Enviar pesquisa
Carregar
Recommendation Letter from William Delicate 2
•
0 gostou
•
256 visualizações
Paul Claxton
Seguir
Denunciar
Compartilhar
Denunciar
Compartilhar
1 de 1
Baixar agora
Baixar para ler offline
Recomendados
Recommendation Letter from Williams and Associates 2
Recommendation Letter from Williams and Associates 2
Paul Claxton
The experimental study of economic exchange behavior revealed many discrepancies between normative theory of strategic rationality (game theory) and actual behavior. In many games games where defection and competition is expected by game theory, subjects robustly display cooperative behavior. In the ultimatum game, for instance, a ‘proposer’ makes an offer to a ‘responder’ that can either accept or refuse the offer; if the responder refuses, both players get nothing. The rational outcome is a minimal offer by the first player and an unconditional acceptance of the offer by the second. In fact, proposers make ‘fair’ offers, about 50% of the amount, responders tend to accept these offers and reject most of the ‘unfair’ offers (less than 20%;Oosterbeek et al., 2004). Cooperative and prosocial behavior is also observed in similar games, e.g. the trust game and the prisoner’s dilemma (Camerer, 2003). Neuroeconomics, the study of the neural mechanisms of decision-making (Glimcher, 2003), also showed that subjects seems to entertain prosocial preferences. Brain scans of people playing the ultimatum game indicates that unfair offers trigger, in the responders’ brain, a ‘moral disgust’: the anterior insula, an area involved in disgust and other negative emotional responses, is more active when unfair offers are proposed (Sanfey et al., 2003). In the prisoner’s dilemma and the trust game, similar activations have been found: cooperation and punishment of unfair players elicit positive affective emotions, while unfairness elicit negative one (de Quervain et al., 2004; Rilling et al., 2002). The received view of these behavioral and neural data is that human beings are endowed with genuinely altruistic cognitive mechanisms, a view now labelled “Strong Reciprocity” (SR). According to SR, an innate propensity for altruistic punishment and altruistic rewarding makes us averse to inequity (Fehr & Rockenbach, 2004). In this talk, I argue that this moral optimism is far-fetched. Yes, the ‘cold logic’ model of rationality is not an accurate description of our decision-making mechanisms, but the SR model, I shall argue, relies on unwarranted assumptions. I present another model–the ‘hot logic’ approach–according to which human agents are selfish agents adapted to trade, exchange and partner selection in biological markets (Noë et al., 2001). Cognitive mechanisms of decision-making aims primarily at maximizing positive outcomes and minimizing negative ones. This initial hedonism is gradually modulated by social norms, by which agents learn how to maximise their utility given the norms. The ‘hot logic’ approach provide a simpler explanation of cooperation and fairness: subjects make ‘fair’ offers in the ultimatum game because they know their offer would be rejected otherwise. Responders affective reaction to ‘unfair offers’ is in fact a reaction to the loss of an expected monetary gain: they anticipated that the proposer would comply with social norms. This claim is supported by other imaging studies showing that loss of money can be aversive, and that actual and counterfactual utility recruit the same neural resources (Delgado et al., 2006; Montague et al., 2006). This approach explains why subjects make lower offers in the dictator game (an ultimatum game in which the responder make an offer and the responder's role is entirely passive) than in the ultimatum, why, when using a computer displaying eyespots, almost twice as many participants transfer money in the dictator (Haley & Fessler, 2005), and why attractive people are offered more in the ultimatum (Solnick & Schweitzer, 1999). In every case, agents seek to maximize a complex hedonic utility function, where the reward and the losses can be monetary, emotional or social (reputation, acceptance, etc.). SR is thus seen as cooperative habits that are not repaid (Burnham & Johnson, 2005).
Social Neuroeconomics: Strong Reciprocity or “Hot Logic”?
Social Neuroeconomics: Strong Reciprocity or “Hot Logic”?
Benoit Hardy-Vallée, Ph.D.
Presentation from the Fruition Academ
Social reciprocity presentation
Social reciprocity presentation
Jessica Dreistadt
WWCMA Meeting November 15, 2011: Putting Behavioral Economics to Work with Health and Wellness
Putting Behavioral Economics to Work
Putting Behavioral Economics to Work
Worksite Wellness Council of Massachusetts
Surfing a Web of Trust: Reputation and Reciprocity on CouchSurfing.com
Surfing a Web of Trust: Reputation and Reciprocity on CouchSurfing.com
debra24
Describes Systems of Exchange. Reciprocity; Redistribution; Market Exchange
Economic Anthropology: Distribution and Exchange
Economic Anthropology: Distribution and Exchange
PaulVMcDowell
A Technology Product Development and Innovation Consulting Company
Reciprocity ROI Standard Presentation
Reciprocity ROI Standard Presentation
Paul Claxton
I believe Public Speaking is one of the best ways to give back to the world. Take the time to learn, take the time to acquire the necessary knowledge, and then apply those things. Then share your experiences. The people who are best at what they do are not hiding in a corner or a cave somewhere they are out and about talking about what they do and paying the knowledge forward!
Paul Claxton - My Public Speaker One Sheet
Paul Claxton - My Public Speaker One Sheet
Paul Claxton
Recomendados
Recommendation Letter from Williams and Associates 2
Recommendation Letter from Williams and Associates 2
Paul Claxton
The experimental study of economic exchange behavior revealed many discrepancies between normative theory of strategic rationality (game theory) and actual behavior. In many games games where defection and competition is expected by game theory, subjects robustly display cooperative behavior. In the ultimatum game, for instance, a ‘proposer’ makes an offer to a ‘responder’ that can either accept or refuse the offer; if the responder refuses, both players get nothing. The rational outcome is a minimal offer by the first player and an unconditional acceptance of the offer by the second. In fact, proposers make ‘fair’ offers, about 50% of the amount, responders tend to accept these offers and reject most of the ‘unfair’ offers (less than 20%;Oosterbeek et al., 2004). Cooperative and prosocial behavior is also observed in similar games, e.g. the trust game and the prisoner’s dilemma (Camerer, 2003). Neuroeconomics, the study of the neural mechanisms of decision-making (Glimcher, 2003), also showed that subjects seems to entertain prosocial preferences. Brain scans of people playing the ultimatum game indicates that unfair offers trigger, in the responders’ brain, a ‘moral disgust’: the anterior insula, an area involved in disgust and other negative emotional responses, is more active when unfair offers are proposed (Sanfey et al., 2003). In the prisoner’s dilemma and the trust game, similar activations have been found: cooperation and punishment of unfair players elicit positive affective emotions, while unfairness elicit negative one (de Quervain et al., 2004; Rilling et al., 2002). The received view of these behavioral and neural data is that human beings are endowed with genuinely altruistic cognitive mechanisms, a view now labelled “Strong Reciprocity” (SR). According to SR, an innate propensity for altruistic punishment and altruistic rewarding makes us averse to inequity (Fehr & Rockenbach, 2004). In this talk, I argue that this moral optimism is far-fetched. Yes, the ‘cold logic’ model of rationality is not an accurate description of our decision-making mechanisms, but the SR model, I shall argue, relies on unwarranted assumptions. I present another model–the ‘hot logic’ approach–according to which human agents are selfish agents adapted to trade, exchange and partner selection in biological markets (Noë et al., 2001). Cognitive mechanisms of decision-making aims primarily at maximizing positive outcomes and minimizing negative ones. This initial hedonism is gradually modulated by social norms, by which agents learn how to maximise their utility given the norms. The ‘hot logic’ approach provide a simpler explanation of cooperation and fairness: subjects make ‘fair’ offers in the ultimatum game because they know their offer would be rejected otherwise. Responders affective reaction to ‘unfair offers’ is in fact a reaction to the loss of an expected monetary gain: they anticipated that the proposer would comply with social norms. This claim is supported by other imaging studies showing that loss of money can be aversive, and that actual and counterfactual utility recruit the same neural resources (Delgado et al., 2006; Montague et al., 2006). This approach explains why subjects make lower offers in the dictator game (an ultimatum game in which the responder make an offer and the responder's role is entirely passive) than in the ultimatum, why, when using a computer displaying eyespots, almost twice as many participants transfer money in the dictator (Haley & Fessler, 2005), and why attractive people are offered more in the ultimatum (Solnick & Schweitzer, 1999). In every case, agents seek to maximize a complex hedonic utility function, where the reward and the losses can be monetary, emotional or social (reputation, acceptance, etc.). SR is thus seen as cooperative habits that are not repaid (Burnham & Johnson, 2005).
Social Neuroeconomics: Strong Reciprocity or “Hot Logic”?
Social Neuroeconomics: Strong Reciprocity or “Hot Logic”?
Benoit Hardy-Vallée, Ph.D.
Presentation from the Fruition Academ
Social reciprocity presentation
Social reciprocity presentation
Jessica Dreistadt
WWCMA Meeting November 15, 2011: Putting Behavioral Economics to Work with Health and Wellness
Putting Behavioral Economics to Work
Putting Behavioral Economics to Work
Worksite Wellness Council of Massachusetts
Surfing a Web of Trust: Reputation and Reciprocity on CouchSurfing.com
Surfing a Web of Trust: Reputation and Reciprocity on CouchSurfing.com
debra24
Describes Systems of Exchange. Reciprocity; Redistribution; Market Exchange
Economic Anthropology: Distribution and Exchange
Economic Anthropology: Distribution and Exchange
PaulVMcDowell
A Technology Product Development and Innovation Consulting Company
Reciprocity ROI Standard Presentation
Reciprocity ROI Standard Presentation
Paul Claxton
I believe Public Speaking is one of the best ways to give back to the world. Take the time to learn, take the time to acquire the necessary knowledge, and then apply those things. Then share your experiences. The people who are best at what they do are not hiding in a corner or a cave somewhere they are out and about talking about what they do and paying the knowledge forward!
Paul Claxton - My Public Speaker One Sheet
Paul Claxton - My Public Speaker One Sheet
Paul Claxton
Using emerging technology and innovation to create sustainable impact in the areas of healthcare, robotics, and AI
Reciprocity ROI, LLC Methods in Healthcare, Robotics and AI
Reciprocity ROI, LLC Methods in Healthcare, Robotics and AI
Paul Claxton
Venture Partner | Serial Entrepreneur | Board Advisor | Public Speaker | U.S. Marine Veteran | #innovation #robotics #boardadvisor #boardadvisors #entrepreneur #entrepreneurship #innovator #leadership #publicspeaker #technologist #veteran #marine #venturepartner #venturecapital #healthcare #artificialintelligence #conventional #resume
Paul Claxton Conventional Resume
Paul Claxton Conventional Resume
Paul Claxton
Venture Partner | Serial Entrepreneur | Board Advisor | Public Speaker | U.S. Marine Veteran | #innovation #robotics #boardadvisor #boardadvisors #entrepreneur #entrepreneurship #innovator #leadership #publicspeaker #technologist #veteran #marine #venturepartner #venturecapital #healthcare #artificialintelligence #creative #resume
Paul Claxton Creative Resume
Paul Claxton Creative Resume
Paul Claxton
There are unseen, intangible forces driving our global economies. What are these forces? Some people say that technology has increased inequality, but really it appears that technology has just simply changed the global economy and made more opportunity for equality. This change in the economy has forced us to become more relevant and transparent as individuals and organizations. Equality, opportunity and prosperity exists for all who are willing to open their eyes and understand the forces causing such disruptive changes in our global economies. As we move forward into the future, equality and opportunity will be determined by understanding how we can be relevant to these unseen, intangible forces. In this webinar, I will discuss how relevance will determine who becomes the winners and losers in our society based on how well organizations and individuals understand and adapt to these unstoppable and unseen changing forces.
Maintaining Relevance In the New Global Tech Economy
Maintaining Relevance In the New Global Tech Economy
Paul Claxton
Guidance on what to do if one of these scenarios happen to you. Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer or human resource professional. However in a previous life I have spent a number of years in executive search placement staffing at Fortune 500 and boutique firms. I currently run teams out of my own company(s).
At Will Employment During COVID19: Maintaining and Retaining Employment.
At Will Employment During COVID19: Maintaining and Retaining Employment.
Paul Claxton
Sensory environment rooms for those with wellness conditions such as Autism, PTSD etc. The rooms can be fitted with various forms of technology.
Sensory Haven
Sensory Haven
Paul Claxton
Modular work spaces, modular cubicles, and privacy rooms
Your Haven
Your Haven
Paul Claxton
Tutorial on Investing I wrote. We're working on our own MVP Release and we also do a lot of work supporting startups. In my experience, there seems to be an lacking of education in the marketplace about VC/Angel/Seed/Investment and what investors look for. VC funding is highly popularized but it is not the only way to fund your business startup e.g. you can go organically or get a traditional loan and there are pros and cons to do each approach. I created this document for others to use as a tutorial or reference point of information, and hopefully help them in their own funding efforts. ***This is for example purposes only and proprietary information has been excluded or changed. ***
Investment strategy for mvp development and release
Investment strategy for mvp development and release
Paul Claxton
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais de Paul Claxton
Using emerging technology and innovation to create sustainable impact in the areas of healthcare, robotics, and AI
Reciprocity ROI, LLC Methods in Healthcare, Robotics and AI
Reciprocity ROI, LLC Methods in Healthcare, Robotics and AI
Paul Claxton
Venture Partner | Serial Entrepreneur | Board Advisor | Public Speaker | U.S. Marine Veteran | #innovation #robotics #boardadvisor #boardadvisors #entrepreneur #entrepreneurship #innovator #leadership #publicspeaker #technologist #veteran #marine #venturepartner #venturecapital #healthcare #artificialintelligence #conventional #resume
Paul Claxton Conventional Resume
Paul Claxton Conventional Resume
Paul Claxton
Venture Partner | Serial Entrepreneur | Board Advisor | Public Speaker | U.S. Marine Veteran | #innovation #robotics #boardadvisor #boardadvisors #entrepreneur #entrepreneurship #innovator #leadership #publicspeaker #technologist #veteran #marine #venturepartner #venturecapital #healthcare #artificialintelligence #creative #resume
Paul Claxton Creative Resume
Paul Claxton Creative Resume
Paul Claxton
There are unseen, intangible forces driving our global economies. What are these forces? Some people say that technology has increased inequality, but really it appears that technology has just simply changed the global economy and made more opportunity for equality. This change in the economy has forced us to become more relevant and transparent as individuals and organizations. Equality, opportunity and prosperity exists for all who are willing to open their eyes and understand the forces causing such disruptive changes in our global economies. As we move forward into the future, equality and opportunity will be determined by understanding how we can be relevant to these unseen, intangible forces. In this webinar, I will discuss how relevance will determine who becomes the winners and losers in our society based on how well organizations and individuals understand and adapt to these unstoppable and unseen changing forces.
Maintaining Relevance In the New Global Tech Economy
Maintaining Relevance In the New Global Tech Economy
Paul Claxton
Guidance on what to do if one of these scenarios happen to you. Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer or human resource professional. However in a previous life I have spent a number of years in executive search placement staffing at Fortune 500 and boutique firms. I currently run teams out of my own company(s).
At Will Employment During COVID19: Maintaining and Retaining Employment.
At Will Employment During COVID19: Maintaining and Retaining Employment.
Paul Claxton
Sensory environment rooms for those with wellness conditions such as Autism, PTSD etc. The rooms can be fitted with various forms of technology.
Sensory Haven
Sensory Haven
Paul Claxton
Modular work spaces, modular cubicles, and privacy rooms
Your Haven
Your Haven
Paul Claxton
Tutorial on Investing I wrote. We're working on our own MVP Release and we also do a lot of work supporting startups. In my experience, there seems to be an lacking of education in the marketplace about VC/Angel/Seed/Investment and what investors look for. VC funding is highly popularized but it is not the only way to fund your business startup e.g. you can go organically or get a traditional loan and there are pros and cons to do each approach. I created this document for others to use as a tutorial or reference point of information, and hopefully help them in their own funding efforts. ***This is for example purposes only and proprietary information has been excluded or changed. ***
Investment strategy for mvp development and release
Investment strategy for mvp development and release
Paul Claxton
Mais de Paul Claxton
(8)
Reciprocity ROI, LLC Methods in Healthcare, Robotics and AI
Reciprocity ROI, LLC Methods in Healthcare, Robotics and AI
Paul Claxton Conventional Resume
Paul Claxton Conventional Resume
Paul Claxton Creative Resume
Paul Claxton Creative Resume
Maintaining Relevance In the New Global Tech Economy
Maintaining Relevance In the New Global Tech Economy
At Will Employment During COVID19: Maintaining and Retaining Employment.
At Will Employment During COVID19: Maintaining and Retaining Employment.
Sensory Haven
Sensory Haven
Your Haven
Your Haven
Investment strategy for mvp development and release
Investment strategy for mvp development and release
Baixar agora