O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.

Assessment Of Risk Mitigation

3.529 visualizações

Publicada em

  • Login to see the comments

Assessment Of Risk Mitigation

  1. 1. Assessment of Risk MitigationStrategiesPresented b y:Eneni Oduw oleGroup Head, Operational Risk Mgt.Guaranty Trust Bank Plc
  2. 2. OutlineWhat is Risk AssessmentCase StudyProcess for Assessing RiskOptions for Evaluating RiskEvaluation of Mitigation Strategies
  3. 3. What is Risk Assessment?A logical and objective (qualitative / quantitative)approach to analyzing and interpreting data with thepurpose of PREDICTING possible adverse eff ectsA formal way to CALCULAT E risk so that informeddecisions can be made; it bears an element ofuncertainty Risk = Exposure . Exposure Limit
  4. 4. Case StudyIn 2007, the senior management of CSBank Ltd decided tolook for better ways to use its IT infrastructure andinvestments to prudently and effectively support growthThe Bank had grown rapidly as a result of both acquisitionsand the entrepreneurial cultures in its lines of business whichresulted in difficulties in managing the organization s ITlandscapeIt hopes to achieve first mover advantage with new businessopportunities that emerge, the use of initiative is encouragedamongst business unit headsWhat are the major risks faced by this Bank?
  5. 5. Process for Assessing RiskReview strategy & business modelIdentify gaps between desired and actual resultsConduct risk assessment (identi fies prevalent risks) f2Assess impact & f requencyDevelop & implement controlsReassess risk exposures and controlsCommunicate and document f indings
  6. 6. Slide 5f2 comma inserted funmilayo.phillips, 04/07/2011
  7. 7. Options for Evaluati ng RiskConducting Periodic Risk AssessmentsRisk MappingMaintaining a Risk RegisterPeriodic Revie w of Contingency Plans
  8. 8. Evaluation of mitigation strategiesHow to assess risk miti gationIdentification of risk exposuresCritical evaluation of exposuresDealing with the exposures(terminate, tolerate, treat or transfer)Establishment of action plans
  9. 9. Features of Risk Mitigation StrategiesEffectiveness at business unit level: Reduction of riskexposureCost effectiveness: Risk mitigation strategy must be cheaperthan the likely loss estimateAlignment with business model: Risk controls mustseamlessly fit into the work culture and business profile of theorganisationComplexit y: The simpler the strategies, the higher the chances ofadoption by stakeholdersConsistenc y with regulatory / legal & ethicalrequirements
  10. 10. Methods of identifying risk exposuresInterview with stakeholders: one on one chatsTrend analysis: Key Risk Indicator / data analysisBrain-storming: with a group of expertsReview completed checklists, templates and surveys:should be closely monitoredNominal Group Technique: risk manager facilitates the session butdoes not lead the discussionDelphi Technique: reduces chaos
  11. 11. Interview with Experts 10
  12. 12. Trend Analysis 11
  13. 13. Checklist, Templates and Sur veys 12
  14. 14. Brainstorming 13
  15. 15. Nominal Group (NGT ) & Delphi Techniques 14
  16. 16. Process for NGT 15
  17. 17. Process for Delphi T echnique 16
  18. 18. Critical evaluation of Risk ExposuresDefine Exposure Groups ( EGs)Define Exposure ProfilesAscertain likel y frequency of occurrenceDetermine estimated impact on business (w hetherfinancial or non -financial)Determine overall risk ratingDecide acceptabilit y of the risk profile For each EG
  19. 19. Dealing with the Risk Exposur esTerminate : when cost is higher than benefit; no competencies formanaging riskTolerate: when cost is within risk appetite levels or insignificant tobenefit; no brainerTreat: when benefit from business venture is seriously threatened;staff and business model / structure can implement and supportcontrolTransfer: when benefit is threatened but staff / business modelmay not support required control (risk may be shared or transferredcompletely)
  20. 20. Considerations for selecting Action PlansPolicy Changes: Consider regulatory / legal / ethical issues such asmodifications of banking & related policiesIn-House Actions: Consider appropriate plans that would fit intothe organization s business strategy / model / structure, and cultureSimplicity: Action plans should be rid of complexities / complexmethodologies which might sabotage the correction process; new process/ control should be easy for auditors to reviewImplementation: Incorporation of related activities into routinebusiness processes should be seamless; relevant parties should becarried alongReview: Tracking of implementation should be easy; effectiveness ofcontrol should be tested periodically
  21. 21. Thank you...

×