Teams
4 teams:
Opening Government (Prime Minister, Deputy
Prime Minister)
Opening Opposition (Leader of Opposition,
Deputy Leader of Opposition)
Closing Government (Government Member,
Government Whip)
Closing Opposition (Opposition Member and
Opposition Whip)
Set-up of a BP Debate
Opening
Government
Closing
Government
Opening
Opposition
Closing
Opposition
Format of BP Debate
Only 1 motion is announced for each round.
All teams have 20 minutes to casebuild
started right after the Motion Launch
The government must propose the motion.
The opposition must negate the motion and
present an alternative (ie. the status quo or
counter model).
Each speaker has 7 minutes to speak.
Points of Information (POI) are allowed
between the 2nd and 6th minute.
Roles - Opening Government
The OG has to set up the debate – ie.
present the context/problem, define the
motion, set a parameter, propose a model (if
necessary).
The PM and DPM should present different
arguments – ie. through a split.
The PM and DPM should present logically
consistent arguments.
The OG should present the bulk of the
government’s case.
Roles - Opening Opposition
The OO should negate the motion and
present an alternative – ie. the status quo or
counter model.
The LO and DLO should present different
arguments – ie. through a split.
The LO and DLO should present logically
consistent arguments.
The OO should present the bulk of the
opposition’s case.
Roles - Closing Government and
Closing Opposition
Closing teams should aim to:
Move the debate to a different area.
Be distinct from the opening teams.
Both GM and OM should present an extension
– ie. new arguments, deeper analysis.
Both GW and OW should deliver rebuttals and
replies. No new materials/arguments!
Notas do Editor
There are disagreements on what is and what isn’t the ‘right way’ to do a BP debate.
What I’m going to explain to you is the most accepted view, or how the majority of adjudicators assess a BP debate (ex. extension is a must!).
Government bench.
Opposition bench.
All 4 teams are separate from one another. Physical separation between the teams, not casebuilding and discussing arguments together.
All try to win from one another, including the team on their own bench.
Motions are worded “That this house…(would/believes/should)”. “This house” refers to the government.
Example on proposing and negating motion.
Example of different argument of LO and DLO :
LO :from economy point of view (the raising of fuel price )
DLO: from society point of view.