/Finance Sales Leadership Marketing Leadership @PriceIntel
  64. 64. We’re in a customer value centric world. @PriceIntel
  65. 65. You will be left behind if you think you can brute force your growth. @PriceIntel
  66. 66. Thankfully, there’s a community around you to help you grow, but you need to take the first step. @PriceIntel
  67. 67. Here’s how we’re going to help today • SaaS Pricing Workshop – 1:30pm – Pricing workshop, where we’ll walk through the steps to quantify your personas and answer every pricing question you’ve ever had • SaaS Benchmarking Data Dump – 4pm – We have the world’s largest SaaS dataset, and we’ll be walking through some key benchmarks and differences between companies doing well and those in trouble @PriceIntel
  68. 68. Patrick@priceintelligently.com @PriceIntel

×