SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Competive Analysis                 Dynapert

Industry Attractiveness Factor
Relative Market Share
Costs relative to Competitors
Match Rivals
Bargaining Leverage
Strategic Fit Relationships
Innovative Capabilities
How well matchs KSPs
Degree profit relevant to rivals
Sum of Weights
Industry Attractiveness rating
Industry:                           Household Chemicals
Weight      Rating       Weighted
                                         Industry Attractiveness Factor
      0.2            8               1.6 Market Size & Potentional Growth
     0.15            7              1.05 Intensity of Competition
     0.15            8               1.2 Strategic Fit
     0.05            6               0.3 Resource Requirements
     0.25            7              1.75 Emerging Opportunities/Threats
      0.1            2               0.2 Cyclical Threats
     0.05            7              0.35 External Factors
     0.05            8               0.4 Degree of Risk
        1                                Sum of Weights
                                    6.85 Industry Attractiveness rating
Household Chemicals
                  Weight     Rating       Weighted

                      0.05            6        0.3
                      0.05            5       0.25
                      0.05            6        0.3
                      0.05            7       0.35
                      0.35            6        2.1
                      0.25            6        1.5
                      0.15            5       0.75
                      0.05            8        0.4
                         1
                                              5.95

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Template s07.1 [2015]
Template s07.1 [2015]Template s07.1 [2015]
Template s07.1 [2015]
Bazlin Ahmad
 
Inkfish Ontwerp Identity for Bert's Bierhuis
Inkfish Ontwerp Identity for Bert's BierhuisInkfish Ontwerp Identity for Bert's Bierhuis
Inkfish Ontwerp Identity for Bert's Bierhuis
Ed van Oosterhout
 
Bidang pembelajaran-5-2
Bidang pembelajaran-5-2Bidang pembelajaran-5-2
Bidang pembelajaran-5-2
Bazlin Ahmad
 
Bidang pembelajaran-1-3-tingkatan-4
Bidang pembelajaran-1-3-tingkatan-4Bidang pembelajaran-1-3-tingkatan-4
Bidang pembelajaran-1-3-tingkatan-4
Bazlin Ahmad
 
Tr*ffpunkt Mikromarc 2014 - Invitasjon og program (norsk)
Tr*ffpunkt Mikromarc 2014 - Invitasjon og program (norsk)Tr*ffpunkt Mikromarc 2014 - Invitasjon og program (norsk)
Tr*ffpunkt Mikromarc 2014 - Invitasjon og program (norsk)
vkp1970
 
What If We Had Listened To These Guys
What If We Had Listened To These GuysWhat If We Had Listened To These Guys
What If We Had Listened To These Guys
Wayne Rodolfich
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Bukulatihanict la1
Bukulatihanict la1Bukulatihanict la1
Bukulatihanict la1
 
Digital Dissertations: Defining, Architecting, & Sustaining
Digital Dissertations: Defining, Architecting, & SustainingDigital Dissertations: Defining, Architecting, & Sustaining
Digital Dissertations: Defining, Architecting, & Sustaining
 
Template s07.1 [2015]
Template s07.1 [2015]Template s07.1 [2015]
Template s07.1 [2015]
 
Inkfish Ontwerp Identity for Bert's Bierhuis
Inkfish Ontwerp Identity for Bert's BierhuisInkfish Ontwerp Identity for Bert's Bierhuis
Inkfish Ontwerp Identity for Bert's Bierhuis
 
Grey Presbytery Closing Presentation Pt 2
Grey Presbytery Closing Presentation Pt 2Grey Presbytery Closing Presentation Pt 2
Grey Presbytery Closing Presentation Pt 2
 
Subscribing to a Blog
Subscribing to a BlogSubscribing to a Blog
Subscribing to a Blog
 
C 4 lesson 1
C 4   lesson 1C 4   lesson 1
C 4 lesson 1
 
The Middle East in the 20th Century
The Middle East in the 20th CenturyThe Middle East in the 20th Century
The Middle East in the 20th Century
 
Bidang pembelajaran-5-2
Bidang pembelajaran-5-2Bidang pembelajaran-5-2
Bidang pembelajaran-5-2
 
Bidang pembelajaran-1-3-tingkatan-4
Bidang pembelajaran-1-3-tingkatan-4Bidang pembelajaran-1-3-tingkatan-4
Bidang pembelajaran-1-3-tingkatan-4
 
4000-7000 lb. Feature Brochure
4000-7000 lb. Feature Brochure4000-7000 lb. Feature Brochure
4000-7000 lb. Feature Brochure
 
Tr*ffpunkt Mikromarc 2014 - Invitasjon og program (norsk)
Tr*ffpunkt Mikromarc 2014 - Invitasjon og program (norsk)Tr*ffpunkt Mikromarc 2014 - Invitasjon og program (norsk)
Tr*ffpunkt Mikromarc 2014 - Invitasjon og program (norsk)
 
Life
LifeLife
Life
 
How to plan any project
How to plan any projectHow to plan any project
How to plan any project
 
Mikromarc Brukermøte 2013 Fag
Mikromarc Brukermøte 2013 FagMikromarc Brukermøte 2013 Fag
Mikromarc Brukermøte 2013 Fag
 
David poem setting vocabulary
David poem setting vocabularyDavid poem setting vocabulary
David poem setting vocabulary
 
Gallery
GalleryGallery
Gallery
 
Itinerary CycleforCF 2011
Itinerary CycleforCF 2011Itinerary CycleforCF 2011
Itinerary CycleforCF 2011
 
Generating Viral Heat for Brands
Generating Viral Heat for BrandsGenerating Viral Heat for Brands
Generating Viral Heat for Brands
 
What If We Had Listened To These Guys
What If We Had Listened To These GuysWhat If We Had Listened To These Guys
What If We Had Listened To These Guys
 

More from Johnny Schaefer

Bingo Generation Style.doc
Bingo Generation Style.docBingo Generation Style.doc
Bingo Generation Style.doc
Johnny Schaefer
 
Bingo Generation Style.pdf
Bingo Generation Style.pdfBingo Generation Style.pdf
Bingo Generation Style.pdf
Johnny Schaefer
 
BK Chapter 1 and Chapter 2.pdf
BK Chapter 1 and Chapter 2.pdfBK Chapter 1 and Chapter 2.pdf
BK Chapter 1 and Chapter 2.pdf
Johnny Schaefer
 
Case Study_ Black & Decker.doc
Case Study_  Black & Decker.docCase Study_  Black & Decker.doc
Case Study_ Black & Decker.doc
Johnny Schaefer
 
Case Study_ Comestics in Nigeria-Marketing Segments.doc
Case Study_  Comestics in Nigeria-Marketing Segments.docCase Study_  Comestics in Nigeria-Marketing Segments.doc
Case Study_ Comestics in Nigeria-Marketing Segments.doc
Johnny Schaefer
 
Case Study_ I-69 Expansion - Gov. Funding.doc
Case Study_  I-69 Expansion - Gov. Funding.docCase Study_  I-69 Expansion - Gov. Funding.doc
Case Study_ I-69 Expansion - Gov. Funding.doc
Johnny Schaefer
 
Case Study_ I69 Expansion Environmental Impacts.doc
Case Study_  I69 Expansion Environmental Impacts.docCase Study_  I69 Expansion Environmental Impacts.doc
Case Study_ I69 Expansion Environmental Impacts.doc
Johnny Schaefer
 
Case Study_ Indiana Transportation Growth.doc
Case Study_  Indiana Transportation Growth.docCase Study_  Indiana Transportation Growth.doc
Case Study_ Indiana Transportation Growth.doc
Johnny Schaefer
 
Case Study_ J. Peterman PESTLE Analysis.doc
Case Study_  J. Peterman PESTLE Analysis.docCase Study_  J. Peterman PESTLE Analysis.doc
Case Study_ J. Peterman PESTLE Analysis.doc
Johnny Schaefer
 
Case Study_ J. Peterman.doc
Case Study_  J. Peterman.docCase Study_  J. Peterman.doc
Case Study_ J. Peterman.doc
Johnny Schaefer
 
Case Study_ Swiffer Case Study Works Cited.doc
Case Study_  Swiffer Case Study Works Cited.docCase Study_  Swiffer Case Study Works Cited.doc
Case Study_ Swiffer Case Study Works Cited.doc
Johnny Schaefer
 

More from Johnny Schaefer (20)

Bingo Generation Style.doc
Bingo Generation Style.docBingo Generation Style.doc
Bingo Generation Style.doc
 
Bingo Generation Style.pdf
Bingo Generation Style.pdfBingo Generation Style.pdf
Bingo Generation Style.pdf
 
BK Chapter 1 and Chapter 2.pdf
BK Chapter 1 and Chapter 2.pdfBK Chapter 1 and Chapter 2.pdf
BK Chapter 1 and Chapter 2.pdf
 
BK Chapter 10.pdf
BK Chapter 10.pdfBK Chapter 10.pdf
BK Chapter 10.pdf
 
BK Chapter 3.pdf
BK Chapter 3.pdfBK Chapter 3.pdf
BK Chapter 3.pdf
 
BK Chapter 4.pdf
BK Chapter 4.pdfBK Chapter 4.pdf
BK Chapter 4.pdf
 
BK Chapter 5.pdf
BK Chapter 5.pdfBK Chapter 5.pdf
BK Chapter 5.pdf
 
BK Chapter 6.pdf
BK Chapter 6.pdfBK Chapter 6.pdf
BK Chapter 6.pdf
 
BK Chapter 8.pdf
BK Chapter 8.pdfBK Chapter 8.pdf
BK Chapter 8.pdf
 
BK Chapter 9.pdf
BK Chapter 9.pdfBK Chapter 9.pdf
BK Chapter 9.pdf
 
Campaigns pt 2.ppt
Campaigns pt 2.pptCampaigns pt 2.ppt
Campaigns pt 2.ppt
 
Case Study_ Black & Decker.doc
Case Study_  Black & Decker.docCase Study_  Black & Decker.doc
Case Study_ Black & Decker.doc
 
Case Study_ Comestics in Nigeria-Marketing Segments.doc
Case Study_  Comestics in Nigeria-Marketing Segments.docCase Study_  Comestics in Nigeria-Marketing Segments.doc
Case Study_ Comestics in Nigeria-Marketing Segments.doc
 
Case Study_ I-69 Expansion - Gov. Funding.doc
Case Study_  I-69 Expansion - Gov. Funding.docCase Study_  I-69 Expansion - Gov. Funding.doc
Case Study_ I-69 Expansion - Gov. Funding.doc
 
Case Study_ I69 Expansion Environmental Impacts.doc
Case Study_  I69 Expansion Environmental Impacts.docCase Study_  I69 Expansion Environmental Impacts.doc
Case Study_ I69 Expansion Environmental Impacts.doc
 
Case Study_ Indiana Transportation Growth.doc
Case Study_  Indiana Transportation Growth.docCase Study_  Indiana Transportation Growth.doc
Case Study_ Indiana Transportation Growth.doc
 
Case Study_ J. Peterman PESTLE Analysis.doc
Case Study_  J. Peterman PESTLE Analysis.docCase Study_  J. Peterman PESTLE Analysis.doc
Case Study_ J. Peterman PESTLE Analysis.doc
 
Case Study_ J. Peterman.doc
Case Study_  J. Peterman.docCase Study_  J. Peterman.doc
Case Study_ J. Peterman.doc
 
Case Study_ K-Mart.doc
Case Study_  K-Mart.docCase Study_  K-Mart.doc
Case Study_ K-Mart.doc
 
Case Study_ Swiffer Case Study Works Cited.doc
Case Study_  Swiffer Case Study Works Cited.docCase Study_  Swiffer Case Study Works Cited.doc
Case Study_ Swiffer Case Study Works Cited.doc
 

Cleaning Product Industry Analysis.xls

  • 1. Competive Analysis Dynapert Industry Attractiveness Factor Relative Market Share Costs relative to Competitors Match Rivals Bargaining Leverage Strategic Fit Relationships Innovative Capabilities How well matchs KSPs Degree profit relevant to rivals Sum of Weights Industry Attractiveness rating
  • 2. Industry: Household Chemicals Weight Rating Weighted Industry Attractiveness Factor 0.2 8 1.6 Market Size & Potentional Growth 0.15 7 1.05 Intensity of Competition 0.15 8 1.2 Strategic Fit 0.05 6 0.3 Resource Requirements 0.25 7 1.75 Emerging Opportunities/Threats 0.1 2 0.2 Cyclical Threats 0.05 7 0.35 External Factors 0.05 8 0.4 Degree of Risk 1 Sum of Weights 6.85 Industry Attractiveness rating
  • 3. Household Chemicals Weight Rating Weighted 0.05 6 0.3 0.05 5 0.25 0.05 6 0.3 0.05 7 0.35 0.35 6 2.1 0.25 6 1.5 0.15 5 0.75 0.05 8 0.4 1 5.95