J449 Media Management assignment by Ilona Meagher for Dr. Sabryna Cornish. NIU -- May 2008.

1. Meagher 1
Crossroads Reporting: The Intersection of Traditional Media and Citizen Journalism
Ilona Meagher
Northern Illinois University
May 1, 2008

2. Meagher 2
Introduction
Repeated polls show that Americans – on all sides of the political spectrum – are
unhappy with the job the news media industry is doing in covering issues they care about. Has
this unease been a major catalyst in the increase of citizen journalism or have citizens flocked to
blogging simply out of desire? Or is it perhaps because they simply can, that the technology
needed to communicate with a mass audience is at last easily within their reach and budget?
This paper attempts to find (if one exists) a quantifiable correlation between rising
newsroom staff cuts, consumer distrust/disgust with the quality of news production, and the rise
of citizen journalism. In order to seek out such a connection, research data will include: 1) a
literature review of related journal articles, conference papers, books and news reports; 2) a table
collecting some of today’s more notable newsroom layoff numbers and figures; and 3) the results
of a questionnaire sent to a sample of citizen journalists and traditional media professionals,
including past attendees of last year’s National Conference for Media Reform and the Journalism
That Matters conference series organized by the Media Giraffe Project, a non-partisan journalism
program at the University of Massachusetts – Amherst.
Literature Review
The news reporting industry continues to evolve and change dramatically as we barrel
through the 21st Century. While so much of past news business paradigms are being questioned
and challenged at every turn these days, one constant remains: Newspapers (print and online
versions) are still king of the news value chain heap – and for good reason. We would not want
to seriously ponder what life in a democracy would look like without them. Where would we go

3. Meagher 3
for substantive, sustained information on issues of the greatest significance to us? Certainly, we
could survive without cable television’s 24–hour news channels that increasingly churn out
quick-as-a-beat but trivial coverage of local house fires and police chases, shark attacks and
celebrity gossip while forgoing hard-hitting and sustained investigations into the “basic bread
and butter issues” that studies have repeatedly shown are of top concern to Americans (Project
for Excellence in Journalism, 2008). While radio offers us the greatest service during certain
times of crisis (think chemical spills that require quick evacuation or breaking weather alerts and
emergency instructions preceding and following a hurricane or other natural disaster), generally
they add more entertainment than original probing content to the news mix.
How would we oversee our federal, state and community government and private
institutions, which require long-term comprehensive attention for successful stewardship, if not
for the work done by investigative reporters employed at traditional news organizations? But it’s
not necessarily the physical newsprint produced by their efforts that matters most to us here, but
rather the act of journalism itself – with its resulting enlightenment of the masses, a vital element
in democracies that rely on an informed citizenry to successfully govern themselves – that is at
the heart of its importance in the media landscape. Eric Klinenberg, an associate professor at
New York University and author of Fighting for Air: The Battle to Control America’s Media,
explains, “Newspapers provide the core editorial content for radio, television, and Internet news
sites, from those produced by major media companies to those made by solitary bloggers” (115).
They offer their consumers “greater quantity, diversity, and depth of coverage;” in fact, using
one quantitative measure, one can expect to receive between 80,000 and 100,000 words in a
large metropolitan daily newspaper vs. the 3,000 to 3,600 words received in the average 30-
minute television newscast (124, 118).

4. Meagher 4
But the American public is increasingly becoming restive with its media. A February
2008 WeMedia/Zogby International poll found two-thirds of U.S. media consumers are not
satisfied with the job being done by the professional press. About 67 percent felt “traditional
journalism is out of touch with what Americans want from their news;” and, while 70 percent
believe “journalism is important to the quality of life in their communities,” 64 percent say they
are “dissatisfied with [its] quality.” Additionally, 87 percent of respondents felt “professional
journalism has a vital role to play in journalism's future,” but consumers no longer rely solely on
the mainstream press for their information: 77 percent felt citizen journalists and 59 percent
believed bloggers are doing “significant” work, important to the future of journalism (Zogby
International, 2008).
The March 2008 Annual Report on American Journalism by the Project for Excellence in
Journalism exhaustively examined U.S. print, radio, television and online news media. They
found the industry as a whole to be “more troubled” than in 2007, with a steady 20-year uptick in
public skepticism of journalists, the companies they work for and even the institution of
journalism itself. More and more, citizens see news organizations as “corporations [that]
increasingly act like others businesses” often more interested in quantity vs. quality. The public
is far from the only group doing the complaining at the state of the industry, however. Those
working on the inside are as perplexed as those peering in. Journalists, for example, are growing
increasingly frustrated as the public second-guesses its motives; and lower pay, layoffs and
rapid-fire technology changes force them to do more with less. The institution of news itself is
straining and stressed. Modern newsrooms find themselves dealing with unexpected problems,
the largest being how to pay for the media they produce. Most prominently played out in the
print world as the drying up of classified advertising income, this “decoupling of news and

5. Meagher 5
advertising,” is the driving force in the reinvention of the paid journalism profession and the
mainstream news media business model (Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2008).
The reinvention is perhaps most deeply felt on the human level. Buffeted traditionally-
trained newspersons are reeling from shifting job qualifications and descriptions and the rising
complexity and demands of positions that require everyone to possess the very latest multimedia
production skills. With the convergence of media, today’s employees must also converge and
expand their range and load to include research and writing; broadcast radio and TV spot
producing; photography, videography and multimedia creation; and packaging it all up for the
Internet. Content development has replaced straight journalism. “[C]onvergence journalism
inevitably leaves journalists with less time to report, reflect, and produce stories” (Klinenberg,
2007, 129). Knocking at their door, applying even more pressure, are the untrained but able
newcomers, once relatively voiceless and powerless consumers of the news, who have taken up
what is today called citizen journalism. A definition is in order, as the serious citizen journalism
label need not apply to everyone who creates a blog and uploads a few musings or images from
their personal photography collection.
While legal definitions of citizen journalism have not yet worked their way up to the
Supreme Court, lower courts have developed a relevant test for what journalism is. The U.S.
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit stated, “We hold that individuals are journalists when
engaged in investigative reporting, gathering news, and have the intent at the beginning of the
news-gathering process to disseminate this information to the public” (Titan Sports, Inc. v.
Turner Broadcasting, 1998) Therefore, it could be said that a citizen journalist is someone who
collects, researches, investigates, analyses, etc. information with the direct intent of
disseminating it into the public sphere for the greater good. Intention and follow-up are the key

6. Meagher 6
facets that elevate what one does to more serious and civically valuable journalism. Deliberate
intent matters when we consider someone who casually stumbles on a news story (perhaps they
happen upon the right place at the right time and take some newsworthy photos on their cell
phone). Because they had not intended to go there to find and report on the news story, they
would not – at least in the legal sense – be considered a citizen journalist; and, in fact, there’s no
denying that serious professional journalists probably wouldn’t view them that way, either.
But the rise of gifted and hard-working online writers, and the seriousness of their
challenge to those on the professional side, cannot be underestimated. Some of the most valuable
work that bloggers do, in addition to acting as aggregators or filters of the swelling information
that constitutes our media-saturated age, is in the niche reporting area. As the San Francisco
Chronicle cuts its madly popular Book Review pages by half due to “production constraints”
(Freeman, 2006), Critical Mass is there to take its place. And while newsrooms cut down their
science departments, as the Dallas Morning News, St. Petersburg Times and Raleigh News and
Observer (among many others) have, specialty blogs like the appropriately named Science Blog
or ScienceBase have descended on the scene to pick up the slack. “Strong science sections used
to be commonplace,” reports the Project for Excellence in Journalism. “One study in the 1980’s
counted 91 of them. Now the total is about 35 and most of those have been refocused on personal
health and fitness [instead of more substantive science reporting].”
As science goes, so do other specialty areas, including once-bustling international and
regional beats; corporate news owners no longer feel they can afford to commit the personnel for
these niche topics. Online writers, on the other hand, have usually chosen to report on their
selected subject out of a strong personal interest and it shows. Often, they devote more time to its
full exploration than their traditional counterparts have to spare. The result? Citizen journalists

7. Meagher 7
frequently deliver readers a “more detailed and illuminating” final product (Andrews, 2003, 63).
Regular reporters no longer have the same luxury. Meanwhile, many established journalists
recoil from the “decentralized, nonhierarchical, chaotic, anarchic” (Wall, 2003, 113)
communication forms parlayed by the citizen journalist who blends passion with pen, activism
with analysis. As these old-school journalists grumble about the lack of professionalism of the
citizen journalist who interjects their own personal viewpoint into their writing, they fail to
realize that this form of journalism has always had a coveted place in newsprint, for example, in
the form of the standing column or the op-ed page.
Traditional reporters also find fault with the repurposing of their work, yet their own
papers are increasingly doing the very same thing, most notably when they choose to run an
Associated Press article over one written in-house. More and more today, just as online writers
do, journalists are “processing information” for their audience rather than doing strictly
investigative journalism (Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2008). A more positive way of
looking at the newfound cozy relationship forming – out of active desire, simple technological
ability and/or sheer democratic necessity – between these two groups whose lot has been cast
together is to begin to appreciate each other’s role in the media ecosystem. “Instead of looking at
blogging and traditional journalism as rivals for readers’ eyeballs, we should recognize that
we’re entering an era in which they complement one another, intersect with each other, play off
one another” (Lasica, 2003, 73). The impact of today’s online citizen-powered civic journalism
or activism is multiplied by the interaction of “many-to-many rather than one-to one (e.g.,
telegraph to telephone) or one-to-many (e.g., print, television and radio)” (Gant, 2007, 24-25).
This hyperlink reality is transforming the practice of journalism by its incessant nudging of
reporters to do better, give more and consider sources outside of the typical government and

8. Meagher 8
corporate halls of power. Bloggers, today’s trailblazers using arguably “the first form native to
the Web,” (Blood, 2003, 61), serve as a “corrective mechanism for bad journalism” by acting as
an instantaneous pool of fact-checkers (Andews, 2003, 63). Journalists who engage them and let
them “finally see how the sausage is made” (Lasica, 2003, 73) will reap rewards personally – and
professionally.Working together, they can lift and sift mounds of data in no time at all.
In their own right, citizen journalists are doing the heavy lifting of investigative reporting
on their own as well, and are finally being recognized for their efforts. Examples of the rise in
credibility and impact of bloggers may be seen through their recent journalistic coups. One
example: In February 2008, political blogger John Micah Marshall of Talking Points Memo was
the first of his tribe to receive the prestigious George Polk Award for Legal Reporting for his
coverage of the Bush administration’s attorneys general firing scandal. Marshall’s “tenacious
investigative reporting” was cited as a significant factor that eventually led to the resignation of
embattled former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales (Cohen, 2008). Other glimpses of the sea
change in attitude towards the work done by these freelancers: In March 2007, the Capitol
Correspondents Association of California credentialed its first blogger to cover its state
legislature (Russo, 2007); only two months earlier, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed bloggers in
to cover the Scooter Libby trial (Gallagher, 2007). Previously, on March 7, 2005, the first
blogger was welcomed at a White House daily briefing (Seelye, 2005). Yet, today is hardly the
first time the definition of ‘journalist’ has been tested and refined and redefined; far from it.
It was a mere slip of a century ago, in 1908, that the world’s first journalism school
opened its doors at the University of Missouri-Columbia. Great debate ensued after its
groundbreaking, swaying around questions of the “nature and function of journalism education”
generally, and “if it was possible to educate for journalism” specifically (Clark, 1958, v-vi). In

9. Meagher 9
those not-so-distant days, editors and publishers balked at the notion that someone needed to
have a pricy pedigree to be a great reporter. Today’s citizen journalists, though some might have
cut their teeth as traditional news reporters before tossing in their lot with the Internet’s blogging
rabble rousers, are dismantling the notion that a journalism degree or official credential is the
only avenue to participating in the activity of journalism. Further push backs on traditional
conventions and assumptions continue in every department in the media field as the “center of
thinking in journalism” shifts from being walled off from larger society in a distant newsroom
somewhere to being within the reach of anyone who owns a computer and a desire to change the
world (Gant, 2007, 12).
Just as the creation of the printing press in 1448 greatly expanded the ability of the
masses of that generation to communicate their ideas with one another, so have our technological
advances blasted open the boundaries of information dissemination on an even more
commanding (and unruly) level for our generation. This technological evolution has changed the
form and fundamental essence of journalism by metamorphosing traditional straight reporting of
the facts in inverted pyramid style into more “contextual” and nuanced work using 1) a variety of
communication formats or modalities (text, audio, video, graphics, animation), whichever best
tells the story; 2) hypermedia linking to related information to increase the reader’s ability to
explore the subject; 3) increased audience involvement due to the Internet’s action-orientation; 4)
dynamic content in real time; and 5) user customization (Pavlik, 2001, 4-22).
Hand-in-hand with all of this great change is a looming “shipwreck” facing legacy media,
as characterized by Memphis Commercial Appeal editor Chris Peck, which can be traced to
cracks forming in the “keel of the business model that traditionally has kept newsrooms afloat.”
Amidst declining profits, newsrooms have been cut by 20-40 percent over the past three years,

10. Meagher 10
leaving the door open for ambitious and energetic non-reporters to fill the empty niches in their
wake. Everyone still on board knows it is sink-or-swim time. While now a mounting minority,
some remain “frozen in fear,” defensive and non-collaborative, clinging to the one-sided
detached form of traditional news reporting many have grown accustomed to. What Peck calls
“The New Newsroom,” however, will instead need to empower as well as inform in hopes of
strengthening the local community and the broader future of democracy. Today’s newspapers
disregard citizen journalists at their own peril (Peck, 2007, 2).
So, it is beyond a doubt that citizen journalism and online forms of communication are
growing as a result of the Internet’s technological empowerment and the seeming decline in
news quality produced by the traditional media. Because of the corrosion, major metropolitan
newspapers need to do a better job of engaging these energetic modern clients, searching for
ways to best make use of the Internet’s “increased immediacy, information richness, and user
control” (Bucy & Affe, 2006, 227). Media organizations are finally learning to embrace the fact
that online users are not merely interested in consuming a news article. Instead, the interactive
nature of the Internet draws users interested in an item’s “information appeal as well as [its]
participatory depth” (230). Information may still be king, but action is today’s online queen.
The natural outcome of all of this interactivity is that agenda-setting no longer flows one
way, from the top down; today, stories and news and direction bubble up from consumers, too,
more aptly described as citizens increasingly interested and capable of having a say in the public
sphere or the marketplace of ideas. In fact, the power of the citizen journalist to drive the
direction of news coverage shows that their mere use of new media communication is “a mode of
civic participation in its own right” (232). This civic journalism – something once practiced by
traditional journalists then defined as “a form of journalism in which the press participates

11. Meagher 11
actively in the public life of the geographic, political, and cultural communities it serves”
(Pavlik, 2001, 132) – is again renewing awareness of the public service/government watchdog
obligations of our traditional news organizations. This may be citizen journalism’s greatest
triumph, as our democracy cannot survive long without a strong and determined Fourth Estate.
Surveying the Media Landscape - Methodology
Any examination into systems which employ and interact with people should require both
a review of any hard numbers that can be collected on them, as well as a consideration of the less
quantifiable and more theoretical thoughts and emotions of the human participants being
researched. Therefore, methodologies used to examine today’s news media landscape for this
research paper include both quantitative (table) and qualitative (survey) methods.
Shortcomings of this methodology will, firstly, be the realization that it will be incredibly
hard to firmly establish the cause and effect relationship of decreasing satisfaction with the news
media and the rise of citizen journalism – no matter what method is used to attempt to gauge it. It
is thought that the qualitative analysis, the table collecting newsroom layoff figures, will reveal
the rapid acceleration of news media change at the same time the ranks of citizen journalists and
bloggers are equally mushrooming. This methodology, however, will not bring us any closer to
learning if the two are exclusively related to one another (as we already know from the literature
review that they are not).
It is therefore hoped that the qualitative survey, although flawed itself in many aspects,
may at least help to shed some light on the prevailing attitudes and concerns of those who would
know best: the professionals and newcomers participating in the range of platforms and
experiences that make up today’s dynamic news media industry.

12. Meagher 12
Quantitative Survey – Results
As 92 million of us turn to the Internet for news, U.S. print media is in steep decline. In
2006 alone, daily circulation dropped by 3 percent; Sunday’s rate by almost 4 percent. Factoring
in the past three years, declines rise to 6.4 percent and 9 percent respectively (Project for
Excellence in Journalism, 2008). On the flip side, more and more citizens are actively picking up
the writing and reporting arts utilizing blogs – which, by 2005, BusinessWeek reported in the 9
million range with another 40,000 created every day. By 2006, Technorati, “the recognized
authority on what’s going on in the world of weblogs,” claimed there were 50 million of them
(Gant, 2007, 25). By the following year, that number had doubled – and that figure didn’t even
include blogs created in China (Helmond, 2008). Suffice it to say, while blogging is booming,
newsrooms are shrinking. For instance, in 2007, the Project for Excellence in Journalism
reported “3,000 newsroom jobs had disappeared since the recent peak in news gathering and
editing employment at newspapers at the end of 2000.” While the figure is daunting for anyone
wishing to enter that career track, there appears to be a silver lining: Some of those eliminated
jobs, estimated at approximately 2,000 by an April 2007 American Society of Newspaper Editors
study, may have ultimately been transformed into online news staff positions. Nonetheless, the
pressroom bloodletting has been a painful and steady stream in recent years.
A sampling of recent cuts:
Philadelphia Daily News • > 100 editorial and advertising workers laid off, 2007
Philadelphia Inquirer
• 68 non-newsroom positions cut (advertising, circulation, customer service, finance,
marketing and systems and a 'very small' # of managers) of 2,400 full-time and 1,500
part-time workers, 2008
(Associated Press, 2008)
Contra Costa Times • 107 take buyout offers of 1,100 workers (10%), 2008
Oakland Tribune
(Bay Area News Group)

13. Meagher 13
(Associated Press, 2008)
Dallas Morning News • 200 newsroom personnel laid off, bought out, or not replaced (approx. remaining
newsroom staff: 400) incl. 47% arts and feature staff departures, 2004 to 2006
• 33% wire stories on page one in a two-week 2007 survey
• 14.3% drop in circulation in the six months ending March 2007; 6.9 % next-highest
circulation drop at a major daily (Newsday)
• 19% drop in satisfied readers 2004 to 2006
• 12% drop in Belo total shareholder return in 2006
• $5,000,000 Belo CEO Robert Decherd's total compensation in 2006…50% increase
compared to 2005 package
(Flournoy & Everbach, 2007)
Concord Monitor • 5 newsroom positions ‘let go dark’ of a staff in the 40’s, 2007
(Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2008)
San Jose Mercury News • 380 journalists employed, 2001
• 35 positions eliminated, 2006
• ~60 newsroom positions cut (almost 1-in-4 of total staff of 250), 2007
• 50 jobs reduced through layoffs/buyouts (20 newsroom; 30 from other departments)
equaling about 5% of total employees, 2008
• > 50% staff reductions since 1990’s, 2008
(McManus, 2007; Carey, 2008; Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2008)
San Francisco Chronicle • 220 full-time positions (8.5%) eliminated via buyouts/layoffs, 2001
• Popular Book Review pages slashed 50% due to “production constraints,” 2006
• 35 staff cuts (10 newsroom - reporters, photographers, designers and copy editors – and
15 business office), 2006
• $1 million in losses per week, 2007
• 100 newsroom jobs cut (25% of total staff of 400), including reporters photographers,
copy editors and managers, 2007
(Moses, 2001; Freeman, 2006; Kim, 2006; Garofoli, 2007)
Boston Globe • 160 jobs eliminated overall, 35 newsroom positions cut, 2005
Telegram & Gazette
(Worchester, Mass.) • 125 jobs cut overall, 2007
• 24 newsroom jobs axed (6%), including two Pulitzer-prize winners, 2007
(Boston Business Journal, 2005; Gavin, 2007)
New York Times • 1,078 newsroom employees in 1998
• 340 jobs eliminated overall, 45 newsroom position cut, 2005
• ~12 newsroom support staff cuts, 2007
• 100 newsroom cuts of 1,332 (8%), due to weak economy/Internet competition, 2008
(Boston Business Journal, 2005; Associated Press, 2008)
Roanoke Times • 27 jobs frozen/eliminated; 21 buyouts of a staff of approx. 450, 2007
(Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2008)

14. Meagher 14
Baltimore Sun • 45 staff cuts from all departments, 2007
(Project for Excellence in Journalism, 2008)
Qualitative Survey – Results
To better understand those participating in the transformation of the American news
media terrain, a stratified sample of reporters, editors, publishers, journalism school educators,
and bloggers from the traditional, independent and citizen journalism news fields was surveyed
between April 19-29, 2008. In order to reach the target sampling frame, surveys were emailed to
past Media Giraffe Project/Journalism That Matters conference alums, National Conference on
Media Reform attendees and a small set of ePluribus Media and Daily Kos (the former a citizen
journalism collective, the latter a political blog) members. Surveys included the following series
of questions:
1. Current age bracket:
a. 18-25
b. 26-35
c. 36-45
d. 46-55
e. 56-65
f. 65+
2. How long have you worked in news media?
3. What news media job title do you currently hold?
4. What former news media job titles/experience have you had?
5. Are you a member of the (select one):
a. Traditional news media
b. Independent news media
c. Citizen journalist news media
d. J-School/Academic
e. Other: ____________________
6. Are you currently employed in:
a. Print
b. Broadcast TV
c. Radio
d. Internet
e. Other: ____________________

15. Meagher 15
7. Do you believe news media is more troubled today than last year?
a. Yes
b. No
c. Don’t know
8. What is the number one challenge or problem facing traditional news media?
9. How has the rise of citizen journalism (as defined in email introduction) this past decade
affected the work you do?
10. Which, in your opinion, is the main driver of citizen journalism:
a. Need, consumer frustration with traditional news reporting
b. Desire, citizens wishing to more actively participate in their world
c. Technology, first-ever ability to communicate on a grand scale via the Internet
d. Other: _____________________
11. What is the number one challenge or problem facing citizen-generated media?
12. What future do you wish to see for American news media?
Of the 279 surveys dispatched, 24 responses were received for a contact rate of 8.6
percent. Of these replies, one respondent was disqualified lacking current or past media
experience; one refused to take the survey; three returned their surveys with a brief comment or
helpful link to related information but did not complete the survey itself; and two said they
would complete and return the survey before its closing date of April 29, 2008, but missed the
deadline. In the end, 17 surveys were successfully returned, making for a cooperation rate of 6
percent. The overall usable survey response rate was about 71 percent. [See attached raw data
document and Excel spreadsheet to view
Survey Respondent Age Bracket
questionnaire answers as submitted by 8
7
respondents.] 6
5
4
7
Question #1 [“Current age bracket:”] 3
5 5
2
1 0 0 0
shows participants to be evenly spread out among
0
18-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 65+
the middle three categories into a bell-shaped
curve: 1) five fell in the 36-45 year-old age
bracket; 2) seven slipped into the 46-55 set; and 3) five came in at 56-65 years-old. There were

16. Meagher 16
no respondents in the two younger categories, 18-25 and 26-35, or in the 65 + year-old age
range.
Breakdown of Respondent
Length of Media
In total, our 17 adults had 239.5 cumulative years Empl oyment
of employment in the news business in one form or Years Worked in News Media
50
another. Ascending order for Question #2’s [“How long 40 40
30
have you worked in news media?”] data set: 25 28
20 20 22
15
10 10
0,0,1.5,2,3,3,5,10,15,15,20,22,25,25,25,28,40. Average 5
0 0 1.52 3
2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1
amount of years an individual surveyed stated they were
employed in the media world was 14.08824 years; the
median was 15 years; and the mode, 25. Two respondents said they had no experience working
in the industry (one was a college professor, the other a public affairs director), and another five
with fewer than 5 years of such employment generally counted themselves among the citizen
journalist group.
Questions #3 [“What news media job title
Respondent Employment Based
on Media OrganizationFormat
do you currently hold?”] and #4 [“What former
Print news media job titles/experience have you had?”]
2
2 5 Broadcast TV
0 show that survey respondents represented a healthy
Radio
1
Internet cross-section of media professionals and novices:
9 Academia editors and publishers at both print and online news
Other
media; freelance writers and citizen journalists –
both formerly or currently employed in the
traditional press as well as free-standing newcomers with very little official journalistic
experience – an executive producer and a public affairs director; a copy editor; webmaster;

17. Meagher 17
production manager; a few media analysts and consultants; two J-school college professors and
even a still-productive but well-seasoned former corporate executive and news division president
with 40 years of media experience under his belt. In addition to this wide range of positions held
by respondents in the media field, additional past work experience for the group also includes
jobs in sales/marketing/PR departments; as executive producers; bureau chiefs; editorial
assistants and feature, freelance and staff writers; reporters, correspondents and columnists; and
researchers.
Question #5 [“Are you a member of the…(select one)”] asked respondents to identify
themselves according to the type of news
Respondent-Chosen News
organization they are a member of: traditional, Organization Membership
3 5
independent, citizen journalist, journalism 2
2
school/academic, or ‘other.’ Just as consumers are 7
Traditional
increasingly multi-tasking and dipping into multiple Independent
media formats to get their news, some information Citizen Journalism
J-School/Academic
producers are also increasingly crossing over to
create content and engaging audiences across
several platforms. For example, one respondent, a 28-year media professional, selected all
options in this category (not including ‘other’). She is currently an executive producer for the
Free Voice Media Alliance, an independent news organization; a co-curator of
BallotVox.prx.org; a teacher of media studies/production at The European Graduate School; a
paid traditional media writer of articles on citizen journalism and occasionally blogs for free as
well. Another respondent answered in similar fashion, saying, “I work for a mainline
organization, have my own blog, and teach regularly.”

18. Meagher 18
Crossover employment notwithstanding, because this study and paper are meant to gauge
current conditions in the newspaper field (print and online versions) vs. broadcast television or
radio, the survey sample attempted to target those working in this area; therefore, it’s not
surprising that Question #6’s results reveal a higher concentration of respondents employed in
these two categories. However, it’s important to note: An attempt was made to pool a mixture of
responses from all media business sectors, including academia, in order to have some
understanding of the overall general state of American news media as seen by those who
currently work in it or are currently teaching its future generators. Perhaps the most interesting
response to this particular question was offered by our 40-year media maven, who refused all
categories presented, instead filling in the following prescient comment in the ‘other’ field:
“Everyone is a journalist. Time to remove the adjectives in front of a good word.” Later, in
Question #9, this same respondent fleshed his feelings out further, saying of citizen journalism’s
effect on the media landscape, “It has changed the way we look at the world.” Considering his
broad and deep breadth of experience and ongoing efforts in the media industry, his suggestions
are strong evidence that support the thesis presented in this paper and study.
Do you believe news media is more
With Question #7 [“Do you believe troubled today than last ye ar?
news media is more troubled today than last
15
year?”] we finally arrive at the heart of the
Yes
10
survey. As previously noted in this paper, the No
5 Don't Know
March 2008 Annual Report on American
Journalism by the Project for Excellence in 0
Journalism exhaustively examined U.S. print,
radio, television and online news media, finding the industry as a whole to be “more troubled”

19. Meagher 19
than in 2007. Overwhelming, 88 percent of this survey’s respondents (15 out of 17) agreed with
that analysis. Two respondents answered by stating that they didn’t know if the industry was
more troubled or not. Not surprisingly, they were both from the citizen journalist set, one having
only two years of experience as a media freelancer while the other had three. While their answers
almost certainly reflect a lack of professional newsroom experience, not wishing to simply take a
guess may also reflect the integrity and seriousness with which they approach their journalism.
For the purposes of being able to chart Question #8 [“What is the number one challenge
or problem facing traditional news media?”], responses were distilled and grouped into the
following media management themes, listed in descending order: profit motive/business model/
corporate ownership;
#1 challenge/problem facing traditional news
media democracy/public service
Profit motive/biz model
Democracy/public service role erosion; technology
2 Technology adaptation
2
9 adoption/harnessing;
3 Consolidation
Declining quality
2 consolidation/loss of
Relevance
2
5 Newsroom cuts independent media;
3
3 Loss of public trust
Special interest influence
newsroom cuts; declining
news quality; relevance;
loss of public trust/ethical standards; and special interest influence. Overall survey totals for this
section are greater than 100 percent due to multiple responses received from participants, one
explaining, “It’s hard to identify one problem as they are so numerous,” before listing his top
choices. The great concern found throughout the industry regarding economic sustainability is
clearly reflected here as ‘profit motive/business model/corporate ownership’ concerns, which
clocked in as the number one challenge. One of the older respondents whose family was

20. Meagher 20
involved in publishing wrote this impassioned personal reflection in explaining her selection; “I
have been following this story – I guess now we can call it The Disintegration of the Media – all
my adult life; as a news consumer, as a news junkie, as a part-time writer; as someone who cares
deeply about the business and has watched horrified as papers have consolidated, and cut back
and ceased publication – a steady downward spiral. Even more horrifying – the paper that
continue[s] to exist grow[s] thinner and thinner in content…” A good share of respondents also
shared their concerns for media’s role in our democracy. A 25-year professional media critic and
educator explained the prevailing problem as the media’s “failure to fulfill its core mission.”
For most surveyed, citizen journalism appears either to be a positive event or a non-issue.
One participant, however, answered Question #9 [“How has the rise of citizen journalism this
past decade affected the work you do?”] saying that it has become harder because “not allowing
bias and fact-checking are often absent in citizen journalism. People don’t distinguish between
citizen journalists and professional journalists, so we get blamed for all the mistakes.” Another
respondent echoed the same, noting that the advent of citizen journalism has “created a need for
expanded programming to educate the public on the differences of [citizen journalism] and
[professional journalism].” On the flip side, a 22-year traditional newsroom editor wrote that
“setting up a blog is the best thing I have
Main driver of citizen journalism
done in my career. It has taught me there is
12
a world beyond mainstream media, and that 10
8
if we do things properly, people will come 6
4
to you regardless of the choices and 2
0
distractions.”
Need Desire Technology Don't Know

21. Meagher 21
Question #10 [“Which, in your opinion, is the main driver of citizen journalism: a) Need,
consumer frustration with traditional news reporting, b) Desire, citizens wishing to more actively
participate in their world, c) Technology, first-ever ability to communicate on a grand scale via
the Internet, d) Other”] again contained multiple replies from some respondents. Need and
technology were chosen as the top drivers of citizen journalism.
Question #11 [“What is the number one challenge or problem facing citizen-generated
media”?] answers shared some similarities with Question #9. But participants added a few new
areas to be wary of, in order of
#1 challenge/problem facing citizen-generated
importance: labor abuse/non-payment media
Labor abuse
by for-profit corporation for work Credibility
1 1
1 5 Writing/journalism skills
done; credibility; writing/journalism
2 Exposure
skills; exposure for work; solid news News judgement
3
4 Media law knowledge
judgment; media law/First
4 Media format skills
Amendment knowledge; cross- Source access
platform media formatting skills; and
access to resources and sources. Probably the most unexpected of all answers on the survey, the
number one challenge/problem in this section is best described by a respondent with healthy
doses of employment and experience in all media formats spanning well over two decades. She
explains, “labor abuse by for-profits not paying for people’s work…leads to short lifespans for
CJs, and the impossibility of them doing long range (costly) investigative pieces.” Four other
participants agreed. Other areas of concern that citizen journalists need to be made aware of
include fostering credibility and honing basic writing/journalism skills.

22. Meagher 22
Finally, Question #12 [“What future do you wish to see for American news media?”]
allowed those surveyed to share visions and dreams – and even a few nightmare scenarios. One
participant described himself as “very, very scared about the news media.” He sees decline in the
traditional press spilling over and damaging our democracy; regrettably, he was not alone in his
apprehension. Another similar refrain: “If the American news media doesn’t survive then
democracy in America won’t either.” In contrast, others were more hopeful that a broader range
of voices might join in eventually; that collaboration and greater sharing of skills between public
and private segments of society might develop; and that an “authentic recommitment to a sense
of mission, Democratic enlightenment, in a turbulent world” can be realized through our efforts.
Conclusion
This paper attempted to find a quantifiable link between rising newsroom staff cuts,
consumer displeasure with the quality of news production, and the rise of citizen journalism.
While it’s difficult to directly connect these elements, clearly a symbiotic relationship exists
between the phenomena. Citizen journalists have entered the fray in record numbers, not only
because the technologically allowed them to or because they had a desire to communicate, but
also out of the need to serve – and even save – their democracy. In order to tap into the modern
news making current, it was helpful to read and review previous studies, articles, essays and
books on this vibrant trend of such civic participation; considering the still-evolving picture, it’s
notable to see the scope of material already available for those wishing to delve into the topic of
citizen journalism. While it was useful to gather recent news clips that mirror the decline of
traditional newsroom staffing levels, the most valuable (and fun) part of this research project has
been the chance to survey a cross-section of those actually participating in the business of
journalism in all of its forms. Their perceptions fit well with the rest of the research. As the

23. Meagher 23
media world rapidly moves in new directions, this research may benefit those hoping to gain at
least a momentary footing before heading out and blazing their own journalistic trails.
References
Albiniak, P. (2007, April 9). What the Tribune Sale Means. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from
Broadcast & Cable: http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6431678.html
Andews, P. (2003). Is Blogging Journalism? Nieman Reports , 57 (3), 63-64.
Associated Press. (2008, March 6). Calif. newspaper group to cut work force. Retrieved March
13, 2008, from SignonSanDiego.com:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20080306-1842-ca-newspaperlayoffs.html
Associated Press. (2008, February 27). Guild: Philly newspapers lay off 68. Retrieved March 13,
2008, from Forbes.com: http://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2008/02/27/afx4706273.html
Associated Press. (2008, February 15). New York Times, under financial strain, will cut 100 jobs
from newsroom. Retrieved March 13, 2008, from International Herald Tribune:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/02/15/business/NA-FIN-COM-US-NY-Times-
Jobs.php
Berkman, R. I., & Shumway, C. A. (2003). Digital Dilemmas: Ethical Issues for Online Media
Professionals. Ames: Iowa State Press.
Blood, R. (2003, Fall). Weblogs and Journalism: Do They Connect? Nieman Reports , 61-63.
Boston Business Journal. (2005, September 20). New York Times Co. layoffs to mean 160 Boston
Globe cuts. Retrieved April 21, 2008, from Boston Business Journal:
http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2005/09/19/daily27.html
Bucy, E. P., & Affe, R. B. (2006). The Contributions of Net News to Cyber Democracy: Civic
Affordances of Major Metropolitan Newspaper Sites. In X. Li, & X. Li (Ed.), Internet
Newspapers: The Making of the Mainstream Media (pp. 227-242). Mahwah, New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carey, P. (2008, March 3). Mercury News eliminates jobs and names two editors to key posts.
Retrieved April 18, 2008 , from San Jose Mercury News: http://www.mercurynews.com/
breakingnews/ci_8490401
Clark, W. C. (1958). Journalism Tomorrow. (W. C. Clark, Ed.) New York: Syracuse University
Press.
Cohen, N. (2008, February 24). A Web-only news operation gets its due. Retrieved April 30,
2008, from International Herald Tribune:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/24/business/blogger.php
Flournoy, C., & Everbach, T. (2007). Damage Report. Columbia Journalism Review , 46 (2),
33-37.
Freeman, J. (2006, July 5). An Update on the San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved April 19,
2008, from Critical Mass: http://bookcriticscircle.blogspot.com/2006/07/update-on-san-
francisco-chronicle.html
Gallagher, N. K. (2007, January 13). Blogger gets OK to attend trial of Scooter Libby. Retrieved
April 13, 2008, from Morning Sentinel:
http://morningsentinel.mainetoday.com/news/local/3510973.html
Gant, S. (2007). We're All Journalists Now. New York: Free Press.

24. Meagher 24
Garofoli, J. (2007, May 19). Chronicle to cut 25% of jobs in newsroom. Retrieved April 19,
2008, from San Francisco Chronicle: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?
f=/c/a/2007/05/19/BUGK0PTP8V1.DTL&feed=rss.business
Gavin, R. (2007, March 22). Globe cuts 24 jobs in newsroom via buyouts. Retrieved April 21,
2008, from Boston Globe:
http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2007/03/22/globe_cuts_24_jobs_in_news
room_via_buyouts/
Helmond, A. (2008, February 11). How Many Blogs Are There? Is Someone Still Counting?
Retrieved March 26, 2008, from Blog Herald:
http://www.blogherald.com/2008/02/11/how-many-blogs-are-there-is-someone-still-
counting/
Kim, R. (2006, December 6). Mercury News layoff tally: Job cuts are trimmed to 35. Retrieved
April 18, 2008, from San Francisco Chronicle: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?
f=/c/a/2006/12/06/BUG0LMQ3841.DTL
Klinenberg, E. (2007). Fighting for Air: The Battle to Control America's Media. New York:
Metropolitan Books.
Lasica, J. (2003). Blogs and Journalism Need Each Other. Nieman Reports , 57 (3), 70-74.
McManus, J. (2007, May 31). Mercury News plans to cut one-quarter of newsroom positions
this summer. Retrieved April 18, 2008, from Grade the News:
http://www.gradethenews.org/2007/Merccuts.htm
Moses, L. (2007, April 9). A Zell of a Deal. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from Media Week: http://
www.allbusiness.com/services/business-services-miscellaneous-business/4844887-1.html
Moses, L. (2001, November 27). 'S.F. Chronicle' To Cut Staff 8.5%. Retrieved April 30, 2008,
from All Business: http://www.allbusiness.com/services/business-services-
miscellaneous-business/4687449-1.html
Pavlik, J. V. (2001). Journalism and New Media. New York: Columbia University Press.
Peck, C. (2007, July 11). Journalism That Matters: The Next Newsroom. Retrieved March 23,
2008, from Media Giraffe Project: http://www.mediagiraffe.org/wiki/index.php/Jtm-dc-
next-newsroom
Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2008, March). The State of the News Media 2008.
Retrieved March 23, 2008, from StateoftheNewsMedia.org:
http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.org/2008/
Russo, F. (2007, March 9). First "Blogger" Gets Press Credential With Blessing of Capitol
Correspondents Association of California. Retrieved April 13, 2008, from California
Progress Report: http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2007/03/first_blogger_g.html
Schudson, M., & Dokoupil, T. (2007). A Long View of Layoffs. Columbia Journalism Review ,
45 (6), 63.
Seelye, K. Q. (2005, March 7). White House Approves Pass for Blogger. Retrieved April 13,
2008, from New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/07/technology/07press.html
Titan Sports, Inc. v. Turner Broadcasting, 97-3267 (U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals August 6,
1998).
Wall, M. A. (2003). Social Movements and the Net: Activist Journalism Goes Digital. In K.
Kawamoto (Ed.), Digital Journalism: Emerging Media and the Changing Horizons of
Journalism (pp. 113-122). Lantham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

25. Meagher 25
Zogby International. (2008, February 27). Zogby Poll: 67% View Traditional Journalism as
"Out of Touch". Retrieved March 26, 2008, from Zogby.com:
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1454