O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Próximos SlideShares
Ring Splint
Ring Splint
Carregando em…3
×

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 16 Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Semelhante a CIMT (20)

Anúncio

Mais recentes (20)

CIMT

  1. 1. CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY
  2. 2. CIMT (or CI therapy) is a type of treatment of clients with motor system limitations that combines constraint or immobilization of the unaffected arm with forced use of the affected limb. # INTRODUCTION o A hand mitt or sling is used to constrain the use of the unaffected upper limb while the affected limb is engaged in a forced-use, mass practice meaningful motor task.
  3. 3. CIMT and the learned nonuse theory are based on deafferentation experiments in monkeys done by Dr. Edward Taub. # HISTORY o Early primate studies demonstrated that if the upper limb was surgically impaired by dorsal rhizotomy to disrupt afferent input to the sensory cortex. o the animal stopped using the limb for function. o Active mobility was restored by immobilizing the intact upper limb for several days while training the animal to use the affected limb.
  4. 4. The first report of CIMT for hemiparesis in humans was by Ostendorf and Wolf in 1981. o CIMT has been shown to be an effective therapy in persons with chronic stroke who have sufficient residual motor control to benefit from the exercises. o It is useful in brain-injured patients, in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy, and in patients with Parkinson disease. o hemiparesis, incomplete spinal cord injury, and fractured hip. o Other diverse chronic disabling conditions, including nonmotor disorder such as phantom limb pain may also benefit from CIMT
  5. 5. CIMT is based on the theory that impairment in hand and arm function in clients after a stroke is compounded by learned nonuse of that affected upper extremity, which leads to a physical change in the cortical representation of the upper limb in the primary sensory cortex. Learned Non-use Result of an upper motor neuron lesion that depresses the central nervous system and motor activity after a stroke Use of the uninvolved extremity more often to compensate for lack of movement in the involved extremity Learn to NOT use the involved extremity
  6. 6. o Learned nonuse develops in the early stages after a stroke in humans as the patient compensates for difficulty using the impaired limb by increasing reliance on the intact limb. o This compensation will hinder the recovery of function in the impaired limb
  7. 7. CIMT works by encouraging re-organisation of the brain so that a larger part becomes active when the person uses their weaker arm. The person also develops an improved awareness and motivation to use their weaker arm thereby overcoming the cycle of learned non-use. Goals: o Purposeful movements when performing functional tasks. o Improve the use of the affected limb o Cortical Reorganization: teaches the brain to grow new neural pathways
  8. 8. CIMT involves two main components: 1. Restraint of the unaffected arm using a mitt, sling or cast to encourage use of the weaker arm 2. Repetitive practice of functional tasks with the weaker hand. # COMPONENTS
  9. 9. These criteria includes: o The ability to start from a resting position of forearm pronation and wrist flexion o Actively extend each metacarpal-phalangeal and interphalangeal joint at least 10 degrees o Extend the wrist at least 20 degrees through a ROM. # CRITERIA FOR THE INCLUSION
  10. 10. # PROTOCOL/PROCEDURE o Restraint of the unaffected arm with a mitt, sling, or glove for 90% of waking hours for a 2- to 3-week period o therapeutic sessions with physical and occupational therapy in which patients concentrate on intense, repetitive task training of the more affected upper extremity for 8 hours a day. (typically 6 to 7 hours) o The clients must reinforce this training in home activities and ADLs
  11. 11. o Activities may include picking up or stacking small objects and functional everyday tasks o The therapist’s role is to give tactile and verbal feedback and instruction, along with assistance for the desired skill training. o Clients must keep a daily treatment diary to document the amount and intensity of therapeutic intervention and the amount of time spent wearing the mitt or sling each day for the duration of the intervention
  12. 12. o Acquisition of new motor skills o Increased use of the affected arm in functional activities such as dressing, eating, tying shoe laces and brushing teeth o Improved quality of movement o Enhanced independence with everyday tasks o Improved sense of well being o Improved quality of life # BENEFITS OF CIMT
  13. 13. o Typically for patients with higher level of function o Time consuming and longer period of treatment o Patient endures many hours of frustration which may affect active participation of the patient o Longer treatment = higher cost to patient o Not reimbursable through insurance o Acute CIMT can be harmful by increasing the size of the lesion # DISADVANTAGES
  14. 14. 1. Physical rehabilitation, Susan B O’Sullivan 6th edition 2. Neurological Rehabilitation, Darcy A Umphred 6th edition 3. Taub, E. et al. Constraint induced manual therapy and massed practice. Stroke. 2000; 31:983-991. 4. https://www.rehabbasics.co.uk/constraint-induced-movement-therapy- cimt/#:~:text=CIMT%20works%20by%20encouraging%20reorganisation,cycle %20of%20learned%20non%2Duse. 5. https://www.physio.co.uk/treatments/paediatric-physiotherapy/constraint- induced-movement-therapy-cimt.php # REFERENCES
  15. 15. J.S Tedla et al, (2022) conducted a study on “Effectiveness of Constraint- Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) on Balance and Functional Mobility in the Stroke Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” reviewed 161 studies from Google Scholar, EBSCO, PubMed, PEDro, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science and included eight randomized controlled trials (RCT) in this study. This results showed positive effects of CIMT on balance in three studies and similar effects in five studies when compared to the control interventions such as neuro developmental treatment, modified forced-use therapy and conventional physical therapy. a meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant effect size by a standardized mean difference of 0.51 (P = 0.01), showing that the groups who received CIMT had improved more than the control groups. For more details # RECENT STUDY
  16. 16. PRESENTED BY: DINU DIXON MPT (NEUROLOGY) HANKS

×