The research information space
Source:
EUROCRIS.org
Editors
Industry
Research
institutions
Research
organizations
Investment
opportunities
Publications
Libraries
Patents
Products
Data centres
Projects
Researchers
Research data
Equipment
Facilities
Researchers
Governments
Financiers
Background - goals
• Reference Architecture
• Components / modules to support
• Interoperability (IRs, CRIS, Other scientific
SI systems)
• Norms and standards (data model, interfaces)
Survey eco – institution profile
Country
Suisse
Check Republic
Portugal
Spain
Sweden
Slovak Republic
Netherlands
Brazil
TLD
CH
CZ
PT
ES
SE
SK
NL
BR
Trends, not certainties!
CRIS-PT
Survey eco – institution profile
Organization type
Organization Name
Funding
Research Library
Agency
Swiss National Science Foundation SNSF
Office of the Government of the Czech Republic,
Research and Development and Innovation
Council
Foundation for Science and Technology
SPANISH FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY (FECYT)
Swedish Research Council
Slovak Centre of Scientific and Technical
Information (SCSTI)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico
e Tecnológico – CNPq
Data
Archive
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Data Archiving and Networked Services – DANS
CRIS-PT
Govern.
X
4
1
X
2
3
1
Survey eco - Services
CRIS
Academic
expertise
Project
database
Organizations
database
Outcomes /
outputs
Grant
management
Reserach
news
Research
ethics
Scientific
equipment
Research
portal
CRIS-PT
Survey eco - Services
CRIS
Academic
expertise
Project
database
Outcomes /
outputs
Organizations
database
Grant
management
Research
ethics
Scientific
equipment
Project call
Research
portal
Statistics
Evaluation
Scientific
Journals
CRIS-PT
Reserach
news
Research data
Survey eco - Software
Service
COUNTRY
Custom vs Proprietary
CH
Organizations database
C
Scientific equipment
PT
ES SE
SK
NL
BR
Total
-
Academic expertise (CVs)
CZ
C
C
C
P
C
C
C=5, P=1
C
P
C
C
C=4, P=2
P
C
C=1,P=1
PC
P
C
C=4, P=2
C
C
P
C
C
C=6, P=2
P
-
Grant management
C
-
C
Outcomes/outputs
C
P
C
Project database
C
P
C
P
P
C
C
C=4, P=2
Research portal
NA
P
C
PC
P
C
C
C=4, P=2
P
P
PC
P
C
C
C=3, P=3
Research news
CRIS-PT
Survey eco - Staff
Number of staff involve in
development
Function
COUNTRY
CH CZ PT ES SE SK NL BR
Academic expertise (CVs)
NA
Organizations database
2
4
med
CH CZ PT ES
SE
3,0
3
3,0
6
NA 3
?
4
3
?
2
4
3
3,5
3,0
3
3,5
3
5
Grant management
Outcomes/outputs
Project database
2
10
NA
Research portal
NA
5
6
3
0,35
4
3
NA 3
151
0,5
4
3
2,5
3,0
3,0
3,0
NA 3
3
?
6
1
3,0
3
3,0
4
6
2,3
3
1
3,0
3
1,6
1
0,8
9
15
7,5
8
2
2,5
5
2,3
1
8
3
0,7
4
3,5
5
3
0,8
3
6
2,3
0,1
1
Research news
Research ethics
7
31
9
18
SK NL BR med
4
4
1,2
8
1,2
Scientific equipment
Sub-Total
Number of staff involved in operations
18 0 2,5 45
CRIS-PT
29,8
2
5
3
1
0,5
9 18 7
169
4,65
29 0,75
30,3
Survey eco - dimension
Dimension
Federated
National
Service /data
CH CZ PT ES SE SK NL BR
Academic expertise (CVs)
X
Organizations database
X
X
X
D
X
D
X
X
Scientific equipment
Grant management
X
Outcomes /outputs
X
X
0
4
0
Y
2
1
X
3
X
X
6
0
2
X
6
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
D
X
X
3
X
X
2
X
X
X
3
X
1
X
X
X
3
X
3
X
7
X
X
X
X
X
5
X
X
D
X
X
6
Research news
X
X
X
X
X
5
0
X
X
other - Research data
X
X
X
3
0
X
X
2
other - Statistics survey of
research potential
X
X
X
3
0
X
X
2
other - Evaluation of
quality of science
X
X
X
3
0
X
X
2
45
7
X
CRIS-PT
X
X
X
X
X
1
X
Research portal
X
6
X
Project database
X
CH CZ PT ES SE SK NL BR Total CH CZ PT ES SE SK NL BR Total
1
X
X
Total
Local (institutional)
X
X
X
33
Survey eco - Protocols & Standards
• 5 reported some use of CERIF
• 3 reported some proprietary protocols
– ES – CVN – Normalized CV
– NL – Proprietary identifiers, vocabulary
– LATTES-XML
CRIS-PT
Survey eco - Interoperability
Data providers
Service
AE (CVs) Org.DB
Grant
Outcomes Project External Scientific
Total
management /outputs DB
Sources equip.
3
1
3
1
3
5
2
2
2
Grant management
Data collectors
Academic expertise (CVs)
Organizations database
3
3
1
1
1
Outcomes /outputs
Project database
External Sources
Scientific equipment
Research portal
Research news
Research ethics
Other - project calls
other - Statistics survey of
research potencial
2
2
3
4
1
2
3
1
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
2
1
2
1
2
other - Qvaluation of quality
of science
Total
4
2
1
1
12
24
1
1
CRIS-PT
20
9
14
14
2
3
14
3
0
1
5
1
9
21
9
2
14
14
4
Survey eco – Architecture - ES
Researchers
National
services
CVN
Grants
management
Research
projects
Research
results
PAID
RECOLECTA
Research
Researchs
Research news
results
ethics
ICONO
Others
SINC
RECYT
Universities
and Research
Organizations
Spanish
Scientific
Journals
Ez PUBLISH
OAI-PMH
OJS
Federated
services
Local services
Information
standards
SIC
CVN
PDF
XML
CERIF
Institutional
Repository
OAI-PMH
CSV
Oracle
DRIVER
TXT
Discoverer/S OPEN AIRE
Google API
QL
D-NET
Dublin Core
CRIS-PT
Survey – Architecture - BR
Function
Stakeholders
Research
projects
Research
results
Grants
management
Research
portal
0
lattes.br
carloschagas.br
Researchers
Oportunities
National Services
CVs
Research
Patents
Groups
Grants
Publications
Scholarships
Publications
Grants and
(Universities
Scholarships
Repositories)
(State Funders)
R&D
Institutions &
Projects
Facilities
Local Services
Solution architecture
and students
Lattes
Institutional
Databases
Lattes-XML
Projects
(State Funders)
DOI, DSpace,
Scopus, ISI
PT-CRIS
Editorial/news
Survey eco - SWOT
Country TLD Strengths
Check
Republic
Slovak
Republic
Weaknesses
Opportunities
A stable national CRIS with a long tradition. It
enables transparency in the research funding
domain.
Certain types of
entities missing,
most notably
Facility, Equipment
and Research
Dataset
Quality (Czech)
researcher identification
but not shown on the
portal for personal data
privacy reasons
Linked Open Data
exposure
CERIF compatibility
• Legislative background for national R&D
portal and information system providing
10 years of experience of SCSTI with providing
the similar system
• Established system for R&D organization data
identification (system of evaluation as
condition for use of public resources)
• Implementation of EU standards (CERIF)
• Absence of
institutional CRIS
systems in Slovakia
• Quality and
complexity of
received data is not
lawfully guaranteed
• Improve the
cooperation of Slovak
R&D stakeholders in the
area of R&D data exchange
and systems integration
• Improve the legislation
for reach more complex
and more valid data
CZ
SK
•
•
Portugal PT
Threats
Outputs and outcomes module
Team potential and completeness
(expertise , networking (COAR,
euroCRIS, OCDE, etc))
•
•
CRIS-PT
Underdevelo
ped or nonexistent
modules
Non-CERIF
•
•
•
•
Best practices
Efficiency
Transparency
Better service
• Ensure
continual and
sufficient
funding of SK
CRIS
•
•
Funding
Political
instability
Survey eco – Conclusions
• Survey
– survey response rate was near 50%
– Some questions were complex to answer
– One should read the results in terms of trends
• Responders were mostly Funding agency or
governmental institutions
CRIS-PT
Survey eco – Conclusions
• Services
– New services emerged:
• Some related to outcomes/outputs research data,
scientific journals
• Some related to grants and projects: project call
• Some related to statistics and evaluation
– Most well established services are:
• Outcomes/outputs (8), project database , research
portal (7), academic expertise and org. database (6)
PT-CRIS
Survey eco - Conclusions
• Software - most of the systems are custom developments
• Staff
– Staff is distributed equally between operations and development
– All services, operation sum of medians was dev (28), ops (32)
• Services national (45) and/or local (33), not federated (7)
• Most of the responders indicated some form of CERIF use
• Interoperability
– The top data collectors are CVs, research portal, outcomes / ouputs
and project database
– The top data providers are Organizations
database, outcomes/outputs
PT-CRIS
Survey Eco - Highlights
• Suisse – how to set up a strategical vision
http://www.crus.ch/dms.php?id=28920
• Slovakia – Components of a national CRIS
• Danica Zendulkova: State-operated CRIS systems
in the EU. CVTI SR : Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
2011. ISBN 978-80-89354-04-7
PT-CRIS
Conclusions
• The state of the art reports were very
important to:
– Learn the best practices
– Get decision makers confident
• euroCRIS played an important role in this
process
– Guidance on the survey
– Facilitator for identifying respondents
PT-CRIS
euroCRIS whish list
• Architecture reference model
• Modules specs / requirements (ex:
RFPs)
• One layer up: from tables to objects
PT-CRIS
Survey Eco – Critical analysis (PT)
• Portugal has a long way to go:
– Authoritative organizations database
– Call, grants and project services are obsolete
– Research portal to be considered
– Evaluation and stats to be further analyzed
– CRISs needed
• Swedish logical architecture seams to be the
most comprehensive
• CERIF seams to be imperative
PT-CRIS
Digital ecosystem for research information
Grants
management
Function
Portal
Research
results
Research
news
Research
ethics
National services
Research portal
Academic
expertise
Research
news
Organizations
database
Federated
services
Scientific
equipment
Academic
expertise
Grants mgmt
Projects
database
Outcomes /
outputs
CRISs
CRISs
Outcomes /
outputs
Local
Services
Solution architecture
Research
projects
Business
Intelligence
Expert
service
Outcomes /
Projekt
Projekt
outputs
(EKO m.fl.)
(EKO m.fl.)
Grants mgmt
Ansökningar
Ansökningar
(local)
(Prisma)
(Prisma)
funders
Projects
Projekt
Ansökningar
database
(lokala)
(Prisma)
(local)
Övriga
Outcomes /
Publikationer
Ansökningar
outputs
(EKO m.fl.)
(Prisma)
Statistics
News
Projekt
Ansökningar
(local)
(EKO m.fl.)
(Prisma)
Research
ethics
Strategy - Priorities
Risk
Fed. CRIS Syst.
Grant Manag.
Evaluation
Statistics
Research portal
Scientific equipt
Research news
Research ethics
Organizations database
Academic exp.
Outcomes / outputs
Impact
Cost
PT-CRIS
Colocar visão dos passos definidos e onde estamos.
- Destacarcolaboração. É um grandeefeitosecundáriodestainiciativacomopoderãover de seguida.- Go No-Go. Validarapoiopolítico e financeiroaoprojeto. Criarcondiçõesparaavançarpara a próximafase- Finalmentedestacarque à medidaque o processoavançapassamos de umafase de estudos e estratégiapara aconcretizaçãoAuditing / DiagnosesScope global (processes, organization, IT)7 RecomendationsShort/medium term - implementation plan based on quick fixes + critical business areasMedium/long term - constitution and implementation of na integrated research information systems (PT-CRIS)P1 - Software developmentmodel (sourcing)P2 - ReorganizationofinformaticsservicesP3 - PlanningcomputersupportP4 - externalansweringP5 – ContactcenterP6 - Synergiesfromtheintegrationof FCCNP7 - build a newintegratedinformationsystemonscienceandtechnology (medium & longterm)
Colocar visão dos passos definidos e onde estamos.
Fornecidos pelo sectrario geral euroCRis
virar
virar
Customdevelopmentvs comercial/proprietary
Destaques para CVs locaisProgramas vsgrants
Colocar visão dos passos definidos e onde estamos.
Colocar visão dos passos definidos e onde estamos.
Presença e facilidade de utilização na WebFuncionalidades coreInteroperabilidadeO serviço mais desenvolvido é o de outcomes & outputs (neste caso o RCAAP)O serviço de academic expertise necessita de melhor usabilidade e ergonomia e de interoperar com mais sistemasEm geral todos os restantes serviços necessitam de ser desenvolvidos
Vision and goals: As the basis for the program, the program’s guiding vision and principles for its entiredurationwillbedefined.Principles: Identifying and describing the principles which serve as guidelines for the program.Organization of the program: Description of the program’s organization and the necessary roles.Program management process: Definition of the fundamental management processes for managingthe program over its entire duration. The program management process is subdivided into steering,management andfinancing.Service architecture: Illustration of the national services with a strategic service architecture which isderived from the use cases and based on the functional architecture.Operating model: Description of the possible alternatives for implementing national services.Service prioritization: Prioritization of the identified services with regard to their implementation.Implementation planning: Finalization of implementation planning based on the prioritized services.Strategy: The strategy encompasses all the aspects outlined above
Três pesos pesados:Quickwins: org. db, academic. Expertise, outcomes / outputsGrande impacto, médio risco, médio investimento: Grande risco, grande impacto e grande custo
Auditing / DiagnosesScope global (processes, organization, IT)7 RecomendationsShort/medium term - implementation plan based on quick fixes + critical business areasMedium/long term - constitution and implementation of naintegrated research information systems (PT-CRIS)P1 - Software developmentmodel(sourcing)P2 - Reorganizationof informatics servicesP3 - Planning computer supportP4 - externalansweringP5 – Contact centerP6 - Synergiesfromtheintegrationof FCCNP7 - build a newintegratedinformationsystemon science and technology (medium & longterm)