How to design your interventions to build sustainable and climate-resilient food production systems.
Presented at the Virtual forum. More information is available at https://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/events/operationalizing-farmer-led-irrigation-development-at-scale/
Operationalizing farmer led irrigation development at scale
1. Virtual forum | Forum virtuel
September 2, 2021 (11:00-13:30 GMT) | 2 septembre 2021 (11h00-13h30 GMT)
2. Operationalizing farmer-led
irrigation development at scale:
How to design your interventions
to build sustainable and climate-
resilient food production systems
Welcome!
• We will start in a few minutes.
• Kindly note that you are muted and that all interaction will
take place through the chat box and polling functions.
• As we appreciate you making time to learn and share, we
have used an interactive forum format.
• The forum is available in English and French. Please
select your language.
• The forum is being recorded. We will email you the link to
the video recording, along with other resources, after the
event.
2
• Nous allons commencer dans quelques minutes.
• Veuillez noter que vos micros sont fermés et que toutes les interactions
d'aujourd'hui auront lieu via les fonctions de la boîte de discussion et
de sondage.
• Comme nous apprécions que vous preniez le temps d'apprendre et de
partager, nous avons utilisé un format de forum interactif.
• Le forum étant disponible en Anglais et en Français. Nous vous
invitons à sélectionner votre langue.
• Le forum est en cours d'enregistrement et nous vous enverrons par e-
mail le lien vers l'enregistrement vidéo, ainsi que d'autres ressources,
après la fin de l'événement.
Opérationnaliser le développement de
l'irrigation pilotée par les agriculteurs à
grande échelle: Comment concevoir vos
interventions afin de créer des systèmes
de production alimentaire durables et
résilients au climat
Bienvenue!
6. Opening remarks by
Doina Petrescu,
on behalf of
Ousmane Dione,
Country Director for
Eritrea, Ethiopia, South Sudan and
and Sudan,
The World Bank
7. Opening remarks by
H. E. Amb. Josefa Sacko
Commissioner of Agriculture,
Agriculture, Rural Development,
Development, Blue Economy and
Economy and Sustainable
Environment,
African Union Commission
8. Introduction to the Framework
for Irrigation Development and
Agricultural Water Management
(IDAWM) and FLID pathways
M U R E A G B O N L A H O R
S E N I O R A G R I C U L T U R A L P R O D U C T I O N A N D
M A R K E T I N G O F F I C E R ,
A F R I C A N U N I O N C O M M I S S I O N
8
10. The
challenge
• Low agricultural productivity.
• Increased episodes of hunger and malnutrition
and associated increased food import bills.
• Need to build resilient agricultural livelihoods.
• Recurring drought, unpredictable rainfall patterns
and other climate-related shocks.
• Decisions and declarations of the African Union
Assembly stressed importance of agricultural water
management solutions in driving agricultural growth
and development on the continent.
• Reliable access to sufficient quantity and quality
water is critical to achieve the agricultural
transformation agenda.
11. The structure
Three chapters
• Chapter 1: Introduction, rationale,
methodology and AWM scope
• Chapter 2: Opportunities, irrigation
challenges and AWM solutions used in
African agriculture and lessons learned from
previous projects
• Chapter 3: Details of the four AWM
development pathways, crosscutting
development issues and recommendations
12. The scope – entire agricultural water
management spectrum
S U T I T L E
• Add text here.
• Add text here.
• Add text here.
• Add text here.
• Add text here.
S U B T I T L E
• Add text here.
• Add text here.
• Add text here.
• Add text here.
• Add text here.
12
13. Pathway: Improved water control and watershed
management in a rain-fed environment
• Rain-fed agriculture covers more
land.
• Dominant production system
practiced by the majority of
smallholders (over 80%).
14. Pathway: Large-scale irrigation scheme
renovation/modernisation
• In many countries, constitute the bulk
of public large-scale irrigation schemes
and in a few private farms.
• Modernization, renovation and
paradigm shift in management needed
for improved performance, considering
the huge sunk cost.
15. Pathway: Unconventional water use for irrigation
(wastewater treatment, recycling and reuse)
• Water shortages and urbanization
are increasing alongside high
water waste.
• Growth of peri-urban agriculture.
16. Pathway: Farmer-led irrigation development (FLID) process
• FLID is a process where farmers take the
driving seat to improve their agricultural water
use.
• Farmers drive the establishment, improvement
and expansion of irrigated agriculture.
• Dominated irrigation expansion in the last two
decades and typically irrigate small plots.
• Farmer-led (owned and operated) and market-
driven production.
18. Block I: A diagnostic tool to understand the
potential
of and challenges to the FLID process
Moderated by Petra Schmitter, Senior Irrigation Specialist, The World Bank
20. Keynote
A diagnostic tool to understand
the potential
of and challenges to the FLID
process
J O N AT H A N D E N I S O N
C O N S U L T A N T T O T H E W O R L D B A N K A N D
F A O O N A G R I C U L T U R A L W AT E R
D E V E L O P M E N T
21. … the process where
farmers take the lead in
initiating or expanding
irrigation farming
Farmer-led
irrigation
development …
It’s happening in a
place near you!
22. Diversity in the
farming context
and
between farmers in
one location
Many different faces
Many different places
Hi-tech & low-tech
Humid & arid
Large & small
Full & supplementary irrigation
Individuals & groups
23. Simplified to
7 key factors
You will need to assess:
• each factor
• the interaction between
factors
• the effect on the farm
strategy
24. Justification to
support the FLID
process
Rationale for
irrigation
Enabling
conditions
Factors that enable
or constrain
25. Resource potential
Farmer benefits
Policy & legal
Knowledge
Finance
Markets
Technology
How much water and land is (easily) available for irrigation?
What are the benefits for farmers from irrigation?
Significant benefits
and water is plentiful
Significant benefits
and water stress
Irrigation expansion Sustainability & water
productivity
26. Resource potential
Farmer benefits
Policy & legal
Knowledge
Finance
Markets
Technology
Does FLID feature in policy? Do laws and practices for land and water
tenure provide secure access to resources?
Do farmers have access to knowledge – agronomy, tech, finance?
Can farmers get affordable finance for irrigation investments?
Do farmers have the networks and physical and digital infrastructure for
effective market access?
Is quality transformative technology available locally at
affordable prices?
Factors that enable or
constrain FLID
29. Takeaways
• 7 factors describe irrigation farming business
• Assessed through study & discussion!
• Rank priorities & effect on the system
• Intervene where most needed
More in the easy-access
FLIDguide
http://tiny.cc/FLIDguide
or Google …
World Bank FLIDguide
30. How conducive are the following factors in supporting
the enabling environment for FLID in your country?
(1 = very weak to 5 = very strong)/
Dans quelle mesure les facteurs suivants sont-ils
propices au soutien de l'environnement propice au FLID
dans votre pays ? (1 = très faible à 5 = très fort)
30
1. Water and land resources are abundant, and farmers have easy access
2. Investments in irrigation by farmers can provide significant benefits compared to rain-
fed agriculture
3. The policy and legal institutional environment are supportive
4. Knowledge (irrigation technologies, extension services, financing solutions) is easily
accessible by farmers
5. The financial environment is strong and supports farmers’ needs in accessing credit
and repayment modalities
6. Agricultural markets are well established, stable and easily accessible
7. Irrigation technologies, pre- and after-sale services meet farmer needs and supply
chains are well established
1. Les ressources en eau et en terre sont abondantes et les agriculteurs y ont un accès
facilement
2. Les investissements dans l'irrigation par les agriculteurs peuvent apporter des avantages
significatifs par rapport à l'agriculture pluviale
3. L'environnement institutionnel politique et juridique est favorable
4. Les connaissances (technologies d'irrigation, services de vulgarisation, solutions de
financement) sont facilement accessibles par les agriculteurs
5. L'environnement financier est solide et soutient les besoins des agriculteurs en matière d'accès
au crédit et aux modalités de remboursement
6. Les marchés agricoles sont bien établis, stables et facilement accessibles
7. Les technologies d'irrigation, les services avant et après vente répondent aux besoins des
agriculteurs et les chaînes d'approvisionnement sont bien établies
https://www.menti.com
use the code 3186 2877
31. Key lessons from the FLID
diagnostic carried out
in Malawi
J E A N K A M W A M B A - M T E T H I W A
S E N I O R L E C T U R E R ,
D E P A R T M E N T O F L A N D A N D W AT E R R E S O U R C E S ,
L I L O N G W E U N I V E R S I T Y O F A G R I C U L T U R E A N D
N AT U R A L R E S O U R C E S
M A L A W I
E M A I L : J M T E T H I W A @ G M A I L . C O M
32. Characteristics of FLID farmers in Malawi
• Emerging farmers growing crops – first with very basic tools and technology.
• As farmers progress, they become more accustomed to growing crops; adopt
sophisticated technology, hence increasing production; expand irrigated areas in response
to local market demands; and allocate water usage fairly to avoid conflicts.
• However, Malawian government classifies FLID as ‘informal’ irrigation.
Knowledge and experience – having evolved through different arrangements e.g.
• Choice of irrigation equipment: from traditional to water pumps.
• Better understanding of the additional demands (e.g., labor, time, inputs).
• Establishment of informal but workable land tenure arrangements.
• Skilled techniques i.e., choice of crops and cost, agronomic guidelines, water
management and market potential.
.
33. Water
Land Subsistence
Commercial
Depending on level
of sophistication
Depending on
geographical
proximity
Expert
Local
Depending on level
of sophistication
FLID in Malawi: opportunities and constraints
34. Takeaways
• Leverage experiences and knowledge systems: use
experienced farmers as a platform.
• FLID farmers have different needs depending on the level
evolved – FLID expansion cannot be generic.
• Provide mechanisms for ensuring the availability of cheap and
less complicated technologies and higher water productivity.
• Provide flexible options for accessing credit facilities to
purchase the irrigation equipment and farms inputs.
• FLID farmers’ need is ‘financial sustainability’. If the anticipated
benefits are not realized, the type of irrigation technology is
changed.
35. Systemic barriers to accelerating
FLID at scale in Ethiopia
E L I A S A W O L M O H A M M E D
D I R E C T O R F O R S M A L L - S C A L E
I R R I G AT I O N D E V E L O P M E N T
D I R E C T O R AT E ,
M I N I S T R Y O F A G R I C U L T U R E ,
E T H I O P I A
36. FLID potential
• Irrigable land more than 7 mil ha
• Currently, irrigated land less than 1 mil ha
• Farmers engaged in irrigation development
less than 5 mil ha
• More than 2 mil ha potential of shallow
groundwater was assessed
• Government has the mandate to support
water access for each farmer where water
resources are available
37. Challenges Solutions
Policy and
strategy
• No incentive mechanisms for FLID
• Lack of private sector engagement
• No FLID strategy
• Improve/exempt tax for smallholder irrigation technologies/subsidy
• Include PPP system in the policy
• Develop clear strategy for smallholder irrigation dev’t
Knowledge
• Lack of appropriate crop selection
• Lack of adequate extension services
• Poor data management system
• Limited coordination among private
and government sectors
• Promote media-based campaign to scale up irrigation dev’t
• Develop village approach system for scaling up technologies
• Establish management information system
• Educate irrigation technicians at college
Finance
• Lack of credit access
• Budget constraints
• Create revolving fund to reach more farmers with HH technologies
• Stand alone HHMI development support projects
Markets
• Limited market linkage
• Poor service delivery system
• Establish PPP approach
• Develop service delivery strategy/system
Technology
• Timely supply of technologies
• Quality of technologies
• Affordability of technologies
• Promote and support local technology manufacturers
• Develop national standard for irrigation equipment
• CB for unemployed youth/engage youth groups
Challenges and potential solutions
38. Actions taken
• Revised agricultural water management policy
• Developed smallholder irrigation development strategy
• Tax exempted for all irrigation technologies
• Started PPP implementation strategy to link with private sector
• Developed irrigation extension guideline
• Developed irrigation management information system
• Developed curricula and started technician generation at selected colleges to fill knowledge gap at
grassroots level
• National smallholder irrigation fund design finalized, but needs to be implemented
• Government started and allocated budget for smallholder irrigation development
• Developed service delivery strategy and started implementation
• Developed national standards for pump quality control
Policy and
strategy
Knowledge
Finance
Markets
Technology
39. Focus areas
• Practical implementation of the policy reform.
• Develop and enforce clear implementation modality for coordination
of all stakeholders.
• Implement fund mobilization system.
• Develop village base technology implementation modality/approach
to integrate individual farmers experience of FLID.
• Strengthen agricultural colleges to give practical training for
technicians.
• Strengthen and develop standalone FLID support projects.
• Networking and promote experience sharing.
39
41. Block II: Designing and implementing interventions to
catalyze the FLID process
Moderated by Petra Schmitter, Senior Irrigation Specialist, The World
Bank
43. Keynote
Designing and implementing
interventions to catalyze the
FLID process
G A B R I E L L A I Z Z I
S E N I O R I R R I G AT I O N S P E C I A L I S T,
T H E W O R L D B A N K
E M A I L : G I Z Z I @ W O R L D B A N K . O R G
43
44. FLID in Africa: potential and constraints
Potential
Constraints
51. Be inclusive and partner up wisely
Kenya
When identifying interventions:
52. Takeaways
When identifying interventions:
• Keep your farmers in mind
• Don’t strive for perfection
• Think big
• Be inclusive and partner up wisely More in the easy-access FLIDguide
http://tiny.cc/FLIDguide
or Google …
World Bank FLIDguide
53. Use of digital innovations and
tailored subsidies to expand
technology access under the
Micro-scale Irrigation Program
R O N A L D K AT O K AY I Z Z I
A C T I N G C O M M I S S I O N E R ,
A I M W F A P M I N I S T R Y O F A G R I C U L T U R E , A N I M A L
I N D U S T R Y A N D F I S H E R I E S ,
U G A N D A
E M A I L : K A Y R O N @ E N G I N E E R . C O M
53
54. Uganda Micro-scale Irrigation Program
The program aims to help smallholder farmers to overcome knowledge and financial constraints to sustainable irrigation
development
The government will pay between 25% and 75% of the total cost of the irrigation equipment with a maximum contribution of
USD 2,000 (per acre)
HOSE PIPE
SPRINKLER
DRIP
• Phase 1 started in 2020 with
40 district local governments
• 16,000 farmers expressed
interest
• Rollout to the rest of the
country will start next financial
year (2022-23)
• Targets 5,000 farmers every
year with an estimated 10,000
acres
55. Digital technology for data collection and management
• IrriTrack App was developed to be used by
the district staff to collect data from farmers
• IrriTrack Test App is a trial version mainly for
training purposes
• Program management information system (MIS)
• Supports integrated planning and development, and monitoring
and evaluation
• Provides feedback from farmers and other key stakeholders
• Tracks extension support provided to farmers
• Shown above is an extract of the dashboard
56. Takeaways
• Access to agricultural extension services and knowledge in
irrigation agronomy are critical for program success.
• Subsidies and incentives to small-scale farmers greatly enhance
technology uptake.
• Use of digital technologies and systems facilitate data collection,
knowledge management, research and development.
• The cost of water source development is the biggest constraint to
farmers’ access to water for irrigation.
• Market access and information enhances sustainability.
57. Identifying opportunities for
FLID from the Small-Scale
Irrigation Program in Rwanda
C H A R L E S B U C A G U
M I N I S T R Y O F A G R I C U L T U R E A N D A N I M A L
R E S O U R C E S / R W A N D A A G R I C U L T U R E
B O A R D
R W A N D A
57
58. Potential and challenges for FLID in Rwanda
• Rwanda has abundant lakes and rivers, representing great potential for FLID to serve the farming community.
• 84,552 ha of potential sites for small-scale irrigation technology (SSIT) have been identified nationwide, including
54,188 ha in the Eastern Province and 30,363 ha in the Southern Province.
• It is in this context that the Government of Rwanda initiated the Small-Scale Irrigation Program to build resilience to
climate change while addressing food insecurity. The program started in 2014.
• The cost of investment in SSIT is relatively low, ranging from 350,000 RWF/ha to 600,000 RWF/ha. Large-scale
irrigation requires up to 12 million RWF/ha.
• Irrigation is currently developed on 63,742 ha, of which 17,689 ha is FLID
• Despite the benefits to farmers from the program, several challenges remain:
• low capacity of farmers to maintain their equipment
• affordability of 50% farmers’ contributions to meet the cost of equipment and installation
• farmers’ capacity to effectively use advanced irrigation technologies.
59. Rwanda Small-Scale Irrigation Program
The program is implemented in collaboration with local government, involving the farming community
as much as possible
• Community mobilization: This is done jointly by districts and the Ministry of Agriculture/Rwanda
Agriculture Board (RAB) through organizing mobilization meetings, including at grassroots level, via radio
and TV spots and distribution of brochures.
• Identification of beneficiaries: Individual farmers, cooperatives or farmer groups apply for a SSIT subsidy
by submitting application forms. Applications are assessed by a District Irrigation Steering Committee, with
guidance from RAB.
• Procuring SSIT equipment: SSIT equipment is provided by approved SSIT service providers. As per the
contract, the service provider provides a warranty of one year after installation and RAB ensure provision of
quality equipment.
60. Equipment provision and installation
• Direct subsidy on SSIT provided to farmers (50% of subsidy) and 75% for grouped farmers or
cooperatives for category I and II with prior approval from the district council. The covered area should
be above 5 ha. Applications for solar-powered irrigation technologies receive special consideration.
• Development of SSIT schemes involving a group of farmers. Farmers have to contribute at least 25% of
total project. In this case, the farmers group should form a farmers’ cooperative with a special
committee in charge of operation and maintenance.
Capacity building
• Capacity building will focus on improving farmers’ knowledge of irrigation technologies, establishing
demonstration farms and study tours. The trainings are conducted by RAB in collaboration with the
service providers.
• SSIT beneficiaries are expected to be in position to significantly improve crop productivity, revenues,
ownership of irrigation infrastructures and thus sustainability.
61. Takeaways
Lessons learned so far from rolling out SSIT
• SSIT is an effective strategy to increase land under irrigation in
Rwanda, targeting 102,000 ha in 2024.
• Financial mechanisms need to be explored to support farmers’ cost
sharing/contribution to the cost, e.g., via Savings and Credit
Cooperative Societies (SACCOs).
• There is a need to diversify irrigation technologies, taking into
consideration farmers’ needs, landscape, farmers’ capacity to
mobilize financial resources. Possibility to manufacture locally made
prototypes could be explored.
62. Tailoring financing solutions
and business models
to support inclusive scaling
of FLID
O S M A N S A H A N O O N K U L E N D I
C E O P U M P T E C H ,
G H A N A
E M A I L : K U L E N D I 1 @ G M A I L . C O M
62
63. Solutions
for Ghana’s
irrigation
market
The complete solution
Pumps and accessories
• Wide range of pumps
• Wide range of accessories
• All integrated into COMPASS
• Single supplier for lowest project risk
Corporate services
• Pay-as-you-own financing (PAY-OWN)
• Full-service provision
• Win-win partnerships
64. Market segmentation
Basis for segmentation: Land and water access, irrigation and production, financial potential and preferences
Resource-rich
farmers
Resource-limited
farmers
Mobile farmers
Farmer groups or
water user
associations
Direct payment
cash by
instalment
Pay-as-you-own
and/or blended
financing
Pre-paid pump
services or
plug-and-play
pump system
Market
development
and linkages
Institutional clients
Solar irrigation
knowledge and
labor force
development
Inclusive business models and services
65. Expanding through multi-
stakeholder partnerships
and coordination
Business partners
LORENTZ GmbH, Grundfos Pty,
Duraplast, Interplast, Hydronomics, Calbank,
Zenith Bank
Development partners
GIZ, FAO, MoFA, WVI, CRS
Research partners
IWMI, UDS, TaT, KNUST
Funders
World Bank, USAID, African Development
Bank
66. The use of digital innovation to
enhance water use and
agricultural productivity in
farmer-led irrigation
A L A A E L - B A B L Y
D I R E C T O R O F T H E S O I L , W AT E R A N D
E N V I R O N M E N T R E S E A R C H I N S T I T U T E ,
A G R I C U L T U R A L R E S E A R C H C E N T E R ,
E G Y P T
66
67. From a
constraint
to a
solution
• Constraint: Capacity of Egyptian farmers in irrigation
decision-making.
• Objective: Develop a mobile application to support the daily
on-farm decisions related to water management and
productivity.
• Solution: The IRrigation Water Information (IRWI) application
designed with farmers and GoE to provide daily information
to end user.
• Geographic focus: Egypt.
• Number of users: Currently more than 300.
• Multi-stakeholder collaboration: IWMI, the Soil, Water and
Environment Research Institute (SWERI), October University
for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA) and FAO, with financial
support from the Government of the Netherlands.
67
68. Success factors
• Farmers’ needs are reflected, and lead farmers actively contributed during the design phase.
• During the design of the IRWI application, the Egyptian state’s vision for digitizing the
agricultural sector and its extension services was considered, especially the extension
services that are experiencing a shortage of extension engineers covering the required areas.
• Considering the complete flexibility in design, construction and selection of the operating
system, so that it can achieve the vision of the country through the application of irrigation to
make a breakthrough in the agricultural sector.
• Making the most recent information available and reaching every farmer's hand to support him
and enable him to make decisions to manage his field / farm in terms of water, land, seeds,
field treatments, diseases, etc.
• Providing technical, financial, coordination and training support.
69. Takeaways and next steps
• Increase the number of crops and varieties in the application.
• Include market prices that are updated regularly, to facilitate product marketing and access to
market information.
• Provide live assistance on crop health and receive feedback on the appropriate action to take.
• Alerts regarding heatwaves and frost, suggesting when to irrigate and how much.
• Alert farmers of any pest outbreak, mentioning the area of the outbreak, on what crop, and what
the chemical measures are to achieve pest control.
• Crop price forecasting and feasibility studies for different crops.
• Continuing the cooperation with the Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation to draw a road
map for the second and future phases of the project.
• Collaborate with the Egyptian government to develop the agricultural sector and digitize extension
services.
69
70. Sharing of lessons and experiences in our breakout
rooms
Facilitation provided by colleagues from FAO, IWMI and WB
71. Keep microphones on
mute when you are
not contributing, so
we avoid background
noises
Please use the chat
function for
questions if you
wish to contribute
but not speak up
Kindly
participate in
the Mentimeter
poll
Chatham House
rules apply
Rules of engagement
Rules of engagement
72. Breakout rooms – Instructions
1. Go to the Breakout
Room pop up, click on the
3 dots and JOIN ‘Breakout
Rooms’
If you need help, we
will
stay behind & assign
you. Please open Zoom
from a computer
4. Please remember to
‘Leave Breakout Room’
and not the session
3. Please ONLY switch ON your
mic and video when you are given
the floor by the facilitator
If you do not see breakout rooms, you likely do not have the
most recent Zoom version!
2. SELECT your
breakout room
73. Breakout rooms,
facilitators and
notetakers
ENJOY!
Breakout room Language Facilitator Notetaker
Diagnostic_ENG1 English Charity Osei-Amponsah Likie Nigussie
Diagnostic_ENG2 English Everisto Mapedza Abena Ofosu
Diagnostic_FR1 French Abdou Moulaye Ahmed Nana Ekua Awotwi
Diagnostic_FR2 French Amadou Sidibe Sander Zwart
Interventions_ENG1 English Joy Busolo Martin Ager
Interventions_ENG2 English Brian Nhlema Dagmawi Melaku
Interventions_FR1 French Marie Charlotte Buisson Moctar Dembélé
Interventions_FR2 French Bogachan Benli Miyoubi Koumangoye
74. Regional Economic Communities focal point
update on the FLID process in their region
Moderated by Mure Agbonlahor, Senior Agricultural Production
and Marketing Officer, African Union Commission
75. Speakers
• Mr. Joel Okwir, Lead Agricultural Economist, COMESA
• Mr. Abakar Mohammed, Head, Agriculture and Rural Development Department, ECCAS
• Mr. Ernest Aubee, Head, Agriculture Division, ECOWAS Commission
• Mr. Esaiah Tjelele, Programme Officer Crops, SADC
76. Closing remarks by Dr. Ahmed Elmekass,
Coordinator SAFGRAD, African Union Commission
77. Thank you for
joining!
We hope through this forum that we will put our
hands together to operationalize farmer-led
irrigation.
We look forward to continuing this journey
with you!
Want to get in touch? Please contact:
agbonlahoru@africa-union.org
pschmitter@worldbank.org
Valere.Nzeyimana@fao.org
o.cofie@cgiar.org 77
Nous espérons à travers ce forum que nous mettrons
nos mains ensemble pour opérationnaliser le
développement de l'irrigation pilotée par les
agriculteurs.
Nous sommes impatients de continuer ce voyage
avec vous!
Vous souhaitez nous contacter? Veuillez contacter:
agbonlahoru@africa-union.org
pschmitter@worldbank.org
Valere.Nzeyimana@fao.org
o.cofie@cgiar.org
Merci de nous
rejoindre!
Editor's Notes
Thank you Petra, and warm greetings from the African coast on the Indian Ocean. I’d like to take these few minutes to share a framework that can help to identify the opportunities and constraints to farmer led irrigation development. The ultimate aim of the framework is to make it easier for farmers to take up or expand sustainable irrigation practices.
So first of all … Farmer Led Irrigation Development or FLID, is the process where farmers are in the drivers seat of irrigation uptake or expansion. This is different from public irrigation development where Government is the main driver, usually involving large civil engineering infrastructure like dams, canals and pumpstations. While farmers are the drivers of farmer-led irrigation development, tech suppliers, agribusiness, financing institutions and government are all key actors in the process.
Most of you will surely have seen this rapid acceleration of irrigation farming which is a prominent feature across Africa – in wetlands, along rivers, on hillside streams, near irrigation schemes, and at urban outflows.
There is no doubt these kinds of irrigation farmers who take the initiative in irrigation development have always been there! But perhaps as planners, researchers and decision-makers, we are seeing more clearly now, the tremendous opportunity to achieve long-standing development goals - by learning from and building on this momentum.
We all acknowledge the tremendous diversity among farmers and the nature of their operations – farmers have many different faces, both literally and figuratively. They are young and old, women and men, operating on large and small farms, with different crops, using low and high-tech equipment, and with different purpose – different even from one neighbour to the next.
The strategic question is how do we accelerate the ongoing FLID process so that more farmers can derive more benefits from irrigation, … but at the same time ensure that water and land resources are protected for future generations. The framework helps to answer this question.
Farming is obviously a complex business with many connected factors that we must consider if we are wanting to catalyze change in the system.
We have identified seven key factors to consider. Much like farmer-led irrigation development, these seven factors are nothing new. They will surely resonate with your experience and while they simplify reality somewhat, they give a handle on where to focus.
When conducting a diagnostic for a specific area – whether a region, country, province or district – you will need to assess … each factor, then the interaction between factors or one affects another, and finally, the combined effect they have on the whole system which is the farm business strategy …
The top two factors (resource potential and farmer benefits) communicate the potential for farmer led irrigation development.
The remaining five factors relate to the enabling conditions that can constrain farmer-led development – in terms of formulating responses then, if those constraints are significant, then they need to be addressed through interventions that reduce or remove the constraint, thus allowing the farmer-led process to accelerate.
Let me briefly describe what one wants to explore for each factor. First the justification – resource potential and farmer benefits.
For resource potential we assess water and land availability, looking, not just the quantity, but also the proximity of water to land. The FLID process is easiest and the least-costly to accelerate when water is close to farmer’s fields – this is why FLID is so prominent where groundwater is shallow, alongside rivers and on the perimeter of wetlands.
The second factor, farmer benefits, are assessed by quantifying the gains from irrigation across the farming year, in the form of crop-budgets. Irrigation allows for early planting, higher yields, and in many cases an additional crop. When the incremental benefits over and above rainfed farming are high, the rationale for support to FLID is strong.
Where benefits are high and resources are plentiful, this would justify an irrigation expansion agenda aiming for more farmers to benefit from irrigation.
But it is increasingly more frequent that while farmer benefits from irrigation are high, water availability is scarce due to competition – between farmers and between different water-use sectors. In these situations, a response to support FLID may well be justified, but would have to include measures that strive for sustainability – and that would include a drive for water productivity (including efficiency), and local water governance and water stewardship initiatives.
Then for the five factors that enable or constrain FLID one would ask:
Each of the factors is assessed in a diagnostic process – this involves study, data collection, and probably most importantly, multi-stakeholder dialogue on the findings.
Scores are assessed on a five point scale where 1 means very weak and 5 means very strong. The idea of the scoring is to focus the debate, not to provide a definitive answer in itself. I might think, for example, the policy and legal environment (from a desk study) is strong, so assign a score of 4, while a government colleague with deeper insight into the actual mechanisms of how the law is put into practice, might assess the factor as 2. The discussion, debate, implications and possible solutions, are triggered by our different scores – to arrive at a working consensus across a multi-stakeholder group.
A plot of scores might look this … here resource potential is moderate and farmer-benefits are high. These indicate a strong rationale for supporting FLID, with some caution as to localized hotspots where water may be stressed, and sustainability measures must be included in responses.
On the constraints, the financial factor stands as a severe weakness in the system, followed by a need for knowledge support, and then moderately constraining are technology and markets. Policy in this example is not perfect, but is not really limiting either.
Boundaries for any assessment are important. There are inevitably large differences in water availability within countries between arid and higher rainfall areas - a common feature of many African countries. Market access will often be weaker in more remote parts of a country. So the geographic or spatial boundaries of the assessment need to be clear – both in the diagnostic study and in the multi-stakeholder discussions around findings.
Using the framework and the diagnostic therefore helps to first; formulate an argument and justify why a response in support of FLID is warranted, and secondly, identify which factors in the farming system are the most constraining, and therefore the most important to be addressed so that the process of irrigation uptake by farmers can take place faster, cost-effectively, and most easily.
Emerging farmers growing crops during the dry season under irrigation on own initiative at first, with very basic tools & technology.
Govt. regards FLID farmers as “informal” hence challenges in the true definition and perception.
As farmers progress, become more accustomed to growing crops; adopt more sophisticated technology leading to increased production; often expand irrigated areas by responding to local market demand.
Farmers allocate water usage fairly and avoid conflicts
Emerging farmers growing crops during the dry season under irrigation on own initiative at first, with very basic tools & technology.
Govt. regards FLID farmers as “informal” hence challenges in the true definition and perception.
As farmers progress, become more accustomed to growing crops; adopt more sophisticated technology leading to increased production; often expand irrigated areas by responding to local market demand.
Farmers allocate water usage fairly and avoid conflicts
Significance: knowledge & experience – having evolved through different arrangements including:
Choice of irrigation equipment: from watering/cans to pumps
Better understanding of the additional demands (e.g. labour, time, inputs)
Establishment of informal but workable land tenure arrangements
Skilled management techniques i.e. choice of crops & its cost, agronomic guidelines, water mgt & market potential
use experienced farmers as a platform to engage new FLID farmers and/or expand their own operations.
FLID farmers have different needs depending on the level (technology, labor, water source and land tenure) they have evolved, suggesting that expansion of FLID in Malawi cannot be generic but rather an understanding of level at which the farmers have evolved to and provide the necessary/associated needs.
farmers can benefit more from FLID if
there are mechanisms for ensuring the availability of cheap and less complicated technologies and higher water productivity are put in place, and
there are flexible options for accessing credit facilities to purchase the irrigation equipment and farms inputs.
The main goal that smallholder farmers need is financial sustainability while using the easy and effective technologies. When their anticipated benefits are not realized, the solution is to change the type of irrigation technology.
Thanks Petra.
Good morning, good afternoon to you all, and greetings from Washington DC.
During the first part of this forum, we have looked into the complex reality farmers face when taking the initiative in irrigation. We have learned how to carry out a diagnostic to unpack potential and constraints to FLID, through the 7 factors, and their scoring.
Before the break, you have even given a try at scoring the 7 factors for your country. The spider diagram you see on screen reflects the results of the polling, and gives you a sense of potential and constraint for FLID at a continental level.
As you can see, you have scored the resource potential and farmers benefit high, confirming the huge potential to & benefits of scaling up the FLID process in Africa. Among the constraints, you have identified Finance and Knowledge as the most limiting factors to farmers action, followed by technology and market. Of course, reality varies across the continent, and the scoring for the spider diagram would vary as well.
But carrying out a FLID diagnostic, and going through the scoring exercise, is not the end goal. Rather, the FLID diagnostic is a way to understand farmers’ reality, so to identify interventions that the Government can put in place to make it easier for farmers to take action.
Government interventions to catalyze FLID would allow the process to be faster, to happen on a larger scale, and be more inclusive and sustainable.
When a government implements FLID interventions, it makes easier for farmers to interact with the many other stakeholders involved in the irrigation development process, like financial institutions, irrigation equipment supplier, VCA. And it will be also easier for farmers to come together with other farmers, if need be, for water or commercialization.
In essence, through the FLID interventions, the government sets the stage for private action.
In the same way, FLID interventions can make it easier for farmers to interact with public authorities, for example to get the required water permits.
The FLIDguide, published by the World Bank, includes a set of example interventions which can address constraints across the five factors. We invite you to download the guide and read through the interventions examples which are most relevant to your reality.
For this presentation, I would like to focus now on a few rules, or principles, to keep in mind when you are in the process of identifying interventions aiming at catalyzing the FLID process in your country.
First, Keep your farmer in mind: as Jonathan highlighted in his keynote, there is tremendous diversity among farmers who wish to develop or intensify irrigation - they are on large and small scale farms, growing all kinds of crops, with low and high-tech equipment. Interventions need to be designed with a specific segment of farmers in mind – as there is no one size fits all solution. The diagnostic should allow you to identify the segment of farmers where it makes more sense for the Government to facilitate action. Interventions can contribute to irrigation expansion when there is an abundance of water and land - as is the case in many parts of Africa – and to intensification, such as in the case of Egypt where natural resources do not allow for further expansion.
In terms of farmers segmentation, in Uganda the FLID subsidies target only very small scale farmers who can develop irrigation individually, and who are either rainfed or irrigating with rudimentary technologies. In Rwanda the target is similar, but in this case slightly larger farmers are considered. In Egypt, the focus of FLID interventions is on irrigators.
Second, don’t strive for perfection: you will not be able to help farmers overcome every single obstacle they face. Rather, focus on the main constraints: this is why the spider diagram is useful: it will keep you focused on the main issues. In the country cases discussed at today’s forum, you are indeed seeing a prioritization on only those few factors that are constraining farmers the most. Rest assured that farmers are resourceful, and will be able to work around some less than perfect situations for the rest of the factors.
Third: think about solutions which can work at scale and make an impact on large numbers of farmers. We are past the phase of piloting FLID in Africa, and we should aim at a massive scale up
And forth, be inclusive in the identification of the interventions: FLID is a process that brings together a variety of public and private actors. Identification of the most suitable interventions needs input from all of the actors: ensure that relevant ministries are brought together, from agriculture to water, from energy to environment. Success in catalyzing FLID requires proximity and tailored solutions, thus local governments are often key. Bring together universities, research and development actors. And it goes without saying that the private sector views need to be adequately reflected, acknowledging the pluralities of their views between FI, VCA and ES. And of course, the voice of farmers needs to be loud and clear in setting up priorities. Kenya has been a great example of how a FLID diagnostic can be carried out in an inclusive way.
Once you have identified the list of your interventions, you need to partner wisely for their implementation. There will be some interventions that will be easy to implement for the government. There will be others that – because of political economy, or institutional implications, might require more effort. And this is where you would like to focus the attention of development partners, like the world Bank.
We have now arrived at the end of my presentation, and we look forward to hear how this process for interventions identification and implementation has happening in practice in some countries during the case studies.
Back to you Petra.
The GOU through the Program is subsidizing access to the irrigation equipment. Sprinkler, drip and draghose powered by Solar or fuel pumps.
Solar powered equipment are more subsidized than Petrol-powered systems due to their high cost of purchase but also to increase the uptake of environmental friendly technologies
In addition to the subsidies under the program
Irrigation equipment is tax exempted from VAT. The irrigation equipment suppliers can now sell at an affordable rate for farmers
The program relies on the use of the IrriTrack app to collect data on the program. Technical staff have been trained and equipped to collect this data.
The Ministry is able to remotely track implementation and progress of the program using the management Information system (Microscale MIS and AWMIS)
The program relies on the use of the IrriTrack app to collect data on the program. Technical staff have been trained and equipped to collect this data.
The Ministry is able to remotely track implementation and progress of the program using the management Information system (Microscale MIS and AWMIS)
The GOU through the Program is subsidizing access to the irrigation equipment. Sprinkler, drip and draghose powered by Solar or fuel pumps.
Solar powered equipment are more subsidized than Petrol-powered systems due to their high cost of purchase but also to increase the uptake of environmental friendly technologies
In addition to the subsidies under the program
Irrigation equipment is tax exempted from VAT. The irrigation equipment suppliers can now sell at an affordable rate for farmers
When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.