Article published on the European Student Think Tank website on April 24th, 2013 and CrossingtheBaltic on June 24th, 2013 (http://crossingthebaltic.com/2013/06/24/should-i-stay-or-should-i-go-youth-unemployment-in-europe/)

1. Youth unemployment in Europe: Should I stay or
should I go?
The European Student Think Tank, Apr 24, 2013
One of the drastic consequences of the most recent
global fnancial crisis that has deeply touched the European Union -the euro zone in particular- is
that more and more young people are seeking opportunities elsewhere. Two videos by
theEuroparlTV and the International Labour Organisation (ILO) show the difficulty the EU is facing
in tackling the youth unemployment issue. What are the measures being taken by the EU? How come
they cannot prevent the “great escape”, as more and more Europeans are fleeing to emerging
economies around the world? These are important questions for all of us to think about.
Youth unemployment in Europe
The European sovereign debt crisis is certainly having a devastating effect on youth
unemployment. Around 5.5 million Europeans under 25 (22.7%) are unemployed during the third
quarter of 2012. In some countries, such as Spain and Greece, the situation is even more dramatic
with over 50% of youth unable to find a job. With fewer and fewer investors in Europe, young people
and seniors are the most vulnerable to budget cuts and the reduced amoun of investment. In addition
to this, the jobs offered in the EU labour market and the skills and qualifications of young Europeans
are mismatched. This asymmetry leads to 2 million unfilled vacancies in the EU, despite the crisis.
Clearly, the EU has identified and attempted to tackle the main issues described in the previous part.
Its key actions include measures in the field of education and culture, EU skills panorama, Youth on
the Move, Youth Employment Package (2012) and Youth Employment Initiatives (2013)[1]. These
measures are monitored and the results are published on the Europa website. However, just as
tackling the barriers for services (as opposed to goods), barriers to youth employment are simply too
difficult to counter, even more so since the EU’s competence on this field is limited to coordination
and support (and stipulated in the Lisbon Treaty). Moreover, are these measures attractive enough to
counter the increasing investments in emerging economies and the difficulties for Europe to maintain
its social level and system?

2. Given the overall picture of the situation, what can –or should- we do now? The two main solutions
available to young Europeans seem to be struggling in Europe by accepting temporary jobs or moving
out of Europe to seek opportunities elsewhere.
Should I stay or should I go?
Just one or two generations ago, work could be found more easily in the European market when the
“temptation from the East (emerging economies)” were still distant. Businesses were predominantly
hold in the Western world and opportunities to work abroad were not so evident, so a great majority
of young people followed a scheme that was quite comprehensible and chose a path following that
scheme. In this very rapidly interdependent world however, investments are restraining in a Europe
with high social costs and being less and less competitive. Three main groups of youth seem to
emerge. First, young people who want to move to richer European countries or abroad and
but are somehow limited by their traditions, language and skills, but also the lack of investments in
their respective country. Second, young people who are amongst the privileged elites who can then
have the sufficient global networks and means to deal with the crisis situation. The third one is the
middle-class societies who have the opportunity and means to adapt themselves to the global
challenge, but still faced with some identity issues due to the rapid changes in the world economy and
politics. In the long term, working abroad does not really leave a space for a stable private life and
some might come back with a shock and are forced to re-adapt themselves. The depiction of this
situation only reflects what I have experienced so far and when I speak with young people around me.
Surely other situations exist, but these seem to be the most prevailing.
The EU’s solutions to the youth unemployment as mentioned in the first part of the article seem to
address the first group in particular. The third group might also benefit from these solutions by
programmes such as ERASMUS and Your First EURES Job. These are interesting programmes
that young Europeans should seek to benefit from. However, social issues (education, language,
culture, identity) are very difficult to tackle and the EU itself cannot be hold responsible for all the
problems. How can we build and cement a sense of European identity and culture in this increasingly
multipolar world? Looking for jobs in another European country could be a solution, but with fewer
and fewer opportunities even in the richest countries in Europe, the majority of the graduated young
people of Europe could only expect for temporary jobs even in the richest countries. Is it that worthy?
Should we choose Europe and struggle for it at whatever cost or leave everyone to seek opportunities
elsewhere? An article posted by The Guardiangives a rather nuanced depiction of the situation of
those who have attempted the risks. But after all, do we have a choice? These are questions on our
young generations’ minds and which not only European policy-makers, but also all the youth
concerned, need to consider.
[1] For a more detailed description of these measures, see the Europa
website: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1036