2. Definition of Anger
Many definitions of anger exist, and anger must be separated from
irritation, hostility aggression and violence.
1. Anger is defined as a strong, uncomfortable emotional response to a
provocation that is unwanted and incongruent with one's values,
beliefs, or rights.
- Anger can involve feelings of disapprovals of others.
- Anger can involve feelings of being blocked from obtaining
something.
- It usually involve interpretations of being provoked by others.
- It usually occurs as a result of a perceived injustice and involves
blaming others (involving an element of self-justification).
- Anger may be situational and occasional (state anger).
- Anger may be persistent, long-standing, cross-situational and a
reflection of a stable interpretive belief system (trait anger).
- Anger may involve positive adaptive responses designed to
correct a wrong, or solve an injustice that has been done.
3. Definition of Irritability and Hostility
2. Irritability is defined as minor annoyances that occur in a person’s
daily routine, and the reactions (or overreactions) to these
perceived minor annoyances.
3. Hostility is defined as a chronic antagonistic and mistrustful
negative attitude toward people and the world.
- It involves a personal set of expectations and beliefs in which
one frequently attributes harmful intent to the actions of
others.
- This chronic negative attitude usually involves the devaluation
of work and motives of others, the expectations that others are
source of a given wrongdoing, and a desire to inflict harm
upon others, or see that others are harmed by a third party.
4. Definition of Aggression and Violence
4. Aggression and Violence are defined as the actual or intended
harming of another with flagrant forceful and destructive acts.
Literature supports 2 types of aggression:
1. Reactive aggression – unplanned aggressive acts which are either
unprovoked or out of proportion to the provocation. This type of
aggression involves retaliatory intent independent of premeditated
cognitive processes.
2. Proactive aggression – instrumental, premeditated, or predatory
aggression that is related to personal or social gain, or to the
expression of domination over others, or to the achievement of
some goal. Proactive aggression can occur without anger.
5. Characteristics of Reactive Aggressors
• People characteristically have “hot tempers” or “short fuses”, are easily riled
into anger-aggression at the slightest provocation.
• People usually evidence less self control over emotional reactions.
• They manifest aggressive behavior in response to being teased or
perceived provocation.
• They tend to be hyper vigilant and misinterpret social cues (they tend to use
fewer social cues and tend to focus on aggressive cues).
• They tend to attribute hostile intention to the actions of others.
• They tend to attack someone when feeling bad, angry or bored (even when
they may not benefit from such feelings or even when they may pay a price
for their own aggressive behaviors).
• They are more likely to mull over and have a longer maintenance of
grudges and have a desire for revenge.
6. Characteristics of Proactive Aggressors
• Their behavior is carried out for an extrinsic purpose, or to achieve
some personal goals.
• They tend to evidence less observable emotions (and may not
evidence anger).
• They tend to use physical force to dominate others, and to achieve
their personal goals.
• They may also tend to get others to gang up on peers in order to
achieve their personal goals.
• They evidence leadership skills and qualities, and evidence an
agreeable sense of humor.
7. The DSM-IV-TR and Anger
• Intermittent Explosive Disorder – 1) Several discrete episodes
of failure to resist aggressive impulses that result in serious
assaultive acts or destruction of property. 2) The degree of
aggressiveness expressed during the episodes is grossly out of
proportion to any precipitating psychosocial stressors. 3) The
aggressive episodes are not better accounted for by another mental
disorder (or a substance disorder or general medical condition):
• Antisocial Personality Disorder – anger featured in disorder
• Borderline Personality Disorder – anger featured in disorder
• Conduct Disorder – anger featured in disorder
• Psychotic Disorder
• Manic Episode
• Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Other Disorders that Feature Anger
• Oppositional Defiant Disorder
• Adjustment Disorder with Disturbance of Conduct
• DSM-5 - Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
8. History of Treating Anger
Various treatment approaches have been developed to help
individuals with anger management difficulties to change their
experience and expression of anger. The most effective have been
cognitive-behavioral in nature.
Earlier psychoanalytically trained therapists supported the use of
catharsis.
Empirical evidence supports that venting anger alone does not
automatically reduce its intensity, and that anger reduction is
brought about only if cognitive processes such as reinterpretation of
the triggering events or regaining a sense of control are involved.
9. Myths About Dealing with Your Anger
Myth #1: Actively expressing your anger reduces it.
Errors include:
1. Expressing your rage reduces risks to your health.
2. Letting your anger out will make you feel less angry.
10. Myths About Dealing with Your Anger
Myth #2: Take time out when you feel angry.
Problems with the time out theory include:
1. You are not addressing problems that need to be solved. Running
away from problems will not make them disappear and could cause
them to continue to grow.
2. Avoiding feelings stops you from being able to better manage them,
and situations in which they occur.
11. Myths About Dealing with Your Anger
Myth #3: Insights into your past decreases your anger.
1. While it can be important that you learn how you developed your
anger problem. Practicing new ways of thinking and behaving will
help reduce your anger problem.
2. It is good to have insight into what you’re doing wrong, in regards to
your anger. Knowing how you came to have a problem controlling
anger doesn’t necessarily lead to anger reduction.
12. Myths About Dealing with Your Anger
Myth #4: Outside events make you angry.
1. It is not the outside events that make you angry, it is your beliefs
regarding the events that determine your emotional response.
2. Unfair situations, difficult people and great frustrations help with
anger provoking situations, however you largely create what you
feel.
3. Accepting this responsibility is the crucial first step in dealing
effectively with your anger.
13. Situations That Make People Angry
1. Interruptions – interruptions of planned activities and obstacles to
goal-directed behaviors. The closer a person is to a goal, the
greater the frustration (and anger) when interrupted.
2. Implications – of noncompliance (short-term, long-term, and future
implications of another person not complying).
3. Concern – about possible injury to another or to oneself, also
concern over what might have happened.
4. Expectations – violated expectations. Something another person
“should” or “should not” be doing, that is breaking implicit shared
rules.
14. Situations That Make People Angry
5. History – history repeating itself over and over. Patterns of
annoying behaviors that accumulate over time.
6. Overload – overload of the individual (fatigue and stress that can
lower the frustration tolerance level of a person).
7. Personal Peeve – violation of personal rules and values by another.
For example, being disrespected in front of another.
8. Embarrassment – noncompliant behavior by another that occurs in
public places in front of others.
15. Anger Assessment Exercise #1
Joanie has been married to Chachi for over 7 years, and they have been
together for over 15. They have 4 children, ages 14, twins who are 9, and 7.
Joanie was in treatment at your agency and successfully completed outpatient
treatment 8 months ago. During that time, she reported having domestic
problems with Chachi, a few of which led to physical altercations where Joanie
would hit her husband. She stated her husband never hit her back, but would
often infuriate her because he would not engage in the verbal argument she
was looking for. She would often get into an angry altercation with her
husband over matters of finances, or the restrictions that were currently placed
on the relationship (her husband is currently on parole, and stipulations of
parole affect his curfew, which in turn restricts their ability to have time together
outside of the house).
The last physical altercation that occurred was while Joanie was in treatment
was her anger at not being able to go out on a date with her husband because
of these restrictions. This led Joanie to continue to argue with Chachi, and
when Chachi would no longer engage in the argument, Joanie repeatedly hit
him.
16. Anger Assessment Exercise #1
Joanie has come back to see you on the advice of her DYFS worker, who
learned of the latest incident that occurred just last week. Joanie was arguing
with Chachi over finances. This argument had started on Wednesday, but
Joanie would not let it go, and continued the arguing into Thursday morning
right before both went to work. According to Joanie, Chachi refused to
continue the conversation, stating he had to get the kids ready for school. She
stated this just infuriated her more, and as he was finally leaving for work, she
told him he could not go until she finished having her say. He started walking
out to go to work and she threw a fully loaded Zen Garden at Chachi, hitting
him in the head, and causing him to go to the hospital, where he received 22
stitches.
Joanie stated she did not accompany her husband to the hospital and didn’t
even apologize until three days later. “I just couldn’t stop being mad at him
over all this.” This incident led to her husband losing two days of work, which
caused further financial strain on the family, as he is a temp worker with no sick
days. When asked about this, she was unable to see the connection between
her actions and it leading the worsening of the financial problems.
17. Anger Assessment Exercise #1
When first working with Joanie and assessing her anger patterns and history,
she reported her anger is similar to her mother’s anger pattern. She stated that
her mother and father were separated for two years when she was a teenager.
As an adult she asked her mother about this, and her mother stated Joanie’s
father left her due to repeated anger/aggression bouts in their marriage. She
comes to you today, on the advice of her DYFS worker, but also with real
concern that Chachi is going to leave her if things continue the way they are.
When asked if Joanie relapsed at any time during all of these, she stated no,
she has remained sober since leaving treatment at your agency. Joanie did
state she knows she needs help with her anger problem and wants to come
back to work with you on this issue.
1. What type of aggressor does Joanie appear to be, reactive or proactive, and
please justify your answer with supportive information.
2. In the 8 different types of situations that make people angry, which ones fit
Joanie? Why?
3. Given the information what would your recommendation be? Since she is
requesting you as her counselor, how do you handle her request?
18. Client Education Regarding Anger
In cognitive-behavioral interventions, education is seen as most effective by
using an ongoing collaborative, discovery based Socratic process (i.e.,
education naturally built into the therapy process as opposed to specific
didactic lecture style client education).
Examples of client education:
1. Giving clients material to read as homework assignments, or personalized
handouts (specific to their issues of anger control problems).
2. Introducing conceptual frameworks and have the client discover how these
frameworks apply to their own anger-aggression behaviors.
3. Analysis of homework assignments.
4. Videotape modeling (showing clients video tapes of individuals who become
angry, analyzing the components of the anger cycle that is contributing to
their anger, then (if possible) showing the same clients using their coping
skills to handle the exact same provocation).
5. Group feedback.
19. Anger-Aggression Cycle
1.
STIMULUS EVENTS/INITIAL
APPRAISALS/TRIGGERING
THOUGHTS
5.
2.
CONSEQUENCES
FEELINGS
(IMMEDIATE/LONG-TERM)
PRE-ANGER STATE/OUTSET
INTERPERSONAL (SOCIAL)/SELF
FEELINGS/DURING/AFTER
(HEALTH, MOOD)
EPISODE/SECONDARY
EMOTIONS
4.
3.
FORMS OF EXPRESSION
VERBAL/NONVERBAL/BEHAVIORAL THOUGHTS
/ PHYSIOLOGICAL (INWARD
THINKING ERRORS/AUTOMATIC
ANGER)
THOUGHTS/IMAGES &
MEMORIES/ BELIEFS/PERSONAL
& CULTURAL RULES AND
NORMS
Taken directly from: Meichenbaum, D. (2001). Treatment of Individuals with Anger-Control Problems and Aggressive Behaviors: A Clinical
Handbook. Clearwater, Fl: Institute Press.
20. Anger-Aggression Cycle – Box 1
1. Stimulus Events – Events, People, Behaviors.
Initial Appraisals Triggering Thoughts
Intentional “On purpose”
Unjustified “Nobody has a right to do this to me”
Undeserved/Unwarranted “I don’t have to put up with this”
Preventable/Controllable “This doesn’t have to happen”
Unreasonable “Stupid rule”, “Dumb system”, “They
were asking for it”, “They deserved to
be punished”
Disrespectful “I feel dissed”, “Dishonored” –
possible cultural expectations violated
21. Anger-Aggression Cycle – Box 2
1. Feelings – High arousal and tense state.
Pre-Anger State Triggering Feelings
Irritable “On edge, short fuse, keyed up,
stressed, overwhelmed”
Exhausted “Fatigued, at wits end, hungry, tired”
Mood “Depressed, anxious, bored, jealous”
Low Frustration Tolerance “Frustrated, disappointed, cynical,
hostile”
Trait Features “Argumentative”
2. Feelings at OUTSET of Episode – Furious, enraged, pissed off.
3. Feelings DURING the Episode (Can exacerbate anger) – feeling trapped,
locked in, having no other options available.
4. Secondary Emotional Triggers (Can exacerbate anger – feeling humiliated,
scared, anxious, depressed, rejected, ashamed, embarrassed, hurt.
22. Anger-Aggression Cycle – Box 3
1. Thoughts
Thinking Errors Automatic Thoughts
Catastrophic Interpretation Use dramatic terms: Awful, Can’t stand it
Demanding Language “Shoulds, oughts, have to, need to”
Overgeneralization “Always, never, completely hopeless”
Categorical Thinking “Stupid, nerd, typical of those types”
Inflammatory Thinking “SOB, Asshole, fill in your own here”
Misattribution “They did it on purpose”
Mind Reading “The should know how I feel”, “I know what
you’re up to”
Black/White – either-or thinking “My soul mate or I want a divorce”
2. Images & Memories – memory of wrongdoing, images of getting even
3. Beliefs – Justified, lack responsibility (“Not my fault), Violates personal (narcissistic)
rules of living (“It’s my home, you do it my way”), Authority challenged (“No lip from
you”), Disrespectful and/or dishonorable, Unable to control anger (“Once a fuse is lit,
it blows”, “I’m not able to stop it”).
23. Anger-Aggression Cycle – Box 4
1. Forms of Expression
Verbal Verbal assault, argumentative,
relationship aggression, gossip, lie.
Non-verbal Glares, gives dirty looks, gestures,
threatening posture, threatening acts.
Behavioral Physical assault against others or
objects: Follow cultural
(anger/aggression) display rules.
Physiological Arousal, tenseness,
biochemical changes.
“Anger In” Suppress anger, turn anger in on self
(self injury, self-critical).
24. Anger-Aggression Cycle – Box 5
1. Consequences (Immediate and Long Term)
Interpersonal (Social) Elicit counter-aggression, alienate
others, rejection from others,
damaged relationships, self-
destructive behaviors, leaving problems
unresolved.
Self Feelings – guilty, depressed, fearful,
inadequate, puzzled, dismayed.
Health – increased coronary heart
disease, hypertension, possible
increase in general health (such as
increases in getting sick or catching
colds).
25. Guidelines for Assessing and Working With
Angry Clients
1. What is the client’s usual proneness to react angrily (hot headed vs. slow to
respond angrily)?
2. How intense is the angry emotionality?
3. What is the duration of the typical anger episode? Seconds, minutes, hours,
days?
4. How does the client usually express anger? Is it suppressed or directed
outward in physical actions or verbal behavior? How does the client feel
about his/her style of anger expression? What are some of its
consequences?
5. Does the person ruminate about the grievance, rekindling the anger over
and over again?
6. Are there irrational beliefs fueling the anger (beliefs about the way other
people should behave or about the way a fair world ought to operate)?
7. If the anger is kept to oneself, what barriers prevent it from being
expressed?
26. Guidelines for Assessing and Working With
Angry Clients
8. If the anger is projected outward, does the person make a clear,
forthright declaration of the anger to the person who provoked it?
9. Does the person engage in yelling, screaming, threats or profanity
when angry?
10. What triggers the anger? What is it about? What are the recurrent
themes/patterns?
11. What strategies are used to cool down and control ones temper?
Humor? Meditation? Physical exercise?
12. To what degree is anger creating problems for this client in the
workplace or in intimate relationships? Has the client ever harmed
self or others when angry?
13. What defense mechanisms come into play? Intellectualization,
projection, isolation?
14. How does the current angry behavior compare the person’s usual
pattern.
27. Guidelines for Assessing and Working With
Angry Clients
15. What did the client learn about anger while growing up? Rules for
anger display vary greatly from culture to culture. Gender role
socialization is another strong influence.
16. Is anger somaticized in headaches, gastric distress, or other
physical ailments?
17. Is the discomfort of anger medicated through alcohol, drugs,
nicotine, or food binges?
18. With whom does the anger most frequently occur? Are there any
commonalities with provocateurs? Are transference phenomena
evident?
19. In a situation of recurrent conflict, what would the client like to be
different? Is it possible for the client to understand the other
person’s position on the issue?
20. Who will support the client’s efforts to try new anger behaviors?
Who will attempt sabotage? How will the client handle saboteurs?
28. Imminent Danger Defined
Imminent danger is a concept used to describe problems that can
lead to dire consequences for the client (and others). Imminent
danger is defined as the following 3 components:
1. A strong probability that certain behaviors (such as continued
alcohol or drug use or continued self harm) will occur.
2. The potential for such behaviors to present a significant risk of
serious adverse consequences to the individual and/or others.
3. The likelihood that such harmful events will occur in the near future.
29. New Jersey Duty to Warn & Protect Law
N.J. Stat. 2A:62A-16 Medical or counseling practitioners' immunity from civil liability
a. Any person who is licensed in the State of New Jersey to practice psychology,
psychiatry, medicine, nursing, clinical social work or marriage counseling, whether
or not compensation is received or expected, is immune from any civil liability for a
patient's violent act against another person or against himself unless the practitioner
has incurred a duty to warn and protect the potential victim as set forth in
subsection b. of this section and fails to discharge that duty as set forth in
subsection c. of this section.
b. A duty to warn and protect is incurred when the following conditions exist:
(1) The patient has communicated to that practitioner a threat of imminent, serious
physical violence against a readily identifiable individual or against himself and the
circumstances are such that a reasonable professional in the practitioner's area of
expertise would believe the patient intended to carry out the threat; or
30. New Jersey Duty to Warn & Protect Law
N.J. Stat. 2A:62A-16 Medical or counseling practitioners' immunity from civil
liability (continued)
(2) The circumstances are such that a reasonable professional in the
practitioner's area of expertise would believe the patient intended to carry out an
act of imminent, serious physical violence against a readily identifiable individual
or against himself.
c. A licensed practitioner of psychology, psychiatry, medicine, nursing, clinical
social work or marriage counseling shall discharge the duty to warn and protect
as set forth in subsection b. of this section by doing any one or more of the
following:
(1) Arranging for the patient to be admitted voluntarily to a psychiatric unit of a
general hospital, a short-term care facility, a special psychiatric hospital or a
psychiatric facility, under the provisions of P.L.1987, c.116
(C.30:4-27.1 et seq.);
31. New Jersey Duty to Warn & Protect Law
N.J. Stat. 2A:62A-16 Medical or counseling practitioners' immunity from civil liability
(continued)
(2) Initiating procedures for involuntary commitment of the patient to a short-term
care facility, a special psychiatric hospital or a psychiatric facility, under the provisions
of P.L.1987, c.116 (C.30:4-27.1 et seq.);
(3) Advising a local law enforcement authority of the patient's threat and the identity of
the intended victim;
(4) Warning the intended victim of the threat, or, in the case of an intended victim who
is under the age of 18, warning the parent or guardian of the intended victim; or
(5) If the patient is under the age of 18 and threatens to commit suicide or bodily
injury upon himself, warning the parent or guardian of the patient.
d. A practitioner who is licensed in the State of New Jersey to practice psychology,
psychiatry, medicine, nursing, clinical social work or marriage counseling who, in
complying with subsection c. of this section, discloses a privileged communication, is
immune from civil liability in regard to that disclosure.
32. New Jersey Duty to Warn & Protect Law
N.J. Stat. 2A:62A-17 Court order required for certain disclosures
When a duty to warn and protect arises from the receipt of a privileged
communication from a patient in a drug or alcohol abuse program governed
by federal law, a licensed practitioner of psychology, psychiatry, medicine,
nursing, clinical social work or marriage counseling may be required to
obtain a court order authorizing disclosure prior to disclosure of information
about the patient including the patient's threat of violence, in accordance
with 42 U.S.C. 290dd-3 and 42 U.S.C. 290ee-3 and regulations
promulgated thereunder. *
See also: McIntosh v. Milano, 168 NJS 466 (Law Div. 1979)
* The regulations are the federal Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse
Patient Records; Final Rule, 42 CFR Part 2
33. 42-CFR-Part 2 – Exceptions to
Confidentiality
§ 2.22 Notice to patients of Federal confidentiality requirements.
The confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records maintained by this program is
protected by Federal law and regulations. Generally, the program may not say to a person
outside the program that a patient attends the program, or disclose any information
identifying a patient as an alcohol or drug abuser Unless:
(1) The patient consents in writing:
(2) The disclosure is allowed by a court order; or
(3) The disclosure is made to medical personnel in a medical emergency or to qualified
personnel for research, audit, or program evaluation.
Violation of the Federal law and regulations by a program is a crime. Suspected violations
may be reported to appropriate authorities in accordance with Federal regulations.
Violation of the Federal law and regulations by a program is a crime. Suspected violations
may be reported to appropriate authorities in accordance with Federal regulations. Federal
law and regulations do not protect any information about a crime committed by a patient
either at the program or against any person who works for the program or about any threat
to commit such a crime. Federal laws and regulations do not protect any information about
suspected child abuse or neglect from being reported under State law to appropriate State
or local authorities.
34. 42-CFR-Part 2 – Exceptions to
Confidentiality
§ 2.22 Notice to patients of Federal confidentiality
requirements.
Federal law and regulations do not protect any information about a crime
committed by a patient either at the program or against any person who
works for the program or about any threat to commit such a crime. Federal
laws and regulations do not protect any information about suspected child
abuse or neglect from being reported under State law to appropriate State
or local authorities.
§ 2.14 Minor patients (d)(2) The applicant's situation poses a
substantial threat to the life or physical well being of the applicant or any
other individual which may be reduced by communicating relevant facts to
the minor's parent, guardian, or other person authorized under State law to
act in the minor's behalf.
35. 42-CFR-Part 2 – Exceptions to
Confidentiality
§ 2.63 Confidential communications.
(a) A court order under these regulations may authorize disclosure of
confidential communications made by a patient to a program in the course
of diagnosis, treatment, or referral for treatment only if:
(1) The disclosure is necessary to protect against an existing threat to life or
of serious bodily injury, including circumstances which constitute suspected
child abuse and neglect and verbal threats against third parties;
(2) The disclosure is necessary in connection with investigation or
prosecution of an extremely serious crime, such as one which directly
threatens loss of life or serious bodily injury, including homicide, rape,
kidnapping, armed robbery, assault with a deadly weapon, or child abuse
and neglect; or
(3) The disclosure is in connection with litigation or an administrative
proceeding in which the patient offers testimony or other evidence
pertaining to the content of the confidential communications.
36. Duty to Warn Vignette
Paul is referred to your organization for domestic violence. The domestic violence was
towards a girlfriend who was attempting to break up with him. Paul and the girlfriend
have since broken up, and she has a restraining order against him (which he states he
abides by). Both clinicians with experience with this type of client are full and cannot
accept anymore clients. As the clinical director you decide to give this case to an intern,
who is supervised by one of your master’s level clinicians. The intern is assigned the
case and not much happens for a few months that you are aware of. One week in
supervision, your clinician comes to you to inform you that a situation has happened with
this client.
You come to find out that Paul has been increasingly making threatening statements
towards other drivers on the road when he travels to work. He describes how he gets
“infuriated” by other drivers who cut him off, or don’t move out of the fast lane when he is
behind them. At first “altercations” were just gestures back and forth between he and the
other driver at the time. However, in the past week he followed another driver all the way
to that person’s job, and proceeded to fight him in the parking lot.
37. Duty to Warn Vignette
When asked if anybody was hurt, Paul replied that the other person was “a bit
bloody” when Paul left him on the parking lot grounds. Paul confided to the intern that
he has now started carrying a gun in the car. He at first played with the intern by
stating the gun was there for his “protection”, but later hinted that it might “come in
handy” on his way to work. When pressed, Paul stated that he would only wave the
gun at a potential “highway offender” to scare him/her. He also stated he is licensed
to carry the gun, and the gun is loaded. The final piece of information that the
clinician tells you is the nature of the domestic violence towards the ex-girlfriend was
Paul hitting this woman on the face with the barrel of a gun.
Paul has been diagnosed with Intermittent Explosive Disorder (DSM-IV-TR 314.32).
Paul is employed full-time at Home Depot and works as the customer service
manager for returns. Basically his job consists of being the returns and complaints
manager at the Home Depot.
38. Duty to Warn Vignette Questions
What are your obligations, if any? If you find you have
obligations, who are you obliged to warn?
39. (Duty to Warn) Anger Vignette 2 – “Man
found guilty of serial HIV assaults”
From CNN.com, 11/09/2004 During the trial in Thurston County
OLYMPIA, Washington (AP) -- court, an Oklahoma prison official
A man was convicted by a testified that Whitfield was
judge Monday on charges he diagnosed with HIV while
deliberately exposed 17 incarcerated in 1992.
women to HIV by having
unprotected sex with them. Two women testified that Whitfield
Five of the women have once said, seemingly in jest, that if
tested positive for the virus, he had HIV, he would give it to as
which causes AIDS. many people as he could.
Anthony E. Whitfield, 32, faces a Defense lawyer Charles Lane said
minimum sentence of 137 years in Whitfield was addicted to
prison on the 17 counts of first- methamphetamine and used
degree assault with sexual women for shelter, money and Anthony E. Whitfield,
motivation and other charges. sex but never meant to inflict right, is handcuffed by a
"great bodily harm" as required for Thurston County
Health officials said as many as him to be convicted of first-degree corrections officer
170 people may have been assault. Monday.
exposed to the virus because of
Whitfield's actions, counting
subsequent partners of women he
slept with. No additional people
have tested positive for HIV, but 45 http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/11/09/hiv.assault.ap/index.ht
refused to be tested or couldn't be ml
found.
40. HIV Reporting
As of 2009, 28 states (including NJ) now have HIV reporting for both adults and
adolescents. Under great security, NJ stores names and addresses of individuals
who are infected with the virus that causes AIDS.
Residents have the option of learning their HIV status without their names being
reported (by being tested anonymously), if they go to 1 of 15 state-financed HIV
testing and counseling sites. The approximately 200 residents per year who choose
this option are identified by a number, and the state receives only demographic
information like age, sex and race.
New Jersey’s system of notifying partners is voluntary. Spouses or other partners of
infected people are not notified without the consent of the infected person.
A person with HIV or AIDS who knowingly infects another (which in NJ law the other
person has to be unaware that their partner was infected), is given a 3rd “degree
diseased person” charge. A lesser 4th degree charge is reserved for sexually
transmitted diseases other than HIV or AIDS.
2009 – Leadership Seminar: “Guide to Mental Health Law in NJ and PA.” Leadership Seminars, 4020 N. MacAuthor Blvd, Ste. 122, Irving, Tx. (800) 443-6912.
41. Motivation Interviewing and Anger
MI uses the term resistance when dealing with anger statements
from clients. MI defines resistance as an observable behavior that
occurs in treatment, and shows that the client is moving away from
the direction of change.
Resistance is powerfully determined by therapist style. Therefore,
your style as a therapist will determine how much resistance is
elicited by the client.
Resistance occurs when the counselor uses strategies
inappropriate for the client’s current stage of change.
An important goal of Motivational Interviewing is to avoid eliciting or
strengthening resistance. A more empathic style is associated with
lower resistance and better long-term change.
41
42. Dealing with Resistance – 4 Types
1. Arguing – The client contests the accuracy, expertise or integrity
of the clinician.
2. Interrupting – The client breaks in and interrupts the clinician in a
defensive manner.
3. Denying – The client expresses an unwillingness to recognize
problems, cooperate, accept responsibility, or take advice.
4. Ignoring – The client shows evidence of ignoring or not following
the clinical advice.
42
43. Strategies for Handling Resistance
Simple Reflection
This is responding to resistance with non-resistance.
A simple acknowledgement of the client’s disagreement, emotion, or
perception can permit further exploration rather than defensiveness.
CLIENT: “While this may be somewhat interesting, I’d really like to
get out of this lecture at 2:30 p.m.”
COUNSELOR: “While your not totally disinterested in the topic Ms.
White, you’d like to be able to leave early.”
43
44. Strategies for Handling Resistance (cont.)
Amplified Reflection
Reflecting back what the client has said in an exaggerated form, to
state it in an even more extreme form than the client did. These
responses must be straightforward and supportive, not in a tone of
sarcasm or impatience.
CLIENT: I’ve heard a lot about this Drug Court, and I know I
need help and would be open to going to a treatment program,
I’m not willing to go to AA meetings for the next 5 years because
I’ve tried them before and they suck.”
COUNSELOR: “So what I hear you saying is the only thing you
need to help in your recovery process is therapy and nothing
else will work for you.”
44
45. Strategies for Handling Resistance (cont.)
Double-Sided Reflection
This is acknowledging what the client has said, and add to it the other side
of the client’s ambivalence. This may require material that the client has
offered previously.
CLIENT: “I know my job has expressed concern, and while they
may be honest in their concern I can’t help but believe that they are
pushing their own agenda regarding my right to do what I want in
my own private life.”
COUNSELOR: “You feel that what you do on your own time is none
of your company’s business, but on the other hand you do see that
they may have genuine concern for you.”
45
46. Strategies for Handling Resistance (cont.)
Shifting Focus
This is shifting the client’s attention away from what seems to be a
stumbling block standing in the way of progress. Such detouring can be a
good way to defuse resistance when encountering a particularly difficult
issue.
CLIENT: “I came here for my alcohol problem, and you want to
contact my physician because he prescribes me Vicodin for my
back pain, that’s not going to happen.”
COUNSELOR: “You don’t feel that your problem with alcohol has
anything to do with your prescription for pain from your doctor and
you don’t want to sign this release. We do feel it is very important to
communicate with all professionals involved with our clients,
however, lets move to another part of this assessment and we can
come back to that later.”
46
47. Strategies for Handling Resistance (cont.)
Emphasizing Personal Choice and Control
This works in working with resistance that comes from reactance. When
people think their freedom of choice is being threatened, they tend to react
by asserting their liberty. Antidote for reactance is to assure the client it is
he/she who determines what happens.
CLIENT: “I know my job has expressed concern, and while they
may be honest in their concern I can’t help but believe that they are
pushing their own agenda regarding my right to do what I want in
my own private life. What I do in my private life is none of their
business and they, and you can’t force me to change.”
THERAPIST: Nobody has the power to change your drug usage
but you, it’s totally your choice to either stop using or continue using.
47
48. Handling Resistance - Siding with the Negative
This is where the Clinician presents, or takes up, the negative voice in the
discussion … the voice of precontemplation and status quo.
This works well with clients still in contemplation, and needing to elicit self-
motivational, change oriented statements but needs help doing so.
Taking the negative side can evoke a response of the positives for change from
the client, thus the client would be making your argument for you. This is often
times called a “paradoxical intervention” or “prescribing the problem”.
COUNSELOR: “From what I hear you saying, you don’t have a problem,
everything is functioning perfectly well in your life, and yet you stated you cut
down on your drinking 6 months ago. I don’t see a reason why you needed to
do that.”
CLIENT: “Well there have been some problems, I do have 1 DWI, my wife has
been complaining recently because of my drinking away from home, and my
kids have made comments to me, so I wouldn’t go so far to say there is “no
problem.”
48
49. REBT and Anger Control
1. C – The emotional or behavioral consequence: in this case your
anger.
2. A – The activating experience or adversity.
3. B – Our beliefs about the activating experience. These beliefs
largely influence “C”. It is our irrational beliefs that lead to the
emotional reactions of anger.
4. D – Disputing irrational beliefs by challenging their accuracy and
usefulness. Replacing irrational beliefs with rational ones can help
you to experience more healthy negative feelings such as
disappointment and avoid unhealthy feelings such as rage.
50. REBT and Anger Control
1. Healthy negative feelings – disappointment, regret, frustration,
sadness.
2. Unhealthy negative feelings – rage, depression, panic, self-pity, low
frustration tolerance.
Although REBT does not make clear strict definitions for these
categories, they report that healthy negative feelings and behaviors
will help you cope with and overcome troubles and problems.
51. REBT and Anger Control
REBT focuses on control and choice. While you may have
developed your irrational anger problems from your parents, you still
choose to maintain these irrationalities.
As an adult, you can control your ideas, attitudes, and actions. You
largely can arrange your life according to your own dictates – if you
work at doing so.
REBT insight includes your need to discover and minimize your goal
inhibiting irrational beliefs (these irrational beliefs that lead to the
unhealthy negative feelings).
52. REBT and Anger Control
REBT lists 4 Irrational Beliefs that generalize a majority of how people
create their anger:
1. How awful or terrible that you treat me like this!
2. I can’t stand your irresponsible behavior!
3. You should not and must not act in that bad manner towards me!
4. Because you behave as you should not and must not, you are a rotten
person and should be severely punished!
(Awfulizing, Can’t-stand-it-itis, Damnation, All or nothingism,
overgeneralization)
These statements hold for anger, but not necessarily for other things such
as anxiety and depression. REBT contends that anxiety usually stems
from the irrational beliefs you hold about yourself, while anger stems from
the irrational beliefs that you hold about others. Depression creating
irrational beliefs sometimes puts the world conditions down.
53. REBT Insights
1. Insight #1: Your present anger may have some connection with
your past. However your present adversities and your current
beliefs about them are more important than past connections.
2. Insight #2: However you may have originally acquired your self-
defeating irrational beliefs, you now keep them alive by repeating
them to yourself, reinforcing them in various ways, acting on them,
and refusing to challenge them.
3. Insight #3: REBT states that in order to change your disturbed
feelings and behaviors and the irrational beliefs that create them,
you almost always have to do a great deal of work and practice.
54. Disputing Your Irrational Beliefs
Disputing can be broken down into three distinctive tasks:
1. Detection – raising your awareness of what your irrational beliefs
are. Detection alone is not enough to enact change from an
irrational belief system to a rational one.
2. Discrimination – this is the ability to discriminate irrational beliefs
from rational beliefs.
3. Debating – powerfully and consistently challenging and changing
your core belief about a certain event.
55. From Irrational Beliefs to Rational Ones
1. Irrational Belief: “You absolutely must not treat me with this verbal
abuse. You never should act in that bad way towards me!”
Rational Response: “I hate your treating me with verbal abuse and I
strongly prefer that you stop it!”
2. Irrational Belief: “Because you are treating me unfairly with your
verbal abuse, you absolutely must not; you are a rotten person who
should be damned to Hell and severely punished!”
Rational Response: “Because you are treating me unfairly with your
verbal abuse, your behavior is wrong and poor, and it may benefit
you to correct it!”
56. From Irrational Beliefs to Rational Ones
3. Irrational Belief: “It is awful and terrible when you verbally abuse
me, as you must not! Nothing could be worse than this!”
Rational Response: “It is highly unpleasant when you verbally
abuse me, and I prefer you to stop it and I feel bad about it!”
4. Irrational Belief: “I find it so unpleasant when you irresponsibly
abuse me verbally, as you must not, that I can’t stand it, can only
feel anguish, and am unable to enjoy myself at all in any way!”
Rational Response: “I find it so unpleasant when you irresponsibly
abuse me verbally that I want to stay away from you as much as I
can!”
57. Effective New Philosophy
After persistently and successfully debating irrational beliefs, you
can choose to believe effective new philosophies (E):
1. “I can stand this unfairness, though I’ll never like it.”
2. “It is quite bad, but it is not awful and terrible.”
3. “It is highly preferable that people treat me fairly, but they obviously
don’t have to do so.”
4. “They are not rotten people but people who sometimes treat me
rottenly.”
Behavioral Effect (E) of this new cognitive effect or new philosophy:
Loss of anger, relief, and return to the healthy negative
consequences (feeling of sorry and disappointment).
58. Elements of Effective Anger Management
Complete elimination of angry emotionality is neither possible nor
desirable, because anger has self-protective functions such as
maintaining boundaries and mobilizing courage to correct injustices.
The ability to handle anger effectively fits within the category of
"emotional intelligence," which has been defined as the capacity to
perceive emotion, integrate it in thought, and understand and
manage it
Intelligent anger management means that one can:
(a) modulate excessive physiological arousal
(b) alter irrational antagonistic cognitions
(c) decrease environmental stimuli
(d) modify maladaptive behaviors that do not lead to problem
solving.
59. Stress Inoculation for Anger Control
1. Step 1: Mastering Relaxation Skills – mastering relaxation skills such as
progressive muscle relaxation and special place visualization.
2. Step 2: Developing an Anger Hierarchy
A. Get a blank piece of paper and begin writing down as many anger
situations as you can think of. Think of a full range of provocations,
from mild irritations to things that make you lose your temper. This
list should include 20 – 30 situations.
B. On another sheet of paper, write at the top of the sheet, the item that
makes you the most angry, and at the bottom, the item that makes
you the least angry.
C. Now choose between 10 – 15 items that fit in the middle (with
graduated intensity. Make sure the increments of anger between each
item are approximately equal throughout. If some increments are
larger than others, you may need to put in additional items where the
gaps are.
D. Once the hierarchy is done, rank your items from 1 (lowest) to the
highest.
60. Stress Inoculation for Anger Control
3. Step 3: Developing Coping Thoughts – you should develop two or
more coping thoughts as you get ready to visualize each new scene
in your hierarchy.
A. Briefly visualize the scene, making it as real as possible.
Notice what you see, hear, and even how you feel physically.
Now listen to your trigger thoughts.
- Are you blaming the other person or people involved for
deliberately harming or hurting you?
- Do you see their behavior as wrong and bad, as violating
basic rules of conduct?
61. Blaming Trigger Thoughts
If your trigger thoughts fall into the category of blame, here are
some suggested coping responses to control you anger:
1. I may not like it, but they’re doing the best they can.
2. I’m not helpless – I can take care of myself in this situation.
3. Blaming just upsets me – there’s no point in getting mad. Don’t
assume the worst or jump to conclusions.
4. I don’t like what they’re doing, but I can cope with it.
62. Broken Rules Trigger Thoughts
If your trigger thoughts fall into the “broken rules” category, where
the offending person(s) appears to be violating standards of
reasonable behavior, some of the following coping thoughts can be
helpful:
1. Forget shoulds, they only upset me.
2. People do what they want to do, not what I think they should do.
3. No one is right, no one is wrong. We just have different needs.
4. People change only when they want to.
5. No one is bad; people do the best they can.
63. Other Generic Coping Thoughts
1. Take a deep breath and relax.
2. Getting upset won’t help me.
3. I’m not going to let them get to me.
4. I can find a way to say what I want without anger.
5. No matter what is said I know I’m a good person.
6. Their opinion isn’t important, I won’t be pushed into losing my
temper.
7. It’s just not worth it to get so angry.
8. Anger means its time to relax and cope.
9. This is funny if you look at it a certain way.
10. I can manage this; I’m in control.
11. I don’t have to take this so seriously.
12. I’ll stay rational, as anger won’t solve anything.
64. Stress Inoculation for Anger Control
4. Step 4: Applying Anger-Coping Skills:
A. Take ten to fifteen minutes to get relaxed using relaxation techniques.
B. Visualize the first (or next) item in your anger hierarchy. Try to bring
the scene alive by visualizing the situation, feeling the tension building
up. Remind yourself of the trigger thoughts, the blame towards
others, and/or unfairness of the offense. When you feel the anger
move onto step C.
C. Start to cope. Once the scene is clear and anger response occurring,
start relaxing and start using your coping thoughts you developed for
the situation. Use quick relaxation methods such as deep breathing
or visualization of peaceful scenes.
D. Rate your anger. Rate your anger in the scene (from 1 meaning little
or no anger, to 10 being the worst anger imaginable), just before you
cut your anger off. Re-examine your coping thoughts. Did they
work? If not, dump them and come up with new coping thoughts
that will help you.
65. Stress Inoculation for Anger Control
5. Step 5: Practicing anger-coping skills in real life. If your hierarchy
includes items that occur frequently or predictably in real life, you’ll
find many opportunities to practice.
- The key to real life practice of your relaxation and anger-
coping thoughts is to recognize the first signs of anger.
- The earlier you intervene with brief relaxation interventions
and coping thoughts (e.g., deep breathing exercising, picturing
yourself relaxed, telling yourself a coping thought), the more
likely you are to maintain control.
66. Dialectical Behavior Therapy
Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) – Originally devised by Marsha Linehan
at the University of Washington in Seattle for the treatment of Borderline
Personality Disorders, DBT combines standard cognitive-behavioral
techniques for interpersonal effectiveness, emotion regulation and reality-
testing with concepts of distress tolerance, acceptance, and mindfulness.
DBT was developed initially to treat suicidality in adults with borderline
personality disorder; however, it now is being used effectively in
adolescents with similar self-harm behaviors as well as other co-occurring
psychiatric illnesses such as depression and anxiety.
DBT is an empirically supported technique, meaning that it has been
clinically tested for its effectiveness in adolescents and adults.
67. Dialectical Behavior Therapy
The spirit of a dialectical point of view is never to accept a proposition as a
final truth or indisputable fact.
In the context of therapeutic dialogue, dialectic refers to bringing about
change by persuasion and to making strategic use of oppositions that
emerge within therapy and the therapeutic relationship.
In the search for the validity or truth contained within each contradictory
position, new meanings emerge, thus moving the patient and therapist
closer to the essence of the subject under consideration.
The patient and therapist regularly ask, “What haven’t we considered?” or
“What is the synthesis between these two positions?”
68. Dialectical Behavior Therapy
The treatment includes five essential functions:
1.Improving patient motivation to change,
2.Enhancing patient capabilities,
3.Generalizing new behaviors,
4.Structuring the environment, and
5.Enhancing therapist capability and motivation.
69. Dialectical Behavior Therapy
Like other behavioral approaches, DBT classifies behavioral targets
hierarchically. The DBT target hierarchy is to decrease behaviors that are:
1.Imminently life-threatening (e.g., suicidal or homicidal);
2.Reduce behaviors that interfere with therapy (e.g., arriving late or not
attending therapy, being inattentive or intoxicated during the session, or
dissociating during the session);
3.Reduce behaviors with consequences that degrade the quality of life (e.g.,
homelessness, probation, Axis I behavioral problems, or domestic violence);
and increase behavioral skills.
In any given session, a DBT therapist will pursue a number of these targets but
will place the greatest emphasis on the highest order problem behavior
manifested by the patient during the past week.
70. Dialectical Behavior Therapy
"What" skills
Observe - This is used to non-judgmentally observe one’s environment within
or outside oneself. It is helpful in understanding what is going on in any given
situation.
Describe - This is used to express what one has observed with the observe
skill. It is to be used without judgmental statements. This helps with letting
others know what you have observed.
Participate- This is used to become fully involved in the activity that one is
doing. To be able to fully focus on what one is doing.
71. Dialectical Behavior Therapy
"How" skills
Non-judgmentally - This is the action of describing the facts, and not thinking
about what’s “good” or “bad”, “fair”, or “unfair.” These are judgments because
this is how you feel about the situation but isn’t a factual description. Being non-
judgmental helps to get your point across in an effective manner without adding
a judgment that someone else might disagree with.
One-mindfully- This is used to focus on one thing. One-mindfully is helpful in
keeping your mind from straying into emotion mind by a lack of focus.
Effectively- This is simply doing what works. It is a very broad-ranged skill and
can be applied to any other skill to aid in being successful with said skill.
72. Dialectical Behavior Therapy
Distress tolerance
Many current approaches to mental health treatment focus on changing a
person’s thoughts, feelings and/or belief systems regarding distressing events
and circumstances.
They have paid little attention to accepting, finding meaning for, and tolerating
distress.
Dialectical behavior therapy emphasizes learning to bear pain skillfully.
The goal is to become capable of calmly recognizing negative situations and
their impact, rather than becoming overwhelmed or hiding from them.
73. Dialectical Behavior Therapy
Distress tolerance
Distractwith ACCEPTS - This is a skill used to distract oneself temporarily
from unpleasant emotions.
1. Activities - Use positive activities that you enjoy.
2. Contribute - Help out others or your community.
3. Comparisons - Compare yourself either to people that are less
fortunate or to how you used to be when you were in a worse state.
4. Emotions (other) - cause yourself to feel something different by
provoking your sense of humor or happiness with corresponding
activities.
5. Push away - Put your situation on the back-burner for a while. Put
something else temporarily first in your mind.
6. Thoughts (other) - Force your mind to think about something else.
7. Sensations (other) – Do something that has an intense feeling other
than what you are feeling, like a cold shower or eating a spicy food.
74. Dialectical Behavior Therapy
Distress tolerance
Self-soothe - This is a skill in which one behaves in a comforting,
nurturing, kind, and gentle way to oneself. You use it by doing something
that is soothing to you. It is used in moments of distress or agitation.
IMPROVE the moment - This skill is used in moments of distress to help
one relax. Imagery, Meaning, Prayer, Relaxation, One thing in the
moment, Vacation (brief) - Take a break from it all for a short period of
time, and Encouragement
Pros and cons - Think about the positive and negative things about not
tolerating distress.
75. Dialectical Behavior Therapy
Distress tolerance
Radical acceptance - Let go of fighting reality. Accept your situation for
what it is.
Turningthe mind - Turn your mind toward an acceptance stance. It should
be used with radical acceptance.
Willingness vs. willfulness - Be willing and open to do what is effective.
Let go of a willful stance which goes against acceptance. Keep your eye on
the goal in front of you.
76. Dialectical Behavior Therapy
Emotional Regulation
Dialectical behavior therapy skills for emotion regulation include:
1. Identify and label emotions
2. Identify obstacles to changing emotions
3. Reduce vulnerability to emotion mind
4. Increase positive emotional events
5. Increase mindfulness to current emotions
6. Take opposite action than that emotion that the situation evoked
7. Apply distress tolerance techniques
Other skills of emotional regulation include understanding the story of the
emotion, addressing ineffective health habits, mastering one skill at a time,
problem solving when emotions are justified and learning to observe and
experience your emotion and let it go.
77. Mindfulness Exercises
1. Observing Your Breath Exercise (being in the moment, push out distractions)
Have clients focus on something in the room. While they are doing this, have
them become mindful of their breath. Tell them to count their breath. Breath
in, that’s one. Breath out, that’s two. Breath in, that’s three. Breath out, that’s
four and so on. Have them go all the way to ten and then start back at one.
Tell your clients that if a thought, urge, distraction, etc. comes into their mind,
just notice it and turn their mind back to counting their breath. If they lose
count, start back at one. If they count over ten, just notice that and return their
mind back one.
2. Defining Moment Exercise (interpersonal effectiveness, distress tolerance,
emotional regulation insights)
Have clients get a piece of paper and something to write with. Each client
should write about an event that was their defining moment in their life. It is a
moment that has shaped them to be who they are and how they look at life
now.
78. Mindfulness Exercises
3. Walking Mindfully (focusing on the present, blocking out past and future)
Have clients stand up and get in a single file line. Have them focus solely on
each step as they walk around the room. Be mindful to the feelings they get on
the bottom of their feet. If they loose track of their step, tell them to stop and
turn their mind back to their step before they continue to walk. Be mindful to all
the thoughts that come in, but don’t get stuck on them. Turn the mind back to
your step. You can have them focus on different aspects of walking such as
how one’s pants shift on each leg, breathing patterns, etc.
4. Describe Mindfully (attributions, judgments, assumptions)
Bring different objects to group. Place one object at a time on the table and
have clients DESCRIBE the object by using only the facts! Be mindful to
clients who assume or judge. Get them to describe the objects by using only
what they do know and nothing more.
79. Anger/Aggression Exercise #3
Joanie has come back to you, stating her anger is worse than
before, and angry at you because you decided to refer her to “some
stupid ass bitch” whom she doesn’t believe was helpful. She feels
this person is trying to ruin her family, and she feels this person
reports back everything she states in session to her DYFS worker.
She is agitated, pacing the room and verbally assaulting this other
therapist and you, for making the referral and not working with her.
1. Joanie is in an obvious crisis situation. Work together with your
team to come up with some strategies to de-escalate Joanie
WITHOUT LOOKING AHEAD IN YOUR HANDOUTS.
80. De-escalating Angry Clients
Breathe Deeply, Remain Calm, and Be Aware - In confrontational
situations, staff must be aware of their own frustration and anger.
Only then is it possible to put the other party first, saving the
processing of personal feelings until the incident is over.
Separate the Problem From the Person - Do not take insults or
abusive language personally. When another's behavior is allowed to
adversely impact the workplace, one gives away power, reinforcing
the disrespectful behavior and accompanying negative feelings.
Take Complaints Seriously - When clients complain to staff, it is
important to give them an opportunity to present their grievances by
listening attentively.
81. De-escalating Angry Clients
Respect Personal Space - When a person is angry, it is important to
be close enough to command attention but not so close as to invade
personal space and create more tension.
Use Respectful Language - Most angry individuals are seeking
respect and dignity. One needs to choose words carefully. Respect
and caring can be shown through an interaction such as, "I respect
you and your right to feel the way you do. You know that this is my
job, and I cannot allow you to threaten others. That would cause you
more trouble and I want what is best for you."
Acknowledge Feelings - It is essential for the counselor to recognize
their feelings. For example, one might say, "I can see that you're
frustrated. I'd probably feel angry, too." Acknowledging feelings
does not mean there is agreement about the cause of the person's
feelings or the appropriateness of their behavior.
82. De-escalating Angry Clients
Use Listening Skills - It is imperative one understands the
individual's message. It is important to reassure the client that the
problem can be solved and it is important to reflect what you have
heard the angry client say.
Accept Their World View - To emotionally aroused persons, their
perceptions of reality are real. Denial of this reality only increases
their frustration and anger.
Observe Body Language - The goal is for one's body language to
reflect calmness and balance. Keeping hands relaxed and at one's
sides while maintaining an open and balanced stance. You need to
appear self assured, but not threatening.
83. De-escalating Angry Clients
Reinforce Decision Making Ability - Praise and acknowledgment are
great defusers. It is calming to appeal to an angry person's
strengths. It is important to reassure client’s they can and will make
a good decision.
Know How to Handle Verbal Attacks - Agreeing with a verbal attack
deflates anger and often ends the attack.
1. When individuals are verbally abusive, they are often frustrated
and afraid; most feel powerless or isolated.
2. Agreement acknowledges they have value as human beings.
3. It does not indicate agreement with everything said.
84. Anger Management Training
Anger Management training is delivered customarily to groups, because
anger is such an interpersonal emotion (interestingly enough, a review of
the literature shows that group work with anger is less effective than
individual work with angry clients).
Techniques such as the "empty chair" do not permit individuals to maintain
eye contact with another human while learning to control their breathing and
other physical reactions of being angry.
Clients best learn to express their angry feelings when others are available
to support, empathize, provide feedback, and role-play problematic conflicts
in encounters.
Behavioral practice in the safety of a group gives clients greater confidence
that they can enact new anger behaviors in real-world situations.
Concurrent introspection, using an anger journal or log, usually is
recommended as well.
85. Purpose and Goals in Anger Management
Training
The purpose of an anger management program is to enhance the coping
skills of the clients so they can express their anger constructively and
respond appropriately to anger directed at them. Upon completion of the
program, the participants are expected to be able to:
1. Explain the differences between anger and aggression.
2. Describe the positive and negative functions of anger.
3. Identify personal response to anger including physiological and emotional
responses.
4. Analyze anger-provoking situations in terms of triggering event, thought,
emotion, behavior response and consequence.
5. Perform anger control strategies such as positive reframing, use of positive
reminders, and brief stress reduction techniques in response to anger
provoking situations.
6. Perform problem solving skills and conflict resolution skills.
7. Perform assertive communication skills.
86. Bibliography
Ellis, A. & Tafrate, R. C. (1998). How to control your anger before it
controls you. Carol Publishing Group. Secaucus, NJ.
Ellis, A. (1996). Anger: How to live with and without it. Carol
Publishing Group. Secaucus, NJ.
Helge, D. (2001). Positively channeling workplace anger and anxiety
- Part II. AAOHN Journal, 49(10), pp. 482 – 497.
McKay, M., Davis, M., & Fanning, P. (1997) Thoughts and feelings:
Taking control of your moods and your life. New Harbinger
Publications, Inc. Oakland CA.
87. Bibliography
Miller, W. R. & Rollnick, S. (1998). Motivational Interviewing. Guilford Press.
New York, NY.
Prochaska, J. O., Norcross, J.C., & DiClemente, C. C. (1995). Changing For
Good. Avon Books, New York, NY.
Rollnick, S. (1998). Readiness, importance, and confidence: Critical
conditions of change in treatment. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.),
Treating addictive behaviors: Process of change (2nd ed., pp. 49-60). New
York: Plenum Press.
Rollnick, S., Mason P. & Butler C. (1999). Health behavior change: A guide
for practitioners. London: Churchill Livingstone.
Rollnick, S. & Miller, W. R. (1995). What is motivational interviewing?
Behavioral Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23(4), 325-334.
87
88. Bibliography
Meichenbaum, D. (2001). Treatment of Individuals with Anger-
Control Problems and Aggressive Behaviors: A Clinical Handbook .
Clearwater, Fl: Institute Press.
Spielberger, C. D., Reheiser, E. C., & Sydeman, S. J. (1995).
Measuring the experience, expression and control of anger. In H.
Kassinove (Ed.), Anger Disorders. Washington, DC: Taylor &
Francis.
Tang, M. (2001). Clinical outcome and client satisfaction of an anger
management group program. The Canadian Journal of
Occupational Therapy, 68(4), pp. 228 – 239.
Thomas, S. (2001). Teaching healthy anger management.
Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 37(2), pp. 41 – 48.
89. Bibliography
Swanson, A. J., Pantalon, M. V., & Cohen, K. R. (1999). Motivational
interviewing and treatment adherence among psychiatric and dually
diagnosed patients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 187, 630-
635.
Stress Inoculation Therapy -
http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=15683&cn=117
. Accessed 02/18/13.
Wikipedia: Dialectical Behavior Therapy. http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectical_Behavior_Therapy
Mindfulness Exercises Created and Designed by: Josh Smith,
MSW, LMSW, “The DBT Center of Michigan, PLLC”
89