Talk given at the BOBCATSSS 2015 conference - http://www.bobcatsss2015.com/.
This contribution will define users with visual impairments and divide them into categories according to functional criteria. We will focus on methods of haptization and audialization of information for visually impaired users and define and classify documents that are created by the haptization and audialization of information.
3. Introduction
90 % of information through the eyesight
data are transformed into structured information
through visualization
visually impaired – transformation of visual data
into forms that are accessible for perception
through senses other than the eyesight
different types of documents intended for users
with visual impairments
4. Levels of visual impairment
mild to no visual impairment,
moderate visual impairment,
severe visual impairment,
blindness 1 (practical blindness),
blindness 2 (legal blindness),
blindness 3 (total blindness).
5. Visually impaired user
user who works with information in a modified
visual form or in a form other than visual
works with modified visual information (category 0.-3.
according to WHO),
works exclusively with non-visual information
(category 4.-5. according to WHO).
6. Transformation of visual data
turning visual data into
modified visual information = revisualisation
non-visual information = de-visualization
visual data
textual
image
8. Revisualization of visual textual data
and image data
enlarged printing
camera magnifying glass
applications to enlarge the operating system
environment
9. Haptization of visual textual and image
data
Braille (Braille display)
tactile graphic
vacuum forming
thermal fuser
10. Audialization of visual textual data
non-musical sound document
screenreader and voice syntetizer
hybrid book
15. Conclusion
the more amount of visual (especially)
information we produce, the greater information
deficit of visually impaired people will be.
revisualization and de-visualization is time-
consuming and costly
in all cases where there is data visualization, it is
really necessary to express them in this way
do we not simplify dangerously intricately
structured reality by that that we reduce it to
spatial relationships