Anti Death Penalty Essay

Anti Death Penalty Essay
Disasters in Death Introduction I. Roosevelt Collins, a black man in Alabama, was convicted of rape, sentenced to death, and executed in 1937.
Roosevelt testified that the "victim" who was white had consented to sex, which caused a near–riot in the courtroom. The all–white jury deliberated for
only FOUR minutes. Later interviews with several jurors revealed that although they believed the act was consensual, they also thought that he
deserved death simply for "messin' around" with a white woman. Even the judge, off the record, admitted his belief that Roosevelt was telling the truth,
QUOTE: "An innocent man went to his death." Horace Dunkins was executed on July 17, 1989. His attorney never told the jury he was mentally
retarded, with...show more content...
ii. Data: When an execution is, in fact, carried out it will cost an additional 2.5 to 3 million dollars per execution. iii. Data: There are currently 3,061
inmates waiting to be executed, which will cost approximately $9.1 billion while giving them life imprisonment without the possibility of parole would
cost $3 billion. b. Supporting Point: The death penalty brings with it many issues of morality. i. Data: As it is put on the homepage of
nodeathpenalty.org in an article entitled "Campaign to end the Death Penalty," it is cruel and unusual punishment to put someone to death. c. Supporting
Point: Innocent people are getting lost in the turmoil. i. Data: Also on the deathpenalty.org website in a page entitled, "Death Penalty Focus," it states
that 23 innocent people have been unjustly put to death for crimes they did not commit. ii. Data: On the sociology website of NI University, it is
stated that a man named Sie Dawson was put to death and then later discovered to be innocent. Transition: Chandra has just described a few of the
major problems with the Death Penalty including the inexcusable wrongful executions that have and will take place. In fact, just this Sunday night on
the news show Dateline on NBC, they did a report on the release of a death row inmate.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay on Against the Death Penalty
Against the Death Penalty
The death penalty is one of the most controversial issues in our time. There are many issues that show and prove the death penalty is wrong and
reasons why it should be ceased. Many issues have objections towards the death penalty shows that the death penalty is unfair, irreversible and
expensive.
The Death penalty is an unfair system used as punishment to criminals that performed wrong and unmoral crimes. The death penalty is unfair in the
way that is discriminatory towards color, and race. For example, in the trials of many court cases, a person who kills a white person is treated much
more severely then one who kills a black person. Of the 313 criminals that have been executed between 1997 and 1995,...show more content...
Events have happen where during the past century about 4 cases a year, an innocent person who was convicted of murder, was sentenced to death. Of
these cases, there were people who have been proven innocent after the person was executed. A good example of this type of situtation happened in
1990 when Jesse Tafero was executed in Florida for murdering a state trooper. His wife, Sonia Jacobs was also sentenced to the death penalty but
was later reduced on an appeal to life imprisonment, 11 years later her convictions were vacated by federal court. Even though Jesse and Sonia's
conviction was the same, it was all due to an ex–convict who turned in evidence that help prove the couple was guilty which led one of them to be
penalized with death. The ex convict who turned state witness testified against the couple so the ex convict could avoid the death penalty. If he were
alive in 1992, he would have been released with his wife. Another example of such cases happened in 1992 when Roger Coleman was executed in
Virginia even though another person was suspected as the murder because there was evidence that was never summated to his trial. In court, the jury
did not take anyone seriously until late in the appeal process, when they found out he or she was about to kill an innocent man. Even though they tried
to delay and stop the execution it was to late. Eventually the case was cleared, and he was later proven innocent. These cases clear prove

A Debate of the Death Penalty Essay
The death penalty raises important questions about the right to life, who has a right to life, and under what circumstances a right to life can be taken
away. I believe there are no circumstances under which capital punishment is justified. I will proceed to defend my claim that capital punishment is
unjustified by arguing a position that killing is wrong because it deprives individuals of valuable futures. To support my thesis thatcapital punishment is
not justified, I will expand upon an argument made my Don Marquis in his essay "Why Abortion is Immoral" in which he argues that killing is
immoral on the grounds that it deprives human beings of a valuable future. My argument is as follows:
1.Killing is wrong because it deprives the...show more content...
The outside factors and conditions are irrelevant. Rather, the value is determined by how that person perceives his or her own life and these future
experiences. Thus, when someone is killed, he or she is deprived of all the things that were of value and will be of value to him or her in the future.
Causing this loss of a valuable future is ultimately what makes killing wrong and immoral because that individual has permanently lost the opportunity
to enjoy his or her future experiences which are valuable to him or her. My second premise states that death row criminals are in the same moral
category as other human beings with respect to the moral value of their lives. The only factor which differentiates a criminal from a non–criminal is the
fact that the criminal, usually irrefutably, violated community standards and the law to commit a crime. In the case of a criminal on death row, he or she
would have had to have committed a serious capital crime to receive the death sentence. Since committing a capital offense is the only reason death
row criminals are different from other human beings, death row criminals are the same as other human beings in every other respect, including with
respect to the value of their futures. Furthermore, the future of a criminal on death row is just as valuable as the future of a human being not on death
row. Any form of capital punishment is a form of killing. It does not matter who is actually doing the

Essay on I Am Against the Death Penalty
I Am Against the Death Penalty
The death penalty is the worst that can happen to a criminal if he is tried for murder, treason, or airplane hijacking. This is a very touchy subject for
politicians also. Many politicians will not even speak about it for fear of looking too soft on crime, or, if they are in favor of it they will look too
barbaric and uncivilized. A recent poll shows that theAmerican population is split nearly half–and–half on the topic. In the poll, 41% preferred the
death penalty, 44% were against it and 15% were unsure (Death Penalty Info). Of the fifty states, thirty–eight states use the death penalty plus the U.S.
Government and Military (Death Penalty Info). Twelve states plus the District of Columbia do not...show more content...
There are many instances where the criminal has needed more than one jolt of electricity in order to kill the person. In between each time they send the
electricity the body needs time to cool down before the physicians could check to see if the condemned person still was still alive. Lethal injections can
also have problems as shown by the death of Raymond Landrey. ?Pronounced dead 40 minutes after being strapped to the execution gurney and 24
minutes after the drugs first started flowing into his arms. Two minutes into the execution, the syringe came out of Landry's vein, spraying the
chemicals across the room towards witnesses. The execution team had to reinsert the catheter into the vein. The curtain was closed for 14 minutes so
witnesses could not observe the intermission.? There have been accounts where witnesses have fainted, and suffered from insomnia after viewing an
execution that went wrong.
One of the prime reasons that people support capital punishment is because of the deterrence factor involved with the death penalty. Four authors
looked into the deterrence factor of capital punishment in Texas and their findings were very intriguing. The authors examined the patterns of
executions and murders and found that there was no deterrent effect (Death Penalty Info). This also was true in Oklahoma. The author William Baily
researched the

Anti-Death Penalty Essay
Anti–Death Penalty
History: The death penalty is not a new idea in our world. Its origins date back 3,700 years to the Babylonian civilization, where it was prescribed
for a variety of crimes (Kronenwetter p.10). It was also greatly used in the Greek and Roman empires. In ancient Roman and Mosaic Law they
believed in the rule of "eye for and eye." The most famous executions of the past included Socrates and Jesus (Wilson p.13). It continued into England
during the Middle Ages and then to the American colonies where it exist still today. In the colonies, death was a punishment for crimes of murder,
arson, and perjury. Although today the death penalty is used for murder.
Common ways of execution in the past where...show more content...
Georgia, (408 U.S. 238). This case was the first time the Supreme Court ruled against the death penalty (http://www.time.com/time/magagzine/archive
/1994/940523.crime.html). The rule was a vote of 5 to 4 by the jury. "The dissenting Justices argued that the courts had no right to challenge legislative
judgment on the effectiveness and justice of punishments. The majority however held that it was not the actual death penalty that was cruel and
unusual punishment, but rather the judicial process, which determined who would receive the death penalty sentence. This process violates the Eighth
and Fourteenth Amendment. They decided some factors should be considered before giving a criminal this sentences such as a separate trial for
sentencing, the viciousness of the crime, and environment factors like the criminal's background" (http://www.time.com/time/magagzine/archive/1994
/940523.crime.html). Due to the way this case was done it created three options for the use of the death penalty. The three options where, mandatory
death sentences for certain crimes, development of standardized guidelines for juries and outright abolition (http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi–bin
/foliocgi.exe/historic/query=[group+.../pageitems=[body]).
This was a stop to the death penalty until the case of Gregg Vs. Georgia, (428 U.S. 153). In this case the Georgia Supreme Court reviewed the rights of
constitution and how the

Arguments Against The Death Penalty Essay
"Why do we kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong", what makes us different from those individuals who we execute?
Where do we get the right to take someone's life anymore than they? Many individuals have been executed without physical evidence, how are we to
know that the individual is actually guilty? Till this day, there are thirty–one states with the death penalty and nineteen without.
There are many reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, it violates the offender's rights to life and the offense of human dignity. Yet many
individuals still insist on the death penalty. Bedau argues against capital punishment through his argument "The Minimal Invasion Argument Against
the Death Penalty'. His...show more content...
(4) To achieve valid social goals, long–term imprisonment is sufficient as an invasion of individual liberty, privacy, and autonomy (and other
fundamental values).
(5) Therefore, society ought to abolish any lawful practice that imposes greater violation of individual liberty, privacy, or autonomy (or other
fundamental value) in cases in which a less invasive practice is available. (6) Conclusion: Society ought to abolish the death penalty.
To get acquire a better understanding of the premises, I will provide a brief statement for all.
In premise one, Bedau believes that although the democratic government will be convinced, there should be more evidence to gain the government of
a more totalitarian perspective. In premise two, Bedau states "We have not figured out any less invasive response that will serve as a sufficient means
to the end of public safety." That being said, we have no possibility of preventing future crimes because some punishments can harm our citizens, then
once again creating a crime. Events such as these are a reason why individuals who are for the death penalty stating that the offender such serve for his
crime in order to prevent any future crimes. By this premise, we can see that punishment occurs due to a lack better alternatives in order to maintain a
social contemptment. Therefore, the punishment has to meet the needs to be justified and achieve the social goal. "From time to time one does hear a
friend of

Argumentative Essay On The Death Penalty
The Death Penalty has a powerful meaning to it; it's not just a punishment for those criminals who commit a horrific crime. The Death Penalty offers
the execution, gas chamber, lethal injection, hanging, and firing squad. The capital punishment is a topic that can cause arguments because some say it
helps and some say it cannot help in anyway. The death penalty has saved lives after an execution, but it has caused many issues for families.
The Death Penalty was established "far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, which codified the death
penalty for 25 different crimes" ("History"). It was also apart of the "Fourteen Century B.C.'s Hittite Code, in the Seventh Century B.C.'s Draconian
Code of Athens, which made death the only punishment for all crimes; and in the Fifth Century B.C.'s Roman Law of the Twelve Tablets" ("History").
The Death Penalty was carried out if it was drowning, crucifixion, burning while being alive, impalement, and beating to death. As the time went on by
the Eighteen Century A.D. a man named William the Conqueror would not allow people to be hung unless it was amurder case. As the years carried on
in 1608 Caption George Kendall was the first man who got executed while being record in his colony. Jane Champion was the first woman who got
executed in her colony in 1632. The Death Penalty all started and it did minimize crimes stated in the early 1800.
Furthermore, the Death Penalty is only an execution for

Arguments Against The Death Penalty
Abstract
The death penalty has been a controversial issue for many years. Those who support the death penalty find it to be a fitting form of punishment for
criminal actions. Others suggest that the death penalty is an inhumane practice, even towards criminals. Over the years, it is clear that there are some
fatal flaws in how the death penalty operates. Too often in the past has the death penalty fallen victim to courtroom biases. Furthermore, the death
penalty is an incredibly expensive and time–consuming process. However, the determining factor of whether the death penalty can be considered
justice or not depends primarily on how it affects the overall crime rate. In light of this, William Tucker– the American Spectator's New York
correspondent and CEO of TheElevator.com – and Eric M. Freedman – a professor at Hofstra University School of Law – present evidence of the
effectiveness and ineffectiveness of the death penalty system.
The Value of a Criminal Life The controversy over the death penalty has plagued the world for years. Individuals such as William Tucker– The
American Spectator's New York correspondent and CEO of TheElevator.com– believe that the death penalty reduces crime. Meanwhile, those who
oppose the death penalty, such as Eric M. Freedman – a professor at Hofstra University School of Law – argue that it is unneeded. Freedman's article
The Case Against the Death Penalty and Tucker's article Why the Death Penalty Works reflect why

Essay about The Case Against the Death Penalty
In the United States, since the 1970s there have been more than 1270 executions according to the death penalty information center (Fact Sheet), What's
alarming about that number, is the number of people who were condemned to be executed based on race, income and social status alone, targeting
those that could not afford good legal counsel, and were appointed attorneys that were "inexperienced and had below appropriate professional
standards" (Hessick 1069), which sealed the fate of those literally fighting for their lives, on the day of sentencing.
Capital punishment is unconstitutional, and violates human rights; a point of view rarely seen when debating the topic. Everyone talks about
deterrence, everyone talks about justice for...show more content...
When we are in a hurry, or doing something hasty, exciting, or we act in the heat of the moment, we get a jolt of adrenaline. According to the American
Civil Liberties Union:
"Most capital crimes are committed in the heat of the moment. Most capital crimes are committed during moments of great emotional stress or under
the influence of drugs or alcohol, when logical thinking has been suspended. Many capital crimes are committed by the badly emotionally–damaged or
mentally ill. In such cases, violence is inflicted by persons unable to appreciate the consequences to themselves as well as to others. Even when crime is
planned, the criminal ordinarily concentrates on escaping detection, arrest, and conviction. The threat of even the severest punishment will not
discourage those who expect to escape detection and arrest. It is impossible to imagine how the threat of any punishment could prevent a crime that is
not premeditated." As we could notice, adrenaline is what makes people speed and do certain things they definitely wouldn't do if they were not in a
stressful circumstance, subsequently, it will be safe to say that most crimes are committed in the heat of the moment, when adrenaline is running high
and people are not thinking about the consequences of their actions, therefore not thinking about a future punishment. That's what makes the death
penalty a bogus deterrent against

Persuasive Essay Against Death Penalty
According to Amnesty International 31 states in North America are exercising death penalty whereas 19 states have banned the exercise. While some
states are contemplating whether they should away with death penalty, others are adamant they will not bow out. As such, American people are
divided on whether they should support it or not with a few undecided. In this paper I will look at the reasons why I feel it's not justified for any state
in North America to practice this form of sentencing. To begin with, not every inmate in a prison is guilty of the crimes he was accused of and
ultimately convicted by the court. Many people are behind bars spending years as prisoners as they serve their sentences for the crimes they never
committed. If a state decides to execute the wrongly convicted person then several months later new information or evidence arises the deceased wasn't
involved in the crimes he was charged with; isn't it right to say the state shed an innocent blood? The deceased's family will go through psychological
turmoil fully aware the state killed an innocent man. It would be better if the person was sentenced to life imprisonment. When the state receives new
information the imprisoned person didn't commit the crime, then they would release him with apology and compensate him. Furthermore, there is no
substantive evidence which firmly shows death penalty deters people from committing crimes. Criminals always have a systematic thought pattern they
will never be

Essay On The Death Penalty
The death penalty plays a controversial role in modern society. Many arguments against the death penalty are raised to question whether it is biased
against race or violates the constitution. Reuben Greenberg, the first black police chief involved in innovative criminology and author of the article "
Race, the Criminal Justice System, and Community–Oriented Policing," openly shares his opinion on how race does not affect the death penalty.
Reuben Greenberg also proves false accusations of the death penalty wrong. Jack Greenberg, American attorney and author of "Against the American
System of Capital Punishment," disagrees with Reuben Greenberg's statement, and claims that race does hold a high position within the death penalty.
Aside from...show more content...
Along with this, Reuben Greenberg believes that you have to look past a person's skin color and judge them on their crime, not their looks. Haag agrees
with Reuben Greenberg's statement on how people shouldn't judge someone just because of their race.
The subject of race can become very biased, and many people feel as if the justice system can be racist towards minorities. In my opinion, race should
not play a role in death penalty. Although there are still many racist people in the world, crimes should be prosecuted based on the crime committed,
regardless of the person's race. Many white people are on death row currently for the same crimes a minority might commit. In the world today, many
controversial events have happened dealing with race along with the justice system. For example, there have been multiple incidents where a white
officer has been charged with shooting a black person. It is thought that if a white judge is sentencing a minority, the odds of the minority getting put
on death row would be in favor. A judge must have an opinion when it comes to sentencing a criminal, but it does not always have to be the "race
card". The severity of the crime should be the real reason as to why a person would be put on death row, not their skin color. If a minority commits a
crime worthy of the death sentence, the judge has the right to sentence that upon him, regardless of looking at his skin.

Against the Death Penalty Essay
When you turn on the television, radio, or simply open the local newspaper, you are bombarded with news of arrests, murders, homicides, and other
tragedies. There are many things that I don't agree with in today's society but, out of all the wrong doing that takes place, I believe murder including
the death penalty is the worst of them. I am strongly against the death penalty because it violates God's rules, costs the tax payers too much money, and
possibly the "wrongly accused," may have to die because of the cruel and unusual punishment of the death penalty. How often do these concepts get into
the public's mind when it hears of our 'fair, trusty' government taking away someone's breathing rights? Do we honestly want people thinking of...show
more content...
I believe that religious beliefs are the corner stone for our law system, especially since our country was built to escape religious execution.
Executing someone should not be made an exception to God's rules. My next reason for being against the death penalty is the fact that taxpayers
waste too much of their money with the death penalty. The average death penalty case is appealed at least three times. This means that "we", the
taxpayers, must pay for the same trial to be heard at least three times. After a while this adds up and becomes expensive. Also, the average convicted
murderer spends 12 years on death row. If people who support the death penalty are positive enough to kill the person for committing the crime,
shouldn't the supporters be confident enough to execute them in right then? Why spend everyone else's money keeping these inmates in jail? Our
money should be spent to help better society, not to accommodate the prisoners that are going to end up dead anyways. There's always the chance of
an innocent person being in the wrong place at the wrong time. A little bit of evidence and a good lawyer could sentence someone to life in prison,
and maybe even the death penalty. Some innocent person could be spending and or possibly ending his life in captivity for just walking down the
wrong street on the wrong day. That person does not deserve to serve the time that's not rightfully his and take the needle that shouldn't

Persuasive Essay Against Death Penalty
Some people think that self–defense is justified by trying to save your own life but if the murder is committed on purpose, the murderer obviously
does not value life; therefore, why should he/she be allowed to live when they deprived another human being of this privilege, life? Other people
disagree and think that since the murderer does not value life and commits a crime, the law should not be taking the same path and contradict itself
by sentencing the murderer to death. Why kill people who kill people to show killing is wrong. Putting people to death to prove that we are against
killing does not make any sense. That statement contradicts the country's belief method. Thus, death penalty is wrong. The death penalty has been a
controversial issue for a long time, and has its pros as well as its cons. The way it is applied varies from state to state and depends on different
variables. Some may argue that death penalty punishment is inhumane, against most common religious beliefs, does not reduce the crime, costs a lot
more than life in prison, and worst of all, executions of innocent people, while others are convinced that it is the most effective and inexpensive
way of eliminating dangerous people from the society. However, at the end of the day, as a society we need to move away from the "eye for an eye"
revenge simply because it will not solve any problem and will not prove anything, the obvious is that by striking back at the enemy, the only outcome
is an endless cycle of violence. Death penalty sends the wrong message.
First, let's explain what death penalty is and go over its history. Death penalty is an act to put a person to death by law and a legal system to punish
and make sure the person does not commit any future crimes. Death penalty is referred to as capital punishment because historically it meant losing
one's head. Back in the eighteenth century, people were put to death if they were stealing, did not follow the religion from where they belonged,
disobeyed their king or even were thought to be a witch. They were publicly burned, hung or their head would be cut off to set an example. Nowadays,
types of executions have changed; the modern world uses mostly execution by lethal injection, which

The Cons of the Death Penalty Essay
The Cons of the Death Penalty
"...Over 600 people were falsely convicted and 35 faced death for crimes that they did not commit..."(Johnson). The death penalty is an ineffective and
expensive way of dealing justice to the American people. It is easier and cheaper to send someone to prison for life than to have them face the death
penalty and be executed. Capital punishment is an unnecessary punishment because criminals are already managed at prisons.
69
The death penalty can lead to the death of innocent people. For example, "...According to a new study, serious errors occur in almost 70% of all trials
leading to the death penalty..."(Leibman). This shows that if 100 people were put on death row, 70 would have serious mistakes in their...show more
content...
The lack of proper resources during a trial can make the difference between the innocence and guilt of a person. The death penalty does not always
show the innocence or guilt of a person. It shows how much he or she is willing to spend to help the trial go his or her way. The death penalty is an
unfair system to those who cannot afford the "evidence" they need to help free them.
224
The death penalty is a corrupt form of legal justice. For example, "...Defendants in about one–third of the Texas cases were represented at trial by an
attorney who had been or later was suspended or otherwise sanctioned..."(Leibman). This use of fraudulent attorneys in a case can lead to enough
inaccuracies in the evidence to wrongfully execute a person. This action is against the constitutional right given to us of equal justice for all. In
addition, "...One of you two is gonna hang for this. Since you're the nigger, you're elected..."(Texas Police Officer). A Texas police officer said this to
2 men, one black and one white that were connected to the murder of a 17–year–old girl. Race plays a big part in the sentence of guilty or innocent.
However, supporters of the death penalty claim "...that it enforces the laws by issuing strict punishment to the offenders..."(President George Bush).
The death

Arguments Against The Death Penalty
The concept of the death penalty is one of the most debated issues from then until now. Stearman (2008) defines death penalty as the government
action, which takes someone's life as a punishment for wrongdoing. In the legal system, the death penalty is commonly known as the capital
punishment, which is derived from the Latin language, meaning "lose your head and you lose your life" (Stearman, 2008). It is considered the most
extreme punishment that a government can utilize on its citizens. In the history, there are several societies throughout the world that utilized death
penalty, especially as their last option in a small number of cases. There are two opposing sides shared by people who support and oppose the death
penalty even though not all crimes are punishable. The capital punishment breaches two important human rights, which are protected by the United
Nations under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, such as the right to live free from any form of torture and the right to life. There are several
types of capital punishment being practiced in different regions, including electrocution, beheading, lethal injection, hanging, and shooting in the back
of the head or through firing squad (Amnesty International, n.d.). The capital punishment is still practiced in some countries even though it has been
abolished for almost two–thirds of the world's countries. Specifically, there are 104 countries that had completely abolished the death penalty through
the end of

Against The Death Penalty Essay
Against the Death Penalty "Murder is wrong" ("Capital Punishment"). We've been taught this indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is
defined as one human taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder. There are as many as thirty
–six states with the death
penalty, and it's essential that they change it. The United States needs the death penalty abolished because it is filled with flaws, cruel and immoral,
and is an ineffective means of deterrent for crime. I understand why you would want to have the death penalty in effect. You probably think that it will
be cheaper to execute people instead of paying taxes for them in jail. There is also a probability that you think that you will...show more content...
Another flaw is it is morally wrong. No matter how people sugar–coat it, murder is murder, in the name of justice or in vengeance it is morally wrong.
Everyone deserves to live, no matter their circumstances are. Federal states should not be allowed to decide who lives and who dies, especially in a
country such as the United States, which prides its self on freedom ("Top Ten"). Moreover, the death penalty is applied at random ("Facts"). "The
death penalty is a lethal lottery: of the 15,000 to 17,000 homicides committed every year in the United States, approximately 120 people are sentenced
to death, less than 1%" ("Facts"). Many criminals have committed the same crimes, but few have been sentenced to death for their crimes. In Addition,
there is a chance mentally ill citizens could be convicted to death ("Facts"). According to Amnesty International and the National Association on Mental
Illness, One out of every ten persons who has been executed in the United States since 1977 is mentally ill. "Many mentally ill defendants are unable
to participate in their trials in any meaningful way and appear unengaged, cold, and unfeeling before the jury" ("Facts"). Many mentally ill defendants
have been drugged against their will in order for them to be competent enough to be executed ("Facts"). Some states still haven't put a ban on executing
mentally ill people such as Organ, although the United States Supreme Court has declared that

Support of the Death Penalty Essay
I do support the death penalty and I do not consider it cruel or unusual treatment. The Constitution itself indicates that the death penalty can be used.
Amendment V of the Constitution states that "...no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...." (U.S. Const.,
amend V). In other words, once a person has gone through the due process of law, his life can be taken if he is found guilty. There is a common
misconception that murderers do not think about the end consequence. If that was the case, there would be more killings by police than arrests. When
murderers are confronted by policeman, they normally surrender because of the threat of the lethal weapon pointed at them. This is a conscious...show
more content...
(Pro Death Penalty, 2010). These statistics alone show that capital punishment is a deterrent to murder.
In 1975 Isaac Ehrlich examined U.S time–series data for the period 1933–1969. In Ehrlich's study, time–series data was data for the entire U.S. He used
deterrent variables (the probabilities of arrest, conviction, and execution), demographic variables (population, fraction of nonwhites, fraction of people
age 14–24), economic variables (labor force participation, unemployment rate, real per capita permanent income, per capita government expenditures,
and per capita expenditures on police), and a time variable. His findings indicated a big negative relationship between the murder rate and execution
rate. In conclusion, he estimated that each execution resulted in approximately seven or eight fewer murders. (Ehrlich's study as cited Shepherd, 2004).
I think that capital punishment has been applied fairly in our justice system. The cases that could possibly involve a death sentence are tried by a jury
of our peers. I feel that with a jury, human perspective and compassion comes into play. If thecrime was such as a mother killing the killer of her
child, the pain and suffering of the mother is usually taken into consideration. Such cases where the murder or rape was heinously vicious with no
sense of motive or remorse, this is also taken into consideration. DNA has proven that many people who were convicted and sentence to die were

Against The Death Penalty Essay
There are many reasons to both support and oppose the death penalty. Many people can feel very strongly about whether or not they approve of this
method of punishment. I feel that the death penalty is wrong, and I believe that there is much support to back this up. I believe that the death penalty
is wrong because it is not an effective deterrent, racially and economically bias, unreliable, expensive, and morally wrong of society.
One argument from death penalty supporters is that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to prevent other people from committing murders. It is the
belief that people will think out the consequences of their actions before murdering, and consider the...show more content...
There are many variables that go into deciding if a person will or will not get the death penalty. I feel that there are too many bias and variables to say
that the penalty is dealt out fairly. The people who are up for capital punishment and cannot afford their ownattorney are assigned one by the state,
which may be of much lower effectiveness than one could afford with much financial backing. According to the Michigan State webpage: "Since
the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, 158 black defendants have been executed for the murder of a white victim, while only 11 white defendants
have been executed for the murder of a black victim". This is a clear indication that the penalty is racially bias.
The taking of a person's life is unreliable and once a mistake is made, nothing can be done to make up for it, because you have taken the person's
life. Current statistics show that for every 7 people executed one has been released from death row. One in seven does not sound like never good
consistency to me, and how many of the 6 still executed could still be innocent? I feel that the death of innocents cannot be justified by the death
penalty. A recent study at Columbia University found that two thirds of capital cases had serious errors in them, two thirds does not sound like a very
consistent number that I would

Death Penalty Essay
Death Penalty When turning on the television, radio, or simply opening the local newspaper, people are bombarded with news of arrests, murders,
homicides, and other such tragedies. I believe murder, including the death penalty, is the worst thing that anyone could do. Since Hammurabi first
introduced the notion of "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth", people have been arguing over whether this is just punishment. Those in favor of the
death penalty argue that people should pay for the crimes they do. For them, death is the only fit punishment in some cases. This is not the case. The
death penalty is, rather, unethical and wrong. A death for another death does nothing but satisfy one's need for revenge. How often do these...show more
content...
Therefore, God will punish anyone who aids in executing people. I believe that religious beliefs, such as the Ten Commandments, are the corner
stone for our law system. Executing someone should not be made an exception to God's rule. Most people feel that men who rape little children
deserve to die a painful death. They feel that the child and family would be much happier if he dies and know that he can't hurt anyone anymore. The
death penalty still would be wrong. I am pretty sure that people would feel differently if it were their family. They would just want them to get a
harsher punishment. My next reason against the death penalty is that taxpayers waste too much of their money with the death penalty. The average
death penalty case is appealed many times. This means that the taxpayers must pay for the same trial to be heard three times. This is a very expensive
practice. Also, the convicted murderer spends a long time on death row. If supporters of the death penalty are positive enough to kill the person for
committing the crime, shouldn't the supporters be confident enough to execute them in a timely manner? Why spend the taxpayer's money keeping
these inmates in jail for so long? Taxpayer's money should go to better society, not to accommodate the prisoners that are going to end up dead. People
also think that if someone is killed, they should be killed also. That goes back to my introduction

Anti Death Penalty Essay

Anti Death Penalty Essay

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Similar a Anti Death Penalty Essay

Similar a Anti Death Penalty Essay(20)

Mais de Best Paper Writers Canada

Mais de Best Paper Writers Canada(11)

Último

Último(20)

Anti Death Penalty Essay