Designing Early Alert Programs Aimed at Fostering Student Success and Persist...Mike Dial
Semelhante a The National Center on Response to Intervention and Implementation Science: Building Capacity for Equity and Excellence for All Students (20)
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
The National Center on Response to Intervention and Implementation Science: Building Capacity for Equity and Excellence for All Students
1. The National Center on Response to Intervention and Implementation Science “Building Capacity for Equity and Excellence for All Students” Tessie Rose, PhD
2.
3. What is the National Center on Response to Intervention (NCRTI)?
57. Our Mission To build state capacity and support for implementing RTI in local districts and schools by serving as a central source of knowledge, expertise, and research-based information for educators, administrators, and parents.
58.
59. Strategy 2 – provide ongoing technical assistance to states and to support the implementation of RTI in classrooms, schools, and local districts nationally
99. realize, apply or put plans, ideas, models, norms or policies into operation.Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Macfarlane F, & Kyriakidou O. (2005) Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations. A systematic literature review. Oxford: BMJ Books, Blackwell Publishing. See Guldbrandsson, 2008
100.
101. Implementation Two Sets of Activities Two Sets of Outcomes Intervention Activities Intervention Outcomes Implementation Activities Implementation Outcomes
102. Why is implementation important? As cited in Fixsen, 2008 (Institute of Medicine, 2000; 2001; New Freedom Commission of Mental Health, 2003; National Commission of Excellence in Education, 1983; Department of Health and Human Services, 1999)
103. Evidence: What Doesn’t Work? Most Common Approaches Used to Support Implementation! Dissemination alone Training/ professional development alone Laws and policies alone Special funding alone (see Ager & O´May, 2001; National Implementation Research Network, n.d.; Paul Nutt, 2002; Rogers, Wellins, & Conner, 2002).
104. Evidence: What Works? Combination of several implementation measures leads to better results e.g., distributing guidelines for innovations, offering education, practical training, coaching, feedback and consultation. Quality of support is more important than quantity (See Guldbrandsson, 2008)
105. Implementation Support Making it Happen Effective Implementation Benefits to Consumers Helping it Happen Letting it Happen (Greenhalgh et al., 2005)
110. “The system” Is this really true? Can these things really not be changed?
111. Evidence: What Doesn’t Work? Attempt to fit innovation into existing service delivery system OUTCOMES: Rarely fully implemented in a reasonable time Often viewed as incompatible Eventually disappears Innovation: Component #1 Innovation: Component #2 Service Delivery System Innovation: Component #3 Innovation: Component #4 Innovation: Component #5
112. Example: What Doesn’t Work? Core Curriculum Universal Screening Service Delivery System Tiered Interventions (some) Progress Monitoring Data Based Decision Making
113. Evidence: What Works? Evaluate current infrastructure and identify and address potential barriers to implementation Structure technical assistance and service delivery system to support innovation Service Delivery System Changed to Fit Innovation Innovation: Component #1 Innovation: Component #2 Innovation: Component #3 Innovation: Component #4 Innovation: Component #5
120. Build capacity of implementation teams to identify and address issues immediatelyThe biggest mistake is to ignore or hope they will resolve themselves.
140. selection of staff for purveyor groups.National Implementation Research Network
141.
142. Beyond academic qualifications or experience factors, what practitioner characteristics are essential for carrying out the evidence-based practice “on the ground?” What characteristics or abilities will not or cannot be addressed through training and coaching?
143. Do organizational staff members have a comprehensive understanding of the practices being implemented?
144. Are organizational staff members prepared to support practitioners in carrying out the evidence-based practices that are slated to be implemented?(National Implementation Research Network)
225. Leadership Establish RTI leadership or implementation teams. The dialogue includes discussions about membership, roles and responsibilities, and implementation plans. Identify members, establish roles and responsibilities and establish administrative procedures Identify potential barriers and ensure infrastructures are in place Develop and implement plan (s) (PD, evaluation, ect.) for initial implementation Develop and implement plan (s) for full implementation
226. Needs Assessment Conduct ongoing needs assessment (data collection). The dialogue includes discussions about assessing needs of the infrastructure, data system, students and teachers, and other key stakeholders. Assess SEA/LEA need for RTI Assess infrastructure Conduct ongoing needs assessment for initial implementation Conduct ongoing needs assessment for full implementation
227. Outreach and Training Provide outreach and training. The dialogue includes discussions about broad outreach and communication about RTI, recruiting and training coaches, and scheduling and implementing a series of coordinated training events (including workshops and follow-up activities) to support LEAs Engage in RTI social marketing activities Build competency of leadership and implementation teams Implement training and coaching plan for initial implementation Implement training and coaching plan for full implementation
228. Evaluation Conduct ongoing evaluation. The dialogue includes discussions about how to measure the efficiency with which the is implementing as well as the effectiveness. 1. Evaluate the need and ability to implement RTI 2. Evaluate infrastructure and develop comprehensive data system 3. Evaluate efficacy and efficiency of initial implementation 4. Evaluate efficacy and efficiency of full implementation and evaluate RTI effectiveness
Many people, not just in the field of education agree with this statement. Many of us have triedto realize ideas and introduce new methods, but after a while we have been forced to admit thatthings didn’t turn out as we had originally intended and planned.