This sample opposition to request for domestic violence restraining order in California is used to oppose a request for a domestic violence restraining order in California on the grounds that (1) the Petitioner has failed to meet their burden of showing reasonable proof of a past act or acts of abuse as required by California law and (2) the conduct of the opposing party does not constitute domestic violence and the law in California clearly states that the purpose of a domestic violence restraining order namely Family Code § 6300 is to prevent a recurrence of domestic violence and to ensure a period of separation of the parties involved. The sample on which this preview is based is 13 pages and contains brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
This sample opposition to request for domestic violence restraining order in California is used to oppose a request for a domestic violence restraining order in California on the grounds that (1) the Petitioner has failed to meet their burden of showing reasonable proof of a past act or acts of abuse as required by California law and (2) the conduct of the opposing party does not constitute domestic violence and the law in California clearly states that the purpose of a domestic violence restraining order namely Family Code § 6300 is to prevent a recurrence of domestic violence and to ensure a period of separation of the parties involved. The sample on which this preview is based is 13 pages and contains brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.