An introduction to Qualitative Methods in Psychology. Intended mostly for UG/PG students. Conveys the essentials of Ontology and Epistemology and moves on to the popular methods in Qualitative Psychological Research
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Qualitative methods in Psychology Research
1. Qualitative Methods in Psychology
Theory and Practice
Chinchu C
Psychologist, Trainer & Research Consultant
Association for Social Change, Evolution and
Transformation(ASCENT)
2. How do we know truth?
Nimmy, the lady
claims that Misha,
their cat loves her ‘The
Most’ than anybody
else in the world
And John, her
boyfriend, claims
Misha loves him more
How do we know what is True ?
Image Courtesy: https://laughingsquid.com,
Concept and Content Courtesy: ANNEMARIE ZAND SCHOLTEN, University of Amsterdam
3. Idealism: Reality exists only in our minds.
Realism: External reality exists; Universal concepts like ‘Love’ and
‘Gravity’ exist too.
Objectivism: Applies Realism. External Psychological and Social
Phenomena (Intelligence, Social Cohesion…) exist.
Constructivism: Social Phenomena are mental constructions.
Meaning of ‘Happiness’ or ‘Femininity/Masculinity’ depend on
culture and contexts
Interpretivism: Applies Constructivism: The observer’s
experience can be different from the participant’s experience
Hermeneutics(വ്യാഖ്യാനം), Phenomenology(How people
experience the world) and Verstehen (Empathic Understanding)
Does a ‘Truth’ exist?
4. Qualitative Research generally applies a Constructivist-
Interpretivist view
Unstructured Interview, Participant Observation etc.
Quantitative Research generally applies an Objectivist-
Positivist approach
Focuses on counting, measuring and generalizing.
None of these should be taken as water tight
compartments.
What we need is Mixed Methods where both methods
complement each other, especially in fields like
Psychology
The Fundamental Approaches
5. But why Mixed Methods?
We have all seen such surveys. Is this Qualitative or Quantitative?
Courtesy: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net
Capital Punishment = വ്ധശിക്ഷ
6. Did the respondent understand the term "capital punishment"?
Does the respondent have any idea about alternatives to capital
punishment (otherwise how can they judge what's "best")?
Did the respondent read carefully enough to determine that the
statement was limited only to convicted murderers (for instance,
rapists were not included)?
Does the respondent care or were they just circling anything
arbitrarily?
Was the respondent mentally alert (especially if this is late in a
long survey or the respondent had other things going on earlier
in the day)?
What was the setting for the survey (e.g., lighting, noise and
other distractions)?
Was the survey anonymous? Was it confidential?
In the respondent's mind, is the difference between a "1" and a
"2" the same as between a "2" and a "3" (i.e., is this an interval
scale?)?
7. Data needs to be as naturalistic as possible (ഒട്ടം രൂപമാറ്റം
വ്രാതെ)
Researcher is the tool
Validation is done during the earlier stages itself.
Real-life data collection can also enhance validity
Reflexivity is incorporated for continuous scrutiny.
Personal Reflexivity : How your own values, expectations, beliefs,
interests etc. have shaped this research
Epistemological Reflexivity: How is the design constructed, How was
the research question formed; What were the other possible
questions, their consequences…..
The issue of Reliability. How dependable the data is ? Is
replication really possible?
Some General Principles
8. “I am frequently reminded of the old joke about the
individual who explained that he was looking for his
missing keys under the street lamp because ‘the
light is better there’ . . . The ‘street lamp’ draws us
to it by its apparent capacity to facilitate our
search”
Lorion, R.P. (1990) Evaluating HIV risk reduction efforts: ten
lessons from psychotherapy and prevention outcome strategies,
Journal of Community Psychology, 18: 325–36
Framing your Research Question
9. Semi-Structured Interview is an effective
tool for data collection
Used in
Phenomenology,
Grounded Theory,
Thematic Analysis…
Interview as a Data Collection Tool
10. FGD can be more productive than personal interviews
because of its collaborative nature
The researcher should be aware of group dynamics at
play
Less artificial than interviews
Researcher plays the role of moderator
6 to 8 participants
Interactions should be similar to normal, real-life
discourse
FGD as Data Collection Tool
11. Done in Natural settings
Can be Structured or Unstructured
Used heavily in Ethnography and Action Research
Involves Participation, Documentation, Informal
Interviewing, and Reflection
Substantive, Methodological and Analytical notes need
to be taken
Participation is of utmost importance in Participant
Observation. Mere Observation won’t suffice
Observation Schedules may come in handy
Observation
12. Interpretation has a long history, beginning from classical
hermeneutics to the data science and social media analysis
Realist interpretation: A straight forward description of events
Phenomenological Interpretation : Mapping the experiences of
the actors
Social Constructionist Interpretation: Deconstructing the
narration/event, with assuming different perspectives
Interpretations can be based on Suspicion or Empathy
Suspicion: To reveal a hidden truth; working like a detective.
Remember Freud. Involves some assumptions
Empathy : Trying to get close to the experience of the subject.
No underlying assumptions. Not necessarily tied to theories
The role of Interpretation
13. Thematic Analysis
Case Studies
Phenomenology
Grounded Theory
Discursive Psychology (Discourse Analysis)
Narrative Analysis
Visual Methods
Some Methods
14. A form of pattern-seeking in data.
Can be used to address Realist, Phenomenological or
Constructionist questions
What do I want to know & What data do I collect: Both questions
answered by the Research Question
Coding – Inductive ( Coding frame emerges from data) or
Deductive ( pre-existing coding frame)
Second level of coding (Categorization) can be done before
theme identification
Mere listing of themes is not the goal. You should make sense of
the themes, their possible inner meanings, implications, an
overall story that connects the identified themes … etc.
Thematic Analysis
15. Focus on the particular, not general (Idiographic approach)
Attention to Contexts
Triangulation is used
Temporal element ( Describes changes over time)
Concerned with Theory
Intrinsic V/s Instrumental
Single V/s Multiple
Descriptive V/s Explanatory
Naturalist V/s Pragmatic
Case Studies
16. Study of Subjective Experiences; Draws largely from Husserl
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) is used widely in
Psychology
It attempts to describe the experiences through their
interpretation by the subject
Open-ended and non-directive interviewing
Analysis should record both experience and interpretation
Reading Identifying and labeling emergent themes
Clustering themes Labeling Clusters Summarizing with
tables and quotes.
Integration of cases and layered Interpretation are optional
Writing Up
Phenomenology
17. Introduced by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (1967); they
wanted to move away from theory.
Categories: Start as descriptive labels and move on to abstract
analytic categories
Category names are in vivo
Coding: The layered process to define categories
Constant Comparative Analysis: Moving back and forth between
similarities among and differences between categories; building
up sub categories and linking categories
Negative Case Analysis: Instances that do not fit a category
Theoretical Sensitivity: Revisiting the data based on new
understanding
Grounded Theory
18. Theoretical Sampling: Collecting further data based on emerging
categories
Theoretical Saturation: A point where no new categories emerge
Memo writing: A written record of theory development; An
important part of the process
A Process for Grounded Theory
Research Question
Data Collection (Full Version/Abbreviated Version)
Data Analysis (Coding and Categorizing)
The Report (Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, Reference)
Grounded Theory
19. Fit of data and categories – Explain the Why of each
category
Theory Integration /Coherence– Relationship between units
should be clear and apparent
Reflexivity - The role and position of researcher to be
acknowledged
Proper and Comprehensive Documentation
Theoretical Sampling and Negative Case Analysis
Transferability : The extent of Generalization possible
Credibility: Ways to verify the findings/data
Ensuring Quality
20. Always be careful and never jump into conclusions
Criticize and question your own convictions and
Coming of Age in Samoa, Margaret Mead and Fa’apua’a Fa’amu
and Fofoa
How a single interview shook the whole field of Anthropology,
and still remains a hot topic
A word of Caution
21. Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T. and Rennie, D.L. (1999) Evolving guidelines
for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and
related fields, British Journal for Clinical Psychology, 38: 215–29
Henwood, K. and Pidgeon, N.F. (1992) Qualitative research and
psychological theorising, British Journal of Psychology, 83(1): 97–
112
Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology:
Adventures in theory and method (2nd edition ed.). Berkshire, UK:
Open University Press
References