DPR Case Study BNIM served as sustainable design consultant WIN-GEM Case Study BNIM with Moore Ruble Yudell

1. Matthew Porreca, AIA LEED AP mporreca@bnim.com

2. DPR Construction San Diego Office

5. August 28, 2008 Programming Presentation DPR New Office Project

6. Front of House Front Desk 60 SF New Side Area 168 SF Lobby Storage 72 SF Operations Operations Waiting Area 441 SF w/ Aquarium Surf Boards 231 SF Sub & Mail Pick-up 120 SF Windnsea 2 168 SF Core 20 Person Conf R 500 SF Sub Room 300 SF Phone Booth 40 SF Copy Print Area 220 SF Phone Booth 40 SF Wine Cellar Innovation Room 175 SF Copy Area 544 SF Rumple 221 SF Virtual Cave 300 SF Delta 2 400 SF Birdrock 336 SF Training 1500 SF Wine Bar Library Cafe 192 SF Phone Booth 40 SF Delta 400 SF Windnsea 168 SF Windnsea 168 SF War Room 285 SF Rumple 221 SF Media/Game Room 300 SF Transitional Storage 375 SF IT Workshop 120 SF Kitchen 800 SF Archive Storage 375 SF Basic Storage 180 SF Gym 400 SF Marketing Storage 160 SF Back of House

22. Amount of daylight can be controlled through dampers connected to an operable switch on the wall.

23. Low first cost.24’ 0” x 40’ 0” 24’ 0” x 48’ 0”

24. Skylights – Daylighting analysis The Daylight Saturation Percentage (DSP) is in a very desirable range and very uniform, owing to the diffusing nature of the skylight. 99% of the space has a DSP of 70 or higher. Such uniformity on an annual basis would lead to high lighting energy savings. Most of the illuminances for all UDI sensors lie between 10 to 200 foot-candles range. Only a few sensors have a small percentage between 200 and 400 foot-candles, which was the objective. This scheme would qualify for the LEED EQ Credit 8.1 for daylighting

25. Continuous Roof Monitors – Daylightinganalysis 65% of the space has a DSP of 70 or higher but the distribution of is not as uniform as in other schemes. This may be because the roof monitors face southeast, an orientation towards which the sun movement is not symmetrical. UDI numbers are scattered between 10 to 200 fc and above 200 fc ranges. Further optimization is needed to bring a majority of sensors into the 10 to 200 fc range for a larger portion of the year. This scheme would not qualify for the LEED EQ Credit 8.1 for daylighting

26. Scheme 1: Courtyards

27. Scheme 1: Courtyards – Daylighting analysis Introducing courtyards improves the daylight distribution at the core of the building away from periphery but interior space immediately south of the courtyard experiences glare. While the majority of the illuminances lie between 10 to 200 foot-candles range, there is a considerable amount of time when UDI for some sensors lies between 200 and 400 foot-candles, especially closer to the periphery. Courtyard sizes and visible transmittance of glazing can be further optimized to achieve maximum potential for this option. This scheme would qualify for the LEED EQ Credit 8.1 for daylighting

28. Scheme 1: Courtyards

29. Scheme 1: Courtyards

30. Scheme 1: Courtyards

31. Scheme 3’: Conference Spine

40. University of California, Los Angeles WIN-GEM BUILDINGandENGINEERING VI BUILDING

41. Layers of Design MARCH 30, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI UCLA I HSSEAS moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk

42. Layers of Design MARCH 30, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI UCLA I HSSEAS moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk

43. "A great building must begin with the unmeasurable, must go through measurable means when it is being designed and in the end must be unmeasurable." Louis I. Kahn

44. APRIL 11, 2011 WIN-GEM: PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

45. REPLICATION INNOVATION

46. LE CONTE MARCH 30, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI UCLA I HSSEAS moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk

47. ENGINEERING V ENGINEERING IV ACKERMAN WESTWOOD PLAZA SITE INFLUENCES – WESTWOOD PLAZA / PORTOLA STEPS SITE CIRCULATION SITE VENTILATION SITE CONNECTIONS – INSIDE / OUTSIDE SITE DESIGN – CAMPUS CONTEXT AND INFLUENCES APRIL 20, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

48. MARCH 30, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI UCLA I HSSEAS moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk

49. MARCH 12, 2011

50. 1 2 3 4 5 6 MARCH 12, 2011

51. MARCH 30, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI UCLA I HSSEAS moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk

54. LPD: 1.4 W/sf (lab) - 1.1 W/sf (offices)

55. EPD: 15 W/sf (lab)

57. WIN-GEM ENGINEERING V ENGINEERING VI TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN FOR LEVELS 3-5 – CONNECTING TO ENGINEERING IV and V APRIL 20, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

58. TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN FOR LEVELS 3-5 - LABORATORIES APRIL 20, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

59. TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN FOR LEVELS 3-5 – SOCIAL SPACES APRIL 20, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

60. TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN FOR LEVELS 3-5 – FACULTY SUITE AND COLLABORATIVE AREAS APRIL 20, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

61. GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN – LOBBY APRIL 20, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

62. GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AUDITORIUM APRIL 20, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

63. LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN – GARDEN / COURTYARD AREA APRIL 20, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

64. TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN FOR LEVELS 3-5 – NATURAL LIGHT APRIL 20, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

65. TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN FOR LEVELS 3-5 – NATURAL VENTILATION / MIXED MODE APRIL 20, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

66. Phase I & Phase II: ENGINEERING VI BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

67. Phase I & Phase II: ENGINEERING VI SECOND LEVEL PLAN MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

68. Phase I & Phase II: ENGINEERING VI TYPCIAL THIRD thru FIFTH LEVEL PLAN MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

69. Phase I & Phase II: ENGINEERING VI TYPCIAL THIRD thru FIFTH LEVEL PLAN MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

70. MASSING PARTI BRICK BRACKETS MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

71. MASSING PARTI MAY 2, 2011 LIMESTONE AT WESTERN BASE WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

72. MASSING PARTI LIMESTONE/BRICK DATUM REINFORCES PARTI/PLAN RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OFFICE AND LAB MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

73. MASSING PARTI LIMESTONE EXTENSION (LIMESTONE TRANSLATED INTO LIGHTER TERRA COTTA ABOVE 2ND FLOOR) MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

74. MASSING PARTI MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

75. MASSING PARTI MAY 2, 2011 LIMESTONE EXTENSION (LIMESTONE TRANSLATED INTO LIGHTER TERRA COTTA ABOVE 2ND FLOOR) WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

76. MASSING PARTI MAY 2, 2011 LIMESTONE EXTENSION (LIMESTONE TRANSLATED INTO LIGHTER TERRA COTTA ABOVE 2ND FLOOR) WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

77. 80° summer solstice 33° winter solstice APRIL 11, 2011 PHASE II: CONTINUATION OF PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

78. APRIL 11, 2011 WIN GEM NORTH FAÇADE: LAB PERFORMANCE & CAMPUS CONTEXT WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

79. 80° summer solstice 33° winter solstice Indirect North daylight APRIL 11, 2011 SECTION THROUGH WIN-GEM: PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

80. Natural Ventilation Operable windows to capture prevailing west breeze APRIL 11, 2011 WIN-GEM WEST FAÇADE: OFFICE PERFORMANCE & FRONT DOOR WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

81. APRIL 11, 2011 WIN-GEM SOUTH FAÇADE: LIVING LABORATORY FOR SUSTAINAIBLITY RESEARCH WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

82. SUMMER SOLSTICE WINTER SOLSTICE MAY 2, 2011 SECTION @ DRY LABS WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

83. SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

84. SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

85. SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

86. SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

87. SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

88. SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

89. SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

90. SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

91. SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING MAY 2, 2011 WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

92. Phase I & Phase II: ENGINEERING VI A B C MAY 2, 2011 FAÇADE OPENING STUDIES WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk UCLA I HSSEAS

97. Lighting & Daylighting Percentage glazing - 80%- Percentage glazing - 60%- Percentage glazing - 40%- Percentage glazing - 40%- Percentage glazing - 60%- Percentage glazing - 80%- Ceiling height – 12’ Ceiling height – 10’

98. Ceiling height – 10’ Ceiling height – 12’ Percentage glazing - 40%- 40% area with DF>2%UDI<100=16%UDI100-2000=14%UDI>2000=70% 46% area with DF>2%UDI<100=11%UDI100-2000=13%UDI>2000=76% 49% area with DF>2%UDI<100=11%UDI100-2000=10%UDI>2000=79% Percentage glazing - 60%- 63% area with DF>2%UDI<100=7%UDI100-2000=9%UDI>2000=84% Percentage glazing - 80%- 64% area with DF>2%UDI<100=7%UDI100-2000=7%UDI>2000=86% 81% area with DF>2%UDI<100=5%UDI100-2000=8%UDI>2000=88%

99. Ceiling height – 10’ Ceiling height – 12’ Percentage glazing - 80%- Percentage glazing - 40%- Percentage glazing - 60%- Percentage glazing - 80%- Percentage glazing - 60%- Percentage glazing - 40%- 200 lux 300 lux 400 lux N Illuminance – sunny sky – March 21st 2pm

100. UCLA - PRELIM. DAYLIGHT STUDYNORTH LAB 30ft 11ft 9.5ft 15ft 80% glazing 12ft 60% glazing N GLAZING ASSUMPTIONS: 0.71 Tvis 0.28 U 0.39 SHGC (SOLARBAN 60)

101. UCLA - PRELIM. DAYLIGHT STUDY NORTH LAB 60% glazing 80% glazing N Daylight Autonomy TARGET LIGHT LEVEL: 60FC

102. UCLA - PRELIM. DAYLIGHT STUDY NORTH LAB 60% glazing 80% glazing N N Daylight Factor

104. N Section Through Daylight Study

105. Illuminance Luminance Ackerman Bldg to the North: South Facing Façade (unobstructed) – March 21st, 2pm Sunny with Sun Sky

108. Sustainability Goals LEED Gold, possible Platinum Net Zero Energy Respecting Water as a Resource Carbon Footprint Expressive of the Work Within

109. High Performance Matrix Lighting Building Envelope Fenestration HVAC Systems Renewable Energy Water Systems Gen-2 elevator Chilled Beams Aircircuitry system Dynamic V8 filters Heat Recovery Raised Access floor Net Zero Energy

114. Respecting Water as a Resource Photo © Omega Sustainable Living Center

119. Carbon Footprint

121. VAV with Heat Recovery with 50% glazing on all facades

122. VAV with Heat Recovery with 80% glazing on all facades

123. VAV with HR and D/I evaporative cooling with 50% glazing on all facades

126. Five facades Project Approach SUN SHADING

127. Renewable Energy Systems

128. Biomimetic Materials: Kinetic Shade System