O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×

Patient with a toe gangrene coming to Emergency Department CSSL2021

Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Próximos SlideShares
Chronic venous disease 2020
Chronic venous disease 2020
Carregando em…3
×

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 43 Anúncio

Patient with a toe gangrene coming to Emergency Department CSSL2021

Baixar para ler offline

Patient with a toe gangrene coming to Emergency Department

Joel Arudchelvam

Atherosclerotic OAD – Risk factors

Presentation
FONTAINE CLASSIFICATION
Rutherford classification
SVS Lower Extremity Threatened Limb (WIFI) classification

Patient with a toe gangrene coming to Emergency Department

Joel Arudchelvam

Atherosclerotic OAD – Risk factors

Presentation
FONTAINE CLASSIFICATION
Rutherford classification
SVS Lower Extremity Threatened Limb (WIFI) classification

Anúncio
Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Diapositivos para si (20)

Semelhante a Patient with a toe gangrene coming to Emergency Department CSSL2021 (20)

Anúncio

Mais de Joel Arudchelvam MBBS, MD, MRCS, FCSSL (20)

Mais recentes (20)

Anúncio

Patient with a toe gangrene coming to Emergency Department CSSL2021

  1. 1. Joel Arudchelvam MBBS (COL), MD (SUR), MRCS (ENG) Consultant Vascular and Transplant Surgeon
  2. 2.  65 year old male  Blackish discoloration of the toes for 3 days  Pain  Ulcer with purulent discharge on plantar surface at the base of toes  Smoker  Hypertension , diabetes mellitus
  3. 3.  WT done  Pus drained  Absent popliteal, dorsalis pedis, posterior tibial (distal) pulses  ABPI – 0.5
  4. 4.  2D Echo – EF - 55%  SCr – 0.9 mg/dl  PLAN  Investigation  Management
  5. 5.  Ischaemia  Infection  Trauma  Above combination
  6. 6. Causes  Atheromatous  Risk Factors  Smoking  Diabetes  Hypertension  Hyperlipidemia  Advanced age  Inflammatory  Others
  7. 7. • Claudication • Rest pain • Ulcer • Gangrene
  8. 8.  Stage Symptoms  I Asymptomatic  II Intermittent claudication  IIa Pain-free, claudication walking >200 m  IIb Pain-free, claudication walking <200 m  III Rest pain  IV ulcer / gangrene  Stage III and IV “critical limb ischaemia”
  9. 9. G r Ca t Clinical description Objective criteria 0 0 Asymptomatic Normal treadmill or reactive hyperemia test 1 Mild claudication Completes treadmill exercise; AP after exercise > 50 mm Hg but at least 20 mm Hg lower than resting value I 2 Moderate claudication Between categories 1 and 3 3 Severe claudication Cannot complete standard treadmill exercise, and AP after exercise < 50 mm Hg II 4 Ischemic rest pain Resting AP < 40 mm Hg, flat or barely pulsatile ankle or metatarsal PVR; TP < 30 mm Hg III 5 Minor tissue loss— nonhealing ulcer, focal gangrene Resting AP < 60 mm Hg, ankle or metatarsal PVR flat or barely pulsatile; TP < 40 mm Hg 6 Major tissue loss— extending above TM level, no longer salvageable Same as above
  10. 10.  Wound  Ischemia  Foot Infection
  11. 11. Grade Ulcer Gangrene 0 No ulcer No gangrene . 1 Small, shallow ulcer on distal leg or foot; no exposed bone, unless limited to distal phalanx No gangrene 2 Deeper ulcer with exposed bone, joint, or tendon; generally not involving the heel; shallow heel ulcer, without calcaneal involvement Gangrenous changes limited to digits 3 Extensive, deep ulcer involving forefoot and/or midfoot; deep, full- thickness heel ulcer ± calcaneal involvement Extensive gangrene involving forefoot and/or midfoot; full- thickness heel necrosis ± calcaneal involvement
  12. 12. Grade ABI Ankle systolic pressure TP, TcPo2 0 ≥0.80 >100 mm Hg ≥60 mm Hg 1 0.6-0.79 70-100 mm Hg 40-59 mm Hg 2 0.4-0.59 50-70 mm Hg 30-39 mm Hg 3 ≤0.39 <50 mm Hg <30 mm Hg
  13. 13. Clinical manifestation of infection SVS No symptoms or signs of infection 0 Infection present, as defined by the presence of at least two of the following items:•Local swelling or induration•Erythema >0.5 to ≤2 cm around the ulcer•Local tenderness or pain•Local warmth•Purulent discharge (thick, opaque to white, or sanguineous secretion) 1 Local infection (as described above) with erythema >2 cm or involving structures deeper than skin and subcutaneous tissues (eg, abscess, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, fasciitis) and no systemic inflammatory response signs (as described below). 2 Local infection (as described above) with the signs of SIRS, as manifested by two or more of the following:•Temperature >38°C or <36°C•Heart rate >90 beats/min•Respiratory rate >20 breaths/min or Paco2 <32 mm Hg•White blood cell count >12,000 or <4000 cells/mm3 or 10% immature (band) forms 3
  14. 14.  ABPI = P(Leg) / P(Arm)  P (leg) - higher systolic blood pressure of dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial arteries  P (Arm) - highest of the left and right arm brachial systolic blood pressure  ABPI < 0.9 - Abnormal
  15. 15.  In symptomatic patients when Revascularization planned  Arterial duplex ultrasound  CTA  MRA  Contrast arteriography /DSA
  16. 16.  USS + DOPPLER  Visualise the vessels, stenosis, plaques  Flow and its quality  Non invasive  Good for infrainguinal vessels  Abdomial vessels – bowel gas
  17. 17.  USS + DOPPLER  Triphasic flow
  18. 18.  USS + Doppler
  19. 19.  Angiography  CT angiography  Catheter angiography
  20. 20. NORMAL OCCLUDED ARTERIES • Scan from supra renal level to distal foot • Describe all arteries • Inflow • Out flow
  21. 21.  Contrast directly into artery  Traumatic  DSA – Digital subtraction angiography  Done though a software after obtaining initial images
  22. 22.  Duplex – triphasic flow in CFA
  23. 23.  CTA
  24. 24.  W - 2  I - 3  Fi - 1  High risk foot
  25. 25. Indications for intervention 1. Disabling claudication 2. Rest pain 3. Tissue loss  Rutherford 4, 5, and 6 /  Fontaine III, IV
  26. 26.  Smoking cessation  Statin therapy  Optimizing diabetes control (hemoglobin A1c goal of <7.0%)  Antiplatelet therapy with Aspirin (75-325 mg daily)
  27. 27.  3-month trial of Cilostazol (100 mg twice daily) to improve pain-free walking (In patients with IC who do not have congestive heart failure )  Trial of Pentoxifylline (400 mg thrice daily) (In patients with IC who cannot tolerate or have contraindications for Cilostazol )
  28. 28. • Supervised exercise program - minimum of three times per week (30-60 min/session) for at least 12 weeks • For patients who have undergone revascularization -adjunctive functional benefits
  29. 29.  Does he have a Critical limb ischemia (CLI)  Yes
  30. 30.  First defined - 1982.1  Intended to apply on patients without diabetes  An ankle pressure (AP) of  <40 mm Hg and rest pain  <60 mm Hg and tissue necrosis  Rutherford 4, 5, and 6 / Fontaine III, IV
  31. 31.  Diabetic patients have a varied clinical picture due to neuropathy and sepsis
  32. 32.  Endovascular procedures is recommended over open surgery for focal AIOD  In all patients undergoing revascularization assessment of CFA and correction of hemodynamically significant stenosis is recommended.
  33. 33.  SFA - Focal occlusive disease not involving the origin – endo vascular.  Surgical bypass for;  Diffuse disease  Extensive calcification  Favorable anatomy for bypass ( e.g good runoff)  Low operative risk.  Saphenous vein is preferred conduit for infrainguinal bypass
  34. 34.  In patients undergoing infrainguinal endovascular intervention - aspirin and clopidogrel for at least 30 days  Significant graft stenosis – need reintervention (open or endovascular) to promote long-term patency
  35. 35. TASC II 2007: Europ J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007:33(S1):S52 A Endovascular is procedure of choice B Endovascular is preferred therapy C Surgery is preferred for good-risk D Surgery is procedure of choice
  36. 36. TASC II 2007: Europ J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007:33(S1):S58 A Endovascular is procedure of choice D Surgery is procedure of choice B Endovascular is preferred therapy C Surgery is preferred for good-risk
  37. 37. 1. Autogenous Reversed Saphenous vein Graft ( RSVG) 2. Synthetic PTFE polyester(DACRON)
  38. 38.  30 day morbidity and mortality higher in surgery  However after 2 years bypass strategy was associated with a significant increase in subsequent OS and a trend towards improved AFS.
  39. 39. Thank You

×