Lucie Boudová l.boudova@elsevier.com

1. Citace,
metriky,
spolupráce
Co nového u Elsevier
Lucie Boudová, PhD
18/2/2016

2. Co nového u Elsevier
CITACE METRIKY SPOLUPRÁCE

3. Citace
Short Introduction to Mendeley

5. What is Mendeley?
Mendeley is a reference manager
allowing you to manage, read,
share, annotate and cite your
research papers...
… forming a crowdsourced database with a
unique layer of social research information
and an Open API
...and an academic collaboration
network with 4 million users to
connect like-minded researchers &
discover research trends and
statistics.

6. What is Mendeley?
Desktop
Web
Mobile
• Free Academic Software
• Cross-Platform (Win/Mac/Linux)
• All Major Browsers

7. Mendeley’s Three Key Values
Reference manager
“Drives Researcher
Productivity”
Research Data & API
“Creates Additional
Insights & Build Apps”
Research Network
& Groups
“Enables Collaboration
and Knowledge Sharing”

8. What is Mendeley Institutional Edition?
Reference manager
“Drives Researcher
Productivity”
Research Data & API
“Creates Additional
Insights & Build Apps”
Research Network
& Groups
“Enables Collaboration
and Knowledge Sharing”
More Storage
Space
More teams, more
collaborators
More Insight for
Librarian:
Administration &
Analytics Dashboard
Plus all the institutional
services:
• Alumni policy
• Access to online training
• Pre-arranged train-the-
trainer sessions
• 24x5 customer support
• Deployment program
services

9. Mendeley Library Certification
Programme
• Become a Certified Mendeley Librarian and secure a Mendeley Premium
Upgrade for 500 users at your institution – at no cost.
• Self-paced, self-study program that will take you approximately 15-20 hours
to complete;
• Mendeley Premium Upgrade means:
– Increase in personal library size for each user, from 2 GB to 5 GB
– Increase in group storage, from 100 MB to 20 GB
– Increase in private group size, from three to 25 members
– Increase in number of private groups, from one to unlimited
http://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/mendeley/training-and-support#for-academic-librarians

10. Metriky
Rethinking Scopus

11. | 11
Scopus is the Gold standard: more than 150 leading
research organizations rely on Scopus data
MD Anderson
Keio
University
Kiel
University
Gazi
University
Queen’s
University
Belfast
Ural Federal
University
CAPES Brazil
Nanyang
Technological
University
UK BIS
ERA 2014
UK REF
Nigerian
Government
ISTIC Peking
University
NRF -Korea
FCT Portugal
Danish BFI
Germany IFQ
Italy ANVUR
IISER
STINTMichigan Corporate
Relations Network
ReachNC
Russian Foundation
of Basic Research
TCI -
Thailand
Rankings:
NSF
European Commission & ERC
NCN Poland
Estonia Research Council

12. | 12
Comparison with nearest peer
Scopus
22,245
Web of Science
12,140
Scopus
7,443 (+73%)
WoS
4,291
Scopus
6,795 (+96%)
WoS
3,472
Scopus
4,492 (+50%)
WoS
3,002
Scopus
8,086 (+99%)
WoS
4,060
Physical Sciences Health Sciences Life Sciences Social Sciences
~12K titles (Core Collection)
3,300 publishers
Updated weekly
~22K titles
>5,000 publishers
Updated daily
Source: Web of Science Real Facts, Web of Science title list and Scopus’ own data (April 2015)

13. | 13
Different source types to ensure coverage in all subject
fields
21,362 peer-reviewed
journals
362 trade journals
• Full metadata, abstracts
and cited references (ref’s
post-1995 only)
• Pre-1996 cited ref’s
expansion 4M out of 12M
• Going back to 1823
• Funding data from
acknowledgements
Physical
Sciences
7,443
Health
Sciences
6,795
Social
Sciences
8,086
Life
Sciences
4,492
JOURNALS
84K events
7.0M records (12%)
Conf. expansion (2005 – 2013)
1,017 conferences
6,022 conf. events
410K conf. papers
5M citations
Mainly Engineering and
Physical Sciences
CONFERENCES
521 book series
- 28K Volumes
- 1.1M items
98,060 stand-alone books
- 785K items
Books expansion:
120K books by 2015
- Focus on Social Sciences
and A&H
BOOKS
Different source types are added to ensure that coverage, discoverability,
profiles and impact measurement for research in all subject fields is
accounted for in Scopus.
Source: Scopus title list (June 2015)

14. | 14
Pre-1996 cited reference expansion
Coverage
years
• Pre-1996, going back to 1970
Number of
articles
• Around 8M+ articles will be re-
processed to include cited
references. In addition around 4M
pre-1996 articles will be backfilled
Scope
• Archives from major publishers
with available digital archives
H-index for senior researchers increases:
2015 processing planning:
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Author 1 Author 2 Author 3 Author 4
10-Jul
22-Aug
14-Nov
20-Nov
4-Dec
30-Dec
23-Jan
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Source: Scopus (August 2015)

15. | 15
Curation matters: re-evaluation
Our customers demand it. Our business depends on it
The re-evaluation process is essentially a rigorous housekeeping exercise
designed to ensure that the journal content in Scopus meets the high standards
we and our customers now demand.
Identify and
Evaluate
Titles
Select only
high quality
content
Index titles
Re-evaluate
Titles
Discontinue
poor performing
titles
• Annual rolling initiative:
• Identify and notify underperforming
journals
• One year to improve quality based on
metrics & set benchmarks (output,
usage, citations, self-citations)
• If red flag remains, the journal will be
reviewed by the CSAB with the possible
consequence of discontinuation in
Scopus
• Incentive for continuous journal performance
• Launch Q1 2015, re-evaluation to start Q1 2016

16. | 16
More accuracy, transparency, more metrics
www.journalmetrics.com/

17. | 17
Integration of article level metrics into Scopus

18. | 18
Scopus API to provide Scopus data as key citation
information on the publisher platform

19. | 19
What are the most common uses of Scopus APIs?
Scopus Use cases API More information
Showing publications from Scopus
on your website
Scopus Search API Detailed policy
Implementation guide
Showing Scopus cited-by counts on
your website
Scopus Search API / Abstract
Citation Count API
Detailed policy
Implementation guide
Federated search Scopus Search API Detailed policy
Implementation guide
Populating IRs with basic document
metadata from Scopus
Scopus Search API / Abstract
Retrieval API / Citation Count
API
Detailed policy
Implementation guide
Populating current research
information systems with basic
document metadata and citation
overviews from Scopus
Scopus Search API/ Abstract
Retrieval API / Citation Count
API/ Citation Overview API
Detailed policy
Implementation guide
Populating publication histories of
VIVO profiles
Scopus Search API / Abstract
Retrieval API / Citation Count
API
Detailed policy
Implementation guide
Showing SNIP/SJR/IPP on journal
homepage
Serial Title API Detailed policy
Implementation guide

20. Spolupráce
People and solutions integrated

21. ScienceDirect

22. TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
ScienceDirect and institutional repositories
• Store research output or make it available
• Grant access to any user visiting the IR
• Track research output: evaluation of the efficiency of
researchers
• Compliance reporting for funding bodies
• Managing access and entitlements; provide the best
versions to users
• Copyright compliant for publishers
All of this is time sensitive and
time consuming.

23. | 23Open Access
Elsevier Services for Institutional Repositories
Elsevier supports Institutional Repositories to help their
researchers share their research and collaborate effectively.
Our new API’s help IR’s to:
- Easily retrieve all articles of your affiliated author for better
coverage
- Comply easily with access entitlements (see Elsevier
sharing and hosting policies),which will include embargo end
dates soon
- Ensure your users have access to the best available version.
The 3 API’s:
1. The ScienceDirect Search API; provides metadata including
DOIs and abstracts
2. Article / User Entitlement API; check for the best available
version.
3. Optional: Full Text Retrieval API for Embedding of PDFs.
Links to the final version on SD or a first page preview.
Sign up for updates on Elsevier news for Institutional Repositories on
http://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/sciencedirect/linking-and-integration/institutional-
repository

24. | 24Open Access
Example– MyScienceWork
The first Institutional Repository is yet to go live with the implementation of the API
package, however:
www.MyScienceWork.com, a Scientific Social Network is already using our APIs to let
their users search, view, and even annotate and share ScienceDirect content on their
website.
2. Green check mark
indicates the user is entitled
to view the full text
Using entitlements API
3. First page preview from
ScienceDirect API
(not counted as full-text
download),
using the full-text API
1. Search results based
on indexed XML/
structured meta data
3. User can read and
annotate ScienceDirect
embedded articles on
Mysciencework.com
Using the full-text API

25. | 25Open Access
Next steps to participate in the pilot
1. If you’re interested in participating, we will share a pilot
agreement for your signature as soon as possible
2. We create a token you need to access our API’s
3. We will provide you with developer instructions how to integrate
the relevant API’s into your repository
4. Your repository team will integrate the API’s, our API support
team will be available to support your developers
5. We will ask for your feedback at two points in time:
1. When you have just launched the API integration – to obtain
feedback on the ease of implementation, the clarity of the instructions,
etc.
2. When the integration has been live for a while, to obtain feedback on
user experience.

26. Mendeley Social
• Profile
• Stats
• Suggestions

27. Profile

28. Suggest

29. Fine tuning recommendations

30. Articles stats

31. Citing articles

32. Key insights

33. Elsevier Research Data
Management (Mendeley Data)

34. Summary
The methods and results of health research are documented in study protocols, full study
reports (detailing all analyses), journal reports, and participant-level datasets. However,
protocols, full study reports, and participant-level datasets are rarely available, and journal
reports are available for only half of all studies and are plagued by selective reporting of
methods and results. Furthermore, information provided in study protocols and reports
varies in quality and is often incomplete. When full information about studies is
inaccessible, billions of dollars in investment are wasted, bias is introduced, and
research and care of patients are detrimentally affected. To help to improve this
situation at a systemic level, three main actions are warranted. First, academic institutions
and funders should reward investigators who fully disseminate their research protocols,
reports, and participant-level datasets. Second, standards for the content of protocols and
full study reports and for data sharing practices should be rigorously developed and
adopted for all types of health research. Finally, journals, funders, sponsors, research
ethics committees, regulators, and legislators should endorse and enforce policies
supporting study registration and wide availability of journal reports, full study reports, and
participant-level datasets.
A view on Research Data:

35. A similar view on Research Data - Christine L. Borgman
“…issues are becoming clear: the need for coordination among stakeholders,
economic challenges to the sustainability of archives, and misaligned public
policies for open access to publications and data. The practice and policy
issues on the ground are much less well understood, however. Norms for the
acquisition, release, and reuse of data –and the very definition of data – vary
widely between research domains, and motivations to share data vary
accordingly.... Releasing data offers benefits, but so does controlling data.
The workforces required for the stewardship of data are many and varied; they
too must be nurtured and sustained. Wise investments must be made in
knowledge infrastructures – and soon – if research data are to remain
useful for generations to come.”
- Christine L. Borgman. "Keynote: Data, Data, Everywhere, Nor Any Drop to
Drink (slides)" Research Data Alliance Fourth Plenary Meeting. Amsterdam.
Sep. 2014.

36. Signs of hope
36
Peter W. Kirlew, Life Science Data Repositories in the
Publications of Scientists and Librarians
Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship,
Spring 2011 DOI: 10.5062/F4X63JT2
20111988
Data citations per year (100s)Data citation index coverage (log scale)
http://arxiv.org/vc/arxiv/papers/1306/1306.6584v1.pdf
If this trend continues, we will see more
datasets than articles being posted well
before 2020

37. Common practice: data storage is still very fragmented
Researcher survey, 1202 respondents
(PARSE.insight 2010)
337

38. When you leave your institution…what happens with your data?
„Forschende und ihre Daten. Ergebnisse einer österreichweiten Befragung (eBook)“
E-infrastructures Austria
Bauer, B. (Bruno) et all
Oct 2015
https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/detail_object/o:407736
Stays at
institution
Take it with me
Don’t know
Data is lost
Other

39. The 10 components for effective research data
10.Integrateupstreamanddownstream
–makemetadatatoserveuse.
Save
Share
Use
9. Re-usable (allow tools to run on it)
8. Reproducible
7. Trusted (e.g. reviewed)
6. Comprehensible (description / method is available)
5. Citable
4. Discoverable (data is indexed or data is linked from article)
3. Accessible
2. Preserved (long-term & format-independent)
1. Stored (existing in some form)
39

40. Mendeley Research Data Beta
Individual researchers can already sign up and try Data.Mendeley.com,
publish data articles, and link their data.

41. Děkuji za pozornost!
l.boudova@elsevier.com