TX presentes, anfitrião
Ausentes
Authenticus
Lígia
DGEEC
Lino Santos
Working together across the higher education, further education and skills sectors, Jisc provides trusted advice and support, reduces sector costs across shared network, digital content, IT services and procurement negotiations, ensuring the sector stays ahead of the game with research and development for the future.
REF – In 2013 – the first time institutions submitted their research outputs for the new research assessment exercise. The aim for this time was to simply have something in place and get the house in order. For 2020 – the next time the exercise will happen, the aim is to have a smooth, well-oiled machine in place! For UK institutions this is critical; it’s what their funding will be built on. It is also when OS mandates really start to bite.
With a bleak financial outlook for universities these demands are only likely to increase. There is an even more pressing need to manage resources efficiently and to be effective in identifying opportunities.
Also characterised by a lack of coordination, few shared structures, and with no regulated qualification framework.
Funder systems: Joint e-submission systems (JeS); Research Fish (a research outcomes system), Research Outcomes System; Grants on the Web; REF; HESA.
Despite all this data it is still incredibly hard to get any meaningful statistics or analytics out of the systems, and people are still left keying in information multiple times in each institution.
UK are the FIRST county outside of Canada to undertake the establishment of active CASRAI groups.
They are having active discussions with others in Europe – a handful of Northern European Countries interested in CASRAI and looking at adopting the approach …hence why CASRAI are now holding a meeting in Rome around EuroCRIS in May 2014.
– Governance. An identifier and agreed metadata must be governed and maintained. Regardless of how this is done, it must be done effectively.
– Trust. Parties that rely on an identifier must trust that identifier. There are several key areas of trust: firstly, the assertion that the identifier refers to an organisation of interest (which may be supported by making the identifier human-readable), secondly, the assertion that data associated with an identifier is correct and thirdly that the identifier will continue to be maintained to reflect changes in organisational structure and status, etc.
– Transparency. It must be clear how identifiers are issued, and to which organisations. Processes for the management and governance of identifiers must be defined and must be conducted transparently.
– Temporal. Many use cases require information not just about the current list of organisations, but also about their histories. Institutions are created, merge, split, acquire each other, change status and are renamed. None of the identifiers discovered during this study adequately meet this requirement, although some do store some historical information.
– Appropriate metadata. A Names Authority can issue organisational identifiers associated with a short list of metadata (eg name, deprecated-name, deprecated-nameID, City, County, PostalCode, URI), or an extended metadata list (eg including classifiers and organisational hierarchies). It would probably be easier and more beneficial for an organisational identifier names Authority to be limited to a small metadata set – the minimum required for effective identification.
Examined the landscape of organisational identifiers in the UK and identified 23 different IDs
Based on interviews with key individuals
Lots of detail on use cases for publishing, funders and institutions
Start simple. Don’t try to solve all use cases at once.
UC4 was deleted but kept with numbering.
UK focus but became clear that this is international.
Reviewed separately rather than together as originally planned.
TX presentes, anfitrião
Ausentes
Authenticus
Lígia
DGEEC
Lino Santos
Melhor cobertura das ferramentas de backoffice
Aumento da produtividade
Maior integração e automatização de processos
TX presentes, anfitrião
Ausentes
Authenticus
Lígia
DGEEC
Lino Santos
TX presentes, anfitrião
Ausentes
Authenticus
Lígia
DGEEC
Lino Santos
O azul da tecnologia
Os dois Cs para darem a ideia de camadas
O C maior para reforçar a interoperabilidade
Versão final o slogan foi revisto por força a ser mais expressivo
TX presentes, anfitrião
Ausentes
Authenticus
Lígia
DGEEC
Lino Santos