O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.

Designing, developing, and evaluating a real time student dashboard

554 visualizações

Publicada em

We discuss the technical infrastructure needed to capture student data in an open learning environment (beyond the LMS), our iterative design process along with dashboard prototypes, and our dashboard evaluation results from focus groups and a survey.

Visit BobBodily.com for more information about my research.

Publicada em: Dados e análise
  • My personal experience with research paper writing services was highly positive. I sent a request to ⇒ www.HelpWriting.net ⇐ and found a writer within a few minutes. Because I had to move house and I literally didn’t have any time to sit on a computer for many hours every evening. Thankfully, the writer I chose followed my instructions to the letter. I know we can all write essays ourselves. For those in the same situation I was in, I recommend ⇒ www.HelpWriting.net ⇐.
       Responder 
    Tem certeza que deseja  Sim  Não
    Insira sua mensagem aqui
  • Writing good research paper is quite easy and very difficult simultaneously. It depends on the individual skill set also. You can get help from research paper writing. Check out, please ⇒ www.WritePaper.info ⇐
       Responder 
    Tem certeza que deseja  Sim  Não
    Insira sua mensagem aqui
  • Njce! Thanks for sharing.
       Responder 
    Tem certeza que deseja  Sim  Não
    Insira sua mensagem aqui

Designing, developing, and evaluating a real time student dashboard

  1. 1. Designing, Developing, and Evaluating a Real-Time Student Dashboard Robert Bodily, Charles Graham, Ben Mackley, and Tarah Kerr Brigham Young University
  2. 2. Technical Infrastructure Learning Tools Interoperability (LTI) Experience API (xAPI) Learning Record Store (LRS)
  3. 3. Design Process: Prototype 1
  4. 4. Design Process: Prototype 2
  5. 5. Design Process: Prototype 3
  6. 6. Focus Groups Methods Four focus groups of 4-6 students Approximately 60 minutes each Audio was recorded, transcribed, coded using open coding protocol Semi-structured format
  7. 7. Focus Group Results Good features - reflection Bad features - confusing Requested features - compare to class Frequency of Use - right before an exam Course Synchronization - centralized location Comparison between dashboards
  8. 8. End of Course Dashboard Evaluation Survey Methods Survey sent to all consenting students 70 student responses
  9. 9. End of Course Dashboard Survey Results Some students did not even know they had access to a dashboard tool How can we improve student awareness of the system? Dashboards were not used very much. Why didn’t student use the dashboard more often? Dashboard ratings on: User-friendly Interesting/Engaging Useful
  10. 10. Future Research What is the effect of our real-time dashboard on student behavior, achievement, or skills? How can we increase student use of our dashboard system? What would an instructor or administrator dashboard look like? How can we make them actionable?

×