SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 32
UC Impromptu Debate Guidelines
(Debate format adopted from University of Regina’s
Regina Engineering Students’ Society, Inc.)
UC Impromptu Debate
Overview
Background Information
 Use of analytical techniques to present a reasoned
point of view of a resolution
 Assess the competitors’ abilities to convey ideas
and develop arguments
 The rules normally used in debates have been
modified and relaxed to enable students with no
formal debate experience to take part.
 The debate will be conducted in a parliamentary
debate format.
General Guidelines
 The participant should be a
student of UC this semester.
 Each district shall only have one
representative.
 Vulgar words and actions will be
subject to warning then
disqualification.
 The participants should fill out
the registration forms provided
by the UCCP.
General Guidelines
 Moderators are the ones who
guide the flow of the debate
and give the resolutions.
 Participants can bring the
following during debate rounds
and prep time: pens,
paper/paper pads, books
(dictionary), and/or newspapers.
Debating Rules and Elements
Teams
 Between two teams
(proposition and opposition)
with one member each.
 Coin toss before resolutions are
revealed and winning side gets
to choose their stand.
 Teams are expected to direct all
their speeches to the audience
and the adjudicators, not to
their opponents.
Resolutions
 Set of three resolutions would be
given.
 Resolutions would be related to
issues that a Filipino university
student would have a defensible
opinion.
 It will not be truism nor
absolutism.
 Participants would cross out one
undesirable resolution and the
remaining resolution will be the
one that will be debated.
Time Allotted to
Debaters
 The speaking order and times will be as follows:
 First speech of the proposition: 5 minutes
 First speech of the opposition: 5 minutes
 Second speech of the proposition: 5 minutes
 Second speech of the opposition: 5 minutes
 Whip speech of the proposition: 2 minutes
 Whip speech of the opposition: 2 minutes
The First Speech
The first speech of the proposition must explain the interpretation
of the resolution, clearly state the principle and contention, and clarify
any definitions. If a plan case is introduced, the entire plan must be
outlined in the first speaker's speech. Finally, the first speaker must
initiate the argumentation for the contention and plan.
The Second Speech
The second speech of the proposition continues and supports the
argumentation made during first speech and reaffirms concepts that have
been attacked by the opposition. New parts of a plan may not be
introduced and terms in the resolution may not be defined. Rebuttals to
the first opposition speech, new lines of argumentation, and new
evidence, however, may be introduced.
The Whip Speech
In the Whip Speech, the most prevalent elements and issues of the
debate must be summarized in a concise and convincing manner. No new
arguments or facts may be presented unless they directly refute what
has already been discussed.
Role of the Proposition
The proposition must narrow down the resolution so that the
debate will be about one major topic. The resolutions must not be
squirreled or converted into truisms. Squirreling is the act of redefining
the resolution so that it has a meaning different than the one intended
by the resolution. The proposition must also avoid specific knowledge
debates where the average student has no familiarity with the topic.
Role of the Opposition
The opposition’s task is to convince the judges that the
proposition’s views are fallacious. If the case presented by the
proposition is a truism or requires specific knowledge to debate, the
opposition can appeal to the judges with a "point of procedure" (will be
discussed later) at the beginning of the first speech from the opposition.
If the point is well taken, then the opposition must redefine the
resolution in a debatable manner.
Role of the Opposition
If the proposition presents a principle case, the opposition is left
with little more to do than attack the principle. If the proposition
presents a plan case, the opposition can attack the principle, the
contention, or the arguments for the plan. The opposition can also show
how the plan will not work or identify the undesirable side effects that it
will create. Finally, the opposition may propose a counter plan that is
more effective that the original plan. The first speaker of the opposition
must introduce counter plans.
Questions
 The debater who currently holds
the floor has the authority to take
or ignore questions. The opponent
who wishes to ask a question
indicates their desire by simply
standing up.
 If the debater does not wish to
take the question, he or she can so
indicate by a wave of the hand or a
simple "no, thank you." If this
occurs, the inquiring party must sit
down.
Questions
If the current debater wishes to entertain
the question, it must be stated by the
opponent in less than 15 seconds.
Each debater must accept one question
during his or her speech if the opponent
is making an honest attempt to ask a
question. Three attempts at asking a
question constitutes an honest attempt.
Questions
 Questions will not be
allowed in the first or last
minute of a speech, or
during the Whip Speech.
Heckling
 Often, the speaker can
contradict himself/herself or
make an absurd assumption.
Heckling at this time will
point out the error and add
to the debate. Heckling is
acceptable if it is short, to the
point and preferably witty. If
excess heckling becomes
disturbing, the Chair may
intervene.
Points of Procedure
If a team believes that one of the rules of the debate have been
broken, they must immediately alert the Chair of the violation by standing
and saying, "Point of Procedure." The Chair will then respond with,
"Make your point." The team will then proceed to explain how the
debate rules have not been followed. Finally, the Chair will rule on the
point by saying, "Point well taken" or "Point not taken."
Points of Procedure
If it is obvious that the Chair is incorrect, the team should not
argue with the Chair, but expect the judges to compensate for the Chair’s
shortcomings. The time it takes to rise and rule on a point is not included
in the speaking time of the team currently debating.
Violations
 Unprofessional behavior
 Offensive behavior
 Truism*
 Presentation of a specific
knowledge case*
 Misquotations
 Speaking to the opposition instead
of the audience
 Presenting new arguments in the
Whip Speech
 Introduction of parts of a plan by
the second speaker
Points of Procedure
If the proposition has presented a truism or specific knowledge
case, the opposition must wait until the end of the first debater’s speech
to point this out. Moreover, if the officials have failed to follow the rules
of debate (incorrect speaking order, too much speaking time allowed,
etc.), it may be politely pointed out to them with a Point of Procedure.
Points of Procedure
If the proposition has presented a truism or specific knowledge
case, the opposition must wait until the end of the first debater’s speech
to point this out. Moreover, if the officials have failed to follow the rules
of debate (incorrect speaking order, too much speaking time allowed,
etc.), it may be politely pointed out to them with a Point of Procedure.
Procedure
Pre-Competition
These rules are to be made available to all competitors and
adjudicators at least seven (7) days (168 hours) prior to the competition.
A competition briefing will be held before the commencement of the
competition and will include the debate moderators/chairs, adjudicators,
and organizer. The debate moderators/chairs will run the briefing and
review the rules, tips, and expectations for the debates.
Presentation Order
In the preliminaries (the first four rounds), debate competition will
follow a double elimination format that ensures all teams will get to
participate in at least 2 debates. The competition begins with matches
between randomly assigned pairs of teams. The teams that will advance
to the semifinal rounds will be the top four teams and they will be chosen
from the number of their wins and from the cumulative scores given by
the adjudicators in the preliminaries.
Presentation Order
In the semifinal and final round, the debate competition will follow
a single elimination format regardless of their advantages in the
preliminaries. The third place will be determined by the points given by
the adjudicators to the losing teams in the semifinal round. The final
match will be between the winning teams in the semifinal round.
Teams may have to debate more than once. Debate organizers
must ensure that the debaters are given reasonable breaks in between
rounds.
Assessment and Judging
Judging
The debate is judged based upon the most convincing argument.
Each judge will decide individually, and the debate chair will tally the
decisions and announce the winner. The winning team will then move to
the next round.
Judging Matrix
The speakers would be individually rated according to the
following criteria:
Content (organization, veracity of content, proper substantiation,
argumentation, etc.) - 50%
Manner (decorum, persuasiveness, respectfulness, sportsmanship, etc.)
- 40%
Audience Impact - 10%
Feedback
After the conclusion of the debate and the announcement of the
winning team, adjudicators may elect to provide feedback to the
competitors in the form of writing. The organizer will provide forms that
can be used as a guideline for comments.
See you in the debate rounds!

More Related Content

Similar to UC Impromptu Debate Guidelines.pptx

Similar to UC Impromptu Debate Guidelines.pptx (20)

Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
Rules and Guidelines on Debate CompetitionRules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
 
Philosophy of debating & argumentation
Philosophy of debating & argumentationPhilosophy of debating & argumentation
Philosophy of debating & argumentation
 
Ejved adj seminar
Ejved adj seminarEjved adj seminar
Ejved adj seminar
 
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptxOregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
Argumentation and debate
Argumentation and debateArgumentation and debate
Argumentation and debate
 
AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE
AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE
AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE
 
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at GrenfellHow to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
 
Technical Meeting Debat_Gebyar FTIK.pptx
Technical Meeting Debat_Gebyar FTIK.pptxTechnical Meeting Debat_Gebyar FTIK.pptx
Technical Meeting Debat_Gebyar FTIK.pptx
 
What is debate
What is debateWhat is debate
What is debate
 
Judges Training Jan 2010
Judges Training Jan 2010Judges Training Jan 2010
Judges Training Jan 2010
 
Asian parliamentary debate: Format, Roles of speaker, victory hacks.
Asian parliamentary debate: Format, Roles of speaker, victory hacks.Asian parliamentary debate: Format, Roles of speaker, victory hacks.
Asian parliamentary debate: Format, Roles of speaker, victory hacks.
 
Debate formats-Asian Parliamentary procedure
Debate formats-Asian Parliamentary procedureDebate formats-Asian Parliamentary procedure
Debate formats-Asian Parliamentary procedure
 
MSR Law Debsoc Novice Briefing Main
MSR Law Debsoc Novice Briefing MainMSR Law Debsoc Novice Briefing Main
MSR Law Debsoc Novice Briefing Main
 
Debate 101 oktafia
Debate 101   oktafiaDebate 101   oktafia
Debate 101 oktafia
 
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptxDEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
UNEP_workshop_(1).pdf
UNEP_workshop_(1).pdfUNEP_workshop_(1).pdf
UNEP_workshop_(1).pdf
 
Summary of debate
Summary of debateSummary of debate
Summary of debate
 
Presentation on Debate
Presentation on DebatePresentation on Debate
Presentation on Debate
 

Recently uploaded

1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
QucHHunhnh
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 

UC Impromptu Debate Guidelines.pptx

  • 1. UC Impromptu Debate Guidelines (Debate format adopted from University of Regina’s Regina Engineering Students’ Society, Inc.)
  • 2. UC Impromptu Debate Overview Background Information  Use of analytical techniques to present a reasoned point of view of a resolution  Assess the competitors’ abilities to convey ideas and develop arguments  The rules normally used in debates have been modified and relaxed to enable students with no formal debate experience to take part.  The debate will be conducted in a parliamentary debate format.
  • 3. General Guidelines  The participant should be a student of UC this semester.  Each district shall only have one representative.  Vulgar words and actions will be subject to warning then disqualification.  The participants should fill out the registration forms provided by the UCCP.
  • 4. General Guidelines  Moderators are the ones who guide the flow of the debate and give the resolutions.  Participants can bring the following during debate rounds and prep time: pens, paper/paper pads, books (dictionary), and/or newspapers.
  • 6. Teams  Between two teams (proposition and opposition) with one member each.  Coin toss before resolutions are revealed and winning side gets to choose their stand.  Teams are expected to direct all their speeches to the audience and the adjudicators, not to their opponents.
  • 7. Resolutions  Set of three resolutions would be given.  Resolutions would be related to issues that a Filipino university student would have a defensible opinion.  It will not be truism nor absolutism.  Participants would cross out one undesirable resolution and the remaining resolution will be the one that will be debated.
  • 8. Time Allotted to Debaters  The speaking order and times will be as follows:  First speech of the proposition: 5 minutes  First speech of the opposition: 5 minutes  Second speech of the proposition: 5 minutes  Second speech of the opposition: 5 minutes  Whip speech of the proposition: 2 minutes  Whip speech of the opposition: 2 minutes
  • 9. The First Speech The first speech of the proposition must explain the interpretation of the resolution, clearly state the principle and contention, and clarify any definitions. If a plan case is introduced, the entire plan must be outlined in the first speaker's speech. Finally, the first speaker must initiate the argumentation for the contention and plan.
  • 10. The Second Speech The second speech of the proposition continues and supports the argumentation made during first speech and reaffirms concepts that have been attacked by the opposition. New parts of a plan may not be introduced and terms in the resolution may not be defined. Rebuttals to the first opposition speech, new lines of argumentation, and new evidence, however, may be introduced.
  • 11. The Whip Speech In the Whip Speech, the most prevalent elements and issues of the debate must be summarized in a concise and convincing manner. No new arguments or facts may be presented unless they directly refute what has already been discussed.
  • 12. Role of the Proposition The proposition must narrow down the resolution so that the debate will be about one major topic. The resolutions must not be squirreled or converted into truisms. Squirreling is the act of redefining the resolution so that it has a meaning different than the one intended by the resolution. The proposition must also avoid specific knowledge debates where the average student has no familiarity with the topic.
  • 13. Role of the Opposition The opposition’s task is to convince the judges that the proposition’s views are fallacious. If the case presented by the proposition is a truism or requires specific knowledge to debate, the opposition can appeal to the judges with a "point of procedure" (will be discussed later) at the beginning of the first speech from the opposition. If the point is well taken, then the opposition must redefine the resolution in a debatable manner.
  • 14. Role of the Opposition If the proposition presents a principle case, the opposition is left with little more to do than attack the principle. If the proposition presents a plan case, the opposition can attack the principle, the contention, or the arguments for the plan. The opposition can also show how the plan will not work or identify the undesirable side effects that it will create. Finally, the opposition may propose a counter plan that is more effective that the original plan. The first speaker of the opposition must introduce counter plans.
  • 15. Questions  The debater who currently holds the floor has the authority to take or ignore questions. The opponent who wishes to ask a question indicates their desire by simply standing up.  If the debater does not wish to take the question, he or she can so indicate by a wave of the hand or a simple "no, thank you." If this occurs, the inquiring party must sit down.
  • 16. Questions If the current debater wishes to entertain the question, it must be stated by the opponent in less than 15 seconds. Each debater must accept one question during his or her speech if the opponent is making an honest attempt to ask a question. Three attempts at asking a question constitutes an honest attempt.
  • 17. Questions  Questions will not be allowed in the first or last minute of a speech, or during the Whip Speech.
  • 18. Heckling  Often, the speaker can contradict himself/herself or make an absurd assumption. Heckling at this time will point out the error and add to the debate. Heckling is acceptable if it is short, to the point and preferably witty. If excess heckling becomes disturbing, the Chair may intervene.
  • 19. Points of Procedure If a team believes that one of the rules of the debate have been broken, they must immediately alert the Chair of the violation by standing and saying, "Point of Procedure." The Chair will then respond with, "Make your point." The team will then proceed to explain how the debate rules have not been followed. Finally, the Chair will rule on the point by saying, "Point well taken" or "Point not taken."
  • 20. Points of Procedure If it is obvious that the Chair is incorrect, the team should not argue with the Chair, but expect the judges to compensate for the Chair’s shortcomings. The time it takes to rise and rule on a point is not included in the speaking time of the team currently debating.
  • 21. Violations  Unprofessional behavior  Offensive behavior  Truism*  Presentation of a specific knowledge case*  Misquotations  Speaking to the opposition instead of the audience  Presenting new arguments in the Whip Speech  Introduction of parts of a plan by the second speaker
  • 22. Points of Procedure If the proposition has presented a truism or specific knowledge case, the opposition must wait until the end of the first debater’s speech to point this out. Moreover, if the officials have failed to follow the rules of debate (incorrect speaking order, too much speaking time allowed, etc.), it may be politely pointed out to them with a Point of Procedure.
  • 23. Points of Procedure If the proposition has presented a truism or specific knowledge case, the opposition must wait until the end of the first debater’s speech to point this out. Moreover, if the officials have failed to follow the rules of debate (incorrect speaking order, too much speaking time allowed, etc.), it may be politely pointed out to them with a Point of Procedure.
  • 25. Pre-Competition These rules are to be made available to all competitors and adjudicators at least seven (7) days (168 hours) prior to the competition. A competition briefing will be held before the commencement of the competition and will include the debate moderators/chairs, adjudicators, and organizer. The debate moderators/chairs will run the briefing and review the rules, tips, and expectations for the debates.
  • 26. Presentation Order In the preliminaries (the first four rounds), debate competition will follow a double elimination format that ensures all teams will get to participate in at least 2 debates. The competition begins with matches between randomly assigned pairs of teams. The teams that will advance to the semifinal rounds will be the top four teams and they will be chosen from the number of their wins and from the cumulative scores given by the adjudicators in the preliminaries.
  • 27. Presentation Order In the semifinal and final round, the debate competition will follow a single elimination format regardless of their advantages in the preliminaries. The third place will be determined by the points given by the adjudicators to the losing teams in the semifinal round. The final match will be between the winning teams in the semifinal round. Teams may have to debate more than once. Debate organizers must ensure that the debaters are given reasonable breaks in between rounds.
  • 29. Judging The debate is judged based upon the most convincing argument. Each judge will decide individually, and the debate chair will tally the decisions and announce the winner. The winning team will then move to the next round.
  • 30. Judging Matrix The speakers would be individually rated according to the following criteria: Content (organization, veracity of content, proper substantiation, argumentation, etc.) - 50% Manner (decorum, persuasiveness, respectfulness, sportsmanship, etc.) - 40% Audience Impact - 10%
  • 31. Feedback After the conclusion of the debate and the announcement of the winning team, adjudicators may elect to provide feedback to the competitors in the form of writing. The organizer will provide forms that can be used as a guideline for comments.
  • 32. See you in the debate rounds!

Editor's Notes

  1. Be specific and direct in the title. Use the subtitle to give the specific context of the speech. -The goal should be to capture the audience’s attention which can be done with a quote, a startling statistic, or fact. It is not necessary to include this attention getter on the slide.
  2. Use the background points to post details that are not common knowledge, or that the audience will need to understand the context of the speech. -Do not read these main points from the PowerPoint, instead elaborate on these points during the speech.
  3. The title of main point #1 should be clear and concise. Each piece of evidence should be summarized for clarity and cited correctly. Do not simply read the pieces of evidence, but elaborate where needed. [type notes for elaboration here] Be sure to transition to main point #2 and the next slide.
  4. The title of main point #1 should be clear and concise. Each piece of evidence should be summarized for clarity and cited correctly. Do not simply read the pieces of evidence, but elaborate where needed. [type notes for elaboration here] Be sure to transition to main point #2 and the next slide.
  5. Dedicate this entire slide to the thesis statement. It is the reason the speech is being given. Use this time to reveal the three main points of the speech (slides 4,5,6) as an overview for the direction of the speech: -[type main point #1 here] -[type main point #2 here] -[type main point #3 here] Be sure to transition to the first main point and the next slide.
  6. The title of main point #1 should be clear and concise. Each piece of evidence should be summarized for clarity and cited correctly. Do not simply read the pieces of evidence, but elaborate where needed. [type notes for elaboration here] Be sure to transition to main point #2 and the next slide.
  7. The title of main point #2 should be clear and concise. Each piece of evidence should be summarized for clarity and cited correctly. Do not simply read the pieces of evidence, but elaborate where needed. [type notes for elaboration here] Be sure to transition to main point #3 and the next slide.
  8. The title of main point #3 should be clear and concise. Each piece of evidence should be summarized for clarity and cited correctly. Do not simply read the pieces of evidence, but elaborate where needed. [type notes for elaboration here] Be sure to transition to the counterargument and the next slide.
  9. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  10. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  11. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  12. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  13. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  14. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  15. The title of main point #1 should be clear and concise. Each piece of evidence should be summarized for clarity and cited correctly. Do not simply read the pieces of evidence, but elaborate where needed. [type notes for elaboration here] Be sure to transition to main point #2 and the next slide.
  16. The title of main point #1 should be clear and concise. Each piece of evidence should be summarized for clarity and cited correctly. Do not simply read the pieces of evidence, but elaborate where needed. [type notes for elaboration here] Be sure to transition to main point #2 and the next slide.
  17. The title of main point #1 should be clear and concise. Each piece of evidence should be summarized for clarity and cited correctly. Do not simply read the pieces of evidence, but elaborate where needed. [type notes for elaboration here] Be sure to transition to main point #2 and the next slide.
  18. The title of main point #2 should be clear and concise. Each piece of evidence should be summarized for clarity and cited correctly. Do not simply read the pieces of evidence, but elaborate where needed. [type notes for elaboration here] Be sure to transition to main point #3 and the next slide.
  19. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  20. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  21. The title of main point #1 should be clear and concise. Each piece of evidence should be summarized for clarity and cited correctly. Do not simply read the pieces of evidence, but elaborate where needed. [type notes for elaboration here] Be sure to transition to main point #2 and the next slide.
  22. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  23. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  24. Dedicate this entire slide to the thesis statement. It is the reason the speech is being given. Use this time to reveal the three main points of the speech (slides 4,5,6) as an overview for the direction of the speech: -[type main point #1 here] -[type main point #2 here] -[type main point #3 here] Be sure to transition to the first main point and the next slide.
  25. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  26. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  27. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  28. Dedicate this entire slide to the thesis statement. It is the reason the speech is being given. Use this time to reveal the three main points of the speech (slides 4,5,6) as an overview for the direction of the speech: -[type main point #1 here] -[type main point #2 here] -[type main point #3 here] Be sure to transition to the first main point and the next slide.
  29. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  30. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  31. The counterargument should be the most common argument against the topic. The goal for this slide is to address the counterargument in such a way as to actually strengthen the original topic. Be sure to address each piece of evidence against the topic. As you address each piece of evidence elaborate on the text found on the slide. Remember to transition to the final slide, the action step.
  32. The action step is what the audience is supposed to do or think about the topic. It should be one sentence that is written clearly and with much thought. It may also be the thesis statement restated as an action. The goal of this slide is to leave the audience with a clear message as to what they are to do or think at the end of the speech. It may be a good idea to end with a powerful quote or image.