The development world is changing at a dizzying pace, the development environment of Microsoft Visual Studio. Net, leading a crazy race, it haunts version version, innovative tools and technologies emerge constantly. Developer community is in constant pursuit to keep pace with technological development and to implement them in developing applications and products they develop. Development teams to business organizations was an enormous challenge: On the one hand, they are under pressure to develop functional requirements and applications and products that are the core business of the organization, on the other hand, they develop the same requirements particularly dynamic development environment, as noted above, developed and advanced at an incredible rate. Managers of development organizations face a complex dilemma - whether to allocate time and resources for learning technology, examining how to implement and assimilation among development teams, all at the expense of development time of applications and products of the company - most organizations scales tipped in favor of developing products and applications, leading to the erosion of knowledge, not adoption new technology and tools that can streamline and increase the productivity of the development team and improve the products and applications that the organization develops. Meeting a representative of the current trends in world development, the plans ahead of Microsoft and how technological organization can and should organize themselves, both professionally and in business to maximize its resources and exploit the most of technology has to offer

1. Eyal Vardi
CEO E4D Solutions LTD
Microsoft MVP Visual C#
blog: www.eVardi.com

2. About
 Consulting
 Mentoring
 Projects

3. Stop The Train
SL1 SL2 SL3 SL4 SL5
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

4. Agenda
 From 1 tire to n tires
 Win Application
 Web Application
 SaaS & Cloud
 Code Matrices

6. Single Tier

7. 2 Tier
OS Versions
Security
Deployment

8. 3 Tier

9. n Tier
UI CBL Proxies SI BL DAL

12. Win Application

13. WIN Application Vision
 Unified approach to
UI, Documents, and Media
 Integration as part of development and
experience
 Integrated, vector-based
composition engine
 Utilizing the power of the PC throughout
the graphics stack
 Declarative programming
 Bringing designers directly into
application development
 Ease of deployment
 Allowing administrators to deploy and
manage applications securely

14. No Design Protocol

15. Designer-Developer Productivity
With XAML designers &
developers can streamline
their collaboration
Designers design Developers add business logic

16. XAML

17. View ViewModel Model

18. M-V-VM

19. Security
Communication
Productivity
How to build Composite application?
Modularity
Extensibility Deployment
Multi-Language

20. Modularity Problem

21. Shell & Region == Master Page
Ribbon
App Nav
Body Pane
App’s
Status Bar

22. Prism

23. Win Application Summary
 Only .NET
 Silverlight, only Desktop browsers & WP 7
 Designer don’t like it.
 WPF is good for App’s that need full trust

24. Web Application

25. n Tire

26. n Tire

27. Web API Growth
Source: www.programmableweb.com – current APIs: 4,535

28. Embrace HTTP

29.  Devices ( Desktop, Laptop, Tablet & Smartphone)
 OS’s (Windows, Apple & Android)
 Browsers ( IE, Chrome , Firefox & Opera )

30. The problems we have
 Client  Server
 OS’s  Security
 Screen Resolution  Load Balance
 Deployment  Session
 Security  Format ( SOAP, JSON or Odata)
 Browsers
 Modularity

32. Win App’s vs. Web App’s

Thin Client Smart Client 


33. Select UI Technology
Win Forms Silverlight Web
WPF Flash Metro UI
SOAP REST OData JSON POX ??
SaaS
Server API

34. Solutions – “Power Builder”
 Dynamics CRM | xRM
 LightSwitch
 SharePoint ?
 …

35. Web Forms vs. MVC
 Events
 Web Controls
 Id
 HTML Controls
 Separation
 View State

36. Web Forms vs. MVC

37. ASP.NET AJAX vs. JQuery




38. ASP.NET MVC &
HTML 5

39. ADO.NET
2011 - EF 4.1
2010 - EF 4.0
2008 – LINQ to SQL
EF 1.0
2005 – DataSet &
Table Adapters
2003 - DataSet & DbCommand

40. Always up. Always on.
Open
Powerful Capabilities
Unlimited servers. Unlimited storage.

42. It All About Quality
An Overview

43. 







44. - 
.1
.2

45. Code Metrics
 Heat Map Report
 Health Metric
 Quality Metric

46. Heat Map Report
Architectural Layer
Component Name Component Name Component Name
82 77 85 82 77 85 82 77 85
Hlth Qlty Cvg Hlth Qlty Cvg Hlth Qlty Cvg

47. Heat Map Report – in details
 Health Metric
Component Name
The % of classes that were identified as healthy
(Non Toxic) Target: 85% Refractor when< 70%. 82 77 85
 Quality Metric
The average Pyramid score of sub packages
Target: 80% Refractor when < 70%.
 Coverage Metric
The % of Test Visited Sequence Points
Target: 85%.
 RAG Status
Red < 60 Amber < 75 > Green
Hlth Qlty Cvg

48. Questions?

49. Thanks 