The webinar presented the findings of the output report and gave delegates the opportunity to talk directly with representatives who went on the Mission in a Q&A Session. KTN hosted this event on behalf of Innovate UK and was presented by Sandeep Sandhu, KTN, Brendan Vickers, Innovate UK, David Hytch, Innovate UK, Zoe Barnes, Everoze, Roger Townsend, Innovate UK, James Battensby, Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult, Nee-Joo Teh, KTN, Bruce Clements, UK Department for International Trade, Daniel Finch, EDPR, and Chris Briggs, SGRE.
To help UK businesses become truly global enterprises through strategic collaboration, Innovate UK launched its Global Expert Missions in October 2017. Delivered by KTN, the missions provide an expert-led evidence base to strengthen Innovate UK’s global investment strategy: how and where it should invest to create UK business opportunities in partnerships with key economies.
Find out more: https://ktn-uk.co.uk/news/offshore-wind-in-china-usa-japan-and-south-korea-global-expert-mission-dissemination-webinar-recording-and-slides-now-available
Strategic Project Finance Essentials: A Project Manager’s Guide to Financial ...
Offshore Wind Global Expert Missions Key Findings
1. Offshore Wind in US, Japan, South Korea & China
Dissemination Webinar
Protocol
• Due to the large number of people registered all participants will be muted.
• After testing your speakers, please do remember to connect your audio by using the “Join Audio”
icon at the bottom left of the screen or dial in via phone using the number provided in the joining
instructions.
• If you have any technical problems, please use the chat to seek advice from the host (Poonam
Phull).
• Please use the Q&A box to type in your questions to the presenters during or after the
presentation (do not use this for technical problems).
PLEASE NOTE – THE WEBINAR IS BEING RECORDED
The recording will be made available via the KTN website
2. Innovate UK Expert Missions
Offshore Wind in the UK, China,
USA, Japan and South Korea:
Synergies, Opportunities and the
Future
Hosted by the Knowledge Transfer Network (KTN)
John Ransford
john.ransford@ktn-uk.org
Dr Sandeep Sandhu
sandeep.sandhu@ktn-uk.org
Dr Nee-Joo Teh
neejoo.teh@ktn-uk.org
3. Offshore Wind Global Expert Missions
10.00: Welcome and Introduction – Sandeep Sandhu (KTN)
10.05: Innovate UK International Programmes – Brendan Vickers (Innovate UK)
10.15: Global Expert Mission Objectives: Offshore Wind – David Hytch (Innovate UK)
10.20: Key Findings from China, USA, Japan & South Korea – Zoe Barnes (Everoze)
10.45: Current Activities and Outcomes – Roger Townsend (Innovate UK), James Battensby
(Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult), Nee-Joo Teh (KTN)
11.10: Support for British Business – Bruce Clements (UK Dept. for International Trade)
11.20: Q&A – Panel, Daniel Finch (EDPR) & Chris Briggs (SGRE)
11.50: Wrap up & Close
6. Offshore Wind Global Expert Missions
10.00: Welcome and Introduction – Sandeep Sandhu (KTN)
10.05: Innovate UK International Programmes – Brendan Vickers (Innovate UK)
10.15: Global Expert Mission Objectives: Offshore Wind – David Hytch (Innovate UK)
10.20: Key Findings from China, USA, Japan & South Korea – Zoe Barnes (Everoze)
10.45: Current Activities and Outcomes – Roger Townsend (Innovate UK), James Battensby
(Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult), Nee-Joo Teh (KTN)
11.10: Support for British Business – Bruce Clements (UK Dept. for International Trade)
11.20: Q&A – Panel, Daniel Finch (EDPR) & Chris Briggs (SGRE)
11.50: Wrap up & Close
9. • UK is good at starting businesses but not so good when it comes to their growth
• OECD Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2017 - UK comes first globally for start-ups, but not
in the top ten for growing businesses into established, medium-sized companies with a
lasting impact on our economy
• The Scaleup Institute Scaleup Review 2018 highlights that being able to access UK and
international markets is the second most important factor for businesses looking to
grow and scale
• 95% of the world’s R&D takes place outside of the UK
• In exploring global markets, businesses often lack confidence and face the challenges of
finding international partners, customers and having the right connections
• Businesses look for trusted support and ability to open opportunities
Innovate UK supporting global R&D and innovation
10. • Aim is to help innovative UK businesses to grow and scale globally – even before they
have a market-ready product or service to sell
• Range of different types of support to facilitate partnership building and development
• Financial and non financial
Innovate UK supporting global R&D and innovation
11. Global Expert
Missions
Group of 6-8 experts scoping opportunities for UK businesses in specific countries
and technology and sector areas.
Led by KTN
Three stages:
• Scoping visit – fact-finding and benchmarking UK
• Dissemination report published at:
https://ktn-uk.co.uk/programmes/international
• Dissemination workshop
• Offshore Wind GEMs to date are:
USA, China 2018
Japan & South Korea 2019
Innovate UK supporting global R&D and innovation
12. Global Expert
Missions
Global Business
Innovation
Programmes
Cohort of c.15 innovative high growth businesses
exploring opportunities and building
collaborations and partnerships in specific
countries and technology and sector areas.
Delivered by Enterprise Europe Network (EEN)
Programme over 9-12 months with 3 stages –
• Get ready
• Innovation visit overseas
• Exploit the opportunity
• GBIPs in OSW to date include:
USA 2018
Innovate UK supporting global R&D and innovation
15. Global Expert
Missions
Global Business
Innovation
Programmes
Global
Incubator
Programme
Bilateral and
multilateral
R&D&I
funding
programmes
Group of 6-8 experts scoping
opportunities for UK
businesses in specific
countries and technology and
sector areas. KTN led.
Three stages –
• Scoping visit
• Dissemination report
• Dissemination workshop
Cohort of c.15 innovative
high growth businesses
exploring opportunities and
building collaborations and
partnerships in specific
countries and technology
and sector areas. EEN led.
Programme over 9-12
months with 3 stages.
Cohort of c.6-8 innovative high
growth businesses building long-
term relationships and foundations
for future market growth.
Piloted in Canada, USA, Singapore
and India in specific technology and
sector areas.
Programme over 12-18 months with
4 phases.
Collaborative R&D&I grant
funding programmes to support
projects in specific technology
and sector areas.
Programmes can be bilateral or
multilateral (such as using
EUREKA network) with most
projects bilateral.
Other funds include H2020,
Newton ODA, GCRF, UKRI FIC
Global Business
Innovation
Programmes
16. Offshore Wind: UK-USA CR&D current activities
• Fund for International Collaboration c £1.5m
• Joint programme with National Offshore Wind R&D Consortia (NOWRDC) led
by New York State R&D Authority (NYSERDA) with US DoE funding
• Initial Partner searching with KTN Q4 2019
• EoI in Q1 2020 – 18 UK projects selected
• Detailed partner identification with US stakeholders Summer 2020
• Second Stage Call Opening Sept 2020
• UK-USA joint CR&D projects to run for up to 24 months from Q1 2021
19. Mission objectives
Noun Project credits: ProSymbols, Gregor Cresnar, priyanka, Adrien Coquet, Eucalyp
Early
dialogue with
key partners
Learn about
market –
drivers,
capabilities
and needs
Understand
innovation
policy
Understand
technology
needs
Explore
innovation
collaboration
models
Fit with UK
24. USA
These are the findings of the mission at the time of the mission.
China
3 OSW MISSIONS: 2018-2019
Floating wind:
Japan
S. Korea
25. LOCATION NEW JERSEY YANGJIANG,
GUANGZHOU, BEIJING
ULSAN, SEOUL TOKYO
DATE April 2018 October 2018 Feb 2019
OSW
Developer/
asset owner
• Deepwater Wind
• Ørsted
• China Resource Power
Holdings Co. Ltd
• China Southern Power Grid
– (State Grid operator)
• CECEP
• ACE E&T • Marubeni Corporation
Public market
enablers
• Department of Energy
• Maryland state
representatives
• National Development and
Reform Commission (NDRC)
• Korean Energy Agency (KEA)
• Government of City of Ulsan
• Ministry for Economy Trade
and Industry (METI)
R&D
organisations
(public unless
otherwise
stated)
• National Renewable
Energy Laboratory (NREL)
• POWER US (R&D
consortium)
• New York State Energy
Research and
Development Agency
(NYSERDA)
• Energy Research Institute,
(NDRC)
• Guangdong Provincial
Department of Science and
Technology
• Ministry for Science and
Technology (MOST)
• TUS Wind (private)
• University of Ulsan
• Ulsan Technopark (private)
• New Energy and Industrial
Technology Development
Organization (NEDO)
Industrial supply
chain (some
may also
develop)
• GE Renewable Energy • CSIC, Haizhuang Windpower
Co., Goldwind SS&T
• Minyang Smart Energy
• Shanghai Electric Wind Power
Group
• Sinovel
• Hyundai Heavy Industries
• Blue Wind Engineering
• Mitsubishi Corporation
• Hitachi Zosen Corporation
TODA Corporation
• Japan Marine United Corp
• Mitsui E&I
Wide range of public and private sector stakeholders engaged in all countries
MISSIONS: Overview
26. RELATIVE
MATURITY
AMBITION LEVELS ABILITY TO MEET AMBITIONS
UK HIGH
Q4 2019 – 8.5 GW
HIGH
40 GW by Q4 2030
MEDIUM
World leading market – others catching up
fast.
USA
LOW
Q1 2018 – 0.03 GW
HIGH
18 GW leasing planned by Q4 2019
MEDIUM
A market with high ambitions and confidence.
Likely issues with consenting. Market
predictions 3-4 GW by 2030.
CHINA
MEDIUM
Q4 2018 – 2.1 GW
HIGH
10.5 GW by Q4 2020**
HIGH
Ambitions thought to be pessimistic.
Expectations over 10 GW by 2020. Putting it
on a par with the UK.
S.KOREA
LOW
Q1 2019 – 0.04 GW
MEDIUM
2 GW by 2030
LOW
High ambitions but substantial process and
regulatory challenges expected due to
immaturity.
JAPAN
LOW
Q1 2019 – 0.02 GW*
MEDIUM
10 GW by 2030
HIGH
5.4 GW in planning but with change in 2018
legislation to support renewables, rapid
market development expected.
All the markets are immature but prospects for growth are good
MISSION FINDINGS: Markets overview
*Excluding shoreline projects
** Installed or under construction
27. Priority
Priority
Priority
Priority
JOBS/ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
CARBON
EMISSIONS
JOBS/ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
JOBS/ECONOMI
C
DEVELOPMENT
SAFETY
CARBON
EMISSIONS
ENERGY
SECURITY (INCL.
LCOE)
ADHERENCE TO
NATIONAL
STRATEGY
ENERGY
SECURITY (INCL.
LCOE)
ENERGY
SECURITY
(INCL. IMPORTS)
ENERGY SECURITY
(INCL. LCOE)
JOBS/ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
CARBON
EMISSIONS
CARBON
EMISSIONS
Progression of European Markets
• Falling costs
• Growing confidence in technology due to mass build out
Local flagship projects:
• Demonstration of regional viability
• Confidence in ability of local companies
Governmental commitments, support and
• Climate change commitments
• Governmental and state level targets and incentives for OSW
Increased interest from local, non-renewable energy
companies
• US – O&G majors
• Asia – large fabricators and industrial
Drivers of market confidence and growth are similar in all the
markets.
Governmental support is driven by different factors in each
market.
CENTRAL STATE
MISSION FINDINGS: Markets drivers
28. MISSION FINDINGS: Site and project conditions
Similarity between project conditions and UK projects
US CHINA SOUTH KOREA JAPAN
ATLANTIC PACIFIC
SITECONDITIONS
GROUND CONDITIONS High High Low Medium Medium
WATER DEPTH High Low Medium High Medium
DISTANCE FROM SHORE High Low Medium Low Low
WIND REGIME Medium Medium Low Low Low
KEY DIFFERENCES • Occasional
hurricanes
• Slightly lower wind
regime
• Deeper water • Challenging soft mud with
hard outcrops in the south
• Current developments very
nearshore planned
developments <20 km to
shore
• North = low wind speeds
• South = typhoons
• Low wind speeds with
typhoons
• Av. distance to shore <10
km
• 80% of seabed >100 m
• Low wind speeds and
typhoons
• Earthquakes
• Most deployed and
planned projects <5 km
from shore, remaining
<20 km from shore
• East coast US represents most similar conditions to UK
• Conditions in Asian markets are significantly different to the UK so innovation is needed to
meet regional conditions (seabed, low-wind, typhoon, earthquakes)
• Generally projects are much closer to shore than UK but this reflect maturity of the industry
• Similar to the UK, US, S. Korea and Japan have very variable water depths including large areas
of deep water, so are suitable for fixed and floating foundations.
29. SUB-SECTION
SIMILARITY BETWEEN INSTALLED/PLANNED PROJECTS & UK PROJECTS
USA CHINA FLOATING WIND PROJECTS
SOUTH KOREA JAPAN
US ATLANTIC US PACIFIC
TECHNOLOG
Y
FOUNDATIONS MEDIUM LOW LOW MEDIUM HIGH
TURBINES HIGH MEDIUM MEDIUM LOW MEDIUM
ELECTRICAL BOP HIGH HIGH HIGH MEDIUM MEDIUM
INSTALLATIO
N & O&M
STRATEGIES
INSTALLATION MEDIUM LOW LOW MEDIUM MEDIUM
O&M HIGH MEDIUM MEDIUM MEDIUM MEDIUM
DIFFERENCES TO UK
• Jackets chosen
over monopile
in some case,
due to local
content
• Dominated by
FOSW, similar
to Scotwind
• China developing
bespoke solutions
for challenging
ground conditions
• To date ‘assemble
at port’ technique
• S. Korean stakeholders
showed general
preference for spar
buoys
• Drive towards integrated
turbine and platform
• Little work done on
O&M to date
• Deployed floating substations
• Downwind turbine used to
date but changing
Technology typically deployed at time of mission:
• As expected, due to similar conditions to the UK, East Coast US has adopted the most similar technology,
• Asia is typically using smaller turbines, due to constraints in local turbine supply and vessels.
• Installation techniques vary significantly across markets.
• Some level of interest in floating in all markets but in all markets there is still a significant fixed wind market
that will be exploited first.
MISSION FINDINGS:Technology deployment
31. R&D LANDSCAPE: USA
• Primary federal funding – $20.5m funding from the DoE for. and
distributed by, the National OSW R&D consortium.
• Some states (NY, MD, MA) have set up funding for state
institutions.
In Spring 2018:
• Well established wind R&D infrastructure but limited specific
OSW activity.
• Significant increase in last 6-7 years.
• R&D spend low compared to other energy sectors.
• Spend on OSW comparable to UK (around £15m over last 5
years).
MATURITY
FUDNING
FOCUSAREAS
• Development of the solutions needed to remove specific
barriers to development of the US industry
• Floating wind
• Wildlife impact
• Hurricane protection
• Cost reduction.
• Also looking to build on areas where some onshore
expertise exists
• Academic organisations dominate (onshore wind &
environmental capabilities).
• Key federal delivery mechanism moving forward – National
OSW R&D Consortium.
• Appears established OSW industry is maintaining core R&D in
Europe.
• Two large OSW testing facilities recently opened.
DELIVERY
32. R&D LANDSCAPE: China
• Funding for R&D is complex
• Most funding for R&D comes through industry and the private
sector.
• Public sector funding is available
• Several UK/China joint funding programmes have been
established that could potential be adapted to cover OSW
In Autumn 2018:
• China’s general R&D spend is huge ($658 billion 2018)
• R&D in the OSW is still limited but developing fast
• OSW R&D capability is built on 15 years of onshore wind
R&D – has evolved from importing technology to a substantial
domestic capability
MATURITY
FUDNING
FOCUSAREAS
• Focus on getting demonstration projects in the water – learn
by doing
• R&D Areas
• Market support and stimulation
• Turbine development (for China & Europe markets)
• Adaption/development of technology for Chinese
conditions:
• Typhoon and earthquake survival
• Installation
• Foundations
• Little current activity in R&D for the operational phase.
• Most of the R&D activity in OSW sits within industry
• R&D being carried out within:
• Universities
• State corporate research institutes
• Tech accelerators e.g. TUS
• Larger testing facilities all sit within industry
• ORE Catapult has established centre for collaboration incl.
China-UK demonstration wind farm
DELIVERY
MOST Coordinates and funds National level programmes
NSFC Supports basic research
Provincial & city
level governments
Support to local institutes and companies
33. R&D LANDSCAPE: S. Korea - Floating
In Spring 2019:
• No commercial-scale FOSW
• A single demonstrator under advanced development (750 kW
Shin Gori Project)
• Pilot plant planned for 2023
• First commercial sites planned following pilot
MATURITY
FUDNINGFOCUSAREAS
• Strong industrial base – capability to build supply chain
in the region means strong emphasis on manufacturing
rather than driving future technology trends
• Other R&D areas
• Floating platforms (spar-buoys, semi-subs, cone
buoys)
• Turbine design
DELIVERY
• No FOSW specific funding
• Most R&D spend and funding comes
from industry
• Funding by Ulsan City
• Incubation services are available for
smaller innovative companies in the
sector
Ulsan FOSW roadmap
sources of funding of R&D in S. Korea:
INDUSTRY In 2017 around
sources.
KIAT KIAT reports to M
Korea. It is not k
CITY
GOVERNMENTS
City Government
that promote eco
To date, funding for floating OSW R&D seems t
some central government funding towards to lar
strategic programmes of funding aimed at floati
General R&D spend
• Work ongoing at universities and
through applied innovation in FOSW
through government-funded turbine
system demonstration programmes
• Most delivery through selected
consortia containing large local
industrial companies.
• All R&D activity focused around and
driven by the City of Ulsan
• Wider network of onshore wind
R&D infrastructure including testing
facilities, but generally too small for
OSW
34. S. Korea
R&D LANDSCAPE: Japan- Floating
In Spring 2019:
• No commercial-scale FOSW
• Floating wind R&D activity in Japan peaked in 2011-2015
driven by Fukushima demonstration project
• Developed as much for economic reasons post disaster as it
was for tech reasons
• Fukushima – expensive and technically flawed – has damaged
floating wind reputation. This has stalled activity but this is
changing slowly.
MATURITY
FUDNING
FOCUSAREAS
Key areas of R&D activities on FOSW:
• Platforms (Semi-subs and spar buoys)
• Wildlife impact monitoring (mammal and fishing)
• Cost reduction
• Demonstration of tech
• Majority of FOSW delivery to date has been through large
industrial corporations with public funding, although this
has declined
• 3 FOSW demo sites are operational or in development
• Small amount of work being undertaken at universities
• Level of work in FOSW is currently relatively low
DELIVERY
• Two key funding bodies:
• NEDO – Funds industry to
deliver OSW R&D and
demo, similar to Innovate UK
• METI – Funds earlier stage
research at universities
• Significant industrial R&D funding
from large corporation went into
Fukushima demo but has since
declined
36. Maintain early mover market advantage in
emerging market
Create transfer route to market for UK
technologies and products
Strengthening position of UK as an
innovative country and leader in OSW
Leverage UK R&D spend
Access to technology/products for import
China – attract funding for UK technology
and inward investment
Access to capabilities and resources for
removing barriers to market
Accelerate US OSW industry development
using UK experience
Use UK capabilities to support upskilling of US
companies
Accelerate Chinese OSW industry
development using UK experience
Gain access to UK tech for integration in
China
Create opportunities for investment in UK
companies
Attract UK firms to establish in core regions
USACHINA
Accelerate S. Korean OSW market using UK
experience
Access potential future market for supply of
OSW structures
S.KOREA
Accelerate Japanese OSW market using UK
experience
Access to UK O&G technology and capabilities
Gain understanding of European markets for
potential future export
JAPAN
OPPORTUNITIES:Why collaborate?
37. OPPORTUNITIES:Areas of collaborationUSA
JAPAN
CHINA
UK & S. Korea
• Developing FOSW at similar
speed
• Similar challenges in bringing
FOSW to commercial
deployment.
• Collaboration at provincial
level most likely
TECHNICAL AREAS
SOUTHKOREA
UK & Japan
• Similar market maturity and
barriers to deployment for
FOSW
• Good synergies between
R&D amin systems, funding
schemes and market size
• Opportunities for national
level collaboration
As above for S. Korea, plus:
• Installation technology and
methodology
• Technology for improved O&M
• Floating wind hardware
• Mooring systems
• Dynamic cable systems
• Reducing consenting risks
• Fishing
• Marine mammal avoidance and
monitoring
• Cost reduction
Both Japan and S. Korea highlighted similar areas for collaboration
UK & USA
• US is looking to learn from ‘real-
world’ experience & peer to
peer collaboration Suppliers are
looking for JVs with European
companies
• Likely collaboration partners -
established R&D organisations
or B2B
TECHNICAL AREAS
• Policy and support
mechanisms for OSW market
stimulation
• O&M optimisation
• Blade development and testing
• FOSW development
UK & China
• Chinese stakeholders can offer 3
key opportunities that are
challenging to access in UK
• Large scale finance
• Access to OSW
turbines for core
component technology
• Access to sites/turbine
for demonstration and
testing
• Most likely collaboration
partners –State level &
commercial e.g. TUS
TECHNICAL AREAS
• Large turbine development
• Cost reduction –
development and installation
• Adapting wind turbines and
foundations for Chinese
conditions
• Policy and support
mechanisms for OSW
market stimulation
Areas where there is good technical synergy and stakeholders show significant interest in collaborating
38. USA
• US market
maturity
•UK’s
apparent
strength as a
partner
•Complexity
of market
•Bureaucracy
China
• Competition
from other
European
companies/
countries
•Accessing
the Chinese
R&D system
•Fast market
development
•Achieving
long term
benefit from
collaboration
•Scale of
available UK S.Korea(FOSW)
•S. Korean market
maturity
•Lack of confidence
in the S. Korean
OSW sector
•Lack of confidence
in FOSW sector in
S. Korea
•Lack of indigenous
UK floating OSW
expertise
•Cultural
differences
Japan(FOSW)
•Lack of
commitment to
FOSW from
Japanese
Government
•Lack of indigenous
UK floating OSW
expertise
•Negative
perception of
floating OSW in
Japan
•Cultural
differences
OPPORTUNITIES: Challenges for collaboration
39. Marketsize
(next10years)
Levelofinterestin
collaboration
Readinessfor
collaboration
Technicalsynergies
SynergiesinR&D
delivery
Opportunitylevel
Challengelevel
USA
M M H H H H M
• Growing market with a lot of similarities to the UK.
• Established R&D sector makes access relatively easy
• Strong US focus on US supply chain and solving problems
domestically creates challenges
CHINA
H H H M M H M
• Rapidly growing market – likely to be a big market
• High level of interest in learning from Europe
• Scale of market/ funding likely to be challenging
S. KOREA (FOSW)
M H L H H M M
• Very immature market with substantial challenges to delivery
• Not a priority for R&D collaboration but should not be
ignored
• FOSW being driven by Ulsan City
• Opportunity to work directly with stakeholder in Ulsan
JAPAN (FOSW)
M H H H H H H
• Market maturing fast, first phase will be fixed
• FOSW reputation heavily damaged by Fukushima demo but
changing
• High level of interest in collaborating to develop FOSW
industry from both large industrials and government
OPPORTUNITIES: Conclusions
40. experts | evolving | energy
contact@everoze.com
everoze.com
Talk to us
@everozepartners
Thanks for listening
experts | evolving | energy
40
41. Roger Townsend
Innovation Lead - Renewables
Innovate UK
James Battensby
Head of Research Business Development
Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult
Nee-Joo Teh
Head of International & Development
KTN
42. Current Activities and Outcomes
- USA: UK–US Offshore Wind R&D competition
- China: ORE Catapult initiatives
- Japan: BEIS-METI MoC
44. UK–US bilateral offshore wind R&D
Summary
• Innovate UK is funding UK companies to work collaboratively on US offshore wind R&D projects
• US projects are administered by the US National Offshore Wind Research and Development Consortium,
NOWRDC
• Projects must focus on the research pillars outlined in the US National Offshore Wind Roadmap and one or
more challenge areas outlined in the US solicitation
45. UK–US bilateral offshore wind R&D
Scope – Challenge Areas
1. Array performance and control optimisation
2. Cost-reducing turbine support structures for the US market
3. Floating structure mooring concepts for shallow and deep waters
4. Power system design and innovation
5. Comprehensive wind resource assessment
6. Development of a metocean reference site
7. Heavy lift vessel alternatives
8. Offshore wind digitisation through advanced analytics
9. Technology solutions to accelerate US supply chain
46. UK–US bilateral offshore wind R&D
Summary
• Innovate UK is funding UK companies to work collaboratively on US offshore wind R&D projects
• US projects are administered by the US National Offshore Wind Research and Development Consortium,
NOWRDC
• Projects must focus on the research pillars outlined in the US National Offshore Wind Roadmap and one or
more challenge areas outlined in the US solicitation
Status and Next Steps
• Innovate UK has selected 18 UK projects through an Expression of Interest competition
• Full UK and US project proposals are due in Q3 2020
• Projects will be selected by December 2020
Initial Conclusions
• US stakeholders are very interested to collaborate with UK entities to advance technologies, accelerate the US
supply chain and help deliver the US project pipeline
47. Current Activities and Outcomes
- USA: UK-US Offshore Wind R&D Competition
- China: ORE Catapult initiatives
- Japan: BEIS-METI MoC
48. China Offshore Wind Overview
May 2020 James Battensby - Head of R&D Business Development
49. ORE Catapult
Mission
To accelerate the creation and
growth ofUK companies in the
ORE sector
Vision
By 2023,ORECatapult will be
the world’s leading offshore
renewables technology centre
50. International Market
• Bloomberg predicts offshore wind market to
grow x6 by 2030
• Significant non-EU market opportunities in
Asia and USA
• Offshore wind sector deal strategy to increase
exports to £2.6 billion by 2030
• China is the fastest growing international
market > 40GW planned development
Image Credit: Bloomberg NEF
Image Credit: Wind Power monthly
51. Technical Development Challenges
Key priorities for offshore windfarm
investment
• Turbine Manufacture,Optimisation
and Reliability
• ArrayCables and Foundation
Installation
• Wind FarmOperations,
Maintenance and Service
• Electrical Infrastructure design,
manufacture and installation
• Wind FarmSite Planning, Seabed
Survey and Development
In July 2017 China National Energy Administration (NEA) has published national level 13th 5
year energy development plan
Predicted investment scale of several billion US dollars by 2025 to achieve national targets
52. UK has strong technology export potential
• Total investment in new UK offshore wind farms from
now to 2030 will total over £40 billion
• Over 600 UK companies already work in the sector
with 7,000 employees
• Major opportunity for international research and
innovation engagement
Source: Renewable UK supply chain map
53. Future Innovations for international engagement
- Robotics andAutonomous Systems with Machine Learning
- Improved component reliability and human less intervention
- Next generation storage and digital operation
- Areas of technology interest:
Application of
DigitalTwins
100%
predictive
maintenanc
e
Robotics and
Autonomous
systems
Maximising
output: next gen
storage and
transmission
54. TUS-ORE Catapult Research Centre (TORC)
• ORECatapult have created joint a
research partnership agreement
withTUS Park andTUSWind in
China
• TUS Park are the largest science
and technology incubator in the
world with a presence in every
major city inChina
• The joint research centre is located
in the coastal city ofYantai in the
Shandong province with a key focus
on offshore wind collaboration
• Over 15 UK businesses were
engaged with the centre as part of
the 2019GBIP
55. Partnership between ORE Catapult andTUS
• Engagement with the UK
innovation Hub access to
funding
• SpecialistTest and
Demonstration Facilities
• Support for developing
product businesses
models
• Major Chinese R&D
Science andTechnology
Incubator
• Equity fund to support
technology growth
• Involved in planning
development for 300MW
demonstrator (>£90 mil UK
opportunity)
UK China Growth Accelerator
Applied UK-China technology projects
UK SME Support for development of new products
Technology and testing support
International business model development
57. www.ktn-uk.org @KTNUK
• MoC signed in July 2019 and discussed at
the 3rd
Japan-UK Industrial Policy Dialogue in
Feb’20 in Tokyo.
• Floating offshore wind:
‘Accelerating floating offshore wind development,
leveraging the experience in demonstration and
deployment in Japan and the UK. The Participants
will explore potential opportunities for bilateral
cooperation or research and innovation to accelerate
cost reduction and improve performance and
management of floating offshore wind.’
Japan-UK MoC on Clean Energy Innovation
BEIS & METI | July 2019
Source: www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2020/0228_002.html
59. Department for
International Trade
Support for UK Business
Offshore Wind in the UK, China,
USA, Japan and South Korea:
Synergies, Opportunities and
the Future
KTN, Innovate UK
14th May 2020
Bruce Clements
Offshore Wind Specialist
Renewable Energy Team
60. Overview
• The Department for International Trade
• UK Export Finance (UKEF)
• Offshore wind in the UK works
• A growing UK supply chain
• A global industry
• Supporting overseas
• Future
61. Department for International Trade
Three arms to DIT -
1. Trade Policy
2. UK Export Finance (UKEF)
3. International Trade and Investment (ITI)
International Trade and Investment -
• Attracts foreign investment and increase exports in priority
sectors
• Staffed - HQ, Sector teams, trade posts in country, local
International Trade Advisers
Renewable Energy Team and offshore wind -
• Renewable Energy Team aims to maximise the sector’s value
to the UK
• Through FDI, Supply Chain Development and Export
• Supported through events
62. DIT and export
62
• Supporting locally in the UK – ITAs
• Connecting with opportunities
• DIT works in country building networks
• DIT works internationally, with activities such as missions, trade
show and other support
• Finance - UK Export Finance
63. UK Export Finance
63
• UK’s export credit agency
o Provides attractive financing terms for UK capital goods & services
o F18/19 - 262 companies’ exports to 72 countries total value £6.8 billion
1. Long term financing, including projects
o In local currencies
o With direct loans and unconditional guarantees
o Across the life cycle
o 85% of contract value
o Minimum 20% of UK content
o Eligible products and services
2. Products and services that finance the overseas buyer
o Providing guarantees to the banks of the buyers
o Direct lending to the buyer
3. Products and services that support the exporter
o Protection against the risk of non payment
o Helping to raise the required bonds
o Assisting with working capital requirements
64. Offshore wind is a success in the UK
Expertise from –
• Energy / Grid
• Engineering
• Legal / finance
• Insurance
• Oil and gas
• Engineering
• Environmental
• Marine
• Port
Mother nature –
• World class resources
• Large shallow seabed
• Ports
• People
Stable & clear policies –
• Government vision
• Public support
• Policy structures
• Financial certainty
• 10 GW installed
• 30 GW + target
65. Supply chain capability – the story so far…
• Development / Feasibility / Planning
• Specialist Engineering
• Fabrication
• Equipment supply / Blades
• Port / Marine
• Cable
• Construction support
• Operations and maintenance
65
66. Offshore wind moves quickly
Scale
• Turbines
• Lease areas
• Vessels
• Cable capacity
Innovation
• Foundation design
• Electrical systems
• Windfarm layout
• Optimised installation schedules
Industrialisation
• Transition from single supply to multiple suppliers
• Longer term goals
66
71. Sources of information and contact details
• International Trade Advisers provide local help exporting
Bruce Clements
Offshore Wind Specialist
Department for International Trade
Bruce.clements@trade.gov.uk
71
Jamie Cribb
Offshore Wind Trade Manager
Department for International Trade
Jamie.cribb@trade.gov.uk
72.
73. Q & A
All Speakers & Dan Finch,
Managing Director, EDPR & Chris
Briggs, Regional Innovation
Manager, SGRE
74. Innovate UK Offshore Wind
Global Expert Missions to US,
China, Japan & South Korea
Roger Townsend
roger.townsend@innovateuk.ukri.org
Chris Bagley
Chris.Bagley@ktn-uk.org
Sandeep Sandhu
sandeep.sandhu@ktn-uk.org
Brendan Vickers
Brendan.Vickers@innovateuk.ukri.org
David Hytch
David.Hytch@innovateuk.ukri.org
John Ransford
John.ransford@ktn-uk.org
Nee-Joo Teh
neejoo.teh@ktn-uk.org