Anúncio
Anúncio

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Apresentações para você(20)

Similar a Big Data: Setting Up the Big Data Lake(20)

Anúncio
Anúncio

Big Data: Setting Up the Big Data Lake

  1. @joe_Caserta Big Data: Setting up a Big Data Lake Joe Caserta President Caserta Concepts September 17, 2015 - New York City NEW YORK
  2. @joe_Caserta
  3. @joe_Caserta Launched Big Data practice Co-author, with Ralph Kimball, The Data Warehouse ETL Toolkit Data Analysis, Data Warehousing and Business Intelligence since 1996 Began consulting database programing and data modeling 25+ years hands-on experience building database solutions Founded Caserta Concepts Web log analytics solution published in Intelligent Enterprise Launched Data Science, Data Interaction and Cloud practices Laser focus on extending Data Analytics with Big Data solutions 1986 2004 1996 2009 2001 2013 2012 2014 Dedicated to Data Governance Techniques on Big Data (Innovation) Top 20 Big Data Consulting - CIO Review Top 20 Most Powerful Big Data consulting firms Launched Big Data Warehousing (BDW) Meetup NYC: 3,000+ Members 2015 Awarded for getting data out of SAP for data analytics Established best practices for big data ecosystem implementations Caserta Timeline Awarded Top Healthcare Analytics Solution Provider
  4. @joe_Caserta About Caserta Concepts • Consulting firm with focused expertise on Data Innovation, using Modern Data Engineering approaches to solve highly complex business data challenges • Award-winning company • Internationally recognized work force • Mentoring, Training, Knowledge Transfer • Strategy, Architecture, Implementation • An Innovation Partner • Transformative Data Strategies • Modern Data Engineering • Advanced Architecture • Leaders in architecting and implementing enterprise data solutions • Data Warehousing • Business Intelligence • Big Data Analytics • Data Science • Data on the Cloud • Data Interaction & Visualization • Strategic Consulting • Technical Design • Build & Deploy Solutions
  5. @joe_Caserta Awards and Recognitions
  6. @joe_Caserta Client Portfolio Retail/eCommerce & Manufacturing Digital Media/AdTech Education & Services Finance. Healthcare & Insurance
  7. @joe_Caserta Partners
  8. @joe_Caserta Caserta Innovation Lab (CIL) • Internal laboratory established to test & develop solution concepts and ideas • Used to accelerate client projects • Examples: • Search (SOLR) based BI • Big Data Governance Toolkit • Text Analytics on Social Network Data • Continuous Integration / End-to-end streaming (Spark) • Recommendation Engine Optimization • Relationship Intelligence (Graph DB/Search) • Others (confidential) • CIL is hosted on
  9. @joe_Caserta Community New York City 3,000+ members Free Knowledge Sharing
  10. @joe_Caserta As a Mindful Cyborg, Chris utilizes up to 700 sensors, devices, applications, and services to track, analyze, and optimize as many areas of his existence. This quantification enables him to see the connections of otherwise invisible data, resulting in dramatic upgrades to his health, productivity, and quality of life. The Future is Today
  11. @joe_Caserta The Progression of Data Analytics Descriptive Analytics Diagnostic Analytics Predictive Analytics Prescriptive Analytics What happened? Why did it happen? What will happen? How can we make It happen? Data Analytics Sophistication BusinessValue Source: Gartner Reports  Correlations  Predictions  Recommendations Cognitive Computing / Cognitive Data Analytics 
  12. @joe_Caserta Innovation is the only sustainable competitive advantage a company can have Innovations may fail, but companies that don’t innovate will fail
  13. @joe_Caserta What’s New in Modern Data Engineering?
  14. @joe_Caserta What you need to know (according to Joe) Hadoop Distribution: Apache, Cloudera, Hortonworks, MapR, IBM  Tools:  Hive: Map data to structures and use SQL-like queries  Pig: Data transformation language for big data  Sqoop: Extracts external sources and loads Hadoop  Storm: Real-time ETL  Spark: General-purpose cluster computing framework  NoSQL:  Document: MongoDB, CouchDB  Graph: Neo4j, Titan  Key Value: Riak, Redis  Columnar: Cassandra, Hbase  Search: Lucene, Solr, ElasticSearch  Languages: Python, Java, R, Scala
  15. @joe_Caserta Enrollments Claims Finance ETL Ad-Hoc Query Horizontally Scalable Environment - Optimized for Analytics Big Data Lake Canned Reporting Big Data Analytics NoSQL Databases ETL Ad-Hoc/Canned Reporting Traditional BI Spark MapReduce Pig/Hive N1 N2 N4N3 N5 Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) Traditional EDW Others… The Evolution of Modern Data Engineering Data Science
  16. @joe_Caserta How We’ve Built Data Warehouses •Design – Top Down / Bottom Up • Customer Interviews and requirements gathering • Data Profiling •Extract Transform Load data from source to data warehouse •Create Facts and Dimensions •Put a BI tool on top •Develop reports •Data Governance
  17. @joe_Caserta The Traditional Conversation • Kimball Vs. Inmon • Dimensional vs. 3rd Normal Form • What hardware do we need (that will be ready in 6 months) • Oracle vs SQL Server, Postgres or MySQL if we were brave (and cheap) • Which ETL tool should we BUY  Informatica, Datastage? • Which BI tool should we sit on top  Business Objects, Cognos?
  18. @joe_Caserta The New Conversation • Do we need a Data Warehouse at all? • If we do, does it need to be relational? • Should we leverage Hadoop or NoSQL? • Which platform and language are we going to code in? • Which bleeding edge Apache Project should we put in production!
  19. @joe_Caserta Why Change? New technologies are great and all.. But what drives our adoption of new technologies and techniques? • Data has changed – Semistructured, Unstructured, Sparse and evolving schema • Volumes have changed  GB to TB to PB workloads • Cracks in the Armor of Traditional Data Warehousing approach! AND MOST IMPORTANTLY: Companies that innovate to leverage their data win!
  20. @joe_Caserta Cracks in the Data Warehouse Armor • Onboarding new data is difficult! • Data structures are rigid! • Data Governance is slow! • Disconnected from business needs: “Hey – I need to munge some new data to see if it has value” Wait! We have to…. Profile, analyze and conform the data Change data models and load it into dimensional models Build a semantic layer – that nobody is going to use Create a dashboard we hope someone will notice ..and then you can have at it 3-6 months later to see if it has value!
  21. @joe_Caserta Is Anyone Surprised? DWs have 70% FAILURE RATE • Semi-scientific analysis has proven the majority of data analytic projects fail.. • And of those that don’t fail, only a fraction are deemed a “success”, others just finish! • Data is just REALLY hard, especially without the right strategy What do we think the Data Governance failure rate is?
  22. @joe_Caserta Is Traditional Warehousing All Wrong? NO! The concept of a Data Warehouse is sound: •Consolidating data from disparate source systems •Clean and conformed reference data •Clean and integrated business facts •Data governance (a more pragmatic version) We can be more successful by acknowledging the EDW can’t solve all problems.
  23. @joe_Caserta So what’s missing? The Data Lake A storage and processing layer for all data • Store anything: source data, semi-structured, unstructured, structured • Keep it as long as needed • Support a number of processing workloads • Scale-out ..and here is where Hadoop can help us!
  24. @joe_Caserta Hadoop (Typically) Powers the Data Lake Hadoop Provides us: • Distributed storage  HDFS • Resource Management  YARN • Many workloads, not just Map Reduce
  25. @joe_Caserta Governing Big Data  Before Data Governance  Users trying to produce reports from raw source data  No Data Conformance  No Master Data Management  No Data Quality processes  No Trust: Two analysts were almost guaranteed to come up with two different sets of numbers!  Before Big Data Governance  We can put “anything” in Hadoop  We can analyze anything  We’re scientists, we don’t need IT, we make the rules  Rule #1: Dumping data into Hadoop with no repeatable process, procedure, or governance will create a mess  Rule #2: Information harvested from an ungoverned systems will take us back to the old days: No Trust = Not Actionable
  26. @joe_Caserta •This is the ‘people’ part. Establishing Enterprise Data Council, Data Stewards, etc.Organization •Definitions, lineage (where does this data come from), business definitions, technical metadataMetadata •Identify and control sensitive data, regulatory compliancePrivacy/Security •Data must be complete and correct. Measure, improve, certify Data Quality and Monitoring •Policies around data frequency, source availability, etc.Business Process Integration •Ensure consistent business critical data i.e. Members, Providers, Agents, etc.Master Data Management •Data retention, purge schedule, storage/archiving Information Lifecycle Management (ILM) Data Governance • Add Big Data to overall framework and assign responsibility • Add data scientists to the Stewardship program • Assign stewards to new data sets (twitter, call center logs, etc.) • Graph databases are more flexible than relational • Lower latency service required • Distributed data quality and matching algorithms • Data Quality and Monitoring (probably home grown, drools?) • Quality checks not only SQL: machine learning, Pig and Map Reduce • Acting on large dataset quality checks may require distribution • Larger scale • New datatypes • Integrate with Hive Metastore, HCatalog, home grown tables • Secure and mask multiple data types (not just tabular) • Deletes are more uncommon (unless there is regulatory requirement) • Take advantage of compression and archiving (like AWS Glacier) • Data detection and masking on unstructured data upon ingest • Near-zero latency, DevOps, Core component of business operations for Big Data
  27. @joe_Caserta Making it Right  The promise is an “agile” data culture where communities of users are encouraged to explore new datasets in new ways  New tools  External data  Data blending  Decentralization  With all the V’s, data scientists, new tools, new data we must rely LESS on HUMANS  We need more systemic administration  We need systems, tools to help with big data governance  This space is EXTREMELY immature!  Steps towards Data Governance for the Data Lake 1. Establish difference between traditional data and big data governance 2. Establish basic rules for where new data governance can be applied 3. Establish processes for graduating the products of data science to governance 4. Establish a set of tools to make governing Big Data feasible
  28. @joe_Caserta Process Architecture Communication Organization IFP Governance Administration Compliance Reporting Standards Value Proposition Risk/Reward Information Accountabilities Stewardship Architecture Enterprise Data Council Data Integrity Metrics Control Mechanisms Principles and Standards Information Usability Communication BDG provides vision, oversight and accountability for leveraging corporate information assets to create competitive advantage, and accelerate the vision of integrated delivery. Value Creation • Acts on Requirements Build Capabilities • Does the Work • Responsible for adherence Governance Committees Data Stewards Project Teams Enterprise Data Council • Executive Oversight • Prioritizes work Drives change Accountable for results Definitions Data Governance for the Data Lake
  29. @joe_Caserta Data Lake Governance Realities  Full data governance can only be applied to “Structured” data  The data must have a known and well documented schema  This can include materialized endpoints such as files or tables OR projections such as a Hive table  Governed structured data must have:  A known schema with Metadata  A known and certified lineage  A monitored, quality test, managed process for ingestion and transformation  A governed usage  Data isn’t just for enterprise BI tools anymore  We talk about unstructured data in Hadoop but more-so it’s semi- structured/structured with a definable schema.  Even in the case of unstructured data, structure must be extracted/applied in just about every case imaginable before analysis can be performed.
  30. @joe_Caserta Modern Data Quality Priorities Be Corrective Be Fast Be Transparent Be Thorough
  31. @joe_Caserta Data Quality Priorities Data Quality SpeedtoValue Fast Slow Raw Refined
  32. @joe_Caserta The Data Scientists Can Help!  Data Science to Big Data Warehouse mapping  Full Data Governance Requirements  Provide full process lineage  Data certification process by data stewards and business owners  Ongoing Data Quality monitoring that includes Quality Checks  Provide requirements for Data Lake  Proper metadata established:  Catalog  Data Definitions  Lineage  Quality monitoring  Know and validate data completeness
  33. @joe_Caserta Big Data Warehouse Data Science Workspace Data Lake – Integrated Sandbox Landing Area – Source Data in “Full Fidelity” The Big Data Pyramid Metadata  Catalog ILM  who has access, how long do we “manage it” Raw machine data collection, collect everything Data is ready to be turned into information: organized, well defined, complete. Agile business insight through data- munging, machine learning, blending with external data, development of to-be BDW facts Metadata  Catalog ILM  who has access, how long do we “manage it” Data Quality and Monitoring  Monitoring of completeness of data Metadata  Catalog ILM  who has access, how long do we “manage it” Data Quality and Monitoring  Monitoring of completeness of data  Data has different governance demands at each tier  Only top tier of the pyramid is fully governed  We refer to this as the Trusted tier of the Big Data Warehouse. Fully Data Governed ( trusted) User community arbitrary queries and reporting Usage Pattern Data Governance
  34. @joe_Caserta Peeling back the layer… The Landing Area •Source data in it’s full fidelity •Programmatically Loaded •Partitioned for data processing •No governance other than catalog and ILM (Security and Retention) •Consumers: Data Scientists, ETL Processes, Applications
  35. @joe_Caserta Data Lake •Enriched, lightly integrated •Data has been is accessible in the Hive Metastore • Either processed into tabular relations • Or via Hive Serdes directly upon Raw Data •Partitioned for data access •Governance additionally includes a guarantee of completeness •Consumers: Data Scientists, ETL Processes, Applications, Data Analysts
  36. @joe_Caserta A Note On Unstructured Data • A Structure must be extracted/applied in just about every case imaginable before analysis can be performed. • Full data governance can only be applied to “Structured” data • This can include materialized endpoints such as files or tables OR projections such as a Hive table • Governed structured data must have: • A known schema with Metadata • A known and certified lineage • A monitored, quality test, managed process for ingestion and transformation
  37. @joe_Caserta Data Science Workspace •No barrier for onboarding and analysis of new data •Blending of new data with entire Data Lake, including the Big Data Warehouse •Data Scientists enrich data with insight •Consumers: Data Scientists (cool cats) only!
  38. @joe_Caserta Big Data Warehouse •Data is Fully Governed •Data is Structured •Partitioned/tuned for data access •Governance includes a guarantee of completeness and accuracy •Consumers: Data Scientists, ETL Processes, Applications, Data Analysts, and Business Users (the masses) Big Data Warehouse
  39. @joe_Caserta The Refinery BDW Data Science Workspace Data Lake Landing Area Cool new data New Insights •The feedback loop between Data Science and Data Warehouse is critical •Successful work products of science must Graduate into the appropriate layers of the Data Lake
  40. @joe_Caserta Big Data Warehouse Technology? “Polyglot Persistence - where any decent sized enterprise will have a variety of different data storage technologies for different kinds of data. There will still be large amounts of it managed in relational stores, but increasingly we'll be first asking how we want to manipulate the data and only then figuring out what technology is the best bet for it…” - Martin Fowler (http://martinfowler.com) Abridged Version: Use the right tool for the job!
  41. @joe_Caserta Polyglot Warehouse We promote the concept that the Big Data Warehouse may live in one or more platforms •Full Hadoop Solutions •Hadoop plus MPP or Relational Supplemental technologies: •NoSQL: Columnar, Key value, Timeseries, Graph •Search Technologies
  42. @joe_Caserta Hadoop is the Data Warehouse? •Hadoop can be the entire data pyramid platform for including landing, data lake and the Big Data Warehouse •Especially serves as the Data Lake and “Refinery” •Query engines such as Hive, and Impala provide SQL support
  43. @joe_Caserta More Typical: Hadoop + Relational •Hadoop is the platform for the Data Lake and Refinery •The Active Set is federated out into MPP or Relational Platforms  Presentation Layer •Serves as a good model when there is existing MPP or Relational Data Warehouse in place
  44. @joe_Caserta On the Cloud AWS and other cloud providers present a very powerful design pattern: •S3 serves as the storage layer for the Data Lake •EMR (Elastic Hadoop) provides the Refinery, most clusters can be ephemeral •The Active Set is stored into Redshift MPP or Relational Platforms Eliminate massive on premise appliance footprint
  45. @joe_Caserta Data Warehousing is not Dead! • The principles of Data Warehousing still makes sense • Recognize gaps in feature/functionality of the Relational Database, and traditional Data Warehousing • Believe in the Data Lake and accept Tunable Governance • Think Polyglot Warehouse and use the right tool for the job
  46. @joe_Caserta What skills are needed? Modern Data Engineering/Data Preparation Domain Knowledge/Business Expertise Advanced Mathematics/ Statistics
  47. @joe_Caserta What about the tools I have? People, Processes and Business commitment is still critical! Caution: Some Assembly Required The V’s require robust tooling: Some of the most hopeful tools are brand new or in incubation! Enterprise big data implementations typically combine products with some custom built components
  48. @joe_Caserta Use Cases • Real-Time Trade Data Analytics • Comply with Dodd-Frank • Electronic Medical Record Analytics • Save lives?
  49. @joe_Caserta High Volume Trade Data Project • The equity trading arm of a large US bank needed to scale its infrastructure to enable the ability to process/parse trade data real-time and calculate aggregations/statistics ~ 1.4Million/second ~12 Billion messages/day ~240 Billon/month • The solution needed to map the raw data to a data model in memory or low latency (for real-time), while persisting mapped data to disk (for end of day reporting). • The proposed solution also needed to handle ad-hoc data requests for data analytics.
  50. @joe_Caserta The Data • Primarily FIX messages: Financial Information Exchange • Established in early 90's as a standard for trade data communication widely used throughout the industry • Basically a delimited file of variable attribute-value pairs • Looks something like this: 8=FIX.4.2 | 9=178 | 35=8 | 49=PHLX | 56=PERS | 52=20071123-05:30:00.000 | 11=ATOMNOCCC9990900 | 20=3 | 150=E | 39=E | 55=MSFT | 167=CS | 54=1 | 38=15 | 40=2 | 44=15 | 58=PHLX EQUITY TESTING | 59=0 | 47=C | 32=0 | 31=0 | 151=15 | 14=0 | 6=0 | 10=128 | • A single trade can be comprised of 100's of such messages, although typical trades have about a dozen
  51. @joe_Caserta Data Quality Rules Engine Storm Cluster Trade Data d3.js Real-time Analytics Hadoop Cluster Low Latency Analytics Atomic data Aggregates Event Monitors • The Kafka messaging system is used for ingestion • Storm is used for real-time ETL and outputs atomic data and derived data needed for analytics • Redis is used as a reference data lookup cache • Real time analytics are produced from the aggregated data. • Higher latency ad-hoc analytics are done in Hadoop using Pig and Hive Kafka High Volume Real-time Analytics Solution Architecture
  52. @joe_Caserta Electronic Medical Records (EMR) Analytics Hadoop Data LakeEdge Node ` 100k files variant 1..n … variant 1..n HDFS Put Netezza DW Sqoop Pig EMR Processor UDF Library Provider table (parquet) Member table (parquet) Python Wrapper Provider table Member table Forqlift Sequenc e Files … variant 1..n Sequenc e Files … 15 More Entities (parquet) More Dimensions And Facts • Receive Electronic Medial Records from various providers in various formats • Address Hadoop ‘small file’ problem • No barrier for onboarding and analysis of new data • Blend new data with Data Lake and Big Data Warehouse • Machine Learning • Text Analytics • Natural Language Processing • Reporting • Ad-hoc queries • File ingestion • Information Lifecycle Mgmt
  53. @joe_Caserta Some Thoughts – Enable the Future  Big Data requires the convergence of data governance, advanced data engineering, data science and business smarts  Make sure your data can be trusted and people can be held accountable for impact caused by low data quality. It takes a village to achieve all the tasks required for effective big data strategy & execution  Get experts that have done it before! Achieve the impossible….. … everything is impossible until someone does it!
  54. @joe_Caserta Workshops: www.casertaconcepts.com/training Sept 21-22 (2 days), Agile Data Warehousing taught by Lawrence Corr Sept 23-24 (2 days), ETL Architecture and Design taught by Joe Caserta (Big Data module added) SAVE $300 by using discount code: DAMANYC Agile DW & ETL Training in NYC, 2015 New York Executive Conference Center 1601 Broadway @48th St. New York, NY 10019
  55. @joe_Caserta Recommended Reading
  56. @joe_Caserta Thank You / Q&A Joe Caserta President, Caserta Concepts joe@casertaconcepts.com (914) 261-3648 @joe_Caserta

Notas do Editor

  1. Reports  correlations  predictions  recommendations
  2. Last 2 years have been more exciting than previous 27
  3. We focused our attention on building a single version of the truth We mainly applied data governance on the EDW itself and a few primary supporting systems –like MDM. We had a fairly restrictive set of tools for using the EDW data  Enterprise BI tools  It was easier to GOVERN how the data would be used.
  4. Volume, Variety, Veracity and Veolcity
  5. Spark would make this easier and could leverage same DQ code
Anúncio