NLP (Neurolingusitic Programming for IT Professionals)
24 de Oct de 2012•0 gostou
6 gostaram
Seja o primeiro a gostar disto
mostrar mais
•2,384 visualizações
visualizações
Vistos totais
0
No Slideshare
0
De incorporações
0
Número de incorporações
0
Baixar para ler offline
Denunciar
Tecnologia
This presentation has been prepared by Mr Ashutosh Pandey Deputy Dean at QBI Institute. The presentation covers Neoro Lingustic Programming and its applicability for IT Professionals.
NLP (Neurolingusitic Programming for IT Professionals)
NLP to build rapport
NLP to build rapport, avoid ambiguity &
achieve results
(esp for S/W pros)
An overview
NLP to build rapport
About the trainer
The trainer, Mr. Ashutosh ShriPrakash Pandey has 15
years of rich national and international experience in
MNCs & Indian Companies, encompassing the entire
gamut of HR Function, issues concerning Recruitments,
Quality Management systems, T&D, M&A,
Organizational culture & OD interventions etc.
To his credit are several successful projects &
operational execution wherein he has used various tools
like MBTI, NLP, FIRO-B , DISC, TQM etc, to get the best
out of the people, resulting in a seamless integration of
people, process & technology.
NLP to build rapport
Agenda
In this curtain raiser session, we will discuss the following:-
• What is NLP
• Why build rapport, how to know 2 people are in rapport, how
to build rapport
• Types of Representational systems, how to assess these in you
& others
• Pacing , its practice for rapport building
• How NLP & S/W are related, attributes of a professional
• Attibutes vs. States, how to convert attributes into states
• Using meta model to identify ambiguity & achieve results
• Summary , followed by Q & As..
NLP to build rapport
Review: Which of the following is
accurate about communication?
A. 15% words, 30% tone, 55% body language
B. 7% words, 63% tone, 30% body language
C. 15% words, 62% tone, 23% body language
D. 7% words, 38% tone, 55% body language
E. I don’t know!
NLP to build rapport
What is NLP?
• Neurolinguistic
Programming
– Communication
– Personal development
– Modeling
• Developed by-
John Grinder & Richard
Bandler
NLP to build rapport
How is NLP advertised?
• Improve your relationships,
• master rapport with anyone in moments,
• sell anything to anyone, and do it ethically,
• gain more flexibility,
• cure any phobia in seconds,
• get more of what you really want,
• Create instant motivation and confidence
NLP to build rapport
Neuro Linguistic Programming
Neuro
Nervous system through
which experience is
received and processed “…the study of
through the five senses. the structure of
subjective
experience.”
Linguistic Programming
Language and nonverbal The ability to organize our
communication systems communication and
through which neural neurological systems to
representations are coded, achieve specific desired
ordered, and given meaning. goals and results.
NLP to build rapport
Modelling
“The NLP modeling process involves finding out
about how the brain (“Neuro”) is operating by
analyzing language patterns (“Linguistic”) and non-
verbal communication. The results of this analysis
are then put into step-by-step strategies or
programs (“Programming”) that may be used to
transfer the skill to other people and areas of
application.”
NLP to build rapport
Is rapport important?
• “A loop of mutual influence.” M. Erickson
• Rapport is to communication what fuel is to a
car; without it, you get nowhere.
• Rapport is different from agreement—it is
being understood and regarded. People in
rapport may or may not agree on much of
anything.
NLP to build rapport
How do you know when two people
are in rapport?
NLP to build rapport
Building Rapport Using NLP
• Eye Accessing Cues
• Representational Systems
• Both help with: Pacing
NLP to build rapport
Eye Accessing Cues
• Tendencies, but
not always true
for every person
• Loiselle (1985)
C = constructed; R = remembered; d = digital
NLP to build rapport
• There are
exceptions!
– Cultural conditioning
– Near-term
memory
NLP to build rapport
Practice…
Which modality did this interviewee use most
frequently?
A. Visual constructed
B. Auditory constructed
C. Kinesthetic
D. Visual recall
E. Auditory recall
F. Auditory/Digital (internal dialogue)
NLP to build rapport
Representational Systems
• The map is not the territory.
• Four main representational systems
– Visual
– Auditory
– Kinesthetic
– Auditory/Digital
NLP to build rapport
What was your strongest preference?
A. Visual
B. Auditory
C. Kinesthetic
D. Auditory Digital
E. I had a tie with two or more
NLP to build rapport
Visual Characteristics
• Organized, neat, well-groomed.
• Use visualization for memory and decision making - often getting insights
about something.
• Are imaginative, may have difficulty putting their ideas in words.
• Speak faster than the general population.
• Prefer in-person interactions - to see the other person and his/her
reactions.
• Want to see or be shown concepts, ideas or how something is done.
• Want to see the big picture.
• May not remember what people have said or be confused with verbal
instructions.
– Maps/pictures are better
• Remember faces more easily than names.
• Be distracted by visual activity and less so by noise.
NLP to build rapport
Auditory Characteristics
• Aware of change in the tone of your voice
• Are responsive to certain tones of voice.
• Perceive and represent sequences
• Remember directions or instructions more easily.
• Learn by listening and asking questions.
• Enjoy discussions and prefer to communicate verbally.
• Talk through problems
– like someone to be a sounding board
• Need to be heard.
• Be easily distracted by noise.
• Tend to cross appendages when listening.
• May avoid eye contact when processing.
NLP to build rapport
Kinesthetic Characteristics
• Speak slower
• More sensitive to their bodies and their feelings
• Tend to respond to physical rewards and touching.
• Learn by doing, moving or touching.
• Dress/groom more for comfort than looks.
• Make decisions based on their feelings.
• Stand closer to other people than those with a visual
preference
NLP to build rapport
Auditory Digital Characteristics
• Need to make sense of the world, to figure things
out, to understand.
• Talk to themselves and carry on internal
conversations (sometimes with you!)
• Learn by working things out in their mind.
• Not spontaneous, like to think things through.
• Logic, facts and figures play keys roles in
decisions.
• Memorize by steps, procedures, sequences.
NLP to build rapport
Predicates
• One way to assess representational systems in others
NLP to build rapport
Time for practice!
Exercise #1: 2 minutes for each person
Describe your house to your partner using your
most PREFERRED modality
NLP to build rapport
Exercise #2
2 minutes for each person:
Describe your house to your partner using your
LEAST preferred modality
NLP to build rapport
Pause to Consider…
• How could you apply this in your job?
– 1 minute to reflect
– 2 minutes to share
NLP to build rapport
Rapport and Pacing
• Physiology
• Vocal qualities
• Words (predicates)
Representational systems!
NLP to build rapport
Pacing
• Observing (and pacing where applicable):
– Words they use (predicates).
– Eye movements (eye accessing cues, blink rate, etc.).
– Changes in skin color/tone.
– Breathing (fast, slow, deep, shallow).
– Voice quality (volume, tone).
– Posture/gestures.
– Facial expressions
– Changes in energy
• Mirroring vs. Matching
– Cross-matching
– Mismatching—useful in some situations!
NLP to build rapport
Let’s try it!
• Partner A: Imagine your are about to buy your
dream car. Now describe what you want in
your car in as much detail as possible.
• Partner B: Practice SUBTLE pacing.
Remember:
Respect is the key to building rapport
NLP to build rapport
Check in…
What was the main representational system
Person A used to describe their dream car
(person A, don’t tell person B)?
A. Visual
B. Auditory
C. Kinesthetic
D. Auditory digital
NLP to build rapport
Other ways to practice pacing
• Pace with someone on TV
• Practice with friends or family
– don’t tell them or they may feel self-conscious!
• Pace a person at a restaurant
NLP to build rapport
NLP and S/W are related
• Questioning • Literalism
• Modelling • Identify Ambiguity
• Communication • Honesty
• Effectiveness
• Attitude
• Synthesis Knowledge Systems
NLP to build rapport
The Three variables &
triple constraint
NLP to build rapport
Time Cost
Quality/Scope
People Process
Technology
NLP to build rapport
Exercise: Attributes of a S/W pro
Identify…
• Attributes or Qualities
• Eg- Descriptions of a tester
Eg:- Analytical, works within a
process/framework, follows SOPs,
deliverables vs intention, competencies vs.
Knowledge
NLP to build rapport
Attributes vs States
Attributes States
• Person ‘has’ • Person ‘feels’
• Context? • Context
• “IS” of identity State
• Behaviour
NLP to build rapport
Exercise: Convert attributes
into states
• Can you generate and feel those states in
yourself?
• Can you say things to other people to
generate those states? (Elicitation)
• When would those states be appropriate?
• Can you identify a time when you used
those states positively? Negatively?
NLP to build rapport
Meta-Model
• Identify Ambiguity Early
• Apply to the communication we give
• Apply to the system
• A Model of Analysis (Req, Spec, etc.)
• Apply to our beliefs and values about
testing
NLP to build rapport
Deep Surface
• Meta-Model based on transformational grammar
model
• Words affect experience
Surface
Deep Structure Structure
Surface
Primary Secondary Structure
Experienc Experienc Transformation
e e Surface
Sensory & Linguistic Structure
Emotional Derivation
Surface
Structure
NLP to build rapport
Nominalization
Simple Deletion
Cause and Effect
Comparative Deletion
Mind Reading Distortion Deletion
Lack of Referential Index
Complex Equivalence
Unspecified Verb
Lost Performative
Meta Model
Universal Quantifier
Modal Operators Generalization
Presuppositions
• Transformations (Distortion, Deletion,
Generalization) can create ambiguity
• Ambiguous statement:
– “The daily trade file must be processed in
under 5 seconds when the system starts up.”
NLP to build rapport
LP
CE
Effect Cause
"The daily trade file must be processed in under 5 seconds when the system starts up"
SD (1) MO UV (1) SD (2) SD (3) SD (4) UV (2)
• Processed by what? How?
• Daily trade file – contains what? From
where?
• 5 seconds – based on what?
• Starts up? How, When, How often?
NLP to build rapport
Rules A Limiting Counter, challenge
Challenge and get more for Generalisation
limits Identify exception
information on the
limits Modal Universal "I develop and
"I can't run Operators Quantifier I don't hate you"
these tests" "All developers
"What stops you?" hate testers" "*ALL* developers?"
"Microsoft have 2 testers
"I shouldn't
"What would for every developer,
test this."
happen if you did?" that must be hate city"
Generalization
What is unstated
and has to be true
Presuppositions for the statement to
be true Challenge, test
•Universal Quantifier: The system will always process the daily trade file at start
up. Even if the system is restarted in the middle of the day?
•Modal Operator: The system might ask the user to save the file.
•Presuppositions: Daily trade file exists. What if it doesn’t? The daily trade file can
be processed. What if it is corrupt?
NLP to build rapport
Identify Generalizations
• “Only admin users can delete records”
• “All records must be validated by the front
end when they are amended”
• “All test cases must be scripted”
Modal Operators,
Universal Quantifiers
Presuppositions
NLP to build rapport
Missing
Reference Element
Identify Point missing from
Comparison Comparative surface Recover
Deletion Simple structure Deleted
"This system
is rubbish" Deletion Information
"Compared "The system is "fail how?"
to What?" going to fail" "Which
system?"
Missing Deletion
Recover Process
Details Unspecified
Missing Lack of Recover
Noun
Process Unspecified Referential Noun
"How are Verb Index "They have a
you testing?" poor process"
"What kind of "I'm testing"
"Who are
testing are you they?"
doing?"
• Deletion can cause special cases not to be
identified
• Deep Structure deletions identified through
presupposition analysis & model building
NLP to build rapport
Identify Deletions
• “This system must be the fastest on the
market”
• “The admin user will amend user details”
Simple,
Comparative,
Verb,
Noun (referential index)
NLP to build rapport
Stimulus X
Causes Process
& Response Convert noun
Y as noun
More information Cause to process
about the causality and Nominalization
"I'm going
Effect to test"
"What kind of
"Bad specifications testing are you
make me angry" going to do?"
"How specifically
does a bad
specification make
you angry?" A Value Identify Source
Judgement
Lost Identify Criteria
Performative
2 unrelated Distortion "It is wrong
to test without
statements
writing test
Check represented scripts" "According to
validity as equivalent Whom?"
of
equivalence
Complex
"They don't know how to
develop software,
Equivalence Claim to
the requirements are never knowledge Identify source
signed off."
Mind of claim
"If the requirements Reading
were signed off "They hate
does that mean they testers" "How do you
would know how to Know?"
develop software?"
• Distortions can taint beliefs and attitudes
• Good source of resistance in communication
NLP to build rapport
Identify Distortions
• “Obviously, developers deliver code late
because they don’t give the testers any
respect.”
• “When developers don’t do any unit testing it
makes testers really annoyed”
Cause Effect
Complex Equivalence
Lost Performative
Mind Reading
Nominalization
NLP to build rapport
Meta-Model Questioning Exercise
• Work in 3s
• Person 1 ask Person 2 to describe something e.g.:
– their testing project,
– their application under test,
– what testing is
• Person 2 responds, Person 1 listens, Person 1
analyses response based on the Meta-Model and
asks a follow on question based on the Meta-
Model analysis, repeat
• Person 3 takes a meta position for later review
NLP to build rapport
Meta-Model for Influence
• Embedded Commands
• Presuppositions
• Conversational Postulates
• Deliberate use of ambiguity
– use their deep structure
NLP to build rapport
Meta-Model usage Guidelines
• Rapport
• What do you want to know?
• Stop at some point
NLP to build rapport
Meta-Model Repeated
• Identify Ambiguity Early
• Apply to the communication we give
• Apply to the system
• A Model of Analysis (Req, Spec, etc.)
• Apply to our beliefs and values about
testing
NLP to build rapport
Recommended Books
• Structure of magic vols 1 & 2
– (Bandler and Grinder)
• Modeling with NLP
– (Robert Dilts)
52
NLP to build rapport
The takeaways!
• Define NLP, its whys & how’s
• How NLP & S/W are related, attributes of a
professional
• Why & how build rapport & effective
communication
• Using Representational systems, pacing,
converting attributes into states, using meta
model(s) to identify ambiguity & achieve
results
Notas do Editor
From Wikipedia: Neuro-linguistic programming ( NLP ) is an interpersonal communications model and an alternative approach to psychotherapy [1] based on the subjective study of language, communication and personal change. [2] It was co-founded by Richard Bandler and linguist John Grinder in the 1970s as a method of personal change and communications. The focus was pragmatic, modeling three successful psychotherapists, Virginia Satir, Milton Erickson and Fritz Perls. The theoretical foundations borrow from work related to the these models and disciplines related to communication and the mind, including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science, and occupational therapy. Also from Wikipedia: Labouchere states that "NLP has a very pragmatic, applied focus on what is helpful, what works and how to replicate it (Bandler & Grinder, 1990). While NLP draws on and shares common ground with ‘mainstream’ cognitive psychology, it has, from its inception, continued to develop, refine, and apply its own unique range of concepts, models and techniques."[56] Partridge (2003) states that "NLP may be best thought of as a system of psychology concerned with the self development of the human being" and "It is concerned with the function of belief rather than its nature. It is not concerned whether a belief is true or not, but whether it is empowering or disempowering". Similarly, Stephen J. Hunt states that NLP "is a technique rather than an organised religion and is used by several different human potential movements".[57] David V. Barrett (2001) also describes NLP as a technique or series of techniques, or a process. He states that that "the balance comes down against it being labeled as a religion".[58]
Summary of Modelling: What was ‘that’? What is ‘This’? What are the differences? What ‘has’ to be there. What else ‘could’ be there.
Loiselle at the University of Moncton in New Brunswick, Canada (1985) selected 44 average spellers, as determined by their pretest on memorising nonsense words. Instructions in the experiment, where the 44 were required to memorise another set of nonsense words, were given on a computer screen. The 44 were divided into four subgroups for the experiment. Group One were told to visualise each word in the test, while looking up to the left. Group Two were told to visualise each word while looking down to the right. Group Three were told to visualise each word (no reference to eye position). Group Four were simply told to study the word in order to learn it. The results on testing immediately after were that Group One (who did acually look up left more than the others, but took the same amount of time) increased their success in spelling by 25%, Group Two worsened their spelling by 15%, Group Three increased their success by 10%, and Group Four scored the same as previously. This strongly suggests that looking up left (Visual Recall in NLP terms) enhances spelling, and is twice as effective as simply teaching students to picture the words. Furthermore, looking down right (Kinesthetic in NLP terms) damages the ability to visualise the words. Interestingly, in a final test some time later (testing retention), the scores of Group One remained constant, while the scores of the control group, Group Four, plummeted a further 15%, a drop which was consistent with standard learning studies. The resultant difference in memory of the words for these two groups was 61% . Thomas Malloy at the University of Utah Department of Psychology completed a study with three groups of spellers, again pretested to find average spellers. One group were taught the NLP spelling strategy of looking up and to the left, one group were taught a strategy of sounding out by phonetics and auditory rules, and one were given no new information. In this study the tests involved actual words. Again, the visual recall spellers improved 25%, and had near 100% retention one week later. The group taught the auditory strategies improved 15% but this score dropped 5% in the following week. The control group showed no improvement. These studies support the NLP Spelling Strategy specifically, and the NLP notion of Eye Accessing Cues, Sensory system use, and Strategies in general.They are reported in: Dilts, R. and Epstein, T., Dynamic Learning, Meta, Capitola, California,1995
Visual Remembered What is the colour of the shirt you wore yesterday? Which of your friends has the shortest hair? Visual Constructed What would your room look like if it were painted yellow with big purple circles? Can you imagine the top half of a tiger on the bottom half of an elephant? Auditory Remembered What does your best friend’s voice sound like? Which is louder, your door bell or your telephone? Auditory Constructed What will your voice sound like in 10 years? What would it sound like if you played your two favourite pieces of music at the same time? Auditory Digital What is something you continually tell yourself? What are your thoughts about this article? Kinesthetic What does it feel like to walk barefoot on a cool sandy beach? What does it feel like when you rub your fingers on sandpaper?
Often they will say they remember discussing something with you, when you actually did not have the conversation. They did, however, in their mind!
Politicians do it all the time with their clothing and their language!
AKA “the triple constraint,” conventional PM wisdom has it that gains on one side of the triangle usually require making concessions on the other two sides. This is generally true, unless it’s possible to improve the delivery process.
Words that we use affect experience What do different words about a system affect us to think? I’m Testing … [Name of Software] doesn’t mean much but gets you thinking in terms of the adverts, the feature set, what needs to be tested generically [Name of Software] v1.1 extensionalised – changes in this version, what needs to be tested specifically A System an integration of parts, interfaces, data syntax, system theory Software a thing which runs on an operating system, interfaces with hardware (disk), data semantics A solution for whom? What problem?
UQ – All, Every, Just, Only, None, Nobody, Never, Always MO – Possibility – Can’t, won’t, - Necessity – must, should, shouldn’t, ought, mustn’t Presuppositions : A in p(B), A in p(~B) Cause effect: Makes me, can’t help but Comp Equiv: Means that Nominalization: essentials of a process, discipline of software testing, effectiveness -ness
Teaching notes: “ Only admin users can delete records” Only (U), presuppositions: records exist, records can be created/amended? Other types of users exist Can (MO) – what if it read ‘should’ or ‘must’ “ All records are validated by the front end when they are amended” Use presuppositions to ask questions – 2 nd , 3 rd order presuppositions P – there is a frontend, is there a backend? Only on amendment, what about create? Are records only amended on the front end? U – All records (how many types?) Validated (unspecified verb) MO (must be) or what? What if invalid? “ All test cases must be scripted” P – test cases can be written in a non-scripted way (because of modal operator) When we identify modal operators (must), we can change them – should, could, might, need,
Teaching notes: “ This system must be the fastest on the market” – which part of the system?, compared to what? At doing what? How much faster? Which market? “ The admin user will amend user details”. - when? Amend how? Amend which details? What other users are there? Amend other admin users? Only admin users? What makes an admin user an admin user? Any other violations in the above sentences? [must] Lost performatives – according to whom?
Teacher notes: “ Developers deliver code late because they don’t respect the testers” MR how do they know the developers don’t respect testers C= [developers deliver code late] [developers don’t respect the testers] Nom - respect LP “Obviously,” obvious to whom? Other violations – generalisations – “{all} developers” “ When developers don’t do any unit coding I get really annoyed” MR – how do you know they don’t do any unit coding CE – if they did unit coding testers wouldn’t get annoyed? MR – how do you know testers get really annoyed? LP – who says? Other violsations – generalisations – which testers, UQ ‘don’t do any’ – so if they did a little bit, it would be ok => Comparative Deletion ‘How much is ok’? Unspec Verb – [unit testing]