NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
CrossMark Prototype Demo 2010 Annual Meeting
1. Business Development & Marketing
Carol Anne Meyer
CrossMark
CrossRef Annual Member Meeting
16 November 2010
Thursday, December 2, 2010
2. Agenda
• What is CrossMark?
• How Does it Look? A Demo
• What Does it Cost?
• How Does it Work?
• What’s the Schedule?
• What do Publishers Have to Do?
•
Thursday, December 2, 2010
3. How Does a Researcher
Know What to Trust?
• Author name
• Affiliation
• How many times something has been cited
• On a reputable web site (publisher or journal
brand)
• Ratings, Comments
Thursday, December 2, 2010
4. How Does a Researcher Know
if an Article is Up to Date?
Thursday, December 2, 2010
5. How Does a Researcher Know
if an Article is Up to Date?
Thursday, December 2, 2010
16. Publisher Concerns
• Readers might choose unmaintained copies of
articles
• Negative impact on subscription revenue
Thursday, December 2, 2010
17. Publisher Concerns
• Readers might choose unmaintained copies of
articles
• Negative impact on subscription revenue
• Negative impact on usage statistics
Thursday, December 2, 2010
18. Publisher Concerns
• Readers might choose unmaintained copies of
articles
• Negative impact on subscription revenue
• Negative impact on usage statistics
• Readers will not benefit from functionality on
the publisher’s site
Thursday, December 2, 2010
19. Publisher Concerns
• Readers might choose unmaintained copies of
articles
• Negative impact on subscription revenue
• Negative impact on usage statistics
• Readers will not benefit from functionality on
the publisher’s site
• Readers might cite “incorrect” versions instead
of the maintainedVersion of Record
Thursday, December 2, 2010
20. Specific Correction Problems
Mentioned
• Interlibrary loan
• Downloaded PDFs
• Printed articles.
The lack of awareness of corrections or updates could be particularly problematic in
medicine and related fields.
Thursday, December 2, 2010
21. “The Web is by nature an interactive environment,
yet online journals are mostly static, befitting their
traditional role as a never-changing scholarly record.”
Thursday, December 2, 2010
26. What is CrossMark?
• A logo that identifies a publisher certified
version of record
• Clicking the logo tells you
• If the copy is publisher-maintained and whether
there have been any corrections
• Where the publisher-maintained version is
• Other metadata the publisher chooses to include
Thursday, December 2, 2010
49. • Participation is optional
• Participants maintain their content
Thursday, December 2, 2010
50. • Participation is optional
• Participants maintain their content
• Participants agree to keep CrossMark metadata
up to date!
Thursday, December 2, 2010
51. • Participation is optional
• Participants maintain their content
• Participants agree to keep CrossMark metadata
up to date!
• Participants adhere to logo display guidelines
Thursday, December 2, 2010
52. • Participation is optional
• Participants maintain their content
• Participants agree to keep CrossMark metadata
up to date!
• Participants adhere to logo display guidelines
• Participants link (via DOI) to explanatory
“policy”page
Thursday, December 2, 2010
53. • Participation is optional
• Participants maintain their content
• Participants agree to keep CrossMark metadata
up to date!
• Participants adhere to logo display guidelines
• Participants link (via DOI) to explanatory
“policy”page
• Anything with a CrossRef DOI can have a
CrossMark
Thursday, December 2, 2010
54. What do Publishers
Have to do?
• Deposit CrossMark metadata
• Can be with, or after CrossRef DOI deposit
• Update CrossMark metadata
• Display CrossMark logo on HTML publication pages
(there’s a widget for that)
• Add CrossMark metadata to PDFs.
• Add linked CrossMark logo to PDFs.
can help
• Decide on and collect optional metadata
Thursday, December 2, 2010
The idea that journals should be published and preserved in amber doesn’t work in a web world.
The publisher has an ongoing responsibility to correct the literature that they certify and publish.
NISO released a working paper on Journal article Versions. Publishers are concerned with versions starting with the Version of Record and beyond.
It’s time for the idea of a “final version” of an article to rest in peace.
The “other” metadata can include information like content types, the peer review process used, conflict of interest statements, funding sources, license types, location of data deposits...and more.
Here’s a PDF that includes the CrossMark logo. It too is clickable...
Still working on which logo is more clickable--we’ll probably change the text to “click for updates” based on feedback from our usability studies.
Here’s the case when though the article looks like it is on the publisher’s site, it is actually hosted at a domain that the publisher didn’t designate as “maintained”. The user gets a warning.