Anúncio

5_UGent_TrainingCoP_Emilie_v2.pptx

24 de Nov de 2022
Anúncio

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Similar a 5_UGent_TrainingCoP_Emilie_v2.pptx(20)

Mais de OpenAccessBelgium(20)

Anúncio

5_UGent_TrainingCoP_Emilie_v2.pptx

  1. Open Science Training Coordinators Community of Practice www.openaire.eu/cop-training Open Science Training Coordinators Community of Practice Training as grounds for collaboration across disciplinary boundaries Open Science : connecting the actors! 2022, 21 November 2022 Emilie Hermans …sharing, collaborating, contributing, coordinating
  2. Owned and driven by members… Set up in 2018 100+ members ) Projects Institutions Research infrastructures NRENs & more… Slack channel Google Group “The CoP can be regarded as a discipline transcending network of trainers and training organisers. We have built a community. We are exchanging information and best practices.” CoP member, 2020 20+ countries EOSC clusters events monthly meetings 46 10+ Open Science Training Coordinators Community of Practice www.openaire.eu/cop-training
  3. Draft vision, mission and values Vision • Make open science and FAIR the default in Europe (or broader?) with people equipped and skilled to do this. Mission • The CoP is an informal network of training coordinators working together to improve open science training and advocate for FAIR and open science • The CoP aims to act as the collective voice for the training coordinators of a wide range of institutions, projects and initiatives • The CoP organises, together with its collaborators, workshops and other knowledge exchange events related to open science training Values • Open science advocacy, informal, friendly, cooperative • Transcending projects, nations - focussed on our values Community of Practice for Open Science Training Coordinators Draft document
  4. • Past activities Blog post Workshop report & recommendations EOSC Skills & Training WG Report Realising the European Open Science Cloud conference session on examples of community building …sharing, collaborating, contributing, coordinating Past activities
  5. 2020 Survey of members - What do you think are the main achievements of the CoP? • Establishment of community across Europe and wider. Exchange of news and information on cases of good practice. • The CoP can be regarded as a discipline transcending network of trainers and training organisers. We have built a community. We are exchanging information and best practices. We have successfully (co-) organized a few workshops. • Exchange of experience • I think the organisation of events was a great achievement, even though I was not directly involved but I would like to see more of it. I found it one of the best ways to hear about the various different projects going on. • Providing a friendly cooperative place to share practical problems and solutions. It's the best forum I've found to make links between various projects and initiatives involving training and open science. • regular interaction of trainers to avoid duplication and share information • The objective of establishing itself as a community is accomplished. The community grew in number of participants and the exchange of information and practices was also achieved. New challenges for the coming year need to be defined.
  6. Our activities - 2021 • Strengthen the network and increase engagement • Monthly calls with member presentations • Taskforces on specific topics • Raise the profile and voice of the CoP • Improved web presence, increased blogging and use of social media • Presentations about the community at conferences • Involvement in the REPO project (Reimagining Educational Practices for Open) • CoP Open Science Training Week at the Open Science Fair, September 13 - 17, 2021 • Support EOSC skills building • Review EOSC report recommendations and identify gaps • Participate in EOSC projects: EOSC Future, EOSC regional and thematic projects • Participation in EOSC Advisory Groups / Taskforces (but this cannot be done directly as the CoP, but via members who are also EOSC Association members) …sharing, collaborating, contributing, coordinating
  7. Current activities • How to make training materials FAIR - sharing experiences from different communities of how they have tried to do this • Contributions from: CLARIN, ELIXIR, EMBL Bio-IT, OpenAIRE, SSHOC, CESSDA, FORRT, EOSC Synergy • Article in progress: “Towards FAIRification of training materials and catalogues – lessons learned from research communities” Wiegers, Luc, & van Gelder, Celia W. G. (2019). Illustration for "Ten simple rules for making training materials FAIR" (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3593258
  8. Current activities Agenda 1. Welcome new CoP members 2. Presentation on “The Bicycle Principles for Effective, Inclusive, and Career-spanning Short-format Training” → slide deck 3. Reports from Task Forces - FAIR Training Materials - Quality assurance of training - Training in EOSC 4. Training handbooks - OS online handbook: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7254522 - OpenAIRE updates the FOSTER Open Science toolkit 5. UNESCO working group - 26 Sept meeting. Update 6. Trainings and events - OpenAIRE TtT Bootcamp - EOSC Future - Train-the-Trainer: An active learning course on understanding & using EOSC - Skills4EOSC – September kick-off https://www.eventi.garr.it/en/sk4eosc-meet/kickoff-home 7. AOB
  9. Current activities •Training in EOSC •Quality assurance of training materials •Online training handbook: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7254522 https://eoscfuture.eu/
  10. Member voices Prof Hugh Shanahan Royal Holloway, University of London “…the CODATA-RDA schools curriculum was initially very focussed on the technical sides of Data Science with some discussion of Open Science. It was through meetings with instructors from the community (and this is prior to the CoP) that it became clear that we needed to broaden our outlook and cover more of its social aspects. Hence we’ve ended up with a curriculum that is uniquely broad (if shallow) for ECRs. Having this cross-disciplinary community means that different ideas for teaching get brought up. The technical subjects tend to be focussed on discrete exercises with teaching while the social subjects allow room for more discussion and they can both learn from each other.”
  11. Member voices “Many of us are in different projects, handling more or less the same subjects in (slightly) different environments. Hearing other people's experience and solutions is very enriching. A specific example is the question on training & support catalogues developed in different projects. We demonstrated the different catalogues and discussed how we could collaborate or align. At the OSFair the group organised a session around the topic.” Inge Van Nieuwerburgh University of Ghent
  12. Member voices “Some brainstorming about the benefits to me of this CoP being cross- disciplinary: • thanks to CoP I got to know resources that I was not aware of • sharing of know-how might so far be more established in some disciplines than in others • mixed teams help to get to know new tools • in the beginning it is important to create a common vocabulary Actually we are all responsible of a part of the implementation of Open Science at different levels and in different purposes. I would say that we are facing a strong difficulty: we want to push the development of Open Science and EOSC but changing habits is a very long process and needs time to avoid frustration and misunderstanding. It helps me to know that others face similar difficulties - and even more to hear how they deal with it. Thank you all for this.” Marie Czuray University of Vienna, EOSC-Pillar
  13. Member voices “I came to be an open science trainer for food and nutrition researchers through my organization’s participation in a H2020 European project. I knew nothing about open science though I have years of experience in university teaching and in running trainings for professionals. What an eye-opener the CoP has been for me! In a gentle and ongoing way through our monthly meetings I am coming to understand the breadth of open science training methods and resources. I had no idea that so many people in so many fields were working on this! The LIBER example of a treasure hunt for open science knowledge is one small example of a method that I brought to the FNS-Cloud project, another CoP colleague talked eloquently one meeting about finding out what your trainees need and want to know and this is a lesson I’ve taken to heart. Participating in the CoP is easy, stress-free, and brings great rewards.” Katherine Flynn ISEKI-Food Association
  14. Thank you! Emilie Hermans Emilie.Hermans@UGent.be www.openaire.eu/cop-training
Anúncio