“Does China has a Military Strategy?” This pertinent question has been a longstanding query based on China’s ambiguous posture in delineating its military approach. The unpredictable nature of China’s strategic intentions has been the core factor in raising the suspicion and concerns over China’s military actions- raising the red alarms of ‘China threat’. http://www.indrastra.com/2015/12/FEATURED-Decoding-China-Defense-Strategy-by-Amrita-Jash-0564.html

1. Image Attribute: China Defense White Paper, 2015, / Source: China Daily
FEATURED | Decoding China's Defense Strategy by Amrita Jash
AMRITA JASH 12/22/2015 12:43:00 PM
Keywords: China , Featured , Greater Asia , Kindle , Military
By Amrita Jash
“Does China has a Military Strategy?” This pertinent question has been a longstanding query based
on China’s ambiguous posture in delineating its military approach. The unpredictable nature of
China’s strategic intentions has been the core factor in raising the suspicion and concerns over
China’s military actions- raising the red alarms of ‘China threat’. Given this opacity, decoding China’s
military strategy has become the quandary of global politics. In this view, China’s 2015 Defense
White Paper does layout the blueprint of China’s military motivations. Therefore, in this regard, to
gain a perspective in calculating China’s next move, it becomes imperative to decode the strategic
rational of China’s proclaimed ‘Military Strategy’.
On 26 May, the State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China issued the latest
Defense White Paper. Being ninth in the order since 1998, this defense paper marks a significant
departure from its eight predecessors, in terms of adopting a concrete policy framework. Unlike
being conceptualized under the existing norm of “China’s National Defense”, the current white
paper titled “China’s Military Strategy”, is the first Chinese white paper which is exclusively
premised on military strategy and thereby, provides a blueprint of China’s strategic military thought
to the world at large. Rather than solely building on the old framework of ‘China’s threat
perceptions’, the 2015 military doctrine, first of its kind, does give some transparency to China’s long

2. standing opaque defense policy- denominating China’s strategic intentions by outlining a strategy
that combines strategic defense with operational and tactical offence.
In this view, the white paper is reflective of China’s bold and confident posture in the changing
dynamics of the international system. By finally pronouncing the direction of its military buildup, it is
clear that China has also taken a normative departure from Deng Xiaoping’s dictum of “Keeping a
low profile”. This argument stands validated as China’s such a strategic move projects its confidence
and military preparedness to ‘stick its neck out’. By pledging “active defense” as the essence of
“CPC’s military strategic thought”, the White Paper posits China’s military intentions by clearly
specifying: “We (China) will not attack unless we are attacked, but we will surely counterattack if
attacked” and further added that “China will never seek hegemony or expansion”.
Keeping this context, it becomes imperative to decode the underpinnings of this grand ‘Chinese
Military Strategy’. Hereby, the assessment can be done under a three-tier framework of- context,
content and scope that defines and distinguishes the 2015 defense white paper.
First, the context that defines the essence of this white paper. Undoubtedly, it is born out of China’s
imminent security concerns in the changing discourse of international system. Clarifying China’s
military goal to “maintain regional and world peace”, and suggesting that “in the foreseeable future,
a world war is unlikely, and the international situation is expected to remain generally peaceful”, the
white paper outlines China’s concerns of “new threats from hegemonism, power politics and neo-
interventionism”, whereby “the world still faces both immediate and potential threats of local wars”.
Under these new circumstances, the justifications to China’s defensive military posture is equated by
its threat calculations. In this case, the imminent security challenges as the paper notes is posited by
US “re-balancing strategy” and “its military presence and military alliances” in Asia; Japan’s
increasing militarist posture for it “is sparing no effort to dodge the post-war mechanism,
overhauling its military and security policies”. It also mentions that “some of its offshore neighbors
take provocative actions and reinforce their military presence on China’s reefs and islands that they
have illegally occupied”- clearly hinting at Philippines and Vietnam. Adding to this, it emphasizes on
how “some external countries are also busy meddling in South China Sea affairs” and “maintain
constant close-in air and sea surveillance and reconnaissance against China”. Besides, it also
reiterates China’s core security concerns over “Taiwan independence”, “East Turkestan
independence” and “Tibet independence”.
Second, the content that defines China’s military strategy. Undoubtedly, the White Paper fosters a
heavy tone to Chinese military posture to realize the Chinese Dream as it claims “[w]ithout a strong
military, a country can be neither safe nor strong”. For China’s armed forces, the primary goals are:
“[to build] a strong military”, focus on “core security needs”, build an “informationized military” and
win “informationized wars”, “deepen the reform of national defense and the armed forces”, “build a
modern system of military forces with Chinese characteristics”, and “enhance their capabilities”to
address security threats and accomplish “diversified military tasks”. To meet these goals, the armed
forces will adhere to the principles of flexibility, mobility and self-dependence so that “you fight your
way and I fight my way”. Thereby, in safeguarding its interests, China wants to follow a military
strategy of “active defense”, which the Chinese view to be in contrary to “proactive” defense
policies of other international actors mainly United States and Japan. That is, Chinese military will
focus on growing internationalization of its military role under active defense. The motivation
behind this “active defense” posture is to dispel China’s military strategy from being interpreted as
that of aggressive, expansionist or interventionist.
The major shifts undertaken in China’s defense strategy as outlined in Section IV of the 2015 white
paper: The PLA Army “will continue to reorient from theater defense to trans-theater mobility”; The

3. PLA Navy “will gradually shift its focus from ‘offshore waters defense’ to the combination of
‘offshore waters defense’ and ‘open seas protection’” and; the PLA Air Force “will endeavor to shift
its focus from territorial air defense to both defense and offense”.
These shifts in China’s defence policy suggest that China is shifting its focus from its internal security
and territorial integrity to that of areas beyond its borders- that is, adopting an internationalized
outlook to its defence framework. This objective is clear from the white paper, which states that:
“With the growth of China's national interests, its national security is more vulnerable to
international and regional turmoil, terrorism, piracy, serious natural disasters and epidemics, and the
security of overseas interests concerning energy and resources, strategic sea lines of communication
(SLOCs), as well as institutions, personnel and assets abroad, has become an imminent issue”.
Image Attribute: China's SLOC Bypass Routes
And lastly, scope of the military strategy is primarily centered in the maritime domain, that is to win
“informationized local wars” by “maritime preparation for military struggle” - wherein China wants
to build a ‘blue-water navy’. This forms the key nodal point of the 2015 defense white paper. In the
row of security concerns that disturb China’s strategic interests, thus as the white paper declares it is
a “long-standing task for China to safeguard its maritime rights and interests”. As it is suggestive that
the PLA Navy (PLAN) will imbibe greater role in shifting its focus from “offshore water defense” to
combining it with “open seas protection”- taking a shift from defence to offence. Endowed with an
estimated 14,500 kms coastline and faced with tensions in the crucial international waters, the white
paper makes a strong pronouncement of China’s maritime strategy by stating that: “The traditional
mentality that land outweighs sea must be abandoned, and great importance has to be attached to

4. managing the seas and oceans and protecting maritime rights and interests”. This is indicative of
China’s maritime posture whereby an Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ) over the South China
Sea (SCS) cannot be outlawed as its ongoing reclamation activities strongly call for China’s assertive
ADIZ move in the future. Therefore, it signals a warning to the other actors in the SCS dispute.
While what makes the shift to the seas more imperative is China’s grand vision of “One Belt, One
Road” Initiative, wherein China’s seapower capabilities will equip it to realize the dream of “21st
Century Maritime Silk Road”- a grand vision that challenges the western world order. The exemplary
lies in China’s recent plans to build its first overseas base in Djibouti- a strategic move to expand its
naval military capabilities in the Indian Ocean region.
Therefore, in an overall analysis, it can thus, be construed that the 2015 defense white paper on
“China’s Military Strategy” does provide some direction in understanding China’s future moves. It is
clear that China will grow much bigger both literally and figuratively in its strategic military
capabilities in order to secure its national interests. The significant shift is visible in terms of moving
from being a continental power to that of becoming a sea-power- equipped with a ‘blue-water
navy’. Therefore, in the near future, China’s military muscle will experience its obtuse flexing mostly
in the critical international waters- mainly South China Sea, East China Sea and Indian Ocean.
Therefore, with the fall of events, only time can spell the way the strategy will be played out by
China in order fulfill its unparalleled ambitions.
About The Author:
Amrita Jash (K-5665-2015) is Editor-in-Chief of IndraStra Global and a Doctoral Candidate at the
Centre for East Asian Studies (Chinese Division), School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru
University. Twitter ID: @amritajash
Cite This Article:
Jash, Amrita. "Decoding China's Defense Strategy" IndraStra 1, no. 12 (2015):
0564.http://www.indrastra.com/2015/12/FEATURED-Decoding-China-Defense-Strategy-by-Amrita-
Jash-0564.html. ISSN 2381-3652