The Intersection of InterLibrary Loan and Acquisition Models: A review of recent research practices
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•294 views
Speaker: Sarah Paige, ILL Coordinator, Bailey/Howe Library, University of Vermont
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to The Intersection of InterLibrary Loan and Acquisition Models: A review of recent research practices
Similar to The Intersection of InterLibrary Loan and Acquisition Models: A review of recent research practices (20)
More from NASIG
More from NASIG (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
The Intersection of InterLibrary Loan and Acquisition Models: A review of recent research practices
- 1. The Intersection of InterLibrary Loan and Acquisition Models: A review of recent research practices NASIG 2017, Indianapolis, IN Presented by Sarah Paige, John Riddick Student Grant Winner https ://upload.Wikimedia.org/Wikipedia/commons/9/96/Street_intersection_diagram.svg By Jonathan, Feb. 2008. CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International, 3.0 Unported, 2.5 #nasig17
- 2. Intersection of ILL & Acquisition models: A review Thank you! https://www.flickr.com/photos/stevewhite/1509146427/in/photolist-3imLDZ-bmdten-fsM5E-68iHJs-6QFNt-8nYffU-cJMxdf-UZYaTJ-6ky7Vc-6GaJqX-2nbvcj-gx1Wvv-4A3oLX-bGNeh8-8vDTr5-5UPSjX-9VJFx9-4YFSVb-5QaVEN- 5Wn3QY-mN8ua-6214YU-6K9tHm-38WwWw-54gtTj-9gm2Nd-Uwgdp9-n5Jkvb-apFgCf-uDaQt-567KxY-Z8hbH-DaXZF-5L2Lmo-4NsnPY-fmskDW-fYUGH-bDnvTE-uD9KS-dBvMYH-vgM1P-6Ru3M-5Yc92M-oicAy-5StsdS-CaLbN- dCyfuN-4rTZaS-3haXtg-zggAZ Taken by Steve White, called “Clap your hands”; taken on Oct. 6, 2007; CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license
- 3. Intersection of ILL & Acquisition models: A review I’m here in two capacities: Graduate student, University of North Texas MLIS Program InterLibrary Loan Coordinator, Bailey/Howe Library, University of Vermont
- 4. Intersection of ILL & Acquisition models: A review • Looked for articles within past 6 years • Used keywords like “ILL, Acquisitions, Pay-per-view, Demand-driven, E- resources, Collection development,” etc. • Used library databases Word art cloud created by Sarah Paige, May 2017
- 5. Intersection of ILL & Acquisition models: A review Collaboration Flickr image 34030307330_56cd9a52d6 Taken by Zach Catanzareti (of a Kevin Harvick pit stop) on May 2, 2017. CC Public Domain Mark 1.0 license.
- 6. Intersection of ILL & Acquisition models: A review Experimentation is key Small red futuristiccar image: Flickr image 10202424596_1741908060_m Taken by Bernard Spragg on Feb. 24, 2008. CC 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication license. Long red old cruiser car image: Flickr image 10203114535_082a8f6352_m Taken by Bernard Spragg on Feb. 24, 2008. CC 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationlicense. Red muscle car image: Flickrimage 33341144360_71b2ce9c88_m Taken by Jathan Johnston on March 18, 2017. CC Public Domain 1.0 license.
- 7. Intersection of ILL & Acquisition models: A review Many models tried: -- Expensive Big Deal packages -- Article rentals through DeepDyve -- PPV account-fee programs with vendors (e.g., Get It Now, RightsLink, etc.) -- PPV token programs with vendors (e.g., Wiley) -- PPV-converting-to-subscription -- ReadCube (PDF organizer & reader system) -- DDA programs focusing on acquiring content for permanent addition to catalog -- DDDLA (demand-driven discovery-layer acquisition) Flickr image 27266067973_5f6f79a279_z Taken by VS Racing Stuff. Uploaded June 24, 2016. Creative Commons (CC) Public Domain Mark 1.0 License.
- 8. Intersection of ILL & Acquisition models: A review References King, M.; Nichols, A.; & Hanson, M. (2011). Pay-per-view article delivery at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. The Serials Librarian, 601-4), 223-228. Hosburgh, N. (2012). Getting the most out of pay-per-view: A feasibility study and discussion of mediated and unmediated options. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 24(3), 204-211. Baynes, G.; & Hanson, M. (2012). Trialing mobile and article rental access options for journal content. The Serials Librarian, 62, 217-221. Sowards, S.W. (2013). Library-publisher experimentation and partnership in alternative models for journal content. The Serials Librarian, 65, 309-334. Fought, R. (2014). Breaking inertia: Increasing access to journals during a period of declining budgets: A case study. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 102(3), 192-196. England, M.; & Jones, P. (2014). Diversification of access pathways and the role of demand-driven acquisition: A case study at the University of Utah. The Serials Librarian, 66, 96-105. Jarvis, C.; & Gregory, J.M. (2016). Get it? Got it? Good!: Utilizing Get It Now article delivery service at a health sciences library. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 28(2), 93-100. Jaskowiak, M.; & Spires, T. (2016). The usage of ILLiad and Get It Now at a U.S. medium-sized academic library over a three-year period. Interlending & Document Supply, 44(2), 81-87. Harwell, J.H.; & Bunnelle, J. (2017). ATG special report -- Purchasing articles by demand-driven acquisition: An alternative serial distribution model for libraries. Faculty Publications – Rollins College, no. 147, 6 pages long. Retrieved from http://scholarship.rollins.edu/as_facpub/147 Anderson, R. (2017). When the wolf finally arrives: Big Deal cancellations in North American libraries. The Scholarly Kitchen blog, May 1, 2017.
- 9. Intersection of ILL & Acquisition models: A review Collaboration Experimentation Different options tried Success secured for scholarly solutions to access issues
- 10. Thank you, NASIG members, for this opportunity to speak and to be present here with you. ------------------------------------------------------------- spaige@uvm.edu smgpaige@gmail.com
Editor's Notes
- Hello, everyone, my name is Sarah Paige and as you can see, I’m here to talk about the intersection of InterLibrary Loan and Acquisitions, OR, how do we acquire e-resources content for our patrons?
- I first want to say Thank You to NASIG for honoring me this year with one of the John Riddick Student Grant awards. I am pleased to have been chosen and to be present here with all of you.
- I am here in two capacities: I won the Riddick Scholarship as an MLIS student through the University of North Texas, as part of its inaugural Vermont / Maine / New Hampshire online cohort, which was started in January 2016. I also am the InterLibrary Loan Coordinator at the Bailey/Howe Library, University of Vermont. I have worked at UVM for 10 years now, and have been in the ILL Dept. for 7 and a half of those years.
- This presentation was originally titled “The Intersection of InterLibrary Loan, Serials, Acquisitions, and Collection Development” because the intersection of those broad areas within academic libraries is what I’ve become most interested in as I’ve progressed in both my career and my MLIS studies. I am interested in helping my users find what they need for their research, and in pushing the boundaries to do so. After reading some recent research from the last five years, I’ve been able to see the kinds of programs that academic librarians have trialed in order to acquire e-content efficiently and cost-effectively. Here are a couple of big-picture take-aways I’ve gathered from that reading.
- Collaboration within and outside of libraries is crucial to success in gaining access to what users need for their research. Collaboration is necessary between publishers and libraries; between libraries regionally and internationally; between various departments within each academic library; and between the library and its parent institution.
- From the readings I looked at, experimentation is a key tool used to find a workable solution for each library’s unique situation. Librarians must be willing to try something new, even going against the grain and sometimes looking way outside the box, in order to find e-resource-acquisition solutions that work for their particular users.
- These are some of the many different acquisition models that I read about in the 10 articles that I reviewed for this presentation. I’m not sure which ones you all have tried already, but the list does demonstrate the variety of ways in which we try to get access to e-resources content.
- The articles I read for this presentation focus on the various ways academic librarians strive to fill their users’ needs, while at the same time staying within each library’s budget, staff, institutional, and workflow constraints.
- To conclude: One of the articles I read featured a year’s partnership between a publisher and a librarian as they tried to hammer out details of an access deal that would work for both entities. In that 2013 article, Steven W. Sowards of Michigan State University mentioned the “Project Management Triangle” of “cheap / fast / good – pick any two.” Sowards changes that to an e-resources access model with the phrases “reduced cost compared to Big Deal packages / expansive user access / perpetual ownership – pick any two” (Sowards, 2013, p. 316). We can ensure that publishers and librarians continue to work together to reach the pinnacle of access, which would be meeting all three of these needs instead of having to choose just two of them.
- Thank you again, NASIG, for the opportunity to speak at this year’s inaugural Student Presentations session.