Internationalisation of Danish Research
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•344 views
Data on Internationalisation of Danish R&D (mostly in Danish, but some slides in English)
![Internationalisering af dansk forskning – et overblik Nikolaj Helm-Petersen [email_address] Chefkonsulent, Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/2011nhpinternationalisering-13208621896232-phpapp01-111109121148-phpapp01/85/Internationalisation-of-Danish-Research-1-320.jpg)
![[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Småt men godt]()
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Internationalisation of Danish Research
Similar to Internationalisation of Danish Research (20)
Internationalisation of Danish Research
- 1. Internationalisering af dansk forskning – et overblik Nikolaj Helm-Petersen [email_address] Chefkonsulent, Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser
- 3. Videnskabelig gennemslagskraft. 2006-2010. Anm.: National Science Indikators (NSI), 2010. Den relative impact er et udtryk for det gennemsnitlige antal citationer pr. artikel sat i forhold til verdensgennemsnittet. Den sorte streg repræsenterer verdensgennemsnittet.
- 7. Among 16 countries Denmark ranks as the one most likely to provide its scientists with an excellent all-round research experience. It scored best on a satisfaction ranking that included measures such as salary, health care, pension and degree of independence. … Denmark not only has the most satisfied scientists of the countries with sizeable samples according to our poll, it also has the happiest citizenry. This suggests that the ‘background’ influences of location and culture can sometimes have an influence on life and career satisfaction — and science professions are no exception Nature Juni 2010:
- 8. Danske universiteter er attraktive - Andel af danske universitetsstillinger (adjunkt, post.doc., lektor og professor) hvor der var kvalificerede udenlandske ansøgere. 1995-2006 pct. Til 19% af alle universitetsstillinger (2007-2009) var der ingen kvalificerede danske ansøgere
- 11. Markant flere europæiske forskningsmidler over tid * Sources : FP7 & J oint Programming Impact Assessments
- 13. Har vi overhovedet evidens for merværdi ved internationalt samarbejde? Kritisk masse i forskningen Alle taler om det, men ingen kan dokumentere det. Tekst: Jeg tror sgu vi har opnået kritisk masse for jeg har lige fået en ide
- 14. OECD: Impact of scientific production and the extent of international scientific collaboration, 2003-2009. For alle andre lande end USA: sammenhæng mellem impact og internationalisering Kilde: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 OECD and SCImago Research Group (forthcoming), Report on Scientific Production, based on Scopus Custom Data, Elsevier, June 2011 BRIC-lande
- 15. USA NSF: Doctorates awarded, by citizenship and field of study: 1989 and 2009
- 22. Tre Innovationscentre Fire teknologi- og forskningsattachéer ? Teknologi- og forskningsattaché Anders Ødegaard; aod@fi.dk http://www.gksaopaulo.um.dk/en Teknologi- og forsknings-attaché i São Paulo Kontakt: +49 (0)89 5458 5412; mucicd@um.dk www.icdmuenchen.um.dk/en Innovations-centeret i München Teknologi- og forskningsattaché Lars Christensen; (+86 21) 6085 2003; larsch@um.dk www.shanghai.um.dk/en Innovations-centeret i Shanghai Teknologi- og forskningsattaché Lars Beer Nielsen, Tlf: +1 650 543-3190. [email_address] www.siliconvalley.um.dk/en Innovations-centeret i Silicon Valley
Editor's Notes
- 1. The volume is expressed as an index where 1984=100. 2. Iceland has grown nationally as well as internationally; all the other ones have grown internationally. International volume is now 50-60%; 70% för Iceland.
- [Explain the graph.] Cultural proximity seems to be a strong factor behind the choice of cooperation partners. The other Nordic and Baltic states are on the top the (relative) list. The following 19 countries/regions, approximately the rest of the Western world, are chosen as cooperation partners by Danish researchers approximately as often as expected, considering their sizes. The exception to the aforementioned is South Africa, which is above both Canada and France in the Danish list. This is most likely an effect of directed developing programs. The large Asian and Latin American research nations are at the bottom of the list. Since the observed/expected measure is a zero sum game, this means that some other countries cooperate more with these countries.