CrossMark Prototype Demo 2010 Annual Meeting

2.161 visualizações

Publicada em

This presentation has been updated. See http://www.slideshare.net/CrossRef/introduction-to-crossmark for the latest information.

Publicada em: Negócios, Tecnologia
1 comentário
1 gostou
Estatísticas
Notas
Sem downloads
Visualizações
Visualizações totais
2.161
No SlideShare
0
A partir de incorporações
0
Número de incorporações
12
Ações
Compartilhamentos
0
Downloads
15
Comentários
1
Gostaram
1
Incorporações 0
Nenhuma incorporação

Nenhuma nota no slide
  • The idea that journals should be published and preserved in amber doesn’t work in a web world.
  •   The publisher has an ongoing responsibility to correct the literature that they certify and publish.
  • NISO released a working paper on Journal article Versions. Publishers are concerned with versions starting with the Version of Record and beyond.
  • It’s time for the idea of a “final version” of an article to rest in peace.
  • The “other” metadata can include information like content types, the peer review process used, conflict of interest statements, funding sources, license types, location of data deposits...and more.
  • Here’s a PDF that includes the CrossMark logo. It too is clickable...
  • Still working on which logo is more clickable--we’ll probably change the text to “click for updates” based on feedback from our usability studies.
  • Here’s the case when though the article looks like it is on the publisher’s site, it is actually hosted at a domain that the publisher didn’t designate as “maintained”. The user gets a warning.
  • CrossMark Prototype Demo 2010 Annual Meeting

    1. 1. Business Development & Marketing Carol Anne Meyer CrossMark CrossRef Annual Member Meeting 16 November 2010 Thursday, December 2, 2010
    2. 2. Agenda • What is CrossMark? • How Does it Look? A Demo • What Does it Cost? • How Does it Work? • What’s the Schedule? • What do Publishers Have to Do? • Thursday, December 2, 2010
    3. 3. How Does a Researcher Know What to Trust? • Author name • Affiliation • How many times something has been cited • On a reputable web site (publisher or journal brand) • Ratings, Comments Thursday, December 2, 2010
    4. 4. How Does a Researcher Know if an Article is Up to Date? Thursday, December 2, 2010
    5. 5. How Does a Researcher Know if an Article is Up to Date? Thursday, December 2, 2010
    6. 6. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    7. 7. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    8. 8. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    9. 9. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    10. 10. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    11. 11. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    12. 12. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    13. 13. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    14. 14. Publisher Concerns Thursday, December 2, 2010
    15. 15. Publisher Concerns • Readers might choose unmaintained copies of articles Thursday, December 2, 2010
    16. 16. Publisher Concerns • Readers might choose unmaintained copies of articles • Negative impact on subscription revenue Thursday, December 2, 2010
    17. 17. Publisher Concerns • Readers might choose unmaintained copies of articles • Negative impact on subscription revenue • Negative impact on usage statistics Thursday, December 2, 2010
    18. 18. Publisher Concerns • Readers might choose unmaintained copies of articles • Negative impact on subscription revenue • Negative impact on usage statistics • Readers will not benefit from functionality on the publisher’s site Thursday, December 2, 2010
    19. 19. Publisher Concerns • Readers might choose unmaintained copies of articles • Negative impact on subscription revenue • Negative impact on usage statistics • Readers will not benefit from functionality on the publisher’s site • Readers might cite “incorrect” versions instead of the maintainedVersion of Record Thursday, December 2, 2010
    20. 20. Specific Correction Problems Mentioned • Interlibrary loan • Downloaded PDFs • Printed articles. The lack of awareness of corrections or updates could be particularly problematic in medicine and related fields. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    21. 21. “The Web is by nature an interactive environment, yet online journals are mostly static, befitting their traditional role as a never-changing scholarly record.” Thursday, December 2, 2010
    22. 22. erratum corrigendum updates enhancements withdrawals retractions new editions Thursday, December 2, 2010
    23. 23. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    24. 24. Version of Record Enhanced VoR Corrected VoR Thursday, December 2, 2010
    25. 25. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    26. 26. What is CrossMark? • A logo that identifies a publisher certified version of record • Clicking the logo tells you • If the copy is publisher-maintained and whether there have been any corrections • Where the publisher-maintained version is • Other metadata the publisher chooses to include Thursday, December 2, 2010
    27. 27. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    28. 28. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    29. 29. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    30. 30. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    31. 31. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    32. 32. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    33. 33. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    34. 34. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    35. 35. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    36. 36. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    37. 37. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    38. 38. click for updates Thursday, December 2, 2010
    39. 39. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    40. 40. We are working to make the boxes easier to read at a glance and to refine the language. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    41. 41. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    42. 42. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    43. 43. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    44. 44. What Does it Cost? Thursday, December 2, 2010
    45. 45. What Does it Cost? Current content: 20¢ Backfile content: 2¢ Thursday, December 2, 2010
    46. 46. What Does it Cost? Current content: 20¢ Backfile content: 2¢ Current Content: published in the past two years. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    47. 47. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    48. 48. • Participation is optional Thursday, December 2, 2010
    49. 49. • Participation is optional • Participants maintain their content Thursday, December 2, 2010
    50. 50. • Participation is optional • Participants maintain their content • Participants agree to keep CrossMark metadata up to date! Thursday, December 2, 2010
    51. 51. • Participation is optional • Participants maintain their content • Participants agree to keep CrossMark metadata up to date! • Participants adhere to logo display guidelines Thursday, December 2, 2010
    52. 52. • Participation is optional • Participants maintain their content • Participants agree to keep CrossMark metadata up to date! • Participants adhere to logo display guidelines • Participants link (via DOI) to explanatory “policy”page Thursday, December 2, 2010
    53. 53. • Participation is optional • Participants maintain their content • Participants agree to keep CrossMark metadata up to date! • Participants adhere to logo display guidelines • Participants link (via DOI) to explanatory “policy”page • Anything with a CrossRef DOI can have a CrossMark Thursday, December 2, 2010
    54. 54. What do Publishers Have to do? • Deposit CrossMark metadata • Can be with, or after CrossRef DOI deposit • Update CrossMark metadata • Display CrossMark logo on HTML publication pages (there’s a widget for that) • Add CrossMark metadata to PDFs. • Add linked CrossMark logo to PDFs. can help • Decide on and collect optional metadata Thursday, December 2, 2010
    55. 55. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    56. 56. • A few publishers will pilot CrossMark starting in December. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    57. 57. • A few publishers will pilot CrossMark starting in December. • Launch scheduled for next April. Thursday, December 2, 2010
    58. 58. Any Questions? Thursday, December 2, 2010

    ×