The 2016 Election - How and why it's President Trump
22 de May de 2017•0 gostou
1 gostaram
Seja o primeiro a gostar disto
mostrar mais
•2,000 visualizações
visualizações
Vistos totais
0
No Slideshare
0
De incorporações
0
Número de incorporações
0
Baixar para ler offline
Denunciar
Notícias e política
Presented at AAPOR 2017 by Sofi Sinozich, Research Analyst at Langer Research Associates, and Gregory Holyk, Senior Research Analyst at Langer Research Associates
22.7%
-10.3%
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Real median weekly earnings
1979-2014
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Bachelor’s degree and higher
68% of the
U.S. population
age 25+
No college degree
When it’s not
delivered…
▪ People get upset
▪ They reject the status quo
▪ They seek alternatives in leadership
▪ Social/values divisions gain salience
What it looks like
▪ In-group retrenchment; suspicion of “others”
▪ Acceptability of radical alternatives
▪ Bitterness and mutual incomprehension
▪ Hyper-motivated reasoning
▪ The two most unpopular major-party candidates
▪ The first female major-party presidential candidate
▪ Low enthusiasm; high negative voting
▪ Extreme partisanship
▪ Long-running and late-breaking controversies alike
▪ Flawed personal attributes
▪ Little issue differentiation
▪ Sharp class-based division, populism vs status quo
All else equal do you think it’s more important for a child:
a. (To be independent) or (to have respect for elders)?
b. (To be curious) or (to have good manners)?
c. (To be obedient) or (to be self-reliant)?
d. (To be considerate) or (to be well behaved)?
On race…
Which of these do you think is the bigger problem in this
country – (blacks and Hispanics losing out because of
preferences for whites), or (whites losing out because of
preferences for blacks and Hispanics)?
Blacks/Hispanics Whites
Clinton supporters 57% 16%
Trump supporters 16% 44%
On race…
Clinton supporters Trump supporters
Think … have too little
influence in society
Women 58% 21%
Minorities 67% 17%
Think … have too much
influence in society
Men 50% 20%
Whites 53% 8%
Minorities 9% 38%
In summary
▪ Controlling for demographics, partisanship, ideology and
presidential approval…
▪ Seeing too little influence for whites/men and too much
influence for minorities/women independently predicted
support for Trump
▪ (Similar effect size to partisanship, ideology, race – outpaced
only by Obama disapproval)
47%
39%
49% 49% 48%47% 48%
45% 44%
46%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Economy Corruption Terrorism Health care Immigration
Hillary Clinton Donald Trump
Clinton vs. Trump: Issues
Among likely voters
ABC News/Washington Post poll
(29%) (17%) (15%) (13%) (5%)
86%
47% 46%
81%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
Leaned Dems Leaned Reps Leaned Dems Leaned Reps
Trump and Women II
Among registered voters
Think Trump probably made Say it makes no difference
unwanted sexual advances in your vote
Among leaned Republicans who said Trump probably made
unwanted sexual advances, 72 percent also said it made no
difference in their vote.
In September 1998, 66 percent of leaned Democrats thought
Bill Clinton lied under oath. Among them, 78 percent
approved of his job performance, and 63 percent saw him
favorably.
Motivated
reasoning
Our alternative
▪ MRP on our probability-based tracking poll
▫ Correctly predicts 4 out of 5 previous
presidential elections – including 2016
State poll ABC/MRP Outcome
WI Marquette Clinton +6 Trump +1 Trump +1
NC Quinnipiac Clinton +2 Trump +6 Trump +4
PA Monmouth Clinton +4 Trump +2 Trump +1
MI RCP avg. Clinton +3.4 Clinton +1 Trump +0.2
NH UNH Clinton +11 Clinton +2 Clinton +0.3
MN Star Trib. Clinton +8 Clinton +3 Clinton +2
LRA: we do the ABC News/Washington Post polls
Overarching summary of what we observed in our work leading up to the election, ex.
19-day pre-election tracking poll
Exit poll results
Other political polls conducted throughout 2015 and 2016
Two things we saw going in – both of which ended up being important
High levels of p&p
Despite econ improving in the aggregate, longer-term economic trends would impact what gains would be seen on an individual level
Not going into detail, just “quick hits”
In our data
Double what we saw in early 80s
With that, going back to basics
What people really want out of government in the US
Reinforcement of in-group ties
Radical alternatives to status quo become acceptable
Lack of cooperation, understanding, increased resentment
All of this we could see coming ahead of time, and it all points in one direction
But we thought there might be a wrench in the works…
In case you forgot what happened
Class division not based on income per se (as it may have been in previous elections) but a cultural divide
Starting with Trump…
Real stability in his support throughout the cycle, following his announcement
Never consensus choice, but it wasn’t necessary
Because of the breaks, we could examine Trump vs non Trump voters
Two strands
First: economic discontent and populism, looking for outsider
Second: appeal of “Trumpismo” and resentment of other groups
Strong leader going to help you regain status
Pushback in two ways: approval of policies (deportation and muslim ban) and losing out due to pref (affirmative action)
That was mostly same in the general
But evaluations of Obama (whether things have improved or gotten worse under his term) best predictor
– not relevant in primary because of GOP opinion of Obama universally neg
Just to reference
Battery of questions on authoritarianism
Child rearing
That’s what we saw on this side of the aisle…
Large lead that narrowed considerably
60+ and negligible support to approaching 50-50
That said as we all know the Clinton and Sanders camps weren’t evenly distributed
Exit poll data
Women vs men
Nonwhites + blacks vs. whites (even)
Similarly strong divergence on 18-29 but for Sanders (and 65+ for Clinton)
Clinton/Sanders split based on demographics
Thought really interesting based on these backgrounds
Going back to our “losing out” question based on preference in the general
Jumping back to the losing out/affirmative action question
Fundamental difference in worldview
Vol’d into both/neither
Similarly, on separate question, influence in society
Profile of Clinton voters vs. Trump voters
In a separate model from previous
Didn’t get washed out with controls
Base divisions in the electorate
Resulting in a race that’s not about issues so much…
Running essentially even on the issues
- Key: economy
Two of the most unpopular candidates in history
Just magnified when looking at other’s supporters
Unprecedented
Compare to:
Obama supporters strongly unfavorable toward Romney: 70%
Romney supporters strongly unfavorably toward Obama: 74%
Obama supporters strongly unfavorable toward McCain: 57%
McCain supporters strongly unfavorable toward Obama: 72%
W/ this level of antipathy = people were not going to be shaken
Saw this in people’s reactions to Trump’s “hot mic” incident
Split up unwanted advances by party
Rationalizing voting against X candidate who they dislike
Processing developments completely differently based on end goal (chosen candidate)