Panel on ORCID integrations by publishers

1. orcid.org Contact Info: p. +1-301-922-9062 a. 10411 Motor City Drive, Suite 750, Bethesda, MD 20817 USA Connecting Research and Researchers: How ORCID is Facilitating the Interoperable Exchange of Information 30 May 2014 Society for Scholarly Publishing Boston Rebecca Bryant, PhD Director of Community, ORCID r.bryant@orcid.org @ORCID_ORG http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3881

2. Why we need a persistent identifier J. Å. S. Sørensen J.Aa. S. Sørensen J. Åge S. Sørensen J.Aage S. Sørensen J. Åge Smærup Sørensen J.Aage Smaerup Sørensen 2 http://ands.org.au/newsletters/share_issue18.pdf •  Common names •  Multiple names/transliterations •  Name changes, esp. for women

3. What is ORCID? The ORCID •  Unique, persistent identifier for researchers & scholars •  Free to researchers •  Can be used throughout one’s career, across professional activities, disciplines, nations & languages •  Embedded into workflows & metadata •  API enables interoperability between siloed systems The ORCID Organization •  Non-profit, non- proprietary, open, and community-driven •  Global, interdisciplinary •  Supported by the membership of organizations using the ORCID API §  Funding organizations §  Professional societies §  Universities & research institutes §  Publishers 3 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3881

4. Facilitating interoperable exchange of information The ORCID API enables the exchange of information between systems: •  Less time re- keying •  Improved data •  Easier maintenance •  Better sharing across systems 4 Grants http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3881 Repositories Researcher Information Systems Publishers Other identifiersSociety membership

5. Adoption and Integration 5 ORCID has issued over 720,000 iDs since our launch in October 2012. Integration and use is international. Publishing 27% Universities & Research Orgs 39% Funders 7% Associations 15% Repositories & Profile Sys 12% EMEA 35% Americas 50% AsiaPac 15% Over 130 members, from every sector of the international research community - 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Creator Website Trusted party

6. Who is Integrating and How? 6 •  Research Funders •  Universities and Research Orgs •  Publishers •  Professional Associations For a list of organizations and integrations see http://orcid.org/organizations/integrators

7. 7 “Where possible, it is also recommended that contributors be uniquely identifiable, and data uniquely attributable, through identifiers which are persistent, non-proprietary, open and interoperable (e.g. through leveraging existing sustainable initiatives such as ORCID for contributor identifiers and DataCite for data identifiers).” European Commission H2020 Grantee Guidelines http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/ grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf http://biomedicalresearchworkforce.nih.gov/tracking-system.htm#d Funders “Greater precision and transparency of the research outputs linked to a particular funder or grant is vital to help us better understand the impact of our funding.” Liz Allen, Head of Evaluation,Wellcome Trust http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9298-3168 §  Funding organizations are requesting ORCID iDs §  Funders have the potential to capture ORCID information to improve grant submission process for researchers

8. 8 •  NIH •  DOE, Office of Scientific & Technical Information (OSTI) •  FDA •  Autism Speaks •  Wellcome Trust •  National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK) •  Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) (Portugal) •  Japan Science & Technology Agency (JST) •  National Institute of Informatics (NII), Japan •  Swedish Research Foundation •  Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF)

9. How are Universities Integrating? 9 For more on university integrators see http:// orcid.org/organizations/ researchorganizations •  Researcher Information Systems •  Institutional Repositories •  ElectronicTheses & Dissertations (ETDs) •  Campus directories (LDAP) •  Record creation for faculty and students

10. Member organizations U.S. Institutions •  Boston •  Brown •  Caltech •  Carnegie Mellon •  Cornell •  Harvard •  MIT •  MSKCC •  Notre Dame •  NYU Langone Medical Center •  Penn State •  Purdue •  Stony Brook •  Texas A&M •  University of Colorado •  University of Kansas •  University of Michigan •  University of Missouri •  University of Washington •  University ofVirginia Worldwide •  Cambridge •  CERN •  Chinese Academy of Sciences •  European Bioinformatics Institutes (EMBL-EBI) •  Consorcio Madroño •  Glasgow •  Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI) •  Oxford •  Stockholm •  University College London •  University of Hong Kong •  University of Sydney 10 For more on university integrators see http:// orcid.org/organizations/ researchorganizations

11. •  Creating ORCID iDs for: •  10,000+ grad students •  All postdocs •  All faculty •  Also tying to ETDs & campus directory •  Why? •  Having an ORCID iD is part of your professional identity as a scholar •  A persistent identifier will help TAMU track future career outcomes University Case study:

12. Works are discoverable —and distinguishable from others—by iD, not just name Publishers requests ORCID iDs in manuscript submission ORCID iD is a part of the metadata—in addition to the author’s name Data then flows into search tools like PubMed, Scopus, and WOS Publishers

13. Publishing community members Publishing Members: AIP Publishing,AIRITI,Aries,Atlas, Copernicus, EBSCO, Editage, Elsevier, EDP Sciences, eJournal Press, eLife, Epistemio, Flooved, Hindawi, Infra-M Academic Publishing, Jnl Bone and Joint Surgery, Karger, Landes Bioscience, National Academy of Sciences, Nature, Oxford University Press, Peerage of Science, PLOS, RNAi, ScienceOpen, Springer,Taylor & Francis,Wiley,Wolters Kluwer Association Members: American Astronomical Soc,American Chemical Soc,ACSESS,AAAS,American Geophysical Union, American Mathematical Soc,American Psychological Assn, American Physical Soc,American Soc Microbiology,American Soc Civil Engineers,Assn Computing Machinery, Electrochemical Society, IEEE, IOP, Modern Language Assn, OSA, Royal Soc Chemistry, Soc Neuroscience 13

14. Suggested Practices for Collection & Display of ORCID Identifiers •  Add authenticated collection of ORCID identifiers to your manuscript submission process. •  NEVER let an author type in an iD. •  Encourage all authors publishing in your journal to obtain an ORCID identifier. •  Ensure that iDs are included in the XML submitted to CrossRef and other repositories. •  Display ORCID iDs in publication. 14

15. Recognizing reviewer service •  Acknowledge Peer Reviewers •  Link Authors, Reviewers, Members, and Meeting Participants 13 June 2014 orcid.org 15

16. Learn more 16 http://orcid.org/organizations/publishers/learnmore

17. ORCID Membership Member organizations may use the member API to: •  Read information from an ORCID record •  Send data such as publications to ORCID records •  Integrate a search and link wizard to enable researchers to connect with their works •  Link ORCID identifiers to other IDs and registry systems •  Create ORCID records on behalf of employees or affiliates 17

18. •  Find out more at http://orcid.org •  More on membership at http://orcid.org/about/ membership •  Learn about tools to embed ORCID iDs at http:// support.orcid.org/knowledgebase/ •  Attend an outreach meeting http://orcid.org/events •  Subscribe to our blog at http://orcid.org/about/news and follow @ORCID_Org on Twitter •  Contact me at r.bryant@orcid.org 1813 June 2014 orcid.org Thank you!

19. | 1 Michael Habib, MSLS Sr. Product Manager, Scopus habib@elsevier.com twitter.com/habib orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-7565 Connecting researchers with themselves: How ORCID consolidates identity across the scholarly communication ecosystem Society for Scholarly Publishing - Boston, MA - May 30 2014

20. | 2 Researcher EES Scopus SciVal/ Pure 2 Elsevier’s spaces in the ecosystem

22. | 4 Scopus

23. | 5 Scopus Profile Organization

24. | 6 Dr. James Smith 46533489 ORCID Mission: ORCID aims to solve the name ambiguity problem in research and scholarly communications by creating a central registry of unique identifiers for individual researchers The Solution: The ORCID Registry Dr. Smith Dr. J. Smith Dr. James Smith

25. | 7 Authors can use Scopus to populate their ORCID profile via Scopus Author Profiles, the Scopus2ORCID Wizard at orcid.scopusfeedback.com or from ORCID!

26. | 8 First look! – Expected release: Sunday

27. | 9 https://orcid.org/statistics Retrieved:30-May-2014

28. | 10 Elsevier Research Intelligence

29. | 11 11 Retrieved:30-May-2014

30. | 12 Retrieved: 19/05/2014 Retrieved:30-May-2014

31. | 13 FCT Portugal Evaluation of R & D units in 2013 Retrieved:30-May-2014

32. | 14 Pure: Create, manage and report on your researcher's ORCID IDs • February 2014 – Release 4.18 - Link your ORCID license to Pure and automatically create and verify ORCIDs within Pure - Monitor your researcher's use of ORCIDs within Pure and create reports of the content linked to them

33. | 15 Add or Create an ORCID ID from main profile page in Pure

34. | 16 Create an ORCID ID (via Web Services) with pre-filled data

35. | 17 Jisc-ARMA ORCID pilot project – HEI based projects “In particular, the objectives are: • to explore the embedding of ORCID iDs in institutional systems and workflows • to assess costs, benefits and risks of ORCID implementation • to gather evidence and recommend how to proceed – if appropriate – with national ORCID membership” (Retrieved 19/05/2014 from http://orcidpilot.jiscinvolve.org/wp/ ) Aston University “We intend to embed ORCID IDs into the HR system (CORE) so that new staff joining the university beyond this project will be required to register for ORCID as part of the employment process. The implementation plan, training materials and guidance notes will then be made available for use by other universities using PURE” University of York “Information about research outputs from the University is automatically shared between Pure and White Rose Research Online, our shared ePrints repository. Using ORCID to help with this interoperation is a real potential benefit and an important part of the project” (Retrieved 19/05/2014 from http://orcidpilot.jiscinvolve.org/wp/hei-based-projects/ )

36. | 18 Search by ORCID ID for Scopus Author Profiles Expected Q3/Q4 – Design above representative Pure will be a be able to retrieve Scopus Author ID (and associated documents) via ORCID ID search on Scopus APIs Expected Q4/Q1 - Search by ORCID ID for Documents Populate a CRIS with new documents published with an ORCID and Indexed in Scopus

37. | 19 Elsevier Editorial System (EES)

38. | 20| 20 Adoption by Authors in EES 14.7 15.1 15.3 15.6 15.8 16 16.3 16.6 16.8 17.1 17.4 17.6 17.8 18 18 18.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 31-Jan 07-Feb 14-Feb 21-Feb 28-Feb 07-Mar 14-Mar 21-Mar 28-Mar 04-Apr 11-Apr 18-Apr 25-Apr 02-May 09-May 16-May % Submissions to Production with ORCID(s)

39. | 21| 21 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 ORCID per Month Series1 Series2 Series3 Profiles (Corresponding Authors ORCIDs delivered to Production

40. | 22| 22 ORCID in EES Statistics Total number of profiles (corresponding authors) with ORCID IDs 111950 Total number of co-authors with ORCID IDs 148111 Submissions with ORCID ID in various stages 262492 Total submissions still in peer review in process 199718 Total submissions delivered to Production with one or more ORCIDs 62774 Total number of ORCIDs delivered to Production in the JSON file 64856

42. | 24 % Awareness of ORCID among research community 14% of the researchers have registered, 5 points higher than Q2 13 6% 8% 9% 10% 9% 11% 14% 14%15% 20% 23% 24% Q2 13 Q3 13 Q4 13 Q1 14 Aware and registered Aware but not registered

43. http://m2id.org/ Community built by Keita Bando, Mendeley Advisor and ORCID Ambassador

44. | 26 Announcing the ORCID Plugin for the Wordpress blogging platform • Released May 22 2014 as part of ORCID Codefest • Author posts with your ORCID ID • Add your ORCID ID to comments

45. | 27 www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence Thank you! Michael Habib, MSLS Sr. Product Manager, Scopus habib@elsevier.com twitter.com/habib orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-7565

46. ORCID @ PLOS in 8 Steps ! Martin Fenner http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-2405

47. Allow authors to enter ORCID identifier in manuscript submission system 2 1 8% of corresponding authors did so when PLOS enabled this feature last summer

48. Allow contributors to enter ORCID identifier in their profile page 3 2 1,052 contributors did so since February 2014 http://blogs.plos.org/tech/orcid-plos/

49. Unify contributor information across all systems and services 4 3 Many other systems …

50. Include ORCID identifiers in metadata pushed to CrossRef and PubMed 5 4 NLM DTD 3.0 JATS 1.0

51. Use Ringgold/ISNI as institutional identifier for contributors 6 5 ORCID Proﬁle

52. Pull in author information about past PLOS papers from ORCID Registry 7 6 12,303 ORCID proﬁles include at least one PLOS publication

53. Use ORCID for Single Sign-On 8 7 http://datacite.labs.orcid-eu.org/

54. Require ORCID identifiers for all contributions 9 8

55. • Allow authors to enter ORCID identifier in manuscript submission system • Allow contributors to enter ORCID identifier in their profile page • Unify contributor information across all systems and services • Include ORCID identifiers in metadata pushed to CrossRef and PubMed • Use Ringgold/ISNI as institutional identifier for contributors • Pull in author information about past PLOS papers from ORCID Registry • Use ORCID for Single Sign-On • Require ORCID identifiers for all contributions 10

56. FACULTY OF 1000’S ORCID INTEGRATION: CONNECTING OUR AUTHORS TO THEIR WORK César A. Berríos-‐Otero, PhD Outreach Director, F1000Research cesar.berrios-‐otero@f1000.com hMp://f1000.com hMp://f1000research.com @f1000Research @f1000

57. WHY ORCID? Full name: César A. Berríos Otero Normally: César Berríos Only 6 are mine!

58. WHY ORCID? Full name: César A. Berríos Otero Normally: César Berríos For graduate school: César A. Berríos-‐Otero Same for F1000! Properly connect authors AND referees to their work! Assign proper credit where it’s due!

59. F1000PRIME •  Faculty includes over 5000 peer-‐nominated scien]sts and clinical researchers and ~5000 Associates •  Faculty Members select, rate and comment on the most interes]ng and important research ar]cles (2-‐3% of the life science literature) from ~3,700 journals •  Assigns one of three posi]ve ra]ngs: Excep]onal (3 stars), Very Good (2 stars) or Good (1 star) Directory of recommenda]ons of the best research in biology and medicine from a faculty of global experts. (Launched 2002) Partners with ORCiD since August 2012

60. F1000PRIME PERSONAL HOMEPAGE

61. F1000PRIME ORCID INTEGRATION

65. FACULTY OF 1000 Directory of recommenda]ons of the best research in biology and medicine from a faculty of global experts. (Launched 2002) Open science journal for life scien]sts that oﬀers rapid publica]on and transparent peer review. (Launched 2012)

66. F1000RESEARCH Open science journal for life scien]sts that oﬀers rapid publica]on and transparent peer review. (Launched 2012) Key features: •  All data included •  Publica]on within a week •  Transparent, post-‐publica]on peer review by invited referees •  Accepts all sound science, including single ﬁndings, case reports, protocols, replica]ons, null/nega]ve results and more tradi]onal ar]cles

67. THE PUBLICATION PROCESS •  The peer review process can take months – some]mes years. •  Aker rejec]on, start over again with another journal. •  This delays publica]on. •  Referees are anonymous.

68. THE PUBLICATION PROCESS – REVOLUTIONIZED! •  F1000Research ar]cles are published online aker an in-‐house pre-‐refereeing check, on average, within 5 working days. •  Peer review and revisions are carried out publicly by invited referees. •  Ar]cles with suﬃcient posi]ve referee reports are indexed in PubMed. Approved Approved with reserva]ons Not approved

70. THE PUBLICATION PROCESS – REVOLUTIONIZED!

72. CASRAI-‐ORCID PEER REVIEW SERVICE PROJECT •  Ar]cles as a researcher output is well recognised and credit clearly given •  Many other researcher roles are not •  One of the major ]me-‐consuming roles but a crucial one for scien]ﬁc progress is as a reviewer but currently hard to provide credit

73. Referees are named Referee report metrics

74. TASK: To develop a schema and a set of ﬁelds to describe peer review that is standardized and can be used by all for a variety of types of peer review. CASRAI-‐ORCID PEER REVIEW SERVICE PROJECT

75. CASRAI-‐ORCID PEER REVIEW SERVICE PROJECT -‐ WHO’S INVOLVED Project Manager Paul Ritchie (CASRAI) Co-‐Chairs Laura Paglione (Technical Director, ORCID) Rebecca Lawrence (Managing Director, F1000 Research Ltd) Working Group David Baker (Execu]ve Director, CASRAI) Laure Haak (Execu]ve Director, ORCID) Liz Wager (Consultant, Sideview and Visi]ng Professor, University of Split) Brooks Hanson (Director Publica]ons, American Geophysical Union) Ed Clayton (Senior Director of Strategic Funding and Grants Administra]on, Au]sm Speaks) Paul A. Djupe (Professor, Denison University and Editor, Poli]cs and Religion) Dan Whaley (Founder, Hypothes.is)

76. CHALLENGES •  Many types of peer review: o  Ar]cle peer review can be pre-‐ or post-‐publica]on, open, single-‐ or double-‐ blinded o  Grant peer review – varying levels of openness o  Conference peer review o  Tenure / REF peer review •  Several categories of peer review: o  Formal evalua]on c.f. F1000Prime recommenda]ons o  Formal peer review o  Comment c.f. PubMed Commons, PubPeer, Hypothes.is •  Also many reviewer roles, e.g. Editor-‐in-‐Chief, Sec]on Editor, Editorial Board member, Panel member •  Signiﬁcant amount of peer review leads to rejec]on so this can be harder to capture

77. AGREED SCOPE Ar]cle peer review – all types of formal peer review, including other roles such as Editor Grant review Conference topic/mee]ng abstract review Tenure review / REF review Other areas such as annota]on, commen]ng etc were decided to be out of scope for now. ✔ ✔ ✔ X ✔

78. NEXT STEPS •  Drak recommenda]ons are due to be submiMed in June •  CASRAI will translate these recommenda]ons into fully defined record-‐types, fields and classifica]ons for inclusion in the CASRAI dic]onary so they can be openly used by the broader community •  ORCID will use the recommenda]ons to develop methods for linking review ac]vi]es with ORCID iden]fiers and for pos]ng review metadata to the ORCID Registry •  Interested reviewers: info@casrai.org.

79. NEXT STEPS ADOPTION! Con]nue to ask authors, reviewers and users to register: F1000Prime: 345 Faculty Members (out of ~11,000) F1000Research: 48 Authors (out of ~1000) Big announcement to our reviewers at the end of CASRAI project

80. ORCID everywhere at the American Geophysical Union Brooks Hanson Director, Publications bhanson@agu.org

81. About AGU •  60,000 members worldwide •  19 journals; also books •  11,000 submissions/year from ~60,000 authors •  Fall Meeting >20,000 attendees each year; 20,000 abstracts from 50,000 authors •  4 diﬀerent, large people databases all with duplicates.

82. All Together Now… •  4 diﬀerent databases: peer review, member, abstracts, publisher (Wiley). •  Integrating all into the member database but dream is seamless user experience •  ORCID to help for 360 degree view of members (abstracts and papers) •  SSO everywhere •  Pass ID’s of authors to Wiley and back to ORCID •  Recognize reviewers too

83. Timeline 2014 • Sync editorial and member databases • SSO and ORCIDs 2014? • Published papers back to ORCID from Wiley • Abstracts integrated 2015 • Peer review credits to ORCID • Full SSO between all databases

84. Challenges •  So far uptake has been gradual/slow. Discussing how to accelerate. •  Especially problematic for co-authors (email sent on submission but need to be more proactive) and reviewers •  Co-authors of abstracts even more of a challenge.

Panel on ORCID integrations by publishers

Esté a ler uma amostra.

Confira estes a seguir

Panel on ORCID integrations by publishers

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Diapositivos para si (20)

Semelhante a Panel on ORCID integrations by publishers (20)

Mais de ORCID, Inc (20)

Mais recentes (20)