James Perry - Challenges in Public Administration Research

160 visualizações

Publicada em

Apresentação de James Perry (editor-chefe da Public Administration Review) na mesa-redonda "A produção acadêmica em Administração Publica", integrante do evento "Desafios no Campo da Administração Pública: Ensino, Profissionalização e Pesquisa".

Publicada em: Educação
  • Seja o primeiro a comentar

  • Seja a primeira pessoa a gostar disto

James Perry - Challenges in Public Administration Research

  1. 1. James L. Perry, Indiana University, Bloomington OECD Government Schools Network 2017 Organized by National School of Public Administration (ENAP) and Getúlio Vargas Foundation (FGV) June 20, 2017 Challenges in Public Administration Research
  2. 2. CONGRATULATIONS! • 50th anniversary of RAP • RAP’s bilingual status  Revista de Administração Pública  Brazilian Journal of Public Administration
  3. 3. PREVIEW • Brief comment about my evidence related to the research challenges • Research challenges • Meeting the challenges
  4. 4. FOUNDATIONS FOR MY EVIDENCE • Research career dating to 1970s • Experiences as an university administrator on three campuses • Six years as Public Administration Review Editor in Chief
  5. 5. FACTS ABOUT PAR • Nearing 77 years of publication (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.111 1/(ISSN)1540-6210) • Owned by American Society for Public Administration (ASPA), published by Wiley/Blackwell • 19 Editors in Chief since 1940 • Almost 6000 institutional subscribers globally • About 1 million downloads annually since 2015 • Two-year impact factor of 3.47
  6. 6. RESEARCH CHALLENGES Public administration should be seeking three results simultaneously: 1. Quality 2. Relevance 3. Influence
  7. 7. SOME REALITIES BEHIND THE CHALLENGES • Disposed to chase the latest fads • Short-term behaviors precipitated by reward systems, university rankings, pressures to publish in SSCI journals • Uncertain human and financial resources for high-quality research • Diversity of subjects, languages and cultures
  8. 8. QUALITY Rigor Attention Persuasiveness Perry, J.L. (2012). How Can We Improve Our Science to Generate More Usable Knowledge for Public Professionals? PAR
  9. 9. RELEVANCE Generating usable knowledge for people who are trying to improve what administrative institutions do in the public sphere Perry, J. L. (2013). Reflections about Relevance. PAR
  10. 10. INFLUENCE Translating scholarship from publication to impact • Perry, J. L. (2015). Revisiting the Core of Our Good Government Ethos. PAR • Perry, J. L. (2016) Public Administration Needs to Become a Player in the Ratings and Rankings Business. PAR
  11. 11. MEETING THE CHALLENGES • Defining research broadly as discovery, integration, application • Finding ways to address known knowledge gaps  Editors must commissioning critical content • Mitigating the scourge of specialization Structure/motivation for our scholarship • Less exclusively problem-driven research in PA • More attention to questions of practical importance in disciplinary journals (Watts 2017)
  12. 12. MEETING THE CHALLENGES: CROSSOVERS TO DISCIPLINES • Systematic reviews • PA scholarship must become much less insular • Perry, J. L. (2016). Is Public Administration Vanishing? PAR
  13. 13. ELEVATING EXPECTATIONS FOR NORMS OF QUALITY Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) extends quality norms from the journal to the research community • Data sharing • Replication Perry, J. L. (2017). Practicing What We Preach! Public Administration Review Promotes Transparency and Openness. PAR
  14. 14. BUILDING AND STRENGTHENING PRACTITIONER—RESEARCHER TIES • Research programs that generate shared interest • Creation of forums that advance mutual interests between practitioners and scholars • Developing integrative social media strategies Perry, J. L. (2015). Forging Practitioner–Scholar Partnerships. PAR Perry, J. L. (2017). Amplifying the Voices of Practitioners in PAR. PAR

×