Anúncio

group 16 hezberg's theory of motivation.pptx

15 de Sep de 2022
Anúncio

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Anúncio

group 16 hezberg's theory of motivation.pptx

  1. HEZBERG’S THEORY OF MANAGEMENT
  2. • GROUP 16 • Tendai B Mavunganidze R180607S • Tatenda Mabheka R180877S • Tariro Yedwa R181096S
  3. • HEZBERG’S THEORY OF MOTIVATION Factors of motivation Factors of hygiene Advantages Loopholes of the theory Critisism .
  4. • HEZBERG’S THEORY OF MOTIVATION It is one of the content theories of motivation. These attempt to explain the factors that motivate individuals through identifying and satisfying their individual needs, desires and aims persued to satisfy these needs. It is known as a two factor content theory which is based upon the deceptively simple idea that motivation can be separated into hygiene factors and motivation factors and it is often refered to as two need system. These two separate’’ needs’’ are the need to avoid unpleasantness and discomfort and at the end of motivational scale, the need for personal development.
  5. • The theory is based on considerable empirical evidence specifically on the principles that people are motivated torwards what satisfies them, and away from what dissatisfies them as indicated by (McKenna, 2000). • The motivating factors are not in the environment but the intrinsic value and job satisfication gained from the job itself. • The theory suggest that motivatorscause happy feelings or positive job attitudes because they satisfy the individual needs until self actualisation is reached which is thought to be ultimate goal as indicated by Maslow (Hezberg 1968).
  6. • Thus, the presents of motivators has the potential to create job satisfication and serves to motivate the individual to superior effort and performance but their absence does not cause dissatification rather there will be no positive motivation (Tietjen et al.,1998).
  7. • MOTIVATION FACTORS ARE: 1. The sense of achievement and the intrinsic value obtained from the job itself. 2. The level of responsibility 3. opportunities for advancement 4. the level of recognition by both colleagues and management. 5. Status provided.
  8. HYGIENE FACTORS • They are also called job dissatisfiers. • They are needed to remove unpleasentness at work and prevent unfair treatment. • Hygiene factors can demotivate the individual and reduce their performance. • The important factor is that attention to these hygiene factors prevents dissatification but does not necessarily provide positive motivation.
  9. • hygiene factors 1. Job security 2. Working conditions 3. The quality of management 4. Administration 5. Organisational policy 6. Interpersonal relations.
  10. ADVANTAGES OF HEZBERGS THEORY OF MOTIVATION 1. It is a rational approach to motivation. It helps in understanding the effect of job content on motivation of employees. 2. It explains the significance of job enrichment on the job redesign and motivation. 3. It clearly distinguishes between the factors that motivate employees on the job and the factors that maintain employees on the job. 4. It recommends specific measures to improve motivational levels.
  11. LOOPHOLES OF THE THEORY 1. The two factor theory overlooks situational variables. 2. No comprehensive measure of satisfaction is used. For instance, an employee can find their job acceptable despite the fact that he or she may object a part of his job. 3. The theory lays much emphasis on motivators and ignores the impact of hygiene factors on motivation.
  12. CRITICISM OF THE THEORY 1. The criticism is directed at the method of research and data collection . The interviews are defensive since information will always be defensive and biased. 2. The validity of deductions drawn by Hezberg is also questionable. Hezberg failed to recognize the existence of substantial individual differences. Different individuals might have different needs hence different motivators 3. Job enrichment. The theory has given too much emphasis on job enrichment and has totally ignored job satisfaction of workers. 4. The theory’s realibility is uncertain, an analysis has to be made by raters and the raters may spoil the findings by anaylsing the same response in a different manner.
  13. • The end
Anúncio