O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.

Farrell "Publishers Navigating the Consortia Universe"

150 visualizações

Publicada em

This presentation was provided by Emily Farrell of The MIT Press, during the NISO event "The Power of Library Consortia: How Publishers and Libraries Can Successfully Negotiate," held on April 17, 2019.

Publicada em: Educação
  • Seja o primeiro a comentar

  • Seja a primeira pessoa a gostar disto

Farrell "Publishers Navigating the Consortia Universe"

  1. 1. MIT Press Publishers Navigating the Consortia Universe Emily Farrell Library Sales Executive efarre@mit.edu
  2. 2. Overview The benefits of working with consortia What sort of challenges do publishers face? What does the future look like?
  3. 3. MIT Press bio blurb  A large university press (AUP Group 4); annual book revenues ~$19m  But a relatively young UP: established in 1962  A unique focus on STEAM:  Computer science (machine learning & AI); linguistics & cognitive science; neuroscience & behavioral science; economics; art & architecture; design & digital media; information science; environment & urban studies  The Press publishes and distributes  ~230 books per year  40 journals, 11 of which are Open Access  CogNet database
  4. 4. Why work with consortia?  Licensing  Increased reach  Market intelligence  Push to innovate Trust
  5. 5. Licensing & Invoicing  Ease of licensing: one license for a large number of institutions  E.g.Wiley and Projekt DEAL  Streamlines increases  Saves time in negotiating license details  Invoice streamlining  Some consortia will manage bulk invoicing  Relatedly ~  Title reconciliation made easier by one central list for deduplication
  6. 6. Increased reach  For small to mid-sized publishers with less capacity to reach all interested libraries, a consortium can provide easier access to a larger collection of institutions.  Consortia can be made up of smaller institutions that even a larger publisher doesn’t have the capacity to contact directly.  Allows publishers with larger product offerings to bundle a variety of content that appeals to more institutions
  7. 7. Market intelligence  Consortia provide publishers with feedback on proposals that offer important insight into what is happening inside libraries Increased innovation  Working with consortia, having consortia advocate for their libraries to us as publishers, allows for innovation in a way that talking to single libraries directly may not offer
  8. 8. At the centre is:Trust  Publishers trust consortia and libraries trust consortia  A history of working together allows publishers to feel they are getting clear and honest feedback
  9. 9. But what are the challenges?  Some consortia models just won’t fit  Risk of a loss of opportunity  Territory overlap  The need for individual member follow up  Small publishers still dwarfed by larger publishers
  10. 10. The future  Continued collaboration and innovation: consortia being in a position to negotiate agreements in line with policy change  Increase in local consortia
  11. 11. THANKYOU Emily Farrell Library Sales Executive efarre@mit.edu

×