Acute pancreatitis is inflammation of the pancreas that ranges from mild to severe. Mild cases involve pancreatic edema while severe cases involve pancreatic necrosis and multi-organ failure. The main causes are gallstones and alcohol use. Diagnosis is based on abdominal pain and elevated pancreatic enzymes. Severity is assessed using criteria like Ranson score, CT severity index, and Atlanta criteria. Treatment of mild cases involves fluids and pain control while severe cases require intensive care monitoring, fluids, nutrition, and may involve ERCP or surgery for complications.
2. Introduction
The name ‘pancreas’ is derived from the greek ‘pan’ (all) and
‘kreas’ (flesh)
The average gland weighs between 75 and 125 gm. and
measures 10 to 20 cm
Retroperitoneal organ that lies in an oblique position, sloping
upward from the C-loop of the duodenum to the splenic hilum
Due to its retroperitoneal location, pain associated with
pancreatitis often is characterized as penetrating through the
back
3. Anatomically divided into 4 parts -
① Head
② neck
③ Body
④ Tail
Head occupies 30% of the gland by
mass, whereas body and tail
comprises 70% of the whole organ
Coming off the side of the pancreatic head and passing to the
left and behind the sup mesenteric vein is the Uncinate process
of the pancreas
4. 80-90% is composed of exocrine acinar tissue, which is organized
into lobules
The main duct is lined by columnar epithelium, which becomes
cuboidal in the ductules
The endocrine cells arrange in clusters, known as Islets of
Langerhans, are distributed throughout the pancreas, which
consists of ‘B’ cells (producing insulin), ‘A’ cells (producing
glucagon) and ‘D’ cells (producing somatostatin)
5.
6. Pancreatitis is inflammation of the gland parenchyma of the pancreas
Acute pancreatitis is defined as an acute condition presenting with
abdominal pain and associated with raised pancreatic enzymes levels in the
blood or urine as a result of pancreatic inflammation
7. Acute pancreatitis may be categorised into..
Mild acute pancreatitis
- characterised by interstitial edema of the gland and minimal
organ dysfunction.
- 80% of the patients will have a mild attack of pancreatitis
- mortality is around 1%
Severe acute pancreatitis
- characterised by pancreatic necrosis, a severe systemic
inflammatory response and often multi-organ failure
- mortality varies from 20-50%
- death occurs in the early phase from multi-organ failure, while
deaths occuring after 1st week of onset are due to septic complication.
8. 1) Biliary or gallstone pancreatitis (40%)
2) Alcohol induced injury (35%)
3) Post ERCP
4) Anatomic obstruction (ampullary tumour, pancreas divisum)
5) Drug induced (corticosteroids, azathioprine, asparaginase, valproate,
thiazides, estrogens)
6) Metabolic factors (hypertriglyceridemia, hypercalcemia)
7) Abdominal trauma
8) Following biliary, upper GI and cardiothoracic surgery
9) Autoimmune pancreatitis
10)Viral infections (mumps, coxsackie B)
11)Scorpion bite
12)Idiopathic
9. Exact mechanism of AP not completely known
Most researchers believe that AP begins with the activation of
zymogens inside acinar cells, which causes acinar cell injury
Severity of AP may be determined by the events that occur subsequent
to acinar cell injury, which include release of cytokines and other
chemical mediators of inflammation
10. Events of pathogenesis of Acute Pancreatitis include:
A. Precipitating Initial Events
B. Intrapancreatic Events
C. Systemic Events
11. A. Precipitating Initial Events
Acinar Cell Events
When acinar cells are pathologically stimulated, their
Lysosomal(L) & Zymogen(Z) contents colocalize,
consequently trypsinogen is activated to trypsin by
cathespin B
Increased cytosolic Calcium is required
Cathespin B and other contents of these colocalized
organelles are released
Cathespin B activates apoptosis by causing
cytochrome c to be released from mitochondria
12. Schematic presentation of the
Acinar cell Events
Activation of PKC results in a sudden
activation of NF Kappa beta
Which triggers release of Cytokines
Cytokines attract inflammatory
response cells which mediate local &
syst inflammation
13. B. Intrapancreatic Events
After activation of superoxides (“Respiratory burst”) and release of
proteolytic enzymes (cathespin, elastase and collagenase), activated
neutrophils are attracted to focus of tissue injury
Macrophages release TNF-alfa, IL-6 & IL-8 which mediate the local and
systemic inflammatory response
The inflammatory mediators cause increased pancreatic vascular
permeability – leading to edema, hemorrhage & microthrombi
Failure of pancreatic microcirculation resulting in pancreatic hypoperfusion
& necrosis
14. C. Systemic Events
Organ failure can develop at any stage of acute pancreatitis, associated
with an overwhelming proinflammatory response early, or secondary to the
development of infected local complications
The development pancreatic necrosis, the breakdown of the interstitial
barrier and suppression of immune response contribute to the
development of infected pancreatic necrosis
This may associated with late development of SIRS or MODS
Organ failure is scored using the Marshall or Sequential Organ Failure
Assessment (SOFA) system
The 3 organ system most frequently involved are Cardiovascular,
Respiratory an Renal
20. Clinical presentation:
The cardinal symptom of AP is epigastric or periumbilical pain that
radiates to the back
Some patients may gain relief by sitting or leaning forward
Nausea, repeated vomiting and retching are usually marked
accompaniments
Tachypnea, tachycardia and hypotension may be present
In gallstone pancreatitis mild icterus may be present
Bleeding into fascial planes can produce bluish discoloration of the
flanks (GreyTurner sign) or umbilicus (Cullen sign)
Usually muscle guarding in the upper abdomen
Pleural effusion is present in 10-20% patients
25. Cornerstone of diagnosis of AP is the clinical findings plus elevation
of pancreatic enzyme levels in serum
3 folds or higher elevation of amylase and lipase level confirms the
diagnosis.
Serum half life of amylase is shorter than that of lipase, thus lipase
level is more sensitive indicator to establish the diagnosis
Lipase is more specific marker of AP, because amylase an be
elevated in PUD, mesentric ischemia, salpingitis and
macroamylasemia
The degree of amylase/lipase elevation does not correlate with
severity of AP
26. CBC: Leukocytosis
Blood sugar: Hyperglycemia in severe cases
Electrolyte imbalance: Hypokalemia and hypocalcaemia
Elevated LDH in biliary disease
Glycosuria in 10% cases
CT Scan
MRI
EUS
27. CT scan showing well perfused interstitial edematous
acute pancreatitis of the neck and tail of pancreas with
confluent area of necrosis of the pancreatic body
28. A. Ranson Prognostic criteria
B. Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation
(APACHE II)score
C. Computed Tomography Severity Index (CTSI)
D. Atlanta Criteria for Acute Pancreatitis
29. Ranson Prognostic Criteria for Non-Gallstone Pancreatitis
At presentation
Age > 55 yrs
Blood glucose level > 200 mg/dl
White blood cell count > 16,000 cells/ mm3
Lactate dehydrogenase level > 350 IU/L
Aspartate Aminotransferase level > 250 IU/L
After 48 hours of admission
Hematocrit : decrease > 10%
Serum calcium level < 8mg/dl
Base deficit > 4 mEq/L
Blood urea nitrogen level : increase > 5 mg/dl
Fluid requirement > 6 L
PaO2 < 60 mm Hg
** Ranson score ≥ 3 defines severe pancreatitis
30. Ranson Prognostic Criteria for Gallstone Pancreatitis
At presentation
Age > 70 yrs
Blood glucose level > 220 mg/dl
White blood cell count > 18,000 cells/ mm3
Lactate dehydrogenase level > 400 IU/L
Aspartate Aminotransferase level > 250 IU/L
After 48 hours of admission
Hematocrit : decrease > 10%
Serum calcium level < 8mg/dl
Base deficit > 5 mEq/L
Blood urea nitrogen level : increase > 2 mg/dl
Fluid requirement > 4 L
PaO2 : Not available
** Ranson score ≥ 3 defines severe pancreatitis
31. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation
(APACHE II) Score :
APACHE II provides a general measure of the severity of the
disease
Based on patient’s age, previous health status and 12 routine
physiologic measurements
The main advantage is that it can be used on admission and
repeated at any time
APACHE II score of 8 or higher defines severe pancreatitis
APACHE II has a positive predictive value of 43% and a negative
predictive value of 89%
32. Computed Tomography Severity Index (CTSI)
FEATURE POINTS
Pancreatic inflammation
• Normal pancreas 0
• Focal / diffuse pancreatic enlargement 1
• Intrinsic pancreatic alterations with peripancreatic fat 2
inflammatory changes
• Single fluid collection / phlegmon 3
• 2 or more fluid collection or gas, in or adjacent to the 4
Pancreas
Pancreatic necrosis
• None 0
• ≤ 30% 2
• 30% - 50% 4
• > 50% 6
** CTSI 0-3, mortality 3%, morbidity 8%
CTSI 4-6, mortality 6%, morbidity 35%
CTSI 7-10, mortality 17%, morbidity 92%
33. Atlanta Criteria for Acute Pancreatitis
Organ Failure, as Defined by
Shock (SBP <90mm Hg)
Pulmonary insufficiency (PaO2 <60 mm Hg)
Renal failure (creatinine level >2 mg/dl after fluid resuscitation)
Gastrointestinal bleeding (>500 ml/24 hrs)
Systemic Complication
DIC ( platelet ≤10,000)
Fibrinogen <1 g/L
Fibrin split products >80 mcg/dl
Metabolic disturbance (calcium level ≤7.5 mg/dl)
Local Complications
Necrosis
Abscess
Pseudocyst
34.
35. A. Management of mild acute pancreatitis
B. Management of severe acute pancreatitis
36. A. Management of mild acute pancreatitis:
Conservative approach
Intravenous fluid administration
Frequent, but non invasive observation
Brief period of fasting in nauseating patients
But no justification for prolonged NPM
Analgesics and antiemetics
Antibiotics are not indicated
37. B. Management of severe acute pancreatitis:
Admission to HDU / ICU
Analgesia
Aggressive fluid rehydration
Oxygenation
Invasive monitoring of vital signs, CVP, urine output, ABG
Frequent monitoring of haematological and biomedical parameters
(including LFT, RFT, Clotting, sr. calcium & bl. Glucose)
Nasogastric drainage
Antibiotics (imipenem, cefuroxime)
CT scan essential if sign of organ failure
ERCP within 72 hrs for severe gallstone pancreatitis / signs of
cholangitis
Supportive therapy for organ failure (inotropes, ventilatory support,
hemofiltration etc.)
Consider enteral(nasogastric) feeding, if nutritional support is required
38. 1. Resuscitation and monitoring:
Patients with AP require management strategies specifically tailored to
disease severity
Aggressive fluid resuscitation is important in order to replenish
extravascular or “third space” fluid losses
I.V fluid at rates of greater than 200ml/h are often necessary to restore
and maintain intravascular volume
Fluid resuscitation is important to avoid systemic complications,
particularly acute renal insufficiency
Inadequate resuscitation pose a significant risk for further pancreatic
injury
Banks and others have shown that while aggressive fluid resuscitation
does not necessarily prevent the progression of pancreatic necrosis,
patients with inadequate resuscitation have an increased risk of
developing necrosis
39. Close monitoring of respiratory, cardiovascular and renal function is
essential
Close assessment of fluid balance is required including a Foley catheter
Patient with severe disease should be admitted to ICU with capacity for
continuous BP and SpO2 monitoring
Intravenous narcotics are often essential for pain control
Nasogastric tubes to avoid pancreatic stimulation was a common
practice previously, but no clinical data support this
But in paralytic ileus which is quite common in AP, nasogastric tube
should be used to prevent emesis and aspiration pneumonia
40. 2. Nutritional support:
“Rest the pancreas” by avoiding enteral nutrition is no longer acceptable
There are evidences for nutritional support in acute pancreatitis
Enteral nutrition should be commenced after initial fluid resuscitation and
within the first 24 hrs of admission
Can be introduced through NG tube and increased in stepwise fashion in
2-3 days
Delay in commencing enteral nutrition may contribute to the development
of intestinal ileus and feeding intolerance
41. 3. The role of ERCP:
ERCP is used as a diagnostic as well as therapeutic modality in acute
pancreatitis
Randomized trials have demonstrated that early ERCP reduces
complications, but not mortality
Recent evidences suggested that early ERCP confers no benefit in the
absence of concomitant cholangitis
42. 4. Antibiotics:
Controversy surrounding the use of prophylactic antibiotics
Overuse of antibiotics has been associated with a documented rise in
fungal infections and resistant organisms
Most recent studies do not support the use of prophylactic antibiotics
43. 5. Surgical management:
In majority of AP patients, process is limited to parenchymal edema
without necrosis – they require surgical therapy for limited indications
Intervention may be needed to address the etiology or complications of
pancreatitis
Interventions may be either surgical or endoscopic
Between 10-30% of patients develop severe illness, with pancreatic and
peripancreatic illness – these patients require pancreatic debridement as
standard of care
44. In patients with severe pancreatitis or pancreatic necrosis, indications
for surgical intervention are:
①Diagnostic uncertainty
②Intra-abdominal catastrophe unrelated to necrotizing
pancreatitis such as perforated viscus
③Severe sterile necrosis
④Symptomatic organized pancreatic necrosis
45.
46. Conclusion:
Acute Pancreatitis is a complex , life threating disease
that requires diligent and comprehensive medical and
nursing care.